HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Sens taking on Horcoff's contract

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-08-2012, 10:08 AM
  #51
zeus3007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 12,891
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Jones View Post
Would the Oilers trade him to the Sens (Or anybody else, for that matter) for a 6th or 7th round draft pick just to get the contract off their books?
That they might do. Simply for financial reasons. They don't NEED to move Horcoff's contract, but you can't tell me that Katz wouldn't be happier with his 5.5 million off the books. I think they would move him if they were getting something back (like the proposed late draft pick), but not if they had to give up anything as incentive to do so.

zeus3007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 10:52 AM
  #52
TSA0402
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,846
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DropIt View Post
not as much as you would think. Something like:

Horcoff, EDM 2nd round pick
for
Kuba, OTT 3rd round pick
Forget about that.

This thread is stupid, but this proposal isn't exactly good either. Not even close.

TSA0402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 11:05 AM
  #53
zeus3007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 12,891
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSA0402 View Post
Forget about that.

This thread is stupid, but this proposal isn't exactly good either. Not even close.
Horcoff for Kuba (with whatever marginal pieces involved) would actually have somewhat of a chance of happening, unlike the original proposal.

zeus3007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 11:41 AM
  #54
TSA0402
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,846
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeus3007 View Post
Horcoff for Kuba (with whatever marginal pieces involved) would actually have somewhat of a chance of happening, unlike the original proposal.
Kuba is playing on the Sens top pair with Karlsson averaging almost 24 minutes per game at a +26. I have no idea how a player as such is not worth significantly more than an aging 5.5 million dollar solid third line center.

It has NO chance of happening, just like the original proposal. It is just not even close. It really sounds about as bad as the OP.

TSA0402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:26 PM
  #55
victor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,692
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeus3007 View Post
That they might do. Simply for financial reasons. They don't NEED to move Horcoff's contract, but you can't tell me that Katz wouldn't be happier with his 5.5 million off the books. I think they would move him if they were getting something back (like the proposed late draft pick), but not if they had to give up anything as incentive to do so.
He's only owed $13m in salary over the next three years, or an average of $4.3m a season. A replacement player would likely be in the $2.5m-3m range.

The Oilers, over the next three seasons, will spend between $180-195m in player salaries. We're really talking about $3-4m of it. I'm not sure that they'd give any assets to move 1.5%-2% of salary.

If his (or Hemsky's) contracts were on the books when RNH and the 2012 1st round pick's ELC's come off, perhaps - but they're structured to be off by then.

victor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 12:47 PM
  #56
Dick Whitman
Registered User
 
Dick Whitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,415
vCash: 500
Where would Horcoff fit in this team, again? There's a reason the Oilers have sucked so badly the last few years and Horcoff is part of that.

Kuba is a free agent on July 1st, assuming Ottawa doesn't re-sign him. If he were under contract however, Ottawa would not move him for Horcoff and would not have a chance of happening.

Dick Whitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 02:32 PM
  #57
zeus3007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 12,891
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by victor View Post
He's only owed $13m in salary over the next three years, or an average of $4.3m a season. A replacement player would likely be in the $2.5m-3m range.

The Oilers, over the next three seasons, will spend between $180-195m in player salaries. We're really talking about $3-4m of it. I'm not sure that they'd give any assets to move 1.5%-2% of salary.

If his (or Hemsky's) contracts were on the books when RNH and the 2012 1st round pick's ELC's come off, perhaps - but they're structured to be off by then.
I agree, that's why I said a late pick might get him, but us adding an incentive piece won't happen.

zeus3007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-08-2012, 02:34 PM
  #58
BoldNewLettuce
Registered User
 
BoldNewLettuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,791
vCash: 500
I'd rather have Horcoff at 5 million than Gagner at 3 million.

BoldNewLettuce is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 02:16 AM
  #59
Clownpipe*
Whitney Smash!
 
Clownpipe*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bhancoubhair
Country: Scotland
Posts: 1,978
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by internetdotcom View Post
:
To EDM :

OTT 1st 2012
Bishop

To OTT :

Horcoff
EDM 1st 2012

Oilers move down 15 spots in the first round, but get a good young (and HUGE!) goalie in Bishop that we paid a 2nd rounder for, and get rid of Horc's contract. This deal could be tweaked as necessary.

What do people think of this?
It was obvious you were fishing for the pick in the OP, why not just come out with it then? You will never sniff that pick without Spezza or Karlsson in the deal, so take a hike brah. Take the summer off...and watch the draft like the rest of us. It ain't happening...ever.

HUGE!

Clownpipe* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 05:39 AM
  #60
internetdotcom
NoePuempingAllowed
 
internetdotcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Alfieland
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,954
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to internetdotcom Send a message via Yahoo to internetdotcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clownpipe View Post
It was obvious you were fishing for the pick in the OP, why not just come out with it then? You will never sniff that pick without Spezza or Karlsson in the deal, so take a hike brah. Take the summer off...and watch the draft like the rest of us. It ain't happening...ever.

HUGE!
Wow... 'brah'... really? You might want to take a break from Jersey Shore.

This is a discussion forum, so let's discuss, rather than throw around childish terms used by brainless idiots on an even more brainless TV show.

internetdotcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 06:38 AM
  #61
nzoilerfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 286
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by trentmccleary View Post
Hall - Nugent-Hopkins - Eberle
______ - Horcoff - Hemsky
Paajarvi - Belanger - R.Jones
Eager - Lander - Hartikainen

Whitney - Smid
Schultz - Sutton
Teubert - Potter

Khabibulin - _____
.
You Forgot Petry in that lineup who is likely going to around 2m per on his next contract.

You are right in that the oilers do not need cap space right now. Maybe when Hall/Eberle come to resign. I though it was going to be worse because I though Paajarvi was going to do better and demand more money but his next contract should be relatively cheap/he coule be used as trade bait.

It looks as though Lander could crack the oilers lineup after a full season in OKC. But don't know when that's going to be. Horcoff is basically the human shield for the kids on the team. The oil are paying him well and they are jsut trying to get their monies worth by overplaying him against toughs.

Oilers won't give up anything of real value to them in order to move Horcoff. They will wait it out.

nzoilerfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 10:02 AM
  #62
Brian28
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,437
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by internetdotcom View Post
Wow... 'brah'... really? You might want to take a break from Jersey Shore.

This is a discussion forum, so let's discuss, rather than throw around childish terms used by brainless idiots on an even more brainless TV show.
The problem is there is no basis for a discussion here. We don't ned to move Horcoff for financial reasons right now. If we need cap space for Eberle/Hall (unlikely as we're a low budget team right now and barring complete stupidity by Tambo we'll have plenty of cap space for them) then we could talk about Horcoff. But at that point he'll be getting paid 4 Mil for a 5.5 cap hit and the last year only 3.5 or something like that. Makes him an easier asset to move and would require nowhere near the incentive you're suggesting. Probably a 3rd round pikc maybe a 2nd if we got backa 3rd in return. There is zero chance Horcoff would be packaged with the 2nd overall pick to clear cap space when it won't be an isue.

Brian28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 06:47 PM
  #63
burgess1978
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Gold Coast
Country: Australia
Posts: 1,853
vCash: 500
Edmonton aren't up against the cap so don't need to pay to dump Horcoff, and Ottawa aren't interested in taking on that contract. No need to make this trade from either POV. If Ottawa really had a hard-on for one of Edmonton's young guys why not just make a realistic trade for one of them? ... but at this point outside of the guys Edmonton aren't moving (RNH, Hall, Eberle) Ottawa's young forwards are as good or better than Edmonton's anyway - and neither team has defensive prospects to spare.

burgess1978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2012, 07:03 PM
  #64
Petro Points
Registered User
 
Petro Points's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,742
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by burgess1978 View Post
Edmonton aren't up against the cap so don't need to pay to dump Horcoff, and Ottawa aren't interested in taking on that contract. No need to make this trade from either POV. If Ottawa really had a hard-on for one of Edmonton's young guys why not just make a realistic trade for one of them? ... but at this point outside of the guys Edmonton aren't moving (RNH, Hall, Eberle) Ottawa's young forwards are as good or better than Edmonton's anyway - and neither team has defensive prospects to spare.
They can have Alex Plante

As for the OP.. there is no 'hard on' for an Edmonton player.. im sure the guy wanted his team to get a high pick by packaging it with a salary dump. Nothing unrealistic about it.

Unfortunately EDM is not the ideal team.

Petro Points is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.