HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Projections

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-19-2007, 01:49 AM
  #1
Inferno
HFB Partner
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 20,032
vCash: 500
Projections

thought you might be interested...
http://www.rangersreview.com


(click link for better formatting)


Quote:
How this works:

Basically what I do, is to divide the points a team has managed till now, divide it by the games played, then multiply it by 82. That should accurately project what the team should finish it, unless there is an extreme streak one way or the other.

Current
Rank Team Games Played Points PointsPerGame ProjectedFinalPoints ProjectedRank
6 Atlanta 61 69 1.1311 93 6
7 Carolina 61 67 1.0983 90 8
8 Toronto 59 66 1.1186 92 7
9 Montreal 61 66 1.0892 89 9
10 N.Y. Islanders 59 64 1.0847 89 10
11 N.Y. Rangers 59 63 1.0678 88 11
more info on the blog...


Last edited by Inferno: 02-19-2007 at 02:20 AM.
Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2007, 02:22 AM
  #2
JRGNYR
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 206
vCash: 500
Another way to look at it is comparing the Rangers with Toronto, since both have 23 games remaining. The Leafs are playing excellent hockey right now, but even if they went .500 the rest of the way (11-11-1), that'd only net them 23 more points for a total of 89. They could go 12-10-1 to get to 91. I still think the Leafs will play even better hockey than that, so then you have to start looking at what other teams will do.

Montreal is fading, 2-7-1 in their last 10. With 21 games left and 66 points currently, if they went 10-10-1 for another 21 points, that gets them to 87.

Carolina is 4-5-1 in their last 10, 67 points now with 21 games left. If they also go 10-10-1 in their last 21, they'd get to 88.

The Islanders have 23 games left and lead the Rangers by 1 point. 11-11-1 to finish the year nets them 90.

I guess my point here is, 91 is cutting it way too close. The Rangers would need the three teams ahead of them all to go .500 or worse for 91 to be a somewhat reasonable goal to get into the postseason. I think 95 points is probably closer to what the Rangers should strive for, only because you can't expect

I guess my point is, I think 91 is low, even though the extrapolation above shows that 91 seems to be the cutoff.

Frankly, I think the Rangers will need to play better than 14-9-0 hockey to get into the playoffs. Of their next 23 games and 46 possible points, I think they'll need to go somewhere like 16-6-1, or 17-5-1 to get in.


Last edited by JRGNYR: 02-19-2007 at 02:29 AM.
JRGNYR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2007, 02:25 AM
  #3
Inferno
HFB Partner
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 20,032
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRGNYR View Post
Another way to look at it is comparing the Rangers with Toronto, since both have 23 games remaining. The Leafs are playing excellent hockey right now, but even if they went .500 the rest of the way (11-11-1), that'd only net them 23 more points for a total of 89. They could go 12-10-1 to get to 91. I still think the Leafs will play even better hockey than that, so then you have to start looking at what other teams will do.

Montreal is fading, 2-7-1 in their last 10. With 21 games left and 66 points currently, if they went 10-10-1 for another 21 points, that gets them to 87.

Carolina is 4-5-1 in their last 10, 67 points now with 21 games left. If they also go 10-10-1 in their last 21, they'd get to 88.

The Islanders have 23 games left and lead the Rangers by 1 point. 11-11-1 to finish the year nets them 90.

I guess my point here is, 91 is cutting it way too close. The Rangers would need the three teams ahead of them all to go .500 or worse for 91 to be a somewhat reasonable goal to get into the postseason. I think 95 points is probably closer to what the Rangers should strive for, only because you can't expect

I guess my point is, I think 91 is low, even though the extrapolation above shows that 91 seems to be the cutoff.

Frankly, I think the Rangers will need to play better than 14-9-0 hockey to get into the playoffs. Of their next 23 games and 46 possible points, I think they'll need to go somewhere like 16-6-1, or 17-5-1 to get in.
yep, which is why these numbers will be edited on a regular basis (at least on the nights the Rangers play a game, perhaps even every day, i'll see if i can get the time to do quick updates of it) so if you want, you can check out the blog to see the projections as the season goes on. The closer to the end of the season, the closer the accuracy.

Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2007, 02:25 AM
  #4
HVPOLARBEARS19
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Country: Israel
Posts: 2,055
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to HVPOLARBEARS19 Send a message via MSN to HVPOLARBEARS19
Quote:
Originally Posted by inferno272 View Post
thought you might be interested...
http://www.rangersreview.com


(click link for better formatting)



more info on the blog...
Nice analysis. The only thing that bothers me about the projections is that basically it projects everyone to be the same. It's too mathematical. Obviously this isn't your fault at all since it is a mathematical forumla, but I just never put much stock into them. In any event, great site, I've never been there before, definately a nice suprise to say the least! Keep up the great work man.

HVPOLARBEARS19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2007, 02:29 AM
  #5
Inferno
HFB Partner
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 20,032
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HVPOLARBEARS19 View Post
Nice analysis. The only thing that bothers me about the projections is that basically it projects everyone to be the same. It's too mathematical. Obviously this isn't your fault at all since it is a mathematical forumla, but I just never put much stock into them. In any event, great site, I've never been there before, definately a nice suprise to say the least! Keep up the great work man.
well, what i try to do is to use what the team has actually done to this point as a projection of how they will end up. to me its the only sensible way of doing it. While it is just a guesstimate its still worth a look see. I guess if you did the calculation for the Habs like a month ago it would be radically different than what it is now. likewise the penguins would have been radically different as well but in the opposite direction. Like i say, theres no way to accurately predict streaks unless you want to use the real trends stats from the rodent. but those numbers are proprietary, or at least i treat his site with respect to not steal his numbers.

Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2007, 02:36 AM
  #6
JRGNYR
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 206
vCash: 500
Also if you look at what the Rangers have done this year in points per game, and how much better they'd have to perform to get into a reasonable position for the playoffs (say 92-95 points), they'd have to up their point-per-game outcome from 1.06 to better than 1.3 a game, which would be a pretty sizeable increase of about 23%.

Very mathematical, but it kind of quantifies how much better the Rangers have to play if they want a realistic shot at the 8th spot.

JRGNYR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2007, 03:04 AM
  #7
Inferno
HFB Partner
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 20,032
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRGNYR View Post
Also if you look at what the Rangers have done this year in points per game, and how much better they'd have to perform to get into a reasonable position for the playoffs (say 92-95 points), they'd have to up their point-per-game outcome from 1.06 to better than 1.3 a game, which would be a pretty sizeable increase of about 23%.

Very mathematical, but it kind of quantifies how much better the Rangers have to play if they want a realistic shot at the 8th spot.
true enough, im about to goto bed, but in future editions i will include that stat.

good call!

Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2007, 08:18 AM
  #8
HockeyBasedNYC
Registered User
 
HockeyBasedNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Here
Country: United States
Posts: 12,894
vCash: 500
Don't agree with these predictions. Sports are too unpredictable.

I bet if he did that analysis 4 or 5 weeks ago Pittsburgh would be somehere in that lower conference list. No one expected them to go 14-0-2 in their last 16.

Just as no one expected the Devils to rattle off all those wins last year to come back and take the division away.

I cant follow these models.

HockeyBasedNYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2007, 11:57 AM
  #9
Inferno
HFB Partner
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 20,032
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyBasedNYC View Post
Don't agree with these predictions. Sports are too unpredictable.

I bet if he did that analysis 4 or 5 weeks ago Pittsburgh would be somehere in that lower conference list. No one expected them to go 14-0-2 in their last 16.

Just as no one expected the Devils to rattle off all those wins last year to come back and take the division away.

I cant follow these models.


again, if you read the site, i acknowledge all that, and clearly state the projections cant account for extreme streaks.

Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2007, 12:49 PM
  #10
JRGNYR
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 206
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyBasedNYC View Post
Don't agree with these predictions. Sports are too unpredictable.

I bet if he did that analysis 4 or 5 weeks ago Pittsburgh would be somehere in that lower conference list. No one expected them to go 14-0-2 in their last 16.

Just as no one expected the Devils to rattle off all those wins last year to come back and take the division away.

I cant follow these models.
I think inferno's work is pretty good in that it takes into account what a team has done over the course of the first 60 games of the season, when the peaks and valleys of the season, in theory, average out, and you get a better overall picture of what a team has done since October.

Of course, any team who goes incredibly hot (Pit) or incredibly cold is going to defy the average of the season so far.

The main thing you need to keep in mind when reading inferno's stats is it's extrapolation, not a prediction. There is a huge difference.

JRGNYR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2007, 01:01 PM
  #11
Fish
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: New Zealand
Posts: 2,177
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRGNYR View Post
I think inferno's work is pretty good in that it takes into account what a team has done over the course of the first 60 games of the season, when the peaks and valleys of the season, in theory, average out, and you get a better overall picture of what a team has done since October.

Of course, any team who goes incredibly hot (Pit) or incredibly cold is going to defy the average of the season so far.

The main thing you need to keep in mind when reading inferno's stats is it's extrapolation, not a prediction. There is a huge difference.
I've been doing the same thing for a few years on my standings page, but ultimately I think the formula is nothing more than an interesting talking point. Generally teams fluctuate quite dramatically during the season and this can happen right up until the end of the year.

Fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-19-2007, 01:03 PM
  #12
bleedrngrblue
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fayetteville,N.C.
Country: United States
Posts: 792
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fish View Post
I've been doing the same thing for a few years on my standings page, but ultimately I think the formula is nothing more than an interesting talking point. Generally teams fluctuate quite dramatically during the season and this can happen right up until the end of the year.
Just like last year where the Rangers stunk up the ice at the end of the season! I don't want to ever see a collapse like that again!

bleedrngrblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-25-2007, 02:23 AM
  #13
Inferno
HFB Partner
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 20,032
vCash: 500
Updated Projections are being posted after every Rangers game. right now were projecting at 85 points, 7 points lower than what it should take to secure a playoff spot.

Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-25-2007, 08:32 AM
  #14
natureboy*
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 423
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bleedrngrblue View Post
Just like last year where the Rangers stunk up the ice at the end of the season! I don't want to ever see a collapse like that again!
pretty much every year.

natureboy* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.