HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Montreal Canadiens
Notices

Radek Bonk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-03-2007, 11:43 AM
  #1
HABS_FrEaK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 294
vCash: 500
Radek Bonk

I can't believe what I'm seeing on these boards, every single thread that talks about next years roster seems to think we have to get rid of Bonk...WTH!

He is by far our best cheking forward and he's probably been the only consistent forward on the team all year. You guys seem to think that all wee need is 3 first lines with only scoring forward and a 4th "agitator" line. Well that agitator line will never be able to compete against the top lines game in and game out. And we dont have good enough first line talent to play the against guys like Spezza - Heatley.

Point is BONK NEEDS TO STAY

HABS_FrEaK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 11:46 AM
  #2
Shabutie
Registered User
 
Shabutie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ottawa
Country: Portugal
Posts: 15,605
vCash: 500
We don't need him. Do we look any better than we did last year with Plekanec on the 3rd line?

Shabutie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 11:49 AM
  #3
zednik20
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Montreal
Posts: 281
vCash: 500
ya we really need him at 2.3 or 2.4....

someone who makes less then 1 mill can do his job...

zednik20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 11:57 AM
  #4
shimy1221*
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,122
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HABS_FrEaK View Post
I can't believe what I'm seeing on these boards, every single thread that talks about next years roster seems to think we have to get rid of Bonk...WTH!

He is by far our best cheking forward and he's probably been the only consistent forward on the team all year. You guys seem to think that all wee need is 3 first lines with only scoring forward and a 4th "agitator" line. Well that agitator line will never be able to compete against the top lines game in and game out. And we dont have good enough first line talent to play the against guys like Spezza - Heatley.

Point is BONK NEEDS TO STAY
i agree...but we should only re-sign him if he takes a slight paycut...no more than 2 mil...

shimy1221* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 12:25 PM
  #5
Teufelsdreck
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,752
vCash: 500
No one dislikes Bonk this season. The only reservation fans have about him is his salary. If he and Johnson leave, the Habs will give up even more goals than usual because they have a porous D. Plekanec is a good two-way player but he can't check big players like Sundin as well as Bonk can.

Teufelsdreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 12:27 PM
  #6
Evil Ted
Registered User
 
Evil Ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,650
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shabutie View Post
We don't need him. Do we look any better than we did last year with Plekanec on the 3rd line?
on the contrary, hes underraited Bonk, hes been one of our only consistant forwards, we will be even worse next year without him.

Pleks will be our #2 next year most likely again, we will need to probably sign atleast one more center as a UFA so I guess its up in the air.

Hes played against all the other teams top lines all season and done a great job scored some big goals, killed penaltys and is a plus player, hes worth the money. Hes worth what sammy is getting paid, he might not show up on the score sheet but he plays the checking line center role exceptionally well.


Last edited by Evil Ted: 03-03-2007 at 12:41 PM.
Evil Ted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 01:52 PM
  #7
BaseballCoach
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,600
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes View Post
No one dislikes Bonk this season. The only reservation fans have about him is his salary. If he and Johnson leave, the Habs will give up even more goals than usual because they have a porous D.
How is it not good value if your checking centre is paid $2.3M and OUTSCORES the opponents' $5M scoring centre one-on-one?

BaseballCoach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 01:55 PM
  #8
Souray44
Registered User
 
Souray44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NB, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,307
vCash: 500
He's playing well but Plekanec can do his job for 1/4 of the price. The amount of production relative to the amount of money they are making matters more than just performance in the cap world.

Souray44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 01:58 PM
  #9
franchise player
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,833
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Souray44 View Post
He's playing well but Plekanec can do his job for 1/4 of the price. The amount of production relative to the amount of money they are making matters more than just performance in the cap world.
I think it sums up everything that has to be said on the matter.

franchise player is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 02:00 PM
  #10
BaseballCoach
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,600
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Souray44 View Post
He's playing well but Plekanec can do his job for 1/4 of the price. The amount of production relative to the amount of money they are making matters more than just performance in the cap world.
I just said that! If our 3rd line centre can outscore the other teams's first line centre who earns $2Mor $3M more than him, then it is good for the team!

Now, if Plekanec at $1M (next year) can outscore other 2nd line centres, we win again!

We just need a first line centre who can be a + player.

BaseballCoach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 02:04 PM
  #11
Moester
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 947
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Moester Send a message via MSN to Moester
Quote:
Originally Posted by Souray44 View Post
He's playing well but Plekanec can do his job for 1/4 of the price. The amount of production relative to the amount of money they are making matters more than just performance in the cap world.
Yeah, but sometimes you just have to spend. You can have a borderline guy that can score 5 goals and 5 assists per year for 500k. But a guy who scores 30 goals with 30 assists isn't necessarily worth 2.5 million, he's worth more like 3.5 - 5.5 million depending on his leadership and defensive game. You can't just say production relative to salary and get a winning team. Sometimes you have to overspend for a player if he's going to score big points, and put your team over the top even if a younger player can do almost as well for a million less. Because in the NHL a little can lose you a lot of games.

Moester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 02:08 PM
  #12
HABS_FrEaK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 294
vCash: 500
Of course hes not worth 2+million. When he got that contract he was averiging about 70 points per season (if you set his production on a 82 games basis) we should be able to sign him at about 1.5 mil and thats we we need to keep him. I highly doubt anyone will offer him 2 million

HABS_FrEaK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 02:09 PM
  #13
Shabutie
Registered User
 
Shabutie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ottawa
Country: Portugal
Posts: 15,605
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HABS_FrEaK View Post
Of course hes not worth 2+million. When he got that contract he was averiging about 70 points per season (if you set his production on a 82 games basis) we should be able to sign him at about 1.5 mil and thats we we need to keep him. I highly doubt anyone will offer him 2 million
Better get informed on the Sens' board on who Bonk was playing with to get those 70 points

Shabutie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 02:13 PM
  #14
GNick42
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,427
vCash: 500
I would offer Bonk 1.5 million but not more. He is good but replaceable at the same time. If we keep him as a center and Pleks development, and Grabosky, maybe allow us to trade Koivu this summer or next trade deadline.

GNick42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 02:14 PM
  #15
Ross MacLochness
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,774
vCash: 500
If Gainey does his job this summer Bonk will have no spot on the team.

Ross MacLochness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 02:16 PM
  #16
HABS_FrEaK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 294
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shabutie View Post
Better get informed on the Sens' board on who Bonk was playing with to get those 70 points
I thinkl you misunderstood me. I'm not saying we should sign him because he could get 70 points for us (which he won't).

What I'm saying is the only reason his salary is so high is because of those years he spent playing with the big guys in Ottawa. Now we should deff be able to sign him at about 1.5mil per

HABS_FrEaK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 02:19 PM
  #17
Shabutie
Registered User
 
Shabutie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ottawa
Country: Portugal
Posts: 15,605
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HABS_FrEaK View Post
I thinkl you misunderstood me. I'm not saying we should sign him because he could get 70 points for us (which he won't).

What I'm saying is the only reason his salary is so high is because of those years he spent playing with the big guys in Ottawa. Now we should deff be able to sign him at about 1.5mil per
I don't want to go another year with;

Koivu
Plekanec
Bonk
Lapierre

Down the middle. We aren't gonna go anywhere with this crew.

Shabutie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 02:23 PM
  #18
Souray44
Registered User
 
Souray44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NB, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,307
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moester View Post
Yeah, but sometimes you just have to spend. You can have a borderline guy that can score 5 goals and 5 assists per year for 500k. But a guy who scores 30 goals with 30 assists isn't necessarily worth 2.5 million, he's worth more like 3.5 - 5.5 million depending on his leadership and defensive game. You can't just say production relative to salary and get a winning team. Sometimes you have to overspend for a player if he's going to score big points, and put your team over the top even if a younger player can do almost as well for a million less. Because in the NHL a little can lose you a lot of games.
The area we have to spend in is a #2 centre and maybe some D. We've got Pleks and he can do the 3rd line job for cheap with good production.

Souray44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 02:30 PM
  #19
HABS_FrEaK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 294
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shabutie View Post
I don't want to go another year with;

Koivu
Plekanec
Bonk
Lapierre

Down the middle. We aren't gonna go anywhere with this crew.
I agree completly but the problem there isint Bonk. Actually at the 3rd center spot he is the ONLY one who is in the right place.

We need a top 2 guy and then we can just move Pleks to the wing, or hell just put Bonk on the fourth and use him on the PK, or moe bonk to the wing. Honestly we have to many ood young players we need a strong veteran guy down the middle. Drury would be perfect...but the prob won't happen

Higgins - Koivu - Ryder
Kost - Drury - Kovalev
Samsonov - Pleks - Perez
Begin - Bonk - Latendresse

Right there you have three lines that can score with a fourth line that can play against the big guns and hit everything that moves. And if you want Lapierre in put him in place of Begin or Tender.

Of course this is all wishfull thinking that we could get Drury

HABS_FrEaK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 02:55 PM
  #20
Habs721*
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 87
vCash: 500
Totally agree with the original post.

Re-sign Bonk. (And Johnson).

Habs721* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 02:58 PM
  #21
GoHabsGO252006
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 953
vCash: 500
I like Bonk but like those before me have said where would he fit, Koivu will be back, as will Plekanec and most likely Lapierre. That leaves 1 C spot while most of us would prefer to sign a top line C to take the 1/ 2 spot and bump Plex down making our third line amazing. If such a C could not be signed i would not be opposed to bringing Bonk back.

GoHabsGO252006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2007, 03:07 PM
  #22
BaseballCoach
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,600
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoHabsGO252006 View Post
I like Bonk but like those before me have said where would he fit, Koivu will be back, as will Plekanec and most likely Lapierre. That leaves 1 C spot while most of us would prefer to sign a top line C to take the 1/ 2 spot and bump Plex down making our third line amazing. If such a C could not be signed i would not be opposed to bringing Bonk back.
Eventually, the club will have to choose between Plekanec and Koivu as the #2 centre.

BaseballCoach is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.