Okay, would do Brassard, Girardi, 2nd for E. Kane? Just out of curiosity...
As I said earlier in the thread, I don't want Kane, I just think he'll be massivly overpaid for, and if what you proposed is what it takes, I don't want any part.
I mentioned this to you, but just want to get this out here haha:
I'd do Brass + 2nd + MDZ.
Or if it must be your original proposal, I'd want a solid D piece coming from the Jets.
With Staal out, is why I'd keep Girardi. Yes Girardi is "prone" to injury with his style of play, but he's not actually injured. Staal has not had a healthy season in forever. And as "bad" as Girardi has been this year, I think he's better than not having a Girardi and having McI/MDZ or Falk move up the D ranks. (At this point in time.)
Also there is no realistic way Girardi is dealt before MDZ haha.
p.s. damn, now the word "Girardi" looks weird hahah
Miller hypothetically would be the 3rd line center, and Lindberg the 4th. I think Lindberg has the potential to be an elite 4th line centerman, but not sure his upside is much more than that.
Lindberg definitely has the potential to be a solid 3C. The tools are there. Whether or not he puts it all together at the NHL level is the question. Worst case scenario, he's a very good 4C, IMO. He reminds me of Dom Moore, in a good way.
If one or the other happens, we wont get the other, if that makes sense. No way we pull off getting both of them with the parts we have to offer. Im leaning towards wanting Byufglien, if Im honest. Big body, huge shot, versatile. Something about Kane that makes me feel like he's never going to realize his potential.