HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Laughton and Morin lead Philadelphia Flyers Spring Top 20

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-17-2014, 01:00 PM
  #1
HF Article
Hockey's Future Staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Country:
Posts: 7,067
vCash: 500
Laughton and Morin lead Philadelphia Flyers Spring Top 20


The Philadelphia Flyers have several prospects who have demonstrated leadership, scoring ability, physicality, and good overall potential. The prospect talent is spread across the CHL, Europe, the AHL, and the NCAA.



Players like Scott Laughton, Samuel Morin, and Robert Hagg have continued to show their upside, while others like Michael Raffl and Michael Parks have turned in strong seasons to move up in the rankings. Several players have also experienced shortened seasons due to injury, including Eric Wellwood who dropped out of the top 20.

1. (1) Scott Laughton, C, 7.5B
Drafted 1st round, 20th overall, 2012

Laughton remains at the top spot because he's only improved this season and is very close to being NHL ready.… read more



More...

HF Article is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 01:39 PM
  #2
Stizzle
Registered User
 
Stizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,000
vCash: 500
These lists are always pretty bad, but Michael Parks ahead of Michael Raffl is amazing.

Stizzle is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 01:50 PM
  #3
FlyersFan61290
Registered User
 
FlyersFan61290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 8,473
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stizzle View Post
These lists are always pretty bad, but Michael Parks ahead of Michael Raffl is amazing.
Yeah that's really bad. Also MAB shouldn't be on the list at all.

FlyersFan61290 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 01:56 PM
  #4
sa cyred
Yea....the Flyers...
 
sa cyred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Traveling...
Country: Cuba
Posts: 15,372
vCash: 500
Overall I dont think it's that bad of a ranking. Glad Wilcox got some love for once. Yea Parks ahead of Raffl (why Raffl is even on the list is another story), but Parks, from most accounts had a great season. Assistant Captain for UND, 29 points in 37 games. Dont know if he is top 10, but where he is listed to 14 is a good spot for him. Also agree MAB shouldnt be on the list anymore.

sa cyred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 03:31 PM
  #5
Dirty but Good
but mostly dirty
 
Dirty but Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Country: United States
Posts: 1,131
vCash: 500
Flyers are pretty set as far as third and fourth line forwards for the years ahead if Raffl is ranked #10.

Dirty but Good is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 11:34 PM
  #6
tytech
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,355
vCash: 500
lol

Gostisbehere's defense has been a question mark. Gostisbehere was named a finalist for the league's best defensive defenseman award.

Well written

tytech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2014, 11:50 PM
  #7
LegionOfDoom91
Registered User
 
LegionOfDoom91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 13,383
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tytech View Post
Gostisbehere's defense has been a question mark. Gostisbehere was named a finalist for the league's best defensive defenseman award.

Well written
It has been a question mark, he's always been known as an offensive defensemen opposed to a two-way defender. However he did make big strides this year to round out his game at the college level.

I still think his defensive game is a valid concern for the pro level.


Last edited by LegionOfDoom91: 03-18-2014 at 12:14 AM.
LegionOfDoom91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 06:23 AM
  #8
tytech
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,355
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LegionOfDoom91 View Post
It has been a question mark, he's always been known as an offensive defensemen opposed to a two-way defender. However he did make big strides this year to round out his game at the college level.

I still think his defensive game is a valid concern for the pro level.
Yes, but to write in one sentence that he needs to improve on his D work and then the very next sentence write that he's a finalist for defensive defensemen of the year is bad writing.

tytech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 07:28 AM
  #9
BobbyClarkeFan16
Registered User
 
BobbyClarkeFan16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,895
vCash: 500
There's one line that really stood out for me where I started shaking my head. This was in the description of Laughton where I knew that obviously this guy isn't watching any of the guys play:

"The center is not extremely skilled, but he can still score and is a hard-working player who puts the team ahead of him"

Not extremely skilled. From the second half of last season until now, Laughton has put together a complete package of exceptional defensive skill to go with burgeoning offensive play. The moment he became the top center in Oshawa, his game went to a completely new level. To call him "not extremely skilled" is an insult to what he brings to the table.

BobbyClarkeFan16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 07:52 AM
  #10
FLYguy3911
Registered User
 
FLYguy3911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 4,234
vCash: 500
He's not offensively skilled, what the writer was implying, by NHL standards. It's all relative to how you look at it. He's very skilled by OHL standards as evidenced by his numbers this year. He's not a tools guy, but rather an intangibles guy.

FLYguy3911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 08:04 AM
  #11
Psuhockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,859
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLYguy3911 View Post
He's not a tools guy, but rather an intangibles guy.
Neither was Mike Richards, who's own junior coach was shocked about how productive he was at the NHL level.

Psuhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 08:17 AM
  #12
Curufinwe
Registered User
 
Curufinwe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Country: New Zealand
Posts: 7,464
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psuhockey View Post
Neither was Mike Richards, who's own junior coach was shocked about how productive he was at the NHL level.
Remember this quote from his first breakout season of 07-08?

http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog.php?post_id=11203

Quote:
"It's like he went to scoring school or something this summer," said winger Mike Knuble. "He's changed the perception of the kind of player he is. He came into the league as a checker and was going to be a leader and stuff. It's not even just his scoring. It's the opportunities he gets every night.”

Curufinwe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 08:40 AM
  #13
FLYguy3911
Registered User
 
FLYguy3911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 4,234
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psuhockey View Post
Neither was Mike Richards, who's own junior coach was shocked about how productive he was at the NHL level.
And he outscored Laughton in the OHL.


Last edited by FLYguy3911: 03-18-2014 at 08:46 AM.
FLYguy3911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 08:55 AM
  #14
Curufinwe
Registered User
 
Curufinwe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Country: New Zealand
Posts: 7,464
vCash: 500
Laughton may have just developed later. His best OHL regular season is better than any of Richards' seasons in terms of PPG. 86 in 53 versus 89 in 58.

We won't know how good a scorer Laughton will be in the NHL for at least another three or four years.

Curufinwe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 09:12 AM
  #15
RJ8812
Gunner Stahl #9
 
RJ8812's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sudbury
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,701
vCash: 769
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psuhockey View Post
Neither was Mike Richards, who's own junior coach was shocked about how productive he was at the NHL level.
and now Richards will struggle to put up 40 points and score 10 goals

RJ8812 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 09:14 AM
  #16
RJ8812
Gunner Stahl #9
 
RJ8812's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sudbury
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,701
vCash: 769
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curufinwe View Post
Laughton may have just developed later. His best OHL regular season is better than any of Richards' seasons in terms of PPG. 86 in 53 versus 89 in 58.

We won't know how good a scorer Laughton will be in the NHL for at least another three or four years.
not really. he's just doing what every 19/20 year old NHL draft pick should do in his last year of junior hockey: dominate

RJ8812 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 09:32 AM
  #17
FLYguy3911
Registered User
 
FLYguy3911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 4,234
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curufinwe View Post
Laughton may have just developed later. His best OHL regular season is better than any of Richards' seasons in terms of PPG. 86 in 53 versus 89 in 58.

We won't know how good a scorer Laughton will be in the NHL for at least another three or four years.
Mike Richards' OHL PPG numbers blow Laughton out of the water. I know people will say Laughton outproduced Richards as a 19 year old, but that is an outlier for Richards (only 43 games). Age relative to league is one of the best indicators for future success and Richards' 16 and 17 year old seasons trump Laughton's by a good margin.

FLYguy3911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 10:05 AM
  #18
Curufinwe
Registered User
 
Curufinwe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Country: New Zealand
Posts: 7,464
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ8812 View Post
not really. he's just doing what every 19/20 year old NHL draft pick should do in his last year of junior hockey: dominate
Richards didn't.

Curufinwe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 10:06 AM
  #19
BobbyClarkeFan16
Registered User
 
BobbyClarkeFan16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,895
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLYguy3911 View Post
Mike Richards' OHL PPG numbers blow Laughton out of the water. I know people will say Laughton outproduced Richards as a 19 year old, but that is an outlier for Richards (only 43 games). Age relative to league is one of the best indicators for future success and Richards' 16 and 17 year old seasons trump Laughton's by a good margin.
Chris DePiero and Gary Agnew, the previous coaches before D.J. Smith's arrival, nearly ruined Laughton. Laughton would play on average 8 to 11 minutes a night under their watch and would only see spot time on special teams.

Once Smith took over, Laughton actually got to play more and in his draft year, he went on a tear in the second half of the season. The 2012 - 2013 and 2013 - 2014 seasons were a continuation of his development.

I don't know if Laughton will ever put up the numbers that Richards put up in his best years. With that being said, I think Laughton is going to be a lot better than a 30 to 40 point third line checker. He'll be one of those guys that you can put anywhere in the lineup and he'll respond. He might end up being a better pro hockey player than he was a junior player.

BobbyClarkeFan16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 10:56 AM
  #20
StoneColdAnimal
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4
vCash: 500
Laughton has one pretty big advantage over Richards. He is a much better skater both respect to speed and how sturdy he is on his skates.

I think Laughton's offensive potential will surprise some people because of how underrated his skating seems to be by people posting on these types of threads.

StoneColdAnimal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 11:01 AM
  #21
FlyersFan61290
Registered User
 
FlyersFan61290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 8,473
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ8812 View Post
and now Richards will struggle to put up 40 points and score 10 goals
He's at 39 points now, I don't think he'll struggle to hit 40. He's third on the team in points while on a team in the bottom 5 in league scoring. He was on pace for 20g and 55pts last season. People like to make Richards' decline seem worse then it actually is for some reason.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curufinwe View Post
Richards didn't.
No, he did a year earlier though.

FlyersFan61290 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 12:51 PM
  #22
McNasty
Registered User
 
McNasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rutgers
Country: United States
Posts: 5,625
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyClarkeFan16 View Post
There's one line that really stood out for me where I started shaking my head. This was in the description of Laughton where I knew that obviously this guy isn't watching any of the guys play:

"The center is not extremely skilled, but he can still score and is a hard-working player who puts the team ahead of him"

Not extremely skilled. From the second half of last season until now, Laughton has put together a complete package of exceptional defensive skill to go with burgeoning offensive play. The moment he became the top center in Oshawa, his game went to a completely new level. To call him "not extremely skilled" is an insult to what he brings to the table.
It probably should have read "Doesn't possess elite skills".

McNasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 01:00 PM
  #23
MP92
Registered User
 
MP92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 3,272
vCash: 500
If Wayne Simmonds and Scott Hartnell can be 20/20 guys in the NHL then Laughton sure as hell can. Their junior numbers were nothing eye popping either and you can tell just by watching all three that Laughton is the most skilled by far. Now, whether he gets the minutes here to do that, that's a different argument for a different day.

MP92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 01:10 PM
  #24
LegionOfDoom91
Registered User
 
LegionOfDoom91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 13,383
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOREacek View Post
If Wayne Simmonds and Scott Hartnell can be 20/20 guys in the NHL then Laughton sure as hell can. Their junior numbers were nothing eye popping either and you can tell just by watching all three that Laughton is the most skilled by far. Now, whether he gets the minutes here to do that, that's a different argument for a different day.
Hartnell barely played in juniors since he made the jump to the NHL at 18. He was also a top 10 pick.

Simmonds is comparable though since he didn't have a big season until his last year of eligibility like Laughton.

LegionOfDoom91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-18-2014, 01:19 PM
  #25
1865
Registered User
 
1865's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chester, UK
Country: England
Posts: 9,176
vCash: 50
The rankings are one thing, another is that it's just not well written:

"Of all of Philadelphia's defensive prospects, Morin has consistently improved and could help Philadelphia's blue line, especially if he works on his offense a little bit more."

That's all over the shop.

1865 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.