HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Edmonton Oilers
Notices

Your views on Dallas Eakins so far

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
10-11-2013, 07:58 PM
  #51
Hockey Buddha
Darnell Nurse
 
Hockey Buddha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,353
vCash: 500
He looks exactly like David Byrne eating ice cream.



He also looks quite similar to David Byrne eating birthday cake, but I can't find any pictures to prove this, so you'll have to take my word on it.

Hockey Buddha is online now  
Old
10-11-2013, 08:02 PM
  #52
T-Funk
Registered User
 
T-Funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,950
vCash: 1020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Buddha View Post
He looks exactly like David Byrne eating ice cream.



He also looks quite similar to David Byrne eating birthday cake, but I can't find any pictures to prove this, so you'll have to take my word on it.
I require your detailed statistical analysis and all sources cited properly.

T-Funk is offline  
Old
10-11-2013, 08:05 PM
  #53
smackdaddy
Hall-RNH-Eberle
 
smackdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: B.C.
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,674
vCash: 500
I honestly don't know what to think.

He says the right things, has done some of the right things, and also things that are complete head scratchers.

I think what we're seeing right now are the old habits dying hard with the kids. I think Dallas is going to break them, and rebuild them into better players. But I don't know how long that's going to take.

smackdaddy is offline  
Old
10-11-2013, 08:34 PM
  #54
Hockey Buddha
Darnell Nurse
 
Hockey Buddha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,353
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Funk View Post
I require your detailed statistical analysis and all sources cited properly.
Here it is:


Source: Youtube


Last edited by Hockey Buddha: 10-11-2013 at 09:26 PM.
Hockey Buddha is online now  
Old
10-11-2013, 08:44 PM
  #55
tiger_80
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,510
vCash: 500
Too early to tell obviously. If the team looks as disorganized after 20 games, then we can confidently get out pitchforks.

Some positive things: he seems to hold players accountable (Smyth getting benched, Smid relegated to the third pairing, Yakupov getting tough treatment, etc).

Some disconcerting things: merciless overreliance on Hall, RNH, and Eberle, possibly inadequate communication with players, if their running around in the defensive zone is any indication.

tiger_80 is offline  
Old
10-11-2013, 08:48 PM
  #56
tiger_80
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,510
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by syz View Post
You'd take Acton over Belanger and Gazdic over Petrell?

I mean, it's lose/lose, but Belanger and Petrell were both better at their jobs.
Gazdic is an excellent 4th liner and I would take Acton over Belanger. I'd take Petrell over Brown.

Gazdic-Acton-Petrell could be a pretty good 4th line, IMO.

tiger_80 is offline  
Old
10-11-2013, 08:53 PM
  #57
Declassified
Registered User
 
Declassified's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,791
vCash: 1150
Quote:
Originally Posted by CornKicker View Post
the sums up my post perfectly,

skinny neck, slimmer than thought, good choice in suits, good color, bad hair in his eyes.

there is no advanced stat for this, sorry boys
Ive got an advanced stat for you. In the last 20 years, a coach wearing a suit, in the NHL won the Stanley Cup 100% of the time, lockout notwithstanding

Declassified is offline  
Old
10-11-2013, 10:16 PM
  #58
CornKicker
Locked Out
 
CornKicker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,341
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Funk View Post
I require your detailed statistical analysis and all sources cited properly.
lol sums up the day perfectly

CornKicker is offline  
Old
10-11-2013, 10:29 PM
  #59
oilman9482
Registered User
 
oilman9482's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 387
vCash: 500
Likes:

He plays our best players BIG MINUTES(22+ mins a game).

He is a health nut and loves cardio and organic food.

He expects a lot from this team.

He is bold and pulls the goalie with 4 minutes left when we are down by 2+ goals.

He looks like a slimmer version of Wolverine.

Dislikes:

The performance of the team thus far. It's on the players. I will reserve judgement on them for the first 20 games and see where we are at by then. Hopefully 9-9-2 at worst.

oilman9482 is offline  
Old
10-11-2013, 10:39 PM
  #60
guymez
The Seldom Seen Kid
 
guymez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,673
vCash: 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiger_80 View Post
Too early to tell obviously. If the team looks as disorganized after 20 games, then we can confidently get out pitchforks.

Some positive things: he seems to hold players accountable (Smyth getting benched, Smid relegated to the third pairing, Yakupov getting tough treatment, etc).

Some disconcerting things: merciless overreliance on Hall, RNH, and Eberle, possibly inadequate communication with players, if their running around in the defensive zone is any indication.
I agree with this except to say that some of the poor defensive play might have to do with uncertainty. Its takes time to learn a completely new system.
The team has been so poorly managed the last few years that the players are having to deal with the 4th head coach in 5 years.
Thats a tough haul.

BTW...love the David Byrne / Eakins angle.

guymez is offline  
Old
10-11-2013, 10:41 PM
  #61
DeathbyCheerios
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,924
vCash: 500
Imo with Krueger, this team might have another win or two at this moment and that's only cause the teams knew his systems.

Eakins is trying to break the team of their bad habits which with this team is hard to do. When the team stops that ******** and actually plays, well look at how they did at the end of the NJ game.

Like many have said, let's see where the team is in 20 games before we really criticize him to much.

DeathbyCheerios is offline  
Old
10-11-2013, 10:57 PM
  #62
stratedge
Rebuild, year 4...
 
stratedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,225
vCash: 50
This far in, I'm done with questioning the coaches. The players themselves, the ones who are supposed to be superstars, are starting to worry me.

stratedge is offline  
Old
10-11-2013, 10:59 PM
  #63
Oiltankjob Fail
Eakins GTFO
 
Oiltankjob Fail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,957
vCash: 500
Not impressed at all so far starting with pre season games and having veteran Smyth suit up for a lot of them which made no sense, 2nd complaint 1st game of season up 4-2 time for him to flex his power benches Yak second period, Yak has not been the same since , could see if they were losing but up 4-2. Hall was horrible that game never got benched. 3rd complaint pulling goalie so early will lead to a lot more losses than tying it up.

Oiltankjob Fail is offline  
Old
10-11-2013, 11:01 PM
  #64
harpoon
FOB
 
harpoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,365
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by syz View Post
You'd take Acton over Belanger and Gazdic over Petrell?
I would. Never got why Petrell was even here except to help us lose games. Why bring over a guy from Europe that does really nothing to improve the team? The AHL is littered with no-hopers like that. Petrell had three fights (his biggest win coming over that known enforcer Keith Yandle) and seven goals in ninety five games as an Oiler. I doubt Gazdic scores seven goals, but he won't stand around and do nothing while punks run around. MacT clearly like toughness in his lineup, so no matter what you or I say there's going to be a four minute guy on the bench. Given that, Gazdic is a giant upgrade on Smac. Retire already Smac.

And Acton ... meh. He's been no worse than Lander or MPS were for long stretches. One thing for sure, Acton is going to get his bell rung for him pretty soon if he keeps playing like he's NHL tough, but at least he looks like he's trying. Belanger was like a skating zombie here. He was one of the worst players on this team for his entire 100+ games in Edmonton. Four goals and nineteen points in 104 games ... and a void of suck that just destroyed the game of anyone unfortunate enough to be on the ice with him.

So yeah, for me Gazdic and Acton > Belanger and Petrell.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tiger_80 View Post
Gazdic is an excellent 4th liner and I would take Acton over Belanger. I'd take Petrell over Brown.

Gazdic-Acton-Petrell could be a pretty good 4th line, IMO.
Yeah, this too.


And as for Eakins .... I barely follow the AHL so I know nothing about him. Well, four games.
I'm not going to say anything based on four games.

harpoon is offline  
Old
10-11-2013, 11:25 PM
  #65
MeestaDeteta
Registered User
 
MeestaDeteta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Saskazoo
Posts: 7,403
vCash: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by syz View Post
You'd take Acton over Belanger and Gazdic over Petrell?

I mean, it's lose/lose, but Belanger and Petrell were both better at their jobs.
Huh? Never thought I'd hear somebody say they miss Belanger. What a useless piece of ****.

MeestaDeteta is offline  
Old
10-12-2013, 12:06 AM
  #66
Mr V
Registered User
 
Mr V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oka Noggin
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,659
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeestaDeteta View Post
Huh? Never thought I'd hear somebody say they miss Belanger. What a useless piece of ****.
I still get the heebie jeebies any time I think about Tambellini proclaiming on Oil Change, how Belanger wanted the fourth year on his contract so he could be here when the Oilers were good. That was as big a load of a steaming pile of **** as I have heard in a long time.

Mr V is offline  
Old
10-12-2013, 12:39 AM
  #67
thadd
Oil4Life
 
thadd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: China
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,891
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to thadd
I have nothing against him or his tactics for the most part but I don't think he's made us a better team yet.

Yes we're doing better with faceoffs years year. THat's the only thing where I can say we're better off this season.

Need to get more out of Hall, Yakupov, and Eberle. He needs to find a way to get that bottom six working.

I'm pretty sure that Action is only here because Eakins brought him in. Eakins needs to elevate that guy's play. it's not working at all for me. That's all on Eakins. Brown also needs to pull his pants up.

Ryan Smyth shouldn't have been on the third line last game. That's going way too soft on him.

thadd is online now  
Old
10-12-2013, 12:42 AM
  #68
Up the Irons
Registered User
 
Up the Irons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,923
vCash: 480
I like him. gonna stick by him. he is not going to be moved out. if there changes in the near future, its players that have go, and that includes 1 or 2 of the so-called core.

Up the Irons is offline  
Old
10-12-2013, 12:47 AM
  #69
dnicks17
Moderator
.
 
dnicks17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,511
vCash: 500
I like him so far, I think.

Some questionable personnel choices and tactics at times, but overall pretty good.

There's definitely some floating cream puffs on this team that are making it tough to judge him though.

dnicks17 is offline  
Old
10-12-2013, 12:51 AM
  #70
Dubnykov
Registered User
 
Dubnykov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,029
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Funk View Post
I require your detailed statistical analysis and all sources cited properly.
Need an 8 page paper on the analysis of which this man looks like Eakins written in Chicago style with full bibliography at the end

Dubnykov is offline  
Old
10-12-2013, 01:07 AM
  #71
plikestechno
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,608
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by stratedge View Post
This far in, I'm done with questioning the coaches. The players themselves, the ones who are supposed to be superstars, are starting to worry me.
I think this as well. The coaching carousel has to stop at some point. I wonder at a certain point if guys like Hall, Eberle and Justin Schultz are even coachable. And if they don't listen other guys wonder "Why do I have to listen?" No matter who the coach is or what gets drawn up those three guys just seem to go out there and do whatever the hell they want. Sometimes it's pretty but a lot of times it's a disaster. They make the same mistakes over and over again and teams just sit there waiting for it. Hall and Eberle have no excuse. This is their 4th year and they still make some of the same stupid mistakes they made as rookies.

But I need more time for Eakins and the Oilers this year. They seem to be playing better but arent winning games. Theyve lost the goaltending battle every game even including the Jersey game arguably and Eakins cant do anything about that.

I like him leaning on his horses and some of his systems play but i dont know why you roll the same lines out in preseason then jumble them when the season starts. But if there's more jumbling to be had id like to see yak on the top line and eberle back with perron. If yak cant get hot with hall and nuge then it might be time for the pressbox. He needs to get Yak going, he's getting worse with each passing game and looks legitmately bad out there.

The culture is so broken here, they've lost for so long they've forgotten how to win. No matter what players come here, they instantly turn into composureless losers once they put on the Oil Drop. Prototypical bad team with different guys playing good or bad on different nights and never consistently getting everyone on the same page. Then at the first sign of adversity they just throw the system out the window, get nervous and start playing like idiots, not being able to make the simplest play. Maybe there's too much pressure to turn it around here. For the young players, the vets, the coach, the organization, for everyone. They just need to relax and play smart, some confidence would help too.


Last edited by plikestechno: 10-12-2013 at 01:20 AM.
plikestechno is offline  
Old
10-12-2013, 02:12 AM
  #72
thinlizzy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 440
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Funk View Post
Better than our fourth line last year and the year before imo
+ 1 I have no problem with the 4th line in doing what it needs to do. Expecting 30 goal scorers are we ?

thinlizzy is offline  
Old
10-12-2013, 03:04 AM
  #73
syz
(╯□)╯︵ ┻━┻
 
syz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,593
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thinlizzy View Post
+ 1 I have no problem with the 4th line in doing what it needs to do. Expecting 30 goal scorers are we ?
I'm expecting players who don't get destroyed every time they hit the ice.

Frankly it's unbelievable that people are praising the fourth line when they gave up 44% of Montreal's shots on goal in like 5 minutes of ice time. That has to be some sort of record.

One legitimate hit and a fight that didn't do anything somehow evens that out? Give me a break. There are people on this forum with better basic hockey skills than Mike Brown. We're talking about a guy who tried to bank the puck off the boards and out and missed even though he was standing at the blue line and skated into it. His biggest hit of the night was when he slipped and fell into the boards.

syz is offline  
Old
10-12-2013, 05:49 AM
  #74
Liferleafer
Golf....again....
 
Liferleafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,222
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petro Points View Post
He would get perfect score from if he admitted that this team played like **** in 2 periods vs NJ and most of the night vs MTL.

His comments are giving the team members the green light to suck.

Hopefully its just an act for the media so they get off individual player's case..
That is part of the training in the Leaf organization. Coaches/GM always take away the media's ability to single out a player if they can. Carlyle will not answer questions on an individual player's performance.

Liferleafer is offline  
Old
10-12-2013, 09:24 AM
  #75
Steve BachIntyre
BonegrinderNetminder
 
Steve BachIntyre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: 204
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,167
vCash: 500
Main difference is that Krueger nourished the youngstars creativity to allow them to make plays.. and build confidence.. lead by example

Eakins is authoritarian and the players confidence is shot because their creativity they feel might be getting stifled.. this of course is where hemsky comes in handy who can make something out of nothing. Once the youngstars re-learn how to be creative with the new system i'm sure they will surpass krugegers defensive lapsed system.

Steve BachIntyre is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.