HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

Buffalo - Pittsburgh

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-02-2014, 08:38 AM
  #1
Bring Godard Back
Registered User
 
Bring Godard Back's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,610
vCash: 500
Buffalo - Pittsburgh

Buffalo: RFA rights to Brandon Sutter

Pittsburgh: RFA rights to Marcus Foligno

I realize that Sabre fans loves Marcus Foligno, but does Nicolas Deslauriers make him expandable? Pittsburgh needs a power-forward like Foligno. Buffalo gets a a solid shutdown centre in return. Marcel Goc makes Brandon Sutter expandable.

Bring Godard Back is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-02-2014, 08:41 AM
  #2
penguins2946*
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 23,813
vCash: 500
I don't want to move Sutter after seeing how good he is with non-ass linemates. I'll pass.

penguins2946* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-02-2014, 08:42 AM
  #3
pigpen65
Registered User
 
pigpen65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,550
vCash: 500
I don't think Buffalo fans love Foligno after this year. He was pretty terrible.

pigpen65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-02-2014, 09:14 AM
  #4
internetdotcom
11 + 15 + 19 = 666
 
internetdotcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Capital O
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,344
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to internetdotcom Send a message via Yahoo to internetdotcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket Tocchet View Post
Buffalo: RFA rights to Brandon Sutter

Pittsburgh: RFA rights to Marcus Foligno

I realize that Sabre fans loves Marcus Foligno, but does Nicolas Deslauriers make him expandable? Pittsburgh needs a power-forward like Foligno. Buffalo gets a a solid shutdown centre in return. Marcel Goc makes Brandon Sutter expandable.
Goc makes Sutter gain weight?

internetdotcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-02-2014, 09:15 AM
  #5
Malkin Mania LXXI
Registered User
 
Malkin Mania LXXI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 736
vCash: 500
I've said it all postseason, Sutter has been our most consistent guy along with Nisky and Martin. I liked him when we got him, and still do. Hopefully we can keep him and Goc and let Adams slowly disappear from the roster somehow..

Malkin Mania LXXI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-02-2014, 09:21 AM
  #6
Beerz
Registered User
 
Beerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 18,622
vCash: 500
I know they both restricted free agent said but..This is tilted pretty heavily in Sabres favor

Beerz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-02-2014, 09:23 AM
  #7
Dying Alive
Peanut Gallery
 
Dying Alive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: Ireland
Posts: 8,131
vCash: 500
Would rather keep Sutter.

Dying Alive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-02-2014, 09:24 AM
  #8
Beerz
Registered User
 
Beerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 18,622
vCash: 500
Unless Pens don't think they can afford him not sure why they'd do it

Beerz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-02-2014, 09:25 AM
  #9
Tender Rip
#Haz supa line mates
 
Tender Rip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Shanghai, China
Posts: 12,928
vCash: 500
Would love to have Foligno next to Sutter. But Sutter is worth more than him one for one.

Tender Rip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-02-2014, 09:26 AM
  #10
DoctrSteveBrule
@MouseRat_Fan
 
DoctrSteveBrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,634
vCash: 500
a center for a less talented winger? no thanks

DoctrSteveBrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-02-2014, 09:35 AM
  #11
Riptide
Moderator
 
Riptide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Yukon
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,959
vCash: 500
Wouldn't mind Marcus Foligno, however I would need more than just him to move Sutter. Now that we've gotten Sutter some decent linemates, he's been very good. Marcus Foligno alone isn't enough incentive to move Sutter, and hope we can sign Goc.

__________________
I've been looking for trouble... but trouble hasn't been cooperating!
Riptide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 11:00 AM
  #12
Sabretip
Registered User
 
Sabretip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Country: United States
Posts: 8,924
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket Tocchet View Post
Buffalo: RFA rights to Brandon Sutter

Pittsburgh: RFA rights to Marcus Foligno

I realize that Sabre fans loves Marcus Foligno, but does Nicolas Deslauriers make him expandable? Pittsburgh needs a power-forward like Foligno. Buffalo gets a a solid shutdown centre in return. Marcel Goc makes Brandon Sutter expandable.
I'm all over pursuing Sutter - and he does seem to fit the M.O. that Tim Murray referred to in "young players that are ready to assume more ice time / responsibility than they may get on current team". Sutter's size, position and defensive awareness sure would fill a hole Sabres have right now at center.

I don't know about the premise that a journeyman, role-player like Goc is automatically a lock to supplant/replace Sutter long term. He seemed to be more of a trade deadline acquisition by Shero for depth at center in the bottom 6.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beerz View Post
I know they both restricted free agent said but..This is tilted pretty heavily in Sabres favor
Agreed - which is why I'd be OK with Stewart or Adam being thrown in with Foligno, depending on whether the Pens wanted a more established winger for their top 6 to add more options on the wing or if they'd want more of an up-and-coming prospect like Adam.

If the Pens thought they might lose Niskanen and/or Orpik this summer and wanted Ehrhoff as a replacement, I'd even be OK with an Ehrhoff/Foligno package for Sutter and a draft pick.

Sabretip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 11:20 AM
  #13
penguins2946*
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 23,813
vCash: 500
Foligno and Stewart for Sutter? I would do that without any hesitation. It gives Crosby a mean SOB that can score a ton of goals and a big young forward to one day replace Kunitz. I'd be down with that, it gives us a top-9 of:

Kunitz-Crosby-Stewart
Foligno-Malkin-Neal
Bennett-Goc-Dupuis

penguins2946* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 11:35 AM
  #14
Riptide
Moderator
 
Riptide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Yukon
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,959
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabretip View Post
Agreed - which is why I'd be OK with Stewart or Adam being thrown in with Foligno, depending on whether the Pens wanted a more established winger for their top 6 to add more options on the wing or if they'd want more of an up-and-coming prospect like Adam.
I'd even be willing to slightly add to Sutter if Foligno and Stewart were coming back.

Riptide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 12:25 PM
  #15
Blitz
WANTED: Top-4 LHD...
 
Blitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Fergus, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,257
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riptide View Post
I'd even be willing to slightly add to Sutter if Foligno and Stewart were coming back.
To

LW Marcus Foligno (RFA)
RW Chris Stewart ($4.15M)
2015 4th RND pick

To

C/W Brandon Sutter (RFA)
C/W Theodor Blueger (N/A)
2014 2nd RND pick

Thoughts?

Blitz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 12:37 PM
  #16
penguins2946*
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 23,813
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blitz View Post
To

LW Marcus Foligno (RFA)
RW Chris Stewart ($4.15M)
2015 4th RND pick

To

C/W Brandon Sutter (RFA)
C/W Theodor Blueger (N/A)
2014 2nd RND pick

Thoughts?
We don't have a 2nd, and adding Blueger and a 2nd isn't "slightly adding", that's a pretty big plus. I'd do Sutter and Kuhnhackl for those 2, but not much more.

penguins2946* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 06:22 PM
  #17
Sabretip
Registered User
 
Sabretip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Country: United States
Posts: 8,924
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vokouna Maattata View Post
Foligno and Stewart for Sutter? I would do that without any hesitation. It gives Crosby a mean SOB that can score a ton of goals and a big young forward to one day replace Kunitz. I'd be down with that, it gives us a top-9 of:

Kunitz-Crosby-Stewart
Foligno-Malkin-Neal
Bennett-Goc-Dupuis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riptide View Post
I'd even be willing to slightly add to Sutter if Foligno and Stewart were coming back.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blitz View Post
To

LW Marcus Foligno (RFA)
RW Chris Stewart ($4.15M)
2015 4th RND pick

To

C/W Brandon Sutter (RFA)
C/W Theodor Blueger (N/A)
2014 2nd RND pick

Thoughts?
Adjust the draft picks...

To

LW Marcus Foligno (RFA)
RW Chris Stewart ($4.15M)
2015 3rd RND pick

To

C/W Brandon Sutter (RFA)
2014 1st RND pick

This would seem to be a fair deal that gives both teams assets they need.

Sabretip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 06:48 PM
  #18
That1Kid
Nice guy, tries hard
 
That1Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,572
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabretip View Post
Adjust the draft picks...

To

LW Marcus Foligno (RFA)
RW Chris Stewart ($4.15M)
2015 3rd RND pick

To

C/W Brandon Sutter (RFA)
2014 1st RND pick

This would seem to be a fair deal that gives both teams assets they need.
I don't know about that, I mean, I like that more than the previous trade, but a 1st is a bit too steep considering Stewart will be a UFA after next season. If you changed that 2015 3rd to a 2014 2nd (don't you guys have 3 this year?), I'd do it.

That1Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 07:26 PM
  #19
Djp
Registered User
 
Djp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle,WA
Posts: 7,852
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabretip View Post
Adjust the draft picks...

To

LW Marcus Foligno (RFA)
RW Chris Stewart ($4.15M)
2015 3rd RND pick

To

C/W Brandon Sutter (RFA)
2014 1st RND pick

This would seem to be a fair deal that gives both teams assets they need.
Buffalo's 2015 3rd belongs to Washington. Their 3rd could be available this year if the miller deal doesn't trigger.

As for the deal......nothing against Sutter...I don't think Buffalo needs him when they have Larsson, Compher, Girgensons who all project to a similar role.

Stewart +3rd will get a 1st. This still reverts back to Foligno for Sutter.

Djp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 07:36 PM
  #20
ZeroPT*
He's comin for us!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,475
vCash: 50
Is there a way to keep Foligno and still make the Stewart for Sutter trade?

ZeroPT* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 07:45 PM
  #21
That1Kid
Nice guy, tries hard
 
That1Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,572
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroPT View Post
Is there a way to keep Foligno and still make the Stewart for Sutter trade?
Well ideally we'd like to get 2 roster players for 1, Folingo and Stewart both being power forwards is something we really need. Stewart+a forward prospect with top 6 potential maybe? What's the deal with Joel Armia? He didn't exactly light the AHL on fire this year by looking at his stats. Surely he's still more valuable than Foligno, but would you have any interest in Sutter and a 2014 1st (we'd add more if we needed to) for Stewart and Armia? Or if you have any other forward prospects with top 6 potential I'd definitely be interested in them.

That1Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 07:58 PM
  #22
tsujimoto74
Moderator
 
tsujimoto74's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Rochester
Country: United States
Posts: 11,217
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by That1Kid View Post
Well ideally we'd like to get 2 roster players for 1, Folingo and Stewart both being power forwards is something we really need. Stewart+a forward prospect with top 6 potential maybe? What's the deal with Joel Armia? He didn't exactly light the AHL on fire this year by looking at his stats. Surely he's still more valuable than Foligno, but would you have any interest in Sutter and a 2014 1st (we'd add more if we needed to) for Stewart and Armia? Or if you have any other forward prospects with top 6 potential I'd definitely be interested in them.
Buffalo really isn't in a position to give away forwards with that level of talent/skill.

tsujimoto74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 08:02 PM
  #23
Riptide
Moderator
 
Riptide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Yukon
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,959
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroPT View Post
Is there a way to keep Foligno and still make the Stewart for Sutter trade?
Yes and no. Issue with that is he's a young big RFA who's been good vs a guy with 1 yr left on his deal. If he does well here, his value goes up and we may not be able to afford to re-sign him. If he does poorly, he walks and we lost Sutter for 1 yr of Stewart. And we'd still have to find a #3c.

And looking over the roster, I don't really see anyone other than Foligno that interests me. There's some nice forward prospects, but I don't see Buffalo going there.

Riptide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 08:18 PM
  #24
Extra Texture
Slurpy in the house
 
Extra Texture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: This is OUT HOUSE!!!
Country: Sark
Posts: 3,342
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vokouna Maattata View Post
I don't want to move Sutter after seeing how good he is with non-ass linemates. I'll pass.
Ditto, and I have never understood why he was often mentioned in trade proposals (from a Pitt perspective) even before the postseason.

I know he isnt exactly a star, but I love his all around game, and I think he can be an important cog for this team for a long time.

Extra Texture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 08:26 PM
  #25
ZeroPT*
He's comin for us!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,475
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riptide View Post
Yes and no. Issue with that is he's a young big RFA who's been good vs a guy with 1 yr left on his deal. If he does well here, his value goes up and we may not be able to afford to re-sign him. If he does poorly, he walks and we lost Sutter for 1 yr of Stewart. And we'd still have to find a #3c.

And looking over the roster, I don't really see anyone other than Foligno that interests me. There's some nice forward prospects, but I don't see Buffalo going there.
Fair enough. I'd rather not give up Foligno as I think he can be an essential piece to the puzzle down the road (bottom 6 bruiser) and those prove to be ever so valuable, but for Sutter I'd likely pull the trigger on that.

2015 pick (McDavid,Barzal,Eichel)
Reinhart/Bennett
Sutter

and we would still have Larsson,Grigorenko and Girgensons as natural C's.
Insane depth

ZeroPT* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.