HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

Matt Moulson to Vancouver

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-09-2013, 01:19 PM
  #1
Avengers*
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 916
vCash: 500
Matt Moulson to Vancouver

What does it take?


Last edited by Avengers*: 12-09-2013 at 01:41 PM. Reason: ???
Avengers* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 01:24 PM
  #2
Lord Flacko*
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,366
vCash: 500
Not interested considering what Buffalo will ask for.

Lord Flacko* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 01:25 PM
  #3
neutral*
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Country: Switzerland
Posts: 1,391
vCash: 500
Not interested in giving any team prospects for a rental. They will want a fortune for Moulson at the deadline when he will just walk. The Canucks already acquired a failed rental in Derek Roy for a 2nd + really good D prospect and will regret that for a long time. No more trading prospects when this team's window is closing. Gillis himself also said no more rentals.

neutral* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 01:34 PM
  #4
KeninsFan
Fire Benning already
 
KeninsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,730
vCash: 50
Not interested.

Much rather acquire Ryder for significantly less.

KeninsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 01:39 PM
  #5
Lord Flacko*
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,366
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kthsn View Post
Not interested.

Much rather acquire Ryder for significantly less.
I agree. It would probably take a 3rd to get Ryder.

Lord Flacko* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 01:42 PM
  #6
Luck 6
\\_______
 
Luck 6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,990
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanucksCup2014 View Post
Not interested in giving any team prospects for a rental. They will want a fortune for Moulson at the deadline when he will just walk. The Canucks already acquired a failed rental in Derek Roy for a 2nd + really good D prospect and will regret that for a long time. No more trading prospects when this team's window is closing. Gillis himself also said no more rentals.
I'm not sure we'll regret that for a long time. That was a good trade, and if we can acquire Moulson for a 2nd and a B level prospect this year I'd be thrilled if Gillis made that deal. Another thing is we need a top 6 winger next season, who says we can't try to re-sign Moulson?

Luck 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 01:43 PM
  #7
Luck 6
\\_______
 
Luck 6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,990
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kthsn View Post
Not interested.

Much rather acquire Ryder for significantly less.
Ryder is more of what we already have. That's a wasted pick, essentially.

Luck 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 01:47 PM
  #8
Avengers*
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 916
vCash: 500
Michael Ryder will score a few goals for the Canucks but will he take them to the next level?

Avengers* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 01:55 PM
  #9
neutral*
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Country: Switzerland
Posts: 1,391
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luck 6 View Post
I'm not sure we'll regret that for a long time. That was a good trade, and if we can acquire Moulson for a 2nd and a B level prospect this year I'd be thrilled if Gillis made that deal. Another thing is we need a top 6 winger next season, who says we can't try to re-sign Moulson?
Considering Roy did nothing for us in the playoffs... no, it wasn't a good trade.

neutral* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 01:59 PM
  #10
604
Registered User
 
604's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,391
vCash: 50
Hey Canucks fans...why not actually let a BUF fan answer before chiming in?

Might as well be having this conversation on the VAN board.

604 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 02:06 PM
  #11
sabresandcanucks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,970
vCash: 500
I suspect the sabres will be trying to obtain a late first round pick for Moulson (2014 or 2015) or the equivalent in prospect + pick.

It depends on how Moulson plays down the stretch to the Trade Deadline, team injuries, and the availability of the market...Moulson could go anywhere from a 2nd round pick to a mid 1st round pick depending on those variables.

sabresandcanucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 02:06 PM
  #12
KeninsFan
Fire Benning already
 
KeninsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,730
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luck 6 View Post
Ryder is more of what we already have. That's a wasted pick, essentially.
None of our tweeners are one shot scorers.

None of the Canucks forwards are one shot scorers.

Ryder might be a 2nd/3rd liner but he's been averaging 33 goals a season for a while now.

KeninsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 02:09 PM
  #13
Dunkster19
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 864
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sabresandcanucks View Post
I suspect the sabres will be trying to obtain a late first round pick for Moulson (2014 or 2015) or the equivalent in prospect + pick.

It depends on how Moulson plays down the stretch to the Trade Deadline, team injuries, and the availability of the market...Moulson could go anywhere from a 2nd round pick to a mid 1st round pick depending on those variables.
Hands down the Sabres will get a first rounder from someone

Dunkster19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 02:11 PM
  #14
Holymakinaw
Registered User
 
Holymakinaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,849
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kthsn View Post
Not interested.

Much rather acquire Ryder for significantly less.
He'd give significantly less, too.

Holymakinaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 02:17 PM
  #15
gallagt01
Registered User
 
gallagt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sloan
Posts: 11,106
vCash: 500
Your first and a decent prospect.

gallagt01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 02:39 PM
  #16
Horvath Broncos
Registered User
 
Horvath Broncos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,979
vCash: 500
i know that around here nobody wants to give their 1sts away, but those 16-25 picks are not really that good picks. Also the Sedins are not getting any younger, so if i were Gillis i would definitely try to get Moulson or someone like him though it would mean loosing my first round pick.

Horvath Broncos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 02:39 PM
  #17
Zip15
Registered User
 
Zip15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,163
vCash: 50
I think the Sabres would require a 1st from VAN for Moulson. I don't see a player in VAN's prospect pool who could make a 2nd + B prospect deal work for both sides. Given that the Canucks are on the playoff fringe right now, I could see why they wouldn't be willing to give up that 1st for Moulson.

Zip15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 02:40 PM
  #18
Scottyk9
Henrique to Hall..
 
Scottyk9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: West of Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 27,732
vCash: 432
Send a message via AIM to Scottyk9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Flacko View Post
I agree. It would probably take a 3rd to get Ryder.
Ryder won't be available for as long as the Devils continue to be a bubble team. Lou NEVER sells at the deadline...EVER...

Pisses us off

That said I don't see how Ryder gets moved for anything less than a 2nd and a decent prospect.

Scottyk9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 02:44 PM
  #19
Vankiller Whale
Fire Benning
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 28,838
vCash: 1800
I'm not 100% sold on Moulson being the right piece to push us over the top.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 03:11 PM
  #20
Beerz
Registered User
 
Beerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 23,356
vCash: 500
Starts with a 1st ... highest bidder wins.... pretty straight forward.

Beerz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 03:13 PM
  #21
Moore Money
Registered Boozer
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,516
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
I'm not 100% sold on Moulson being the right piece to push us over the top.
unless we get a superstar, there isn't a single player that would push us over the top. Moulson would be a good piece to add in terms of skillset and cap hit. not sure what the Sabres would be asking though.

Moore Money is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 03:54 PM
  #22
Djp
Registered User
 
Djp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle,WA
Country: United States
Posts: 9,937
vCash: 500
Buffalo will get numerous offers for Moulson. It will require a 1st + someting

If Vancouver is a bubble team, Buffalo likely will allow the pick to be lottery protected if they were to miss the playoffs.

If its a 2nd then it will likely be Shinakirk + 2nd

Djp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 03:58 PM
  #23
huntison
Registered User
 
huntison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,594
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djp View Post
Buffalo will get numerous offers for Moulson. It will require a 1st + someting

If Vancouver is a bubble team, Buffalo likely will allow the pick to be lottery protected if they were to miss the playoffs.

If its a 2nd then it will likely be Shinakirk + 2nd
Do not want Moulson for that.

huntison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 04:03 PM
  #24
mgeise
Registered User
 
mgeise's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Fargo, ND
Country: United States
Posts: 4,032
vCash: 500
2014 1st and something of small to decent value. There will likely be numerous teams offering their 1st for him, so he'll go to whoever can offer the best other piece. 2014 1st and 2015 3rd would do it for me.

mgeise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2013, 04:04 PM
  #25
mgeise
Registered User
 
mgeise's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Fargo, ND
Country: United States
Posts: 4,032
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djp View Post
Buffalo will get numerous offers for Moulson. It will require a 1st + someting

If Vancouver is a bubble team, Buffalo likely will allow the pick to be lottery protected if they were to miss the playoffs.

If its a 2nd then it will likely be Shinakirk + 2nd
Buffalo would likely take Shinkaruk alone and run. A low first rounder in a better draft that's further along in his development is worth more than a low first rounder this year.

mgeise is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.