HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Montreal Canadiens
Notices

Benoit Brunet : Dale Tallon in MTL oct 26th

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
10-27-2013, 12:15 PM
  #76
Ezpz
No mad pls
 
Ezpz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,726
vCash: 570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc-E- View Post
Is anyone would take both (Versteeg and Kopecky) for Desharnais and Bourque?
No. Both would be a downgrade on Bourque.

Ezpz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:15 PM
  #77
Habs 4 Life
No Excuses
 
Habs 4 Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montreal
Country: Italy
Posts: 32,347
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc-E- View Post
Is anyone would take both (Versteeg and Kopecky) for Desharnais and Bourque?
I would. Would love to find a way to include Kulikov in there.

Habs 4 Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:18 PM
  #78
Marc-E-
Registered User
 
Marc-E-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montréal, Québec
Posts: 1,395
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habs 4 Life View Post
I would. Would love to find a way to include Kulikov in there.
Well Kulikov would cost us Nathan Beaulieu IMO.

Marc-E- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:21 PM
  #79
Ezpz
No mad pls
 
Ezpz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,726
vCash: 570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc-E- View Post
Well Kulikov would cost us Nathan Beaulieu IMO.
I'd do that. Markov could help Kulikov become what he was showing he would become a few years ago. I feel like Nathan Beaulieu's musical taste will make him bust.

Ezpz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:21 PM
  #80
Marc-E-
Registered User
 
Marc-E-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montréal, Québec
Posts: 1,395
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezpz View Post
No. Both would be a downgrade on Bourque.
Bourque is an okay player but I don't see that move as a downgrade. It's a fair value and it works on the cap.

Marc-E- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:21 PM
  #81
PricerStopDaPuck
#PrayForBozon
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Saskatchewan
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,059
vCash: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc-E- View Post
Well Kulikov would cost us Nathan Beaulieu IMO.
Id do that

PricerStopDaPuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:21 PM
  #82
overlords
Global Moderator
Canada's Mod
 
overlords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Trolling Brian Wilde
Posts: 24,307
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezpz View Post
I'd do that. Markov could help Kulikov become what he was showing he would become a few years ago. I feel like Nathan Beaulieu's musical taste will make him bust.
Guessing you're not a leblanc fan, then

__________________



"overlords is one of my favorite people on this entire site." - Hfboards
overlords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:23 PM
  #83
TT1
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,997
vCash: 500
id be really happy w/ a versteeg for dd trade, not a big fan of kopecky. both have the same contract lenght but versteeg brings much more to the table, and for only 1.4M+

TT1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:23 PM
  #84
Marc-E-
Registered User
 
Marc-E-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montréal, Québec
Posts: 1,395
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezpz View Post
I'd do that. Markov could help Kulikov become what he was showing he would become a few years ago. I feel like Nathan Beaulieu's musical taste will make him bust.
Sometimes you've to be patient with young defensman. But, Kulikov is already an NHLer so, I think I'll do it.

Marc-E- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:29 PM
  #85
sheed36
Registered User
 
sheed36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,069
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TT1 View Post
id be really happy w/ a versteeg for dd trade, not a big fan of kopecky. both have the same contract length but versteeg brings much more to the table, and for only 1.4M+
DD is signed for 1 year longer than Versteeg. DD as 3 years remaining after this season with a $3.5M cap hit and Versteeg as 2 years remaining on his deal after this season with a $4.4M cap hit.

sheed36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:30 PM
  #86
TT1
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,997
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheed36 View Post
DD is signed for 1 year longer than Versteeg. DD as 3 years remaining after this season with a $3.5M cap hit and Versteeg as 2 years remaining on his deal after this season with a $4.4M cap hit.
i meant kopecky and versteeg

TT1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:36 PM
  #87
JAHendrick
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
 
JAHendrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Country: Uganda
Posts: 56
vCash: 500
Until it happens, I refuse to believe that anyone is willing to take Desharnais off our hands.

JAHendrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:37 PM
  #88
sheed36
Registered User
 
sheed36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,069
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TT1 View Post
i meant kopecky and versteeg
Gotcha.

sheed36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:49 PM
  #89
Montreal Impact FC
.:| Champ's City |:.
 
Montreal Impact FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Montreal
Country: Ecuador
Posts: 1,143
vCash: 500
Bergevin doesnt have the cojones to make a big deal but has it to put subban is own teamate down (contract negotiations), come on Bergevin make a move before all our useless players have 0 value dont make sure yourself a new BG. At least BG tried to bring top end quality (Kovalev) even if he failed after (sundin, hossa etc)

Montreal Impact FC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:55 PM
  #90
SouthernHab
Registered User
 
SouthernHab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 8,377
vCash: 500
A runt for a runt.

Sounds like a trade Gauthier would do.

SouthernHab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 12:59 PM
  #91
Teufelsdreck
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 13,780
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WHATaboutLOVE View Post
Would you guys trade Desharnais for Gomez ?

Wondering what this board would do if that happened.
Well, that's an even trade. We Hab fans know all about albatrosses.

Teufelsdreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 01:01 PM
  #92
Maxpac
Registered User
 
Maxpac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: hockey city
Posts: 13,060
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc-E- View Post
Well Kulikov would cost us Nathan Beaulieu IMO.
If the cost was only Beaulieu then you freackin do it. If there's one D that has the potential to replace Andrei Markov for the Habs, it's Kulikov imo.

Maxpac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 01:03 PM
  #93
Lafleurs Guy
Registered User
 
Lafleurs Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,008
vCash: 500
Just go with whoever has a shorter contract...

Lafleurs Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 01:07 PM
  #94
PunkinDrublic*
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sutton,Qc-Sudbury,On
Posts: 8,282
vCash: 500
Florida needs the french connection to sell tickets this winter. Probably a done deal, Briere slips back into the center position he should have been in since the beginning of the season.

PunkinDrublic* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 01:20 PM
  #95
OpenIceHit
Registered User
 
OpenIceHit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,282
vCash: 500
Players that I personally think we should get rid of:

Bourque: One of the worst for +/-. Even if he's 6'2" and 217 lbs, has only 7 hits in 11 games (as much as Plekanec and less than Markov !!!!). With 4 points in 11 games, he's on pace for a 3rd season with PPG ratio less than 0.5. And has a cap hit of 3.3M until 2016.

Diaz: Second worst D for +/- after Bouillon. Among the regular players, only DD has less hits than him. If his only upside is offence, I don't think that 4 passes in 11 games is enough. Good news is that he's UFA at end of the year but unlike Bouillon and Gionta, he might have some trade value.

DD: Just the worst in every category.

Unless another team wants them which is unlikely, Bouillon and Gionta will finish the year with the Habs and won't get re-signed.

Pick your treat...

OpenIceHit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 01:23 PM
  #96
Ezpz
No mad pls
 
Ezpz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,726
vCash: 570
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpenIceHit View Post
Players that I personally think we should get rid of:

Bourque: One of the worst for +/-. Even if he's 6'2" and 217 lbs, has only 7 hits in 11 games (as much as Plekanec and less than Markov !!!!). With 4 points in 11 games, he's on pace for a 3rd season with PPG ratio less than 0.5. And has a cap hit of 3.3M until 2016.

Diaz: Second worst D for +/- after Bouillon. Among the regular players, only DD has less hits than him. If his only upside is offence, I don't think that 4 passes in 11 games is enough. Good news is that he's UFA at end of the year but unlike Bouillon and Gionta, he might have some trade value.

DD: Just the worst in every category.

Unless another team wants them which is unlikely, Bouillon and Gionta will finish the year with the Habs and won't get re-signed.

Pick your treat...
Bourque is playing with Blackholenais. What is he supposed to produce offensively? He gains the zone cycles the puck to DD then DD turns it over. Over and over and over and over and over and over.

Ezpz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 01:25 PM
  #97
OpenIceHit
Registered User
 
OpenIceHit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,282
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezpz View Post
Bourque is playing with Blackholenais. What is he supposed to produce offensively? He gains the zone cycles the puck to DD then DD turns it over. Over and over and over and over and over and over.
No. Plekanec is the one who got stuck with Bourque for the last two years. And if he doesn't score goals, he could at least be more aggressive and act as if he cared a little bit.

OpenIceHit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 01:29 PM
  #98
rockjngo
Registered User
 
rockjngo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,093
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoky Thompson View Post
ESPN reported a couple days ago that there's been trade talk about MTL - FLO involving DD.

Honestly though, DD for Versteeg would be pretty pointless. We'd gain 2 inches and 10-15 goals per season? He's constantly injured and has a cap hit of 4.4 when we need to resign Subban, Markov, Eller, Emelin.

What MB should be doing is offering DD + for a certain Nick Bjugstad I can't even imagine seeing him and Mccarron together on the 3rd line.

ESPN never reported this. I know because I suggested Florida trades Kopecky for Desharnais. ESPN only said Florida is looking to dump some players. Anyhow Benoit Brunet is reading our boards and saw that and is now reporting false rumors. lol

rockjngo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 01:31 PM
  #99
vokiel
#NoTradesWithEDM
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Midgetland
Country: Martinique
Posts: 5,685
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lafleurs Guy View Post
Just go with whoever has a shorter contract...
So none of them?

vokiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-27-2013, 01:37 PM
  #100
waffledave
waffledave, from hf
 
waffledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,991
vCash: 500
Versteeg would be a bad fit here. We don't need more inconsistent forwards.

waffledave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.