HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

Joe Pavelski to PIT

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-03-2014, 03:24 PM
  #26
Country Mac
Violent Gents Unite
 
Country Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Country: Israel
Posts: 1,252
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SJSharks39 View Post
I personally like the Pouliot+1st+Sutter's rights. I think that Sutter could give us a 3rd line center at the right price and adding a 1st and a top D prospect on top of that. I think that would set the Sharks up best for the future.
I'd even add to that package for Pavs if we could get another forward with him. It could be huge for SJ in the long run. They get a top end lefty OFD/PMD/PPQB prospect who could step into the NHL as early as next year and they would be the best spot for Brandon Sutter. We've seen what he can do with good wingers, imagine what he can do with good wingers and a competent coach.

I'd love something like Pouliot + Sutter's RFA rights + Despres + 1st for Pavelski + Wingels + Torres?

Thins out our LD pool but it would be for good cause.

Country Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 03:28 PM
  #27
Leidi J
Registered User
 
Leidi J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Country: United States
Posts: 3,925
vCash: 500
^ hahahaha no way. Sorry. That's our entire third line we're trading away. I've seen what this Sharks team looks like with horrendous bottom six depth and it's gross. There are other paths to improving the defense that don't involve gutting the forward group. Not to mention that's not enough for those three guys. Could probably get more trading them seperately if the Sharks were inclined to do something like that.

Leidi J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 03:53 PM
  #28
Juxtaposer
Window: Closed
 
Juxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bay Area
Country: United States
Posts: 34,529
vCash: 50
Maatta or Bennett or no deal. Sorry. Pavelski got MVP votes. I won't sell him for anything less than full value.

Juxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 03:58 PM
  #29
Coy
Registered User
 
Coy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: SF
Country: United States
Posts: 2,150
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
Maatta or Bennett or no deal. Sorry. Pavelski got MVP votes. I won't sell him for anything less than full value.
I don't even think we would move him for Bennett unless there was another significant piece coming back.

Coy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 03:59 PM
  #30
Juxtaposer
Window: Closed
 
Juxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bay Area
Country: United States
Posts: 34,529
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coy View Post
I don't even think we would move him for Bennett unless there was another significant piece coming back.
Personally, I think Bennett is a potential star. The caveat with him would be his injury history.

Juxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 03:59 PM
  #31
CanadianSharks
Registered User
 
CanadianSharks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,478
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glass Beauns View Post
I'd even add to that package for Pavs if we could get another forward with him. It could be huge for SJ in the long run. They get a top end lefty OFD/PMD/PPQB prospect who could step into the NHL as early as next year and they would be the best spot for Brandon Sutter. We've seen what he can do with good wingers, imagine what he can do with good wingers and a competent coach.

I'd love something like Pouliot + Sutter's RFA rights + Despres + 1st for Pavelski + Wingels + Torres?

Thins out our LD pool but it would be for good cause.
No dice. Take out Wingels and we'd think about it, but that's a bit of an overpayment then.

CanadianSharks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 04:00 PM
  #32
CanadianSharks
Registered User
 
CanadianSharks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,478
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
Maatta or Bennett or no deal. Sorry. Pavelski got MVP votes. I won't sell him for anything less than full value.
Not interested in Bennett unless it's at a great price. I'd rather satisfy a real and pressing need for this team.

CanadianSharks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 10:22 PM
  #33
iFishyHD
#KesselWatch DONE
 
iFishyHD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: United States
Posts: 5,745
vCash: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leidi J View Post
^ hahahaha no way. Sorry. That's our entire third line we're trading away. I've seen what this Sharks team looks like with horrendous bottom six depth and it's gross. There are other paths to improving the defense that don't involve gutting the forward group. Not to mention that's not enough for those three guys. Could probably get more trading them seperately if the Sharks were inclined to do something like that.
Don't worry, you can keep Torres.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
Maatta or Bennett or no deal. Sorry. Pavelski got MVP votes. I won't sell him for anything less than full value.
Pouliot? I understand though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
Personally, I think Bennett is a potential star. The caveat with him would be his injury history.
I do too. I think I am one of the few Pens fans to think so though.

iFishyHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 10:29 PM
  #34
iFishyHD
#KesselWatch DONE
 
iFishyHD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: United States
Posts: 5,745
vCash: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by magic school bus View Post
No thanks. Would maybe consider it if Pouliot was more proven . And that Letang trade isn't even close
Pouliot has looked really good this year in the CHL. I understand its the CHL, but just to say is he is nothing is a little bit underestimating.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 66-29-33 View Post
Man, i think posters rather have a 7th round pick then Letang now.
I know wright, its crazy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big McLargehuge View Post
For what it's worth, the doctors have already cleared him saying that he's at no more of a risk for another one than anyone else. The odds of Letang suffering another stroke during his playing career are just as high as the odds of Joe Pavelski suffering one.


I still think it submarines his trade value for at least a year, though.
I think you really hit the nail on the head there McLarge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadienShark View Post
Pass from SJ. Not really interested in Letang, especially at the cost of Pavelski. We'd be after Maatta+ more likely, but not sure if that would appeal to Pittsburgh.
Maatta with another piece? That's funny .
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnicks17 View Post
I feel like it would make more sense for the Sharks to move Thornton for some kind of defenseman and hang onto Pavelski.
Sharks wouldn't move Thorton.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarleauApologist View Post
He still has a good chance of another head injury, as he has a decent concussion history. He's missed over 100 games the past 3 seasons with head issues. I understand what a stroke is, and that he is unlikely to have another one, but it is still a massive red flag for any team.

Burns for Letang was proposed earlier and could potentially help both teams. But Pavelski for Letang is awful for us.

edit: just read Leidi J's post. I forgot to mention the contract, 8 more years at 7 million for a guy who has an injury history and is a serious risk.
Check McLarges post up there. But I cant say your completely wrong. He just plays a reckless style of play and finds him self in awkward positions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coy View Post
It would have to be Maatta for the Sharks to consider it in my opinion.
I think Despres or Pouliot would do enough for you guys.

iFishyHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 10:32 PM
  #35
iFishyHD
#KesselWatch DONE
 
iFishyHD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: United States
Posts: 5,745
vCash: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadienShark View Post
Not interested in Bennett unless it's at a great price. I'd rather satisfy a real and pressing need for this team.
I dont think Bennett is a fit for you guys. You should be fine with Burns and Havlat (or somebody better if he gets bought out).
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadienShark View Post
No dice. Take out Wingels and we'd think about it, but that's a bit of an overpayment then.
Wingels would be a great fit for the Pens.

iFishyHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 10:33 PM
  #36
edbrubaker*
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 581
vCash: 500
Letang is an absolute nightmare in his own end and extreme soft in puck battles. Why would SJS trading their best center for him?

edbrubaker* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 10:43 PM
  #37
iFishyHD
#KesselWatch DONE
 
iFishyHD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: United States
Posts: 5,745
vCash: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by edbrubaker View Post
Letang is an absolute nightmare in his own end and extreme soft in puck battles. Why would SJS trading their best center for him?
They get a PMD to let Boyle walk.

iFishyHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 10:51 PM
  #38
Srsly
Registered User
 
Srsly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kingston
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,228
vCash: 500
Sure why not. The Pens already have arguably the best Canadian and the best Russian centers in the league on their team. Let's toss them a candidate for the best american center as well.

Shouldn't they be targeting an actual winger instead?

Srsly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 10:53 PM
  #39
iFishyHD
#KesselWatch DONE
 
iFishyHD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: United States
Posts: 5,745
vCash: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Srsly View Post
Sure why not. The Pens already have arguably the best Canadian and the best Russian centers in the league on their team. Let's toss them a candidate for the best american center as well.

Shouldn't they be targeting an actual winger instead?
Sharks fans feel free to correct me, but hasn't he been playing on Coutures wing all year?

iFishyHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 11:21 PM
  #40
Gilligans Island
Registered User
 
Gilligans Island's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF/Bay Area
Posts: 10,107
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by iFishyHD View Post
Sharks fans feel free to correct me, but hasn't he been playing on Coutures wing all year?
He was on Thornton's wing. On Crosby's wing, he'd have scored 50 :-)

Gilligans Island is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 11:49 PM
  #41
JayP812
The Team of Tomorrow
 
JayP812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bay Area
Country: United States
Posts: 6,461
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by iFishyHD View Post
They get a PMD to let Boyle walk.
We're gonna let Boyle walk anyway because he's garbage.

I wouldn't do Pavelski for Letang, but I would offer Burns+.

JayP812 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 11:54 PM
  #42
That1Kid
suh dude
 
That1Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,526
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayP812 View Post
We're gonna let Boyle walk anyway because he's garbage.

I wouldn't do Pavelski for Letang, but I would offer Burns+.
Burns and Wingels for Letang?

That1Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-03-2014, 11:58 PM
  #43
HaleyDestroyedNurse
2 People
 
HaleyDestroyedNurse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 17,185
vCash: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by That1Kid View Post
Burns and Wingels for Letang?
We really need Wingels for our bottom six, and Letang's contract is just, ugh... Maybe Burns + a pick (2nd/3rd?)

HaleyDestroyedNurse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-04-2014, 12:00 AM
  #44
That1Kid
suh dude
 
That1Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,526
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DylanTheGinge View Post
We really need Wingels for our bottom six, and Letang's contract is just, ugh... Maybe Burns + a pick (2nd/3rd?)
Burns and Wingels for Letang and a 3rd? Not really interested in a late 2nd/3rd for a Burns/Letang swap.

That1Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-04-2014, 12:03 AM
  #45
HaleyDestroyedNurse
2 People
 
HaleyDestroyedNurse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 17,185
vCash: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by That1Kid View Post
Burns and Wingels for Letang and a 3rd? Not really interested in a late 2nd/3rd for a Burns/Letang swap.
Sorry then, no deal is to be made on that basis. Wingels is our lunch pale forward who can chip in key goals. Not looking to trade him at all.

HaleyDestroyedNurse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-04-2014, 12:32 AM
  #46
Groo
Crazy 88
 
Groo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: surfingarippleofevil
Country: Ukraine
Posts: 827
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DylanTheGinge View Post
We really need Wingels for our bottom six, and Letang's contract is just, ugh... Maybe Burns + a pick (2nd/3rd?)
No thanks.

Groo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-04-2014, 01:02 AM
  #47
Malkin112*
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Country: Finland
Posts: 2,359
vCash: 500
Pavelski and Burns for Letang, Sutter and Pouliot

Malkin112* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-04-2014, 01:05 AM
  #48
Gilligans Island
Registered User
 
Gilligans Island's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF/Bay Area
Posts: 10,107
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malkin112 View Post
Pavelski and Burns for Letang, Sutter and Pouliot
What in the world?

Take out Letang, and we'll take out one of our players.

Gilligans Island is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-04-2014, 01:06 AM
  #49
Honour Over Glory
Registered User
 
Honour Over Glory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: North America
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 18,048
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DylanTheGinge View Post
Nope, to the first one, would want something like what you are offering for Kesler.
Do NOT want to be stuck with Letang's contract. Value isn't bad though. 2nd one I may take.
I would never, ever ever eeeeever, move any of those packages for Kesler.

For Pavelski, I would.

I'll move that kind of package for the superior player any day. Kesler is not that superior player. Little Joe, most definitely.

I love the idea of Pouliot, but Pavelski on the Pens? Yessir.

Honour Over Glory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-04-2014, 01:13 AM
  #50
Honour Over Glory
Registered User
 
Honour Over Glory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: North America
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 18,048
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilligans Island View Post
He was on Thornton's wing. On Crosby's wing, he'd have scored 50 :-)
Not really, I hate that assumption. But I do like the idea of Burns on the Pens but the only way that could happen is if this went down...


Pascal Dupuis + Kris Letang for Brent Burns + ...not even sure what that + would be right now looking at that Sharks roster. They really can not afford to give up any of their young players, that roster is not as good as I thought, damn.

Honour Over Glory is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.