Mark Bell is someone who is not doing well who I wanted Sather to get in the summer. He can play centre and is better at centre than the wing. He has scored 2 20 goals seasons and is only 26. He can use a change. The Sharks could use a vet scoring dman. Would this trade work?
Rangers get Bell and Davison
Sharks get Immonen, Rachunek and 2ed in 07
Believe it or no, Bell has less points than Hall, that is how bad he has been doing. But Bell with a change, can do well. He had 2 20 goal seasons on a bad Hawks team. He can play C and the wing. Bell is also physical. Rangers also get a physical dman that hits and plays tough.
Sharks get a solid prospect who should be in the NHL, a offensive dman they can use and a high draft pick.
Davison would be great too. Look at the Sharks lineup today...this folks is toughness: Parker, Hannan, Davison, Gorges, Grier, Clowe, Ville, Bell
I'm sure Bell-Davison are acquirable
The Sharks have no reason to make that deal. Bell is obviously having a terrible season, but they have no use for Immonen or the 2nd rounder pick. Rachunek isn't exactly tearing it up, either.
Regadless of how Bell is playing this season, he is by far the best player in this deal, is 26 years old, and is signed to a 3 year, fairly cheap $6M contract. Also, the Sharks have no reason to sell low, as someone pointed out.
Roszival is hurt. We have 3 for tonights game, that was my point.
ok then. but I wouldn't really consider a day-to-day injury reason enough not to make a deal. still the trades rumors involving Malik or Rachunek without at least an equal defenseman coming back baffle me a bit.