HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
National Hockey League Talk Discuss NHL players, teams, games, and the Stanley Cup Playoffs.

Interference on Lundqvist on 2nd goal

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-02-2014, 08:34 PM
  #1
illpucks
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,862
vCash: 500
Interference on Lundqvist on 2nd goal

It's a joke that this is not reviewable. Discredits the league and the sport.

illpucks is online now  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:35 PM
  #2
Ogrezilla
Nerf Herder
 
Ogrezilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 34,608
vCash: 500
that wasn't interference. If interference was reviewable, that would still be a goal.

Ogrezilla is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:36 PM
  #3
Snippit
Registered User
 
Snippit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 983
vCash: 500
I guarantee you that was not interference.

Snippit is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:36 PM
  #4
Corporal Komarov
Kadri's BFF
 
Corporal Komarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,218
vCash: 850
Refs make bad call, more at 11.

Corporal Komarov is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:36 PM
  #5
illpucks
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,862
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ogrezilla View Post
that wasn't interference.
Malkin's stick pushed Lundvist's glove into the post. He was not allowed to make the save.

illpucks is online now  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:36 PM
  #6
JCLiponfanboy*
Kubalik For Calder
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,842
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ogrezilla View Post
that wasn't interference. If interference was reviewable, that would still be a goal.
His glove was knocked out of the way, it may not be interference but it shouldn't be a goal

JCLiponfanboy* is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:37 PM
  #7
bigkam
Registered User
 
bigkam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 372
vCash: 500
Actually thought Henrik moved the wrong way on the puck and initiated the contact. I've seen worse situations not called.

bigkam is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:37 PM
  #8
hersky77
Registered User
 
hersky77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,549
vCash: 500
The only way that is interference is if lundqvist has eyes in the back of his head. Had zero chance of making the save anyways.

hersky77 is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:37 PM
  #9
M Gaz
Drink to me
 
M Gaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 2,160
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ogrezilla View Post
that wasn't interference. If interference was reviewable, that would still be a goal.
Malkin got Lundqvist in the arm with the stick. Should've been disallowed right then and there.

M Gaz is online now  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:37 PM
  #10
Bergeron47
Registered User
 
Bergeron47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 7,962
vCash: 500
Lunqvist clearly had no idea where the puck was. And Malkin's contact didn't affect that.

Bergeron47 is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:37 PM
  #11
Swept In Seven
Disciple of The Zook
 
Swept In Seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 9,421
vCash: 500
Shouldn't have counted, just a bad call

Swept In Seven is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:38 PM
  #12
Insta
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Insta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,628
vCash: 500
This was the incidental contact on a loose puck rule that some people misapplied on that crazy LA goal.

Insta is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:39 PM
  #13
Sky Valley
Registered User
 
Sky Valley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Athens, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,901
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Sky Valley
it wasn't interference just like Malkin pushing Bernier into the net to shoot the puck out from under him wasn't interference

Sky Valley is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:39 PM
  #14
lastcupever75
NY Roadkill
 
lastcupever75's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,419
vCash: 500
pass interference on lunquist.

interfered w/ malkin stick away from the puck

lastcupever75 is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:39 PM
  #15
Ogrezilla
Nerf Herder
 
Ogrezilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 34,608
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by M Gaz View Post
Malkin got Lundqvist in the arm with the stick. Should've been disallowed right then and there.
nope the puck was already behind him and it didn't have any effect on his ability to make a save.

Ogrezilla is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:40 PM
  #16
Blackhawkswincup
Global Moderator
 
Blackhawkswincup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Country: United States
Posts: 111,161
vCash: 50
The puck was already on way down back of Lundqvist when contact was made and was going in

Also Lundy had no clue of location of puck at time and wouldn't have stopped it

Good goal

Blackhawkswincup is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:40 PM
  #17
Swingit
Registered User
 
Swingit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 46
vCash: 500
That's a goal. Would've been a different story if Lundqvist actually knew where the puck was and then couldn't move his arm there because of Malkin.

(I don't know the rules -- I just think it should be like that)

Swingit is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:40 PM
  #18
AJRAYMOND
Registered User
 
AJRAYMOND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 234
vCash: 500
Lundqvist had zero idea where the puck was. Malkin barely touched his glove which had zero influence on the goal. In other news the sky is blue and Greg Millen's a knob.

AJRAYMOND is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:40 PM
  #19
Novak Djokovic
MARC METHOT's #1 FAN
 
Novak Djokovic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,618
vCash: 500
Good call. No interference there, IMO.

Novak Djokovic is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:41 PM
  #20
nikonsniper*
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 901
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergeron47 View Post
Lunqvist clearly had no idea where the puck was. And Malkin's contact didn't affect that.
That means precisely zero. Goalie Interference is not dependant on if a puck goes in the net or not.

nikonsniper* is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:41 PM
  #21
Spearmint Rhino
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,743
vCash: 500
Have seen much less called interference, NHL needs to address this in the offseason, becoming the new toe in the crease fiasco

Spearmint Rhino is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:41 PM
  #22
DoubleA45
Registered User
 
DoubleA45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 97
vCash: 500
Looked more like lundquist initiated contact with milk in to try and stop him from batting in the puck.


Last edited by DoubleA45: 05-02-2014 at 08:43 PM. Reason: malkin not milk! dawn you auto correct on my phone!
DoubleA45 is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:42 PM
  #23
lastcupever75
NY Roadkill
 
lastcupever75's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,419
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleA45 View Post
Looked more like lundquist initiated contact with milk in to try and stop him from batting in the puck.
agreed

lastcupever75 is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:42 PM
  #24
sandysan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,383
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by illpucks View Post
Malkin's stick pushed Lundvist's glove into the post. He was not allowed to make the save.
So he was going to make a save by divining where the puck was? he had no idea where the puck was, his only hope was that it was hit by a stick and it was not.

sandysan is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:42 PM
  #25
nikonsniper*
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 901
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleA45 View Post
Looked more like lundquist initiated contact with milk in to try and stop him from batting in the puck.
Yes, he was more interested in Malkins stick then trying to get to the puck. Makes sense.

nikonsniper* is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.