HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The History of Hockey
The History of Hockey Relive great moments in hockey history and discuss how the game has changed over time.

Brett Hull vs. Mike Modano

View Poll Results: Who Do You Rank Higher All-Time?
Brett Hull 41 83.67%
Mike Modano 8 16.33%
Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
10-23-2013, 05:34 PM
  #1
Hawkey Town 18
Moderator
 
Hawkey Town 18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,207
vCash: 500
Brett Hull vs. Mike Modano

Who do you rank higher all-time?

Hawkey Town 18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-23-2013, 05:40 PM
  #2
thom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,978
vCash: 500
Some of you will say Brett Hull because of his 3 70 goal season including an incredible 86goals but for me its Modano thers more to hockey than goals.Mike is an essential part of long term success and stanley cup.Edge goes to Mike its close.I could go into detail why i think Mike is ahead but Ill leave it to others

thom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-23-2013, 06:08 PM
  #3
tjcurrie
Registered User
 
tjcurrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gibbons, Alberta
Posts: 3,206
vCash: 500
Tough one for me, Modano being my favorite of all-time but I'm also a huge Brett Hull supporter. I appreciate immensely what both players brought. Hull goes down as one of the greatest few goal scorers of all-time and essentially the point of hockey is to put the puck in the nest. Modano on the other hand after his first few years became an elite two-way center and matched right up head-to-head with the likes of Joe Sakic, Steve Yerman, Peter Forsberg, etc etc. I'm sure he could have put up more points somewhere else, he certainly had the talent.

To me they're so different yet both great at what they did that its tough to choose.

tjcurrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-23-2013, 06:18 PM
  #4
struckbyaparkedcar
Zemgus Da Gawd
 
struckbyaparkedcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Country: Cote DIvoire
Posts: 10,519
vCash: 500
I'd say Hull was better but Modano was more crucial to the Cup run and prolly should have won the Smythe over Nieuwendyk.

struckbyaparkedcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-23-2013, 06:22 PM
  #5
tjcurrie
Registered User
 
tjcurrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gibbons, Alberta
Posts: 3,206
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by struckbyaparkedcar View Post
I'd say Hull was better but Modano was more crucial to the Cup run and prolly should have won the Smythe over Nieuwendyk.
It's certainly arguable. I think it's a year where it could have gone to any of 3 or 4 guys, including Belfour and probably Hatcher. It's a good example though of how just a few guys voting opinions on one day can change the way people view a player forever. They're doing the top centers list as we speak and with that on his resume he'd be ranked much higher. The fact that he certainly did enough to get it goes unnoticed, had he been awarded it his rep around here would be bolstered immensely.

tjcurrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-23-2013, 07:10 PM
  #6
Dissonance
Registered User
 
Dissonance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cabbage Patch
Posts: 1,069
vCash: 500
Hard to compare the two. If I was starting a team from scratch, I'd probably choose Modano. Center is arguably a more important position and Modano in his prime was everything you could possibly want in a first line center.

But on the all-time list? I'd go with Hull. What he accomplished over his career was simply ludicrous. That 1990-91 season is still, to me, the greatest goal-scoring season of all time.

Dissonance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-23-2013, 07:26 PM
  #7
bester vaive
Fear the Titan!
 
bester vaive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 254
vCash: 500
Both great players, but Hull had a premium skill (goal scoring.) Hence, advantage Brett.

bester vaive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-23-2013, 08:41 PM
  #8
Devo1212
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 100
vCash: 500
were both very great players were amazing and very talented.

Devo1212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-23-2013, 10:21 PM
  #9
Killion
Global Moderator
 
Killion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Casablanca
Country: Morocco
Posts: 21,649
vCash: 500
As prolific a goal scorer as he was & entertaining to boot on & off the ice, Id go with Mike Modano on this one. More erudite, brought a lot of intangibles to the rink in terms of playmaking ability, general hockey IQ, to the dressing room itself. Very classy player, individual.

Killion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-23-2013, 11:30 PM
  #10
Bure All Day
Registered User
 
Bure All Day's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Vancouver Isl.
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,094
vCash: 500
Brett Hull, but I'm super biased

Bure All Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-23-2013, 11:46 PM
  #11
TheDevilMadeMe
Global Moderator
 
TheDevilMadeMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 38,541
vCash: 500
What did Modano do to overcome Hull's 3 consecutive seasons of 70+ goals?

I'm all for two-way players, and I do think Hull is ranked too high on the HOH Top 100 list, but this is Mike Modano we are talking about, not Steve Yzerman.

I agree that Modano was more important than Hull for the 1999 Cup win, but Hull was Dallas' leading Conn Smythe candidate heading into the 2000 finals.

TheDevilMadeMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-24-2013, 12:27 AM
  #12
King Forsberg
21 68 88 16 44 28
 
King Forsberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 5,182
vCash: 300
While Modano was a solid franchise player for Dallas, Hull was a superstar in the league for a couple of years. Hull wasn't as good as Modano in 99 but the rest of his career is easily above Modano.

King Forsberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-24-2013, 09:09 AM
  #13
ot92s
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 737
vCash: 500
modano was very good but hull is an ALL TIME PINNACLE sniper. there's been, like, 5 of them in the entire history of the game. i'll take mr. 78 adjusted goals...

ot92s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-24-2013, 10:24 AM
  #14
Fred Taylor
The Cyclone
 
Fred Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,757
vCash: 500
Brett Hull. His two 70+ and 86 goal seasons are too much to ignore in comparison to Modano.

Fred Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-24-2013, 11:02 AM
  #15
Darth Yoda
Registered User
 
Darth Yoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Grovebranch's Crease
Country: Sweden
Posts: 2,816
vCash: 593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Taylor View Post
Brett Hull. His two 70+ and 86 goal seasons are too much to ignore in comparison to Modano.
You think Hull gained as much from playing with Modano as he did from Adam Oates? For sure Modano was better defensively as opposed to that overrated, although obviously very clutch, Hull.

Darth Yoda is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-24-2013, 01:32 PM
  #16
weaponomega
Registered User
 
weaponomega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,526
vCash: 500
I think their longevity and consistency is comparable, but Hull's peak seasons put him over Modano for me.

weaponomega is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-24-2013, 07:49 PM
  #17
Big Phil
Registered User
 
Big Phil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,331
vCash: 500
Hull, easily for me. His goal scoring prowess is too hard to ignore. Not to mention it was Hull who put the Stars over the top in 1999, and helped to do the same to the Wings in 2002.

Throw in the fact that Hull is by a noticeable margin the better playoff performer and I can't see how anyone picks Modano here.

Big Phil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-24-2013, 08:13 PM
  #18
tjcurrie
Registered User
 
tjcurrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gibbons, Alberta
Posts: 3,206
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Phil View Post
Hull, easily for me. His goal scoring prowess is too hard to ignore. Not to mention it was Hull who put the Stars over the top in 1999, and helped to do the same to the Wings in 2002.

Throw in the fact that Hull is by a noticeable margin the better playoff performer and I can't see how anyone picks Modano here.
While that may be somewhat true (I'd say the addition of Belfour the season prior was bigger), if you were to take Modano away they'd be less of a team than they would have been without Hull. Hull was a final piece, but that doesn't mean he was the biggest.

No trying to take anything away from him, I love the guy.

tjcurrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-24-2013, 09:40 PM
  #19
Sentinel
Registered User
 
Sentinel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 2,524
vCash: 500
I love them both, and they complimented each other perfectly. Modano was a superb two-way player, but at the end of the day, Hull was just greater.

Sentinel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-24-2013, 10:00 PM
  #20
chaosrevolver
Snubbed Again
 
chaosrevolver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,045
vCash: 50
Modano is great and all, but like stated before, he just simply wasn't as good as Brett Hull. Modano may have been a more all-around player, but Hull was simply an all-world sniper and one of the better ones in the last twenty or so years.

chaosrevolver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-24-2013, 11:15 PM
  #21
Psycho Papa Joe
Porkchop Hoser
 
Psycho Papa Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cesspool, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,357
vCash: 500
I'd take modano in every facet of the game except goal scoring. But Hull has such a big edge there, it's beyond ludicrous.

Voted Hull. Unfortunately, IMO Gainey and Hitchcock had a leash on modano. Made him a terrific all round center, but IMO on a more wide open team he could have been way more special.

Psycho Papa Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2013, 07:40 AM
  #22
the edler
Inimitable
 
the edler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,406
vCash: 500
Modano was Toews before Toews. No crazy amounts of points but he'll give you them intangibles.

the edler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2013, 08:42 AM
  #23
Sentinel
Registered User
 
Sentinel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 2,524
vCash: 500
Modano >> Toews

Sentinel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2013, 08:44 AM
  #24
Darth Yoda
Registered User
 
Darth Yoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Grovebranch's Crease
Country: Sweden
Posts: 2,816
vCash: 593
Okey then, Hull was a great scorer. Not as great as some like to think simply becouse Adam Oates was a better playmaker than Hull was a scorer, but he did had a Steven Stamkos quality to him. As i usually do not hold Modano as high as some others do, i can certainly live with people thinking Hull was better. What i end up with is simply that none of them was the best american ever, wether it's Chelios, Brimsek, or even Howe or Leetch is up for debate. Hull was not an all-time great player, nor was Modano.

Darth Yoda is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-25-2013, 08:49 AM
  #25
TheDevilMadeMe
Global Moderator
 
TheDevilMadeMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 38,541
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sentinel View Post
Modano >> Toews
Not really. I mean, Modano had a much better career because Toews is still young, but I don't think he was better as a player.

TheDevilMadeMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.