This is freaking ridiculous. We have been absolutely harmless in breaking the rules and still we have spent almost an entire period in the box. Sure, some legit, most a joke.
it's two penalties, and penalties should be called. In theory, you have a trip and a guy who embellishes the trip - that's two penalties - why not call both? If the guy doesn't dive, you have one penalty. If there isn't a hook/trip, you have a dive.
But then how do you discourage guys from diving? If they know that the worst outcome is 4-on-4 with the possibility of fooling the ref and having a 5-on-4 PP, then it makes sense to dive. There needs to be a disincentive (other than that supposed list Bettman has circulating around the NHL).
But then how do you discourage guys from diving? If they know that the worst outcome is 4-on-4 with the possibility of fooling the ref and having a 5-on-4 PP, then it makes sense to dive. There needs to be a disincentive (other than that supposed list Bettman has circulating around the NHL).
On top of that list, there is supposed to be a fine, and I thought but don't know for sure, that multiple transgressions resulted in a suspension. Guys should be embarassed for having that label attached...
In this instance you had a guy hold up or hook someone and take a penalty. You had a forward, Cullen, who embellished the call and took a dive. There are many other situations where there isn't a hook/old and a guy takes a dive and there is a man advantage. It didn't make sense to dive - if Cullen doesn't dive, his team has a 5-on4. I honestly do not know what you're trying to say.
This team is an embarassment. Hey Shanny....you going to do something anytime soon? You've been as useless as Adam Hall over the last month. If your tired tell Renney and rest up.
i think the season might be over after this loss. i wanna crunch some numbers, but im really beginning to think that the playoffs just arent going to happen no matter who we get for the last few weeks.