HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Edmonton Oilers
Notices

Justin Schultz's extension

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-26-2014, 10:36 AM
  #1
glassbangers
"I home."
 
glassbangers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UVI
Country: Finland
Posts: 2,543
vCash: 50
Justin Schultz's extension

MacTavish:

Quote:
The plan for Schultz is to look to extend him a serious offer after the deadline concludes.

“I think, with Justin, it will be after the deadline,” MacTavish said. “I’ve had some preliminary conversations with his representation and after the deadline, I think we’ll get down to more serious discussions with Justin.”
Quote:
As for whether or not MacTavish puts Schultz into the same category as Jordan Eberle, Taylor Hall and Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, in terms of contract perimeters and talent, the GM said he’s of the same skill level potentially.

“It all depends on the number on the year-to-year part of the contract. If you’re asking me, do I consider Justin Schultz in that skill level, potentially? I do. I think he’s a terrific talent. I think he’s developing and has taken significant steps this year, maybe in the last six weeks, in terms of really establishing himself as a guy that’s got a very high upside.”
http://oilers.nhl.com/club/blogpost.htm?id=26525

Schultz:

Quote:
“I don’t regret it (signing with us) at all,” he said. “Some people might find that hard to believe but I knew it wasn’t going to be immediate winning. It’s going to take some time. Maybe this year hasn’t gone as good as we all hoped for, but I know it’s going to get better around here and it’s going to be fun.”

On the contract front: “I’m pretty open to anything right now,” he said. “Obviously I want to stay here and play for a long time. With the young guys they have locked up in a matter of no time we’ll be winning. This is where I want to play and if the opportunity presents itself, that’s what will happen."
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2014/02/2...ack-of-success

IMO there's no way in hell Schultz deserves 6M per year. I'm not a fan of bridge contracts but 2yrs, 2.5M per should be the way to go. Of course if you can sign him for 6-7years at 4-4.5M I would probably do it. He has great potential but he hasn't shown anything which is even in the same ball park with 6M.

glassbangers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:38 AM
  #2
BlueChip01
Registered User
 
BlueChip01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,939
vCash: 500
They need to do a bridge contract

BlueChip01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:38 AM
  #3
Joey Moss
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Joey Moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 22,053
vCash: 226
If any of them get a bridge contract it's Schultz.. I'd look at 2 years, 2.5-3M per ish.

Joey Moss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:39 AM
  #4
oilerfan17
Registered User
 
oilerfan17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Washington, D.C.
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,907
vCash: 500
I think you're being very reasonable. I'd imagine that a bridge contract would likely come closer to $3 million, but that's a minor difference. I think that it's the right way to go. We just don't know what Schultz is worth long-term yet, whereas with the other kids it's fairly certain that they'll be worth their $6 million price tags.

oilerfan17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:44 AM
  #5
The Last Dynasty
Big #1 C
 
The Last Dynasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St. OILbert
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,681
vCash: 500
when's he a UFA?

no more than 2-years IMO

The Last Dynasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:45 AM
  #6
Fixed to Ruin
Come wit it now!
 
Fixed to Ruin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grande Prairie, AB
Posts: 6,096
vCash: 50
Bridge Contract is the only option.

He's good but he's accomplished very little at the NHL level.

I want him to have the same attitude that PK Subban has. Here's what you deserve right now. If you win a Norris or become our number 1 dman then we can talk big dollars.

We have to stop paying for the top end potential and pay for what he's worth right now. (ie. Gagner)

Fixed to Ruin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:45 AM
  #7
ManofSteel55
Registered User
 
ManofSteel55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 5,430
vCash: 500
Bridge contract, take his current salary, the bonuses he is projected to earn this year (not the total, just the ones he actually is projected to achieve), and add 5 - 10 %.

ManofSteel55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:45 AM
  #8
doulos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,735
vCash: 500
Yeah, a bridge contract seems to be the way to go. His career could go either direction right now and overpaying down the road if he performs lights out is a much better alternative than being stuck with an ugly contract for a marginal player if he doesn't fully develop.

doulos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:45 AM
  #9
Jimmi Jenkins
Always the Bards
 
Jimmi Jenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 38,372
vCash: 612
I'm thinking about 3 to 4 years, at between $3-4M per, the Cap is going up, so I could see Schultz getting about $500K-ish more then what some might see as "market" value.

Jimmi Jenkins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:45 AM
  #10
Bryanbryoil
Moderator
I Know A Thing Or 6
 
Bryanbryoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: About Winning
Posts: 50,728
vCash: 500
I'd lock him in long term right now. If he'd settle for $4.5 million or so I'd max out his term.

__________________
Treat Others As You Would Like To Be Treated
Bryanbryoil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:46 AM
  #11
CornKicker
Locked Out
 
CornKicker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,424
vCash: 50
i disagree completely, schultz has looked a bit out of sorts this year at times but when he is on his game he is an amazing player. A bridge contract will probably come back to kick us in the hole when he puts up 60pts from the back end just like Montreal is getting hacked when subbans next contract comes up. Use this weak season to lure Schultz into a 6 year 4.5 mil deal and reap the benefits for 4/6 years on that deal. we have the cap space to make a gamble here. if we bridge him at 2.5 for 2 and he lights it up like he did in the ahl we are looking in the 7-8M range to resign him.

also if we can lock him into 4.5 for 6 and he becomes elite then the d cap is set for Nurse/Marincin etc as well.

CornKicker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:47 AM
  #12
Aerchon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,459
vCash: 500
J. Shultz is a very difficult target to hit for a contract.

Such an unknown going forward.

He is 23.

Very lightweight. 185-190. Probably will never be able to put on enough muscle to be effective down low.

His college days, his AHL, and even his first 20 games or so I thought this guy could easily develop into a true #1 and almost certainly a solid #2. I think people forget how good he really was to start off with.

Right now he looks like a mid pairing guy PP specialist. Hopefully that is just a softmore slump.

He has played significantly better the last 10 games or so.

When does he hit Free Agency?

He is not worth 6 mill right now. I would say 4 is a bit steep for where he is at right now.

5 mill long term? Or give him a contract that keeps him as a RFA for cheaper?

I think I would have to gamble on him. His potential is still way up there. I think his low end is still NHL worthy. Give him 5 mill a year and sign him long term as part of "the plan".

EDIT: Wow. Seen all the people above saying long term 4.5... I am usually the cheapest person, always saying lower then the people on this board.

I don't think he signs for that little and if he did and he does reach his potential... OMFG Mac T will be considered a god for that signing.

I also think people are forgetting how much a of a premium goes with even a decent offensive defenseman in this league. Dennis Wideman makes over 5 a year for 5 years I believe and really J. Shultz should reach his level of play.


Last edited by Aerchon: 02-26-2014 at 10:55 AM.
Aerchon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:50 AM
  #13
Oiltankjob Fail
Eakins GTFO
 
Oiltankjob Fail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,034
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryanbryoil View Post
I'd lock him in long term right now. If he'd settle for $4.5 million or so I'd max out his term.
Agreed the longer we sign these young bucks now the more cap space in the future we will have for top ufa's when we are contending.

Oiltankjob Fail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:52 AM
  #14
Fixed to Ruin
Come wit it now!
 
Fixed to Ruin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grande Prairie, AB
Posts: 6,096
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryanbryoil View Post
I'd lock him in long term right now. If he'd settle for $4.5 million or so I'd max out his term.
If i was Justin Schultz agent, i would advise against this.

Fixed to Ruin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:56 AM
  #15
CornKicker
Locked Out
 
CornKicker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,424
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fixed to Ruin View Post
If i was Justin Schultz agent, i would advise against this.
and he probably should, but schultz seems pretty entangled with the young core. maybe the idea of a 6 year deal appeals to him more than potentially earning a bit more money down the road. he has to know that Marincin, Nurse, Klefbom and possibly Ekblad are coming and if he signs a bridge deal and doesnt outplay at least 3 of them he could be trade bait? hard to say, personally the comfort of a 6 year deal would be calming.

CornKicker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:56 AM
  #16
Paralyzer
Tier 13428 Oiler Fan
 
Paralyzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,542
vCash: 500
How much do you wanna bet MacT will be able to lock Schultz up for 4 years at 3.5M with a signing bonus? He'll try to compare it to Smid's contract. Then say if you want to win now, we gotta have money to buy more talent to play with you. Then in the summer, get a Dan Boyle/Andrei Markov to play with Schultz. Win-win IMO.

Paralyzer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 10:59 AM
  #17
joestevens29
Registered User
 
joestevens29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,032
vCash: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paralyzer View Post
How much do you wanna bet MacT will be able to lock Schultz up for 4 years at 3.5M with a signing bonus? He'll try to compare it to Smid's contract. Then say if you want to win now, we gotta have money to buy more talent to play with you. Then in the summer, get a Dan Boyle/Andrei Markov to play with Schultz. Win-win IMO.
How is Smid going to be a comparison?

The big issue here is we have to watch what we give Schultz as Petry is also a RFA. Could make things interesting.

joestevens29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 11:03 AM
  #18
Bryanbryoil
Moderator
I Know A Thing Or 6
 
Bryanbryoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: About Winning
Posts: 50,728
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerchon View Post
J. Shultz is a very difficult target to hit for a contract.

Such an unknown going forward.

He is 23.

Very lightweight. 185-190. Probably will never be able to put on enough muscle to be effective down low.

His college days, his AHL, and even his first 20 games or so I thought this guy could easily develop into a true #1 and almost certainly a solid #2. I think people forget how good he really was to start off with.

Right now he looks like a mid pairing guy PP specialist. Hopefully that is just a softmore slump.

He has played significantly better the last 10 games or so.

When does he hit Free Agency?

He is not worth 6 mill right now. I would say 4 is a bit steep for where he is at right now.

5 mill long term? Or give him a contract that keeps him as a RFA for cheaper?

I think I would have to gamble on him. His potential is still way up there. I think his low end is still NHL worthy. Give him 5 mill a year and sign him long term as part of "the plan".

EDIT: Wow. Seen all the people above saying long term 4.5... I am usually the cheapest person, always saying lower then the people on this board.

I don't think he signs for that little and if he did and he does reach his potential... OMFG Mac T will be considered a god for that signing.

I also think people are forgetting how much a of a premium goes with even a decent offensive defenseman in this league. Dennis Wideman makes over 5 a year for 5 years I believe and really J. Shultz should reach his level of play.
I'd go up to $5 million long term, if that's not good enough for him then I'd go for 2 years at $4 million per and then pay him at the end of that deal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oiltankjob Fail View Post
Agreed the longer we sign these young bucks now the more cap space in the future we will have for top ufa's when we are contending.
Agreed and I for one am a big fan of the kid and think that he has far from shown us the best hockey that he can play as an NHLer. When he hits his stride we will wish that we locked him up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fixed to Ruin View Post
If i was Justin Schultz agent, i would advise against this.
Fair enough, it all depends on what Justin would be happy with. I also wouldn't mind overpaying him a little for choosing us and getting us that much closer to being a competitive team.

Bryanbryoil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 11:09 AM
  #19
Paralyzer
Tier 13428 Oiler Fan
 
Paralyzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,542
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by joestevens29 View Post
How is Smid going to be a comparison?

The big issue here is we have to watch what we give Schultz as Petry is also a RFA. Could make things interesting.
Not by skill you can't compare, but you can compare by age, and how many minutes he plays per game. Same thing happened to Smid.

Paralyzer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 11:12 AM
  #20
joestevens29
Registered User
 
joestevens29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,032
vCash: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paralyzer View Post
Not by skill you can't compare, but you can compare by age, and how many minutes he plays per game. Same thing happened to Smid.
When Smid was 23 he got a two year deal at 1.3mil a year. At 25 he got yet another 2 year deal at 2.25 and then at 27 he got his 4 year 3.5mil deal.

joestevens29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 11:13 AM
  #21
Agron
BELIEVE.
 
Agron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,010
vCash: 500
6 years 6m.

Agron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 11:15 AM
  #22
Paralyzer
Tier 13428 Oiler Fan
 
Paralyzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,542
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by joestevens29 View Post
When Smid was 23 he got a two year deal at 1.3mil a year. At 25 he got yet another 2 year deal at 2.25 and then at 27 he got his 4 year 3.5mil deal.
Nvm then. I don't know what I'm talking about. Carry on.

Paralyzer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 11:21 AM
  #23
ponokanocker
Registered User
 
ponokanocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,916
vCash: 500
Eakins clearly likes what he has been seeing from him for a while now giving him #1 minutes. Call it justified or not, but he has been getting over 22min/game for quite some time, and over 25min/game for half his games lately. Maybe this has been a directive from management, maybe they just really like what they have been seeing. This is going to be an extremely difficult contract and I imagine will be a much debated one.

ponokanocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 11:22 AM
  #24
raab
Where's the Hart?
 
raab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,150
vCash: 580
Id rather overpay him in 2 years then have a 5M dman who should be bottom pairing. So in saying that id give him a 2 year deal between 2.5-3M. I would use Fransons last contract as a comparable.

raab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-26-2014, 11:24 AM
  #25
CornKicker
Locked Out
 
CornKicker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,424
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponokanocker View Post
Eakins clearly likes what he has been seeing from him for a while now giving him #1 minutes. Call it justified or not, but he has been getting over 22min/game for quite some time, and over 25min/game for half his games lately. Maybe this has been a directive from management, maybe they just really like what they have been seeing. This is going to be an extremely difficult contract and I imagine will be a much debated one.
i think if schultz shows in the last 20 games anything close to what we saw in the ahl last year then long term him.

CornKicker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.