HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Bad Calls

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-08-2013, 02:01 PM
  #26
profchaos2001
Registered User
 
profchaos2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 574
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadwayblue View Post
It's perfectly legal in hockey to position/angle your skate in an attempt to deflect the puck into the net. Turning and/or angling is fine...kicking at the puck is not.
I understand that. I just think this whole "oh he was hockey stopping, he wasn't trying to use his feet to propel the puck into the net" is bull. I think its a big gray area that needs to be addressed.

profchaos2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2013, 02:13 PM
  #27
broadwayblue
Registered User
 
broadwayblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 16,871
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by profchaos2001 View Post
I understand that. I just think this whole "oh he was hockey stopping, he wasn't trying to use his feet to propel the puck into the net" is bull. I think its a big gray area that needs to be addressed.
Well that's been the rule for as long as I can remember. It's a crappy way to get scored on, but what can you do? I don't think you can invalidate any goal that goes off a skate...luck is part of the game.

broadwayblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2013, 02:37 PM
  #28
SMantzas
Registered User
 
SMantzas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 5,312
vCash: 500
No, just no. O6 teams get special treatment

http://www.ontheforecheck.com/2011/2...cial-treatment

SMantzas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2013, 04:20 PM
  #29
Oak
Hockey Connoisseur
 
Oak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 2,868
vCash: 397
NJ Devils Soccer team is good at what they do. You guys need to just stop hating.

Oak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2013, 04:50 PM
  #30
GFiP*
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,187
vCash: 500
It would be nice if the NHL explained how last night was a good goal and this is not:

http://snyrangersblog.com/2013-14/20...ived-off-goal/

GFiP* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2013, 06:57 PM
  #31
Zamboner
Your move, creep.
 
Zamboner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 2,018
vCash: 500
That goal last night was technically legal, but it shouldn't be. It's essentially a loophole to kick the puck in without "kicking" it in the more traditional way. I think it'll eventually be illegal.

Zamboner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2013, 07:34 PM
  #32
zuckera1
#35
 
zuckera1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 435
vCash: 500
.....Grabovski got a shot off.

zuckera1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2013, 07:36 PM
  #33
UAGoalieGuy
Registered User
 
UAGoalieGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island,New York
Country: United States
Posts: 10,849
vCash: 500
Add it to the list!

UAGoalieGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2013, 07:40 PM
  #34
Giacomin
Registered User
 
Giacomin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,217
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UAGoalieGuy View Post
Add it to the list!
Maybe Torts was right with his comments after the Winter Classic!

Giacomin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2013, 07:40 PM
  #35
zuckera1
#35
 
zuckera1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 435
vCash: 500
Again, call me a sore loser, but NHL officiating is pathetic. The only consistent thing we can expect from NHL officiating is inconsistency. Complete joke

zuckera1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2013, 07:41 PM
  #36
frozenrubber
Registered User
 
frozenrubber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 2,205
vCash: 500
Sam and Joe have become real homers this season. There's one thing supporting your team, but at least tell the viewers the correct rules and interpretations. The penalty shot was the right call:

NHL Rule Book:

Quote:
There are four (4) specific conditions that must be met in order for the Referee to award a penalty shot for a player being fouled from behind. They are:
(i) The infraction must have taken place in the neutral zone or attacking zone, (i.e. over the puck carrier’s own blue line);
(ii) The infraction must have been committed from behind;
(iii) The player in possession and control (or, in the judgment of the Referee, clearly would have obtained possession and control of the puck) must have been denied a reasonable chance to score (the fact that he got a shot off does not automatically eliminate this play from the penalty shot consideration criteria. If the foul was from behind and he was denied a “more” reasonable scoring opportunity due to the foul, then the penalty shot should be awarded);
(iv) The player in possession and control (or, in the judgment of the Referee, clearly would have obtained possession and control of the puck) must have had no opposing player between himself and the goalkeeper.
http://www.nhl.com/ice/page.htm?id=26308

frozenrubber is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2016 All Rights Reserved.