HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
National Hockey League Talk Discuss NHL players, teams, games, and the Stanley Cup Playoffs.

Rangers Robbed of a Goal Against San Jose

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-16-2014, 10:22 PM
  #251
Clowe Me
Registered User
 
Clowe Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 530
Country: Uzbekistan
Posts: 18,603
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by capebretoncanadien View Post
That was clearly a goal. They got jobbed. Sneaky smooth by Niemi though.
No, it wasn't clearly a goal. Seeing as there wasn't any conclusive visual evidence.

Clowe Me is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 10:31 PM
  #252
sharski
Registered User
 
sharski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,373
vCash: 500
hockey gods are trolling the sharks, giving them false hope that this is the year all the good luck goes our way in the last few months of the season

i want to be leaf

sharski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 10:35 PM
  #253
GoGoSharks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Country: Iran
Posts: 433
vCash: 500
The Zapruder Vine seems to show it crossed the line.

However this goal falls into the category where you expect the ruling to stand half the time, it's pretty close and overturning the on ice call is always more difficult.

On one hand I sympathize, it is never fun when it affects the team you support (it's annoying regardless, but way more against your team).

On the other hand I don't feel that bad because SJ is "due" a couple calls, if this season is going to even out somewhat. Plus this might not even make the top 10 of bad calls during Sharks games this season (there have been quite a few, many which where significantly easier to call correctly).

GoGoSharks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 10:43 PM
  #254
Aufheben
Moderator
 
Aufheben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Victoria, BC
Country: Angola
Posts: 11,331
vCash: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by capebretoncanadien View Post
That was clearly a goal. They got jobbed. Sneaky smooth by Niemi though.
It was, but it was the right call technically. Stupid rule.

__________________

Aufheben is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 10:45 PM
  #255
Phu
Registered User
 
Phu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6,905
vCash: 500
If this wasn't a goal, that isn't even close to a goal.

http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2...tand/#comments

The review standard is way higher than most people in this thread understand. You actually have to see the puck, the line and the space, from overhead.

Phu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 11:15 PM
  #256
Arrch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NorCal
Country: United States
Posts: 4,334
vCash: 500
Right call, stupid rule.

Puck was in the net based on obvious assumptions, but the rule doesn't even allow for obvious assumptions.

Arrch is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 11:21 PM
  #257
I Am The Stig
SPACESHIP!!
 
I Am The Stig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,810
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phu View Post
The review standard is way higher than most people in this thread understand. You actually have to see the puck, the line and the space, from overhead.
What about JVR's shootout goal in Phoenix? Common sense always has to come into play. (JVR's turn is at 1:00)


I Am The Stig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 11:37 PM
  #258
Phu
Registered User
 
Phu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6,905
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by I Am The Stig View Post
What about JVR's shootout goal in Phoenix? Common sense always has to come into play. (JVR's turn is at 1:00)
called as a goal, no conclusive evidence to overturn.

not even the same call as this one.

Phu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 01:29 AM
  #259
SANTArelli25
SAMCRO
 
SANTArelli25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,123
vCash: 170
LOL that puck is so in the net it's not even funny. It comes down to common sense. The only place the puck can be there is in the net. It didn't squeak out beside the net, it's between the pad and the net, and you can see the line, which it is not on. Shocking.

SANTArelli25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 04:31 AM
  #260
giddy up
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,742
vCash: 500
Might be a bad call, but ranger fans need to take off their tin foil hats and ditch the conspiracy theories.

The league would like nothing more than for the biggest US market to have a winning team.

giddy up is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 04:36 AM
  #261
giddy up
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,742
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by High And Wide View Post
One of the worst calls in recent memory costs the Rangers the game and possibly the season.
What's with the drama?

There's no way you mean that.

By the rule book they got the call right. His about blaming richards turnover that cost them a goal?

giddy up is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 04:54 AM
  #262
sjshark91
Registered User
 
sjshark91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country:
Posts: 24,051
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SANTArelli25 View Post
LOL that puck is so in the net it's not even funny. It comes down to common sense. The only place the puck can be there is in the net. It didn't squeak out beside the net, it's between the pad and the net, and you can see the line, which it is not on. Shocking.
Uhhh no it does not.

Might want to re-check your rule book there Chief.

The puck has to 100% over the line and I have yet to see 1 piece of footage that shows the puck, the line, and the puck over it 100%.

sjshark91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 04:56 AM
  #263
jacks
Registered User
 
jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,385
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by High And Wide View Post
Replay showed the puck was in the net, across the line, and there was no doubt about it.

Proof of the goal: https://vine.co/v/MhmP17ixT2U
Actually after closer observation of this i concor that the puck was not totally across the line because Neimi has his pad pinning it against the post.You can tell this by, when Neimi pulls his pad out you can calculate the distance his pad comes out till you see the puck.The proximity would seem to be about 3 inches..So unless the NHL is now playing with an undersiged puck that was absolutely no goal as proven in this video.

NO GOAL.

jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 04:58 AM
  #264
jacks
Registered User
 
jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,385
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SANTArelli25 View Post
LOL that puck is so in the net it's not even funny. It comes down to common sense. The only place the puck can be there is in the net. It didn't squeak out beside the net, it's between the pad and the net, and you can see the line, which it is not on. Shocking.
You can see the front part of the line that it is not on.
You can't see the back part of the line in which part of the puck could be resting on.
That my friend is common sense.

jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 08:46 AM
  #265
nikonsniper*
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 901
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by giddy up View Post
Might be a bad call, but ranger fans need to take off their tin foil hats and ditch the conspiracy theories.

The league would like nothing more than for the biggest US market to have a winning team.
Quite the opposite.

The Rangers are a team that will be financially successful, and therefore prop up the rest of the league, regardless of the on-ice results.

The NHLs efforts are therefore routed to helping small markets in whatever way they can, either financially (Phoenix), or with funneling key players to teams in need (Pitt), or reversing penalties (NJD), etc.

nikonsniper* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 08:59 AM
  #266
blue425
Registered User
 
blue425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 2,271
vCash: 500
It was a **** call, however based on the rules as it was also the right call.

Sorry people but a grainy as ****, low res, 3 second clip is not conclusive proof.

blue425 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 09:03 AM
  #267
John Stamos
Watch the hair!
 
John Stamos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,422
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by High And Wide View Post
Replay showed the puck was in the net, across the line, and there was no doubt about it.

Proof of the goal: https://vine.co/v/MhmP17ixT2U
I've seen clearer pictures of Bigfoot than that.


John Stamos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 09:05 AM
  #268
blue425
Registered User
 
blue425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 2,271
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by theLongR0D View Post
I've seen clearer pictures of Bigfoot than that.

I almost spit coffee all over my laptop.

blue425 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 11:23 AM
  #269
cheap77
Go Kings!
 
cheap77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 1,911
vCash: 500
Common sense says it was in, but there is no proof that it fully crossed the line. Still a better call than meshgoal 2014.

cheap77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 11:26 AM
  #270
Chimp
Registered User
 
Chimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In my food garden.
Country: Sweden
Posts: 10,478
vCash: 500
Here's a better video for those lazy enough to not check it up themselves, but still whine about the vimeo posted in this thread was too grainy.

http://video.nhl.com/videocenter/?id=578723

Chimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 12:23 PM
  #271
Glen Sathers Cigar
Sather = Evil Genius
 
Glen Sathers Cigar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,405
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by giddy up View Post
By the rule book they got the call right. His about blaming richards turnover that cost them a goal?
Zuccarello turned the puck over. Richards hit him with a perfect pass right on his tape, Zucc took a stride and bobbled the puck fumbling it right to Couture.

Glen Sathers Cigar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 12:29 PM
  #272
Follower of Yzlam
Believe the Yzerplan
 
Follower of Yzlam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Richmond, VA
Country: United States
Posts: 9,199
vCash: 570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimp View Post
Here's a better video for those lazy enough to not check it up themselves, but still whine about the vimeo posted in this thread was too grainy.

http://video.nhl.com/videocenter/?id=578723
Still not conclusive.

Follower of Yzlam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 12:33 PM
  #273
BillR10
Registered User
 
BillR10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 439
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dactyl View Post
Rangers have to have the worst Toronto record this season
The sharks league leading 7 disallowed goals say otherwise. Wingels 5 by himself is the worst luck of all.

Honestly for those that are still complaining just check the Logan Couture should of been hat trick goal against Philly 2 weeks ago. That was by far more conclusive and still not allowed cause you couldn't clearly see 100% of the puck on the other side of the line.

BillR10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 12:45 PM
  #274
Elvis Presley
Aka #30
 
Elvis Presley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 1,262
vCash: 500
Where is the angle from inside the net?

Elvis Presley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 01:10 PM
  #275
Dactyl
LMFAO KOSTKA
 
Dactyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 7,974
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillR10 View Post
The sharks league leading 7 disallowed goals say otherwise. Wingels 5 by himself is the worst luck of all.

Honestly for those that are still complaining just check the Logan Couture should of been hat trick goal against Philly 2 weeks ago. That was by far more conclusive and still not allowed cause you couldn't clearly see 100% of the puck on the other side of the line.
I don't think Toronto has allowed a single goal for the rangers this season once it's ton to review, there's also a hell of a lot of blatant kicks going against us.

Dactyl is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.