HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

Tor - Van

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-10-2013, 07:20 PM
  #51
Community
44 is Rielly good
 
Community's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The Darkest Timeline
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,673
vCash: 564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundface View Post
Do some research? So you were serious after all

Doing some "research" you'll find out what his injuries were.

The two big chunks of missed time were a broken leg from a shot block, and a lacerated calf. He had a lacerated calf in 2008 as well. The only other non full season was last season with a groin injury. So only one of those injuries wasn't an accident.

Lupul? Here's a list of his injuries and I'll let people that have some brain cells decide which one of these players is injury prone (if you even know what that term means)

List of injuries where the player missed significant time:

Lacerated Calf
Broken foot
Lacerated Calf
Groin strain

vs

Concussion
Broken wrist
Concussion
Sprained ankle
Abdominal injury
Back injury- later requiring back surgery- missed 52 games
Back injury missed 28 more games next season
Separated shoulder
Forearm injury
Concussion
Groin strain

Talk about stupid comments
Re-occuring injury

Also, I'm pretty sure any player that's not insanely lucky would have got a broken forearm from Phaneuf's shot. The back injury/infection was also a freak accident.

Yes Lupul's injury prone, but people act like he's Booth-esque injury prone, he's not that bad... So far in T.O. all his injuries (other than 1 game for back spasms and the groin strain/hamstring he's hurt (can't remember which one it is)) it's been freak accidents.

Community is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2013, 07:22 PM
  #52
Community
44 is Rielly good
 
Community's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The Darkest Timeline
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,673
vCash: 564
As for Bieksa for Lupul + Franson, value aside it doesn't make sense. Bieksa is too old and I'd rather target a cheaper or younger alternative (Tanev? Klein? etc.).

Community is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2013, 07:44 PM
  #53
Castle1*
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Victoria BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,670
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMLKesselftw View Post
As for Bieksa for Lupul + Franson, value aside it doesn't make sense. Bieksa is too old and I'd rather target a cheaper or younger alternative (Tanev? Klein? etc.).
Canucks dont want breakable lupul at all. Never.

Franson? meh..whatever. Certainly would not trade Bieksa to t.o. for that package. In fact he would not be traded at all except for maybe JVR or Kessel 1 for 1.

Castle1* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2013, 07:57 PM
  #54
mstad101
Registered User
 
mstad101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,593
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMLKesselftw View Post
As for Bieksa for Lupul + Franson, value aside it doesn't make sense. Bieksa is too old and I'd rather target a cheaper or younger alternative (Tanev? Klein? etc.).
I don't see a young scoring forward that could be traded for Tanev though from Toronto. So it's really a go big or go home trade here. Core member for core member. Each team son really like it, but it's the type of win win trade each team needs to kinda move up an echelon.

What about Edler Tanev for Lupul Franson 2014 1st
Leafs gets two Top 4 defensemen, lose Top 6 forward and PP Dman plus a pick
Canucks grab a Dman with offensive flair who is a RH shot, and a quality scorer.

mstad101 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2013, 07:59 PM
  #55
Castle1*
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Victoria BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,670
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstad101 View Post
I don't see a young scoring forward that could be traded for Tanev though from Toronto. So it's really a go big or go home trade here. Core member for core member. Each team son really like it, but it's the type of win win trade each team needs to kinda move up an echelon.

What about Edler Tanev for Lupul Franson 2014 1st
Leafs gets two Top 4 defensemen, lose Top 6 forward and PP Dman plus a pick
Canucks grab a Dman with offensive flair who is a RH shot, and a quality scorer.
Lol at that offer. Canucks say no. Edler and a 2nd is worth that package.

Edit: even though Edler is worth that package Canucks still say no thanks for your breakable forward.

Castle1* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2013, 08:01 PM
  #56
Jax Teller
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,788
vCash: 500
The offer is a pretty steep overpay from Toronto.

Jax Teller is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2013, 08:03 PM
  #57
neutral*
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Country: Switzerland
Posts: 1,391
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinnybaby View Post
The offer is a pretty steep overpay from Toronto.

neutral* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2013, 08:04 PM
  #58
Sergei Shirokov
Registered User
 
Sergei Shirokov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: British Columbia
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,232
vCash: 500
I don't think Bieksa would waive, but I would do the deal in the OP, and I think its a solid hockey trade for both.

Sergei Shirokov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2013, 08:19 PM
  #59
PhiladelphiaKessel
DontCrossthe****Line
 
PhiladelphiaKessel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,982
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kanucks1 View Post
Edler and Schroeder for Lupul, Franson and 1st?
Really don't have a need for Schroeder as we just acquired holland, and leafs really shouldn't be giving up more picks (especially firsts) there still may be a good base for a trade here

PhiladelphiaKessel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2013, 09:10 PM
  #60
Goon42
Registered User
 
Goon42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 897
vCash: 500
Lupul + torts = 30 game season

Goon42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2013, 09:33 PM
  #61
number72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,894
vCash: 500
Swap Clarkson for Lupul and you have deal.

number72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2013, 09:56 PM
  #62
neutral*
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Country: Switzerland
Posts: 1,391
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by number72 View Post
Swap Clarkson for Lupul and you have deal.
I threw up.

neutral* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2013, 09:59 PM
  #63
Castle1*
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Victoria BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,670
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanucksCup2014 View Post
I threw up.
Hahaha. Its awesome TO signed clarkson.

Castle1* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2013, 11:59 PM
  #64
EscapeGoat
We The North
 
EscapeGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: The Hockey Mecca
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,870
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kanucks1 View Post
Edler and Schroeder for Lupul, Franson and 1st?
Did you type that with a straight face?

EscapeGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-11-2013, 05:55 AM
  #65
CreeksideStrangler
Registered User
 
CreeksideStrangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: London, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,262
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Castle1 View Post
Canucks are not trading Bieksa. Close thread.
Castle1 has no reason to call for the thread to be closed. Delete Account :

CreeksideStrangler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-11-2013, 05:56 AM
  #66
CreeksideStrangler
Registered User
 
CreeksideStrangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: London, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,262
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Castle1 View Post
Canucks dont want breakable lupul at all. Never.

Franson? meh..whatever. Certainly would not trade Bieksa to t.o. for that package. In fact he would not be traded at all except for maybe JVR or Kessel 1 for 1.
Way over the top. I don't rvrn think your own fans ever agree eith you.

CreeksideStrangler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.