HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Byfuglien

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-04-2014, 09:49 AM
  #1
heilongjetsfan
Registered User
 
heilongjetsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Peg City!
Country: Canada
Posts: 305
vCash: 500
Byfuglien

Jets fan coming in (mostly) peace. My mom was a flyers fan growing up and they've always been one of my "other teams."

There's another post going strong here on your boards that suggests a trade for buff and montoya revolving around Mark Streit and some other crap that you don't want laying around. Nothing against Streit as a player, I've really liked him even as far back as his days with the Habs, but obviously at this point in his career, his trade value is next to nothing.

Winnipeg BADLY needs an LHD who can handle 2nd pairing commitments or better. We would like to add some depth on the wings, too. I think a trade that could benefit both teams would go something like this:

To Winnipeg:
Braydon Coburn
Wayne Simmonds
2014 4th round pick
2015 2nd round pick *conditional on flyers making the east final*

To Philadelphia:
Dustin Byfuglien

That is all.

I know there's going to be a couple homers who are going to try to tell me I'm trying to rob you blind, or that Buff is a hack. The truth is he's an all-star invitee, has been a league leader in shot attempts, and points by defensemen for the last 4 years and is on a very reasonable contract.

Why do we want to move him? We don't even a little bit want to move him, but we've got too much talent (Buff, Bogo, Trouba, Redmond, Postma) in our RHD corps to benefit from all of it. You don't want Bogo or Trouba getting 3rd pairing minutes, they're just too good.

Let me know what you guys think of this - unless of course you're going to give me a bag of pucks counter. I haven't checked how it works for cap space for either team but someone let me know if it's not workable that way.

heilongjetsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 09:53 AM
  #2
BrindamoursNose
Registered User
 
BrindamoursNose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,794
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by heilongjetsfan View Post
Jets fan coming in (mostly) peace. My mom was a flyers fan growing up and they've always been one of my "other teams."

There's another post going strong here on your boards that suggests a trade for buff and montoya revolving around Mark Streit and some other crap that you don't want laying around. Nothing against Streit as a player, I've really liked him even as far back as his days with the Habs, but obviously at this point in his career, his trade value is next to nothing.

Winnipeg BADLY needs an LHD who can handle 2nd pairing commitments or better. We would like to add some depth on the wings, too. I think a trade that could benefit both teams would go something like this:

To Winnipeg:
Braydon Coburn
Wayne Simmonds
2014 4th round pick
2015 2nd round pick *conditional on flyers making the east final*

To Philadelphia:
Dustin Byfuglien

That is all.

I know there's going to be a couple homers who are going to try to tell me I'm trying to rob you blind, or that Buff is a hack. The truth is he's an all-star invitee, has been a league leader in shot attempts, and points by defensemen for the last 4 years and is on a very reasonable contract.

Why do we want to move him? We don't even a little bit want to move him, but we've got too much talent (Buff, Bogo, Trouba, Redmond, Postma) in our RHD corps to benefit from all of it. You don't want Bogo or Trouba getting 3rd pairing minutes, they're just too good.

Let me know what you guys think of this - unless of course you're going to give me a bag of pucks counter. I haven't checked how it works for cap space for either team but someone let me know if it's not workable that way.
I just think it's too much to give for Buff.

BrindamoursNose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 09:55 AM
  #3
wahoowa
All in the Game
 
wahoowa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Country: United States
Posts: 945
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by heilongjetsfan View Post
Jets fan coming in (mostly) peace. My mom was a flyers fan growing up and they've always been one of my "other teams."

There's another post going strong here on your boards that suggests a trade for buff and montoya revolving around Mark Streit and some other crap that you don't want laying around. Nothing against Streit as a player, I've really liked him even as far back as his days with the Habs, but obviously at this point in his career, his trade value is next to nothing.

Winnipeg BADLY needs an LHD who can handle 2nd pairing commitments or better. We would like to add some depth on the wings, too. I think a trade that could benefit both teams would go something like this:

To Winnipeg:
Braydon Coburn
Wayne Simmonds
2014 4th round pick
2015 2nd round pick *conditional on flyers making the east final*

To Philadelphia:
Dustin Byfuglien

That is all.

I know there's going to be a couple homers who are going to try to tell me I'm trying to rob you blind, or that Buff is a hack. The truth is he's an all-star invitee, has been a league leader in shot attempts, and points by defensemen for the last 4 years and is on a very reasonable contract.

Why do we want to move him? We don't even a little bit want to move him, but we've got too much talent (Buff, Bogo, Trouba, Redmond, Postma) in our RHD corps to benefit from all of it. You don't want Bogo or Trouba getting 3rd pairing minutes, they're just too good.

Let me know what you guys think of this - unless of course you're going to give me a bag of pucks counter. I haven't checked how it works for cap space for either team but someone let me know if it's not workable that way.
Our best D and the leading goal-scorer on our team for Buff? Not to mention the inclusion of draft pick(s)... You're not going to like the response.

wahoowa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 10:04 AM
  #4
FlyersFan61290
Registered User
 
FlyersFan61290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 8,992
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wahoowa View Post
Our best D and the leading goal-scorer on our team for Buff? Not to mention the inclusion of draft pick(s)... You're not going to like the response.
Yeah, this.

No way in hell to be frank.

FlyersFan61290 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 10:26 AM
  #5
4thline4life
The Mased God
 
4thline4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: n philly
Posts: 2,343
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wahoowa View Post
Our best D and the leading goal-scorer on our team for Buff? Not to mention the inclusion of draft pick(s)... You're not going to like the response.
But we're just being homers for not liking the proposal buff has 31 points but is -11. he's average at absolutely best playing defense. Coupled with losing our top scorer and best defenseman, this trade makes us considerably worse and not sure how OP could think otherwise.

4thline4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 10:28 AM
  #6
Prongo
Beer
 
Prongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 14,186
vCash: 500
Don't want Buff anywhere near this team(Have made this known before) and if we are offering two roster players+ anything, I rather make that+a 1st and target a big time defender. Buff doesn't give us the all around defender this team lacks.

Prongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 10:33 AM
  #7
JDinkalage Morgoone
U of South Flurrida
 
JDinkalage Morgoone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 308 Negra Arroyo Ln.
Country: Uzbekistan
Posts: 12,378
vCash: 500
I wouldn't do it.

__________________
"Help was not promised, lovely girl. Only death."
JDinkalage Morgoone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 10:44 AM
  #8
dookie88
Registered User
 
dookie88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germany
Country: Germany
Posts: 2,709
vCash: 500
I like how this guy points out that anyone not liking his proposal is a homer.

dookie88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 10:45 AM
  #9
Flyotes
DownieFaceSoftener
 
Flyotes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,090
vCash: 500
First Counter:

Coburn, B.Schenn, 2nd round pick 2014

Big Buff

Why: You get the piece you want, plus a C/LW (another desire), plus a 2nd to try to bring the value closer for a guy in a logjammed spot on your team's roster.

Flyotes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 10:47 AM
  #10
JDinkalage Morgoone
U of South Flurrida
 
JDinkalage Morgoone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 308 Negra Arroyo Ln.
Country: Uzbekistan
Posts: 12,378
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DownieFaceSoftener View Post
First Counter:

Coburn, B.Schenn, 2nd round pick 2014

Big Buff

Why: You get the piece you want, plus a C/LW (another desire), plus a 2nd to try to bring the value closer for a guy in a logjammed spot on your team's roster.
You think that highly of Byfuglien? That seems like a lot to pay to me.

JDinkalage Morgoone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 10:47 AM
  #11
Cyborg LeClair
14 28 10 16 99
 
Cyborg LeClair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,277
vCash: 400
I'd say Buff is maybe worth Simmonds+4th

But even then, I don't like Buff and his fat, lazy, defense.

Cyborg LeClair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 10:52 AM
  #12
Appleyard
Registered User
 
Appleyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Manc/Shef/Utrecht
Country: Netherlands
Posts: 7,050
vCash: 500
Seeing as Coburn is actually a better defenceman in his own zone that Buff...

And Simmonds is our topscorer since he joined us, with 56 goals (Hartnell: 53, G: 52, Jake: 49, Read: 45) and has been top 35 in the NHL in goalscoring during that time, and top 25 amongst wingers... he has only 3 less goals than Evander Kane in that time.

I think Coburn would arguably be Pegs best D man in his own zone as well... as much as he gets ragged on at times.

And then picks on top... no thanks.

No sure I would even want Buff on the Flyers fullstop.

Appleyard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 10:54 AM
  #13
Flyotes
DownieFaceSoftener
 
Flyotes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,090
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDinklage Morgoone View Post
You think that highly of Byfuglien? That seems like a lot to pay to me.
Buff is underrated a bit on this part of the board. Flyers need more transition, strong point shots, and more options on the PP (I feel they're lacking a bit of creativity on the PP).

In addition, Coburn (like Buff) has 2 years left on contract and could bolt (like Buff). Coburn is also inconsistent, as a team builder, I dislike it. Not sure I'd be willing to overpay him next contract. I'd be more willing to take the risk on Buff, who has flashes of dominance.

B.Schenn is -- everyone has an opinion....and with Laughton, don't the Flyers already have two natural centers playing wing? Flyers need winger depth, that's why I removed Simmonds (plus he's too good).

and I don't value 2nd round picks highly.

B.Schenn is honestly the piece that I would regret losing, but you have to give to get.

Flyotes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 11:01 AM
  #14
Cyborg LeClair
14 28 10 16 99
 
Cyborg LeClair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,277
vCash: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by DownieFaceSoftener View Post
Buff is underrated a bit on this part of the board. Flyers need more transition, strong point shots, and more options on the PP (I feel they're lacking a bit of creativity on the PP).

In addition, Coburn (like Buff) has 2 years left on contract and could bolt (like Buff). Coburn is also inconsistent, as a team builder, I dislike it. Not sure I'd be willing to overpay him next contract. I'd be more willing to take the risk on Buff, who has flashes of dominance.

B.Schenn is -- everyone has an opinion....and with Laughton, don't the Flyers already have two natural centers playing wing? Flyers need winger depth, that's why I removed Simmonds (plus he's too good).

and I don't value 2nd round picks highly.

B.Schenn is honestly the piece that I would regret losing, but you have to give to get.
Our biggest issue on the PP is our defenseman (Timonen, Streit) losing the puck and being too slow to prevent a shorthanded breakaway. Buff weighs 350 lbs and skates like it, he's not going to be any help.

Cyborg LeClair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 11:02 AM
  #15
OgbertTheNerd
what
 
OgbertTheNerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 1,114
vCash: 500
I wouldn't to that deal as a Flyers fan but, could you imagine Buff replacing Kimmo on the PP for next season and beyond? Giroux feeding Buff with one timers .

OgbertTheNerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 11:05 AM
  #16
Jray42
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 3,325
vCash: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by OgbertTheNerd View Post
I wouldn't to that deal as a Flyers fan but, could you imagine Buff replacing Kimmo on the PP for next season and beyond? Giroux feeding Buff with one timers .
Since buff is right handed, this is nearly impossible if you want to keep Giroux in his PP spot.

And to the OP's proposal: hell no, but thanks for the laugh

Jray42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 11:07 AM
  #17
JDinkalage Morgoone
U of South Flurrida
 
JDinkalage Morgoone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 308 Negra Arroyo Ln.
Country: Uzbekistan
Posts: 12,378
vCash: 500
If we're talking deadline, I'd be much more interested in adding a Dman a la Grossmann was a couple years ago. I'd want to try and get someone to add to the 3rd pair for a 2nd + 3rd, or something like that.

JDinkalage Morgoone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 11:08 AM
  #18
OgbertTheNerd
what
 
OgbertTheNerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 1,114
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jray42 View Post
Since buff is right handed, this is nearly impossible if you want to keep Giroux in his PP spot.

And to the OP's proposal: hell no, but thanks for the laugh
DAMN YOU!!! You just killed my dreams.

OgbertTheNerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 11:11 AM
  #19
BringBackStevens
Registered User
 
BringBackStevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 12,285
vCash: 500
I wouldn't do that trade, I wouldn't even consider it

BringBackStevens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 11:18 AM
  #20
FLYERSFAN18
Registered User
 
FLYERSFAN18's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Florida
Country: United States
Posts: 1,959
vCash: 500
IMO we should plan on keeping Giroux, Voracek, Couturier, Simmonds, Read, Laughton, the Schenns, Coburn, Morin, Ghost, and Hagg. We don't need to give up on our young players. We all knew that there would be growing pains when we traded Richards and Carter and especially when Pronger was lost for good. Im not saying that we can't trade any of those players, but they should only be traded for a #1 D. If we can get first round picks for Hartnell and/or Lecavalier you do it. If someone is crazy enough to give up value for Streit we should do it.

One defenseman I would be interested in is Ehrhoff. He is not the sexiest name to upgrade the defense, but I think we might be able to get him without giving up any of the players I named or first round picks.

The perfect trade deadline/free agency would be trading Hartnell or Lecavalier for a 1st. Then packaging that first with one of our 1st from 2014 or 2015 for Ryan. Also trading for a guy like Ehrhoff. Next season we could have:

Ryan-Giroux-Voracek
Schenn-Lecavalier-Simmonds
Read-Couturier-Downie
Raffl/McGinn-Laughton-Hall

Ehrhoff-Coburn
Grossmann-Streit
Gus-Schenn

Mason

FLYERSFAN18 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 11:39 AM
  #21
Mota
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,002
vCash: 500
Buff is not enough of an upgrade over Coburn to justify that trade. If they Flyers are going to give up key assets in a deal, it needs to be for a top tier dman like Weber. I'd rather give an arm and a leg for Weber than give an arm for Buff.

Mota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 11:42 AM
  #22
Dirty but Good
but mostly dirty
 
Dirty but Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Country: United States
Posts: 1,228
vCash: 500
Quit it with the Defense trade proposals. That was last year need.

Flyers need a top line winger before any big name d-man.

Dirty but Good is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 11:47 AM
  #23
Curufinwe
Registered User
 
Curufinwe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Country: New Zealand
Posts: 8,984
vCash: 500
That's false, the defense looks shocking next year without Kimmo. Grossmann or Schenn would be on the top pairing.

But this proposal is a bad one for Philly. We need to keep Coburn and find a strong skating offensive defenseman to play with him.

Curufinwe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 11:48 AM
  #24
flyershockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,370
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty but Good View Post
Quit it with the Defense trade proposals. That was last year need.

Flyers need a top line winger before any big name d-man.
Not unless you think Kimmo Timonen is easily replaceable in the off season. I would give strong consideration to Big Buff, but not for that package.

flyershockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2014, 11:55 AM
  #25
flyershockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,370
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curufinwe View Post
That's false, the defense looks shocking next year without Kimmo. Grossmann or Schenn would be on the top pairing.

But this proposal is a bad one for Philly. We need to keep Coburn and find a strong skating offensive defenseman to play with him.
The Flyers are really in a bind with the defense. They obviously want to give guys like Morin, Hagg, Ghost, and Alt every chance to become impact defensemen, but they're all 2-3 years away from that point, if they even get to that level. And they can't just roll with what they have for the next couple of years, not unless they no plans of being remotely competitive. But, they can't give a couple middle of the pack UFA defensemen 5-6 year deals only to watch them potentially get outplayed in 3-4 years when their prospects are ready to be big time players.

I guess the hope is that you can bring in some UFA's on shorter deals, but the better options out there want those longer deals, and they'll likely find someone to give it to them.

flyershockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.