HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Glencross to Boston

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
01-27-2013, 10:59 PM
  #51
King Of The North
Jankowski Is Coming
 
King Of The North's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hamilton, On
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,946
vCash: 500
Top 6 wingers is not what Boston needs and goalie prospects isn't the highest priority right now in Calgary.

King Of The North is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 12:47 AM
  #52
Flames Fanatic
Flames Fanowski
 
Flames Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,140
vCash: 500
Can we just agree that the Value is more than fair but both teams decline for reasons beaten to death already in this thread. Or is that too logical for HF?

Flames Fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 12:59 AM
  #53
unifiedtheory
Registered User
 
unifiedtheory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Burnaby, B.C.
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,726
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Dion View Post
I don't see 4 wingers better than Glencross in your line up. Lucic is the only one I see who is better. You might be able to make a case for Marchand, but I'd disagree. No one else is even close to as good.
Marchand, Seguin and Lucic are all better and a healthy Horton is better.

Glencross is a 3rd line winger on this Boston team. We are not paying that price for a 3rd line winger.

I'm not giving up Khokhlachev and Subban (our only goaltending prospect) for Glencross. I do like him as a player though and he has a nice contract. It is not the right fit for the Bruins though as they are currently constructed.

All that said, if they flipped a center (Krejci, which I don't want) and had to move Seguin to center there would be a big hole on the wing and Glencross would fit perfectly. I don't want to give up Khokhlachev though.

unifiedtheory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 01:09 AM
  #54
Flames Fanatic
Flames Fanowski
 
Flames Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,140
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by unifiedtheory View Post
Marchand, Seguin and Lucic are all better and a healthy Horton is better.

Glencross is a 3rd line winger on this Boston team. We are not paying that price for a 3rd line winger.

I'm not giving up Khokhlachev and Subban (our only goaltending prospect) for Glencross. I do like him as a player though and he has a nice contract. It is not the right fit for the Bruins though as they are currently constructed.

All that said, if they flipped a center (Krejci, which I don't want) and had to move Seguin to center there would be a big hole on the wing and Glencross would fit perfectly. I don't want to give up Khokhlachev though.
I knew the day would finally come where you and I disagree unified. Most of the time I go into a thread and get steamed and ready to fire off a post and then I'll come across your post which usually nails what I would say. That and I then have fun zoning out to your avatar.

I love Marchand. Hell, I'm probably one of the few people in Calgary that has a Marchand jersey. But I'd be pretty hard up to just say that Marchand flat out a better player than Glencross. Both are equally valuable and I understand you're reasoning but Glencross was on pace for 30+ last year. That's tough to pass up, even with Marchand being an awesome 25-25-50 guy.

To reiterate, I understand from a logical standpoint your concerns, but I still think that Glencross would beat him out in the long run. Not to say that I think Boston should make the trade either. Khokhlachev impressed me a lot at the Juniors this year.

Flames Fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 06:47 AM
  #55
bruins04
Registered User
 
bruins04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 974
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Fanatic View Post
I knew the day would finally come where you and I disagree unified. Most of the time I go into a thread and get steamed and ready to fire off a post and then I'll come across your post which usually nails what I would say. That and I then have fun zoning out to your avatar.

I love Marchand. Hell, I'm probably one of the few people in Calgary that has a Marchand jersey. But I'd be pretty hard up to just say that Marchand flat out a better player than Glencross. Both are equally valuable and I understand you're reasoning but Glencross was on pace for 30+ last year. That's tough to pass up, even with Marchand being an awesome 25-25-50 guy.

To reiterate, I understand from a logical standpoint your concerns, but I still think that Glencross would beat him out in the long run. Not to say that I think Boston should make the trade either. Khokhlachev impressed me a lot at the Juniors this year.
it may be difficult to value Marchand... but he's a pure gamebreaker. he's now 24, career +56, steady improvement year over year. 19 points in 25 playoff games as a rookie including 2 goals (yes one was an empty netter) and an assist in game 7. When Marchand gets to 30, I would imagine he has accomplished a lot more than Glencross, if not already.

I do watch enough flames hockey to know that Glencross is the type of guy you would want in your lineup. But Marchand worked his way into the top 6 and has more than earned his stay there, has great chemistry with his linemates. also, on the 'on pace for 30'... marchand was on pace for 30 last year too if not for suspensions.

between the two of them, i'd say marchand has already played a crucial role in delivering what every hockey fan wants their team to achieve. as a bruins fan, would not want to swap those players at all.

finally, the cup team had ryder on the 3rd line, who went on to score 35 last year in dallas. but with the bruins, the 3rd line was the most appropriate spot for him.

bruins04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 07:04 AM
  #56
Gary83
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,874
vCash: 88
Pass from Flames side. Guys that shoot 15+% don't grow on trees, Glencross is like Ivan Drago, anything he shoots he scores.

Gary83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 08:04 AM
  #57
SPV
Zoinks!
 
SPV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Country: United States
Posts: 3,799
vCash: 500
I think the Bruins would have to add a roster player to make this work. Maybe Daniel Paille?

And only if Glencross could play the right side; then he could replace Horton next year at a fraction of the cost, and give Boston some cap flexibility.

SPV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 08:24 AM
  #58
madmike77
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,154
vCash: 500
Last thing Calgary needs is yet another goaltending prospect.

Subban has a higher ceiling than the existing ones (Gillies, Brossoit, Ortio), but really there's no point in adding another to the mix.

madmike77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.