What Type of player should the Rangers Target on Draft Day?
View Poll Results: Who should be target on draft day (In the 1st round)
High Risk/High Reward Forward
61 64.21%
A Safe Pick - Forward
23 24.21%
Defensive Defenseman
8 8.42%
Offensive Defenseman
2 2.11%
Goalie
1 1.05%
06-10-2007, 08:19 PM
#26
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 20,486
Wouldn't mind seeing..
a centerman with size and skill.
06-10-2007, 10:38 PM
#27
Fire Torts Hire Tort
Join Date: Dec 2003
Country:
Posts: 9,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by
barrel_master
Ha ha, but my opinion IS best player avalible.
yeah, me too
06-11-2007, 05:51 AM
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Danbury, CT
Country:
Posts: 13,137
.
I think it's time that we start looking at those players that can really be boom or bust.
06-11-2007, 06:38 AM
#29
Unsatisfied
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,917
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Thomas Luke
I think it's time that we start looking at those players that can really be boom or bust.
If that's the route the Rangers intend to go, (which I have no problem with them doing), then I think they should target a kid like Max Pacioretty, (who's getting compared to Erik Cole), or a raw talent like Pat White, who looks to be a fast riser.
But, again, if Petrecki's on the board, I'd have a hard time passing him up.
Last edited by jas: 06-11-2007 at 07:38 AM .
06-11-2007, 06:56 AM
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Country:
Posts: 1,448
That's a pity, that NYR haven't TOP 3 pick on this draft
Voracek could be ideal player for NYR - (he is from the same town and club as JJ #68)
For many czech people who know him, he looks similar to JJ (maybe not so good, but who knows
)
And can you imagine next season, how JJ is teaching Voracek how to play on the RW in NYR
Last edited by Mirinho: 06-11-2007 at 07:28 AM .
06-11-2007, 07:25 AM
#31
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ATLANTARANGER
Didn't we do this already? See Huge Jessiman
Damn, man! The first rule of HF is 'We DO NOT talk about Huge Specimen." The second rule of HF is "We DO NOT talk abotu Huge Specimen!"
06-11-2007, 07:40 AM
#32
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NYC
Country:
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ATLANTARANGER
Didn't we do this already? See Huge Jessiman
Don't be surprised to see us draft Colton Gillies, who by the way is NOT Hugh Jessiman.
That is not a shot at Jessiman, just that they are different players.
I want a high risk/high reward forward(includes the above name) or a defenseman like Petrecki
06-11-2007, 07:46 AM
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 328
Quote:
Originally Posted by
inferno272
baranka, tyutin, girardi, staal, sauer, sanguinetti, etc..
James Marcou with one of those 7 rnd picks
06-11-2007, 11:37 AM
#34
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 10,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DarthSather99
Don't be surprised to see us draft Colton Gillies, who by the way is NOT Hugh Jessiman.
Id take Colton Gillies. He has size and gets alot of pim so I assume he is physical. Played with Bahensky in the WHL.
06-11-2007, 11:55 AM
#35
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Long Beach, NY
Country:
Posts: 6,871
would love to move up to like 7 to grab Voracek
06-11-2007, 12:46 PM
#36
13 all year long
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BKLYN, NYC
Posts: 22,520
BPA. Always.
06-11-2007, 12:47 PM
#37
13 all year long
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BKLYN, NYC
Posts: 22,520
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nich
would love to move up to like 7 to grab Voracek
Unfortunately he'd be gone by then. He's a top 5 pick at the least.
06-11-2007, 12:54 PM
#38
Fire Torts Hire Tort
Join Date: Dec 2003
Country:
Posts: 9,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RCallahan43
Played with Bahensky in the WHL.
which is obviously a huge plus.
06-11-2007, 01:02 PM
#39
13 all year long
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BKLYN, NYC
Posts: 22,520
Quote:
Originally Posted by
-31-
which is obviously a huge plus.
He deserved that
06-11-2007, 01:07 PM
#40
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 10,761
Would Gillies last till the 2ed round??
06-11-2007, 01:35 PM
#41
Good luck charm
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Montana
Country:
Posts: 10,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RCallahan43
Id take Colton Gillies. He has size and gets alot of pim so I assume he is physical. Played with Bahensky in the WHL.
We already have one Colton on this team that takes a bunch of PIM's....
06-11-2007, 04:42 PM
#42
Chairman Mao-rilyn
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Country:
Posts: 57,431
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RCallahan43
Would Gillies last till the 2ed round??
If Gillies lasted until the 2nd round, I wouldn't mind them moving up for him and using him as a defenseman. He played it a bit this year and really looked good as a defensive d-man.
__________________"Of course giving Sather cap space is like giving teenagers whiskey and car keys." - SBOB"Watching Sather build a team is like watching a blind man with no fingers trying to put together an elaborate puzzle." - Shadowtron
06-11-2007, 04:56 PM
#43
13 all year long
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BKLYN, NYC
Posts: 22,520
Gillies and Sutter won't make it past the first round.
06-11-2007, 05:03 PM
#44
Chairman Mao-rilyn
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Country:
Posts: 57,431
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bluenote13
Gillies and Sutter won't make it past the first round.
I think both really have the ability to fall out of the 1st. Although if Sutter falls to Calgary's pick, they will probably take him unless they want to disown him from the family or something.
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 PM .
monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
)
