Quote:
Originally Posted by SergeConstantin74
The only reason why I think Fucale didn't have the award is because his stats don't look good. He did great for a 16 yo but do you give the Rookie of the year award to the goaltender who was 12th among goaltending stats? Regardless of the defense or of the team he had, 3.16 and 0.892 are not impressive.
|
What about 32 wins? Because that's all that really matters, and it's pretty damn impressive for a 16-year-old IMO. I didn't expect him to win the ROY, but it's good that he's getting recognition. I expect him to be in the hunt for the GOY next year.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HalifaxDucks
I know he's a center, it's just silly/stupid how they pick their Rookie team. You'd probably want to market your best players as much as you can... No offense to Duclair and Andrighetto, but it should be the best forwards regardless of position.
On the note of center, MacKinnon needs to improve his FO's... Just like Crosby did in junior... Sid wasn't good at faceoffs but eventually got better... Hopefully Nate can do the same... (Yes I made the comparison  )
|
This is very true. There were times where they'd make Critchlow or another player take the face-off for MacKinnon. That said, I'm not sure what his percentage for the year is, but he's definitely improved it as the years go on.