HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

JVR, B Prospect, 2nd for Gabriel Landeskog

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-17-2017, 06:40 PM
  #176
Semyon Says
grocery stick
 
Semyon Says's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: downtown poundtown
Posts: 9,346
vCash: 527
Quote:
Originally Posted by indigobuffalo View Post
I think Toronto should seriously look at something along the lines of Rielly for Duchene.

Rielly may be closing in on elite but the Leafs have other assets that could fetch a viable replacement (Gardiner becomes the 1LD and trading JVR should fetch a 2LD.)

I think Gardiner is good enough to be a 1LD. Adding Duchene to the wing replaces JVR so this whole cycling assets works out.

Leafs might get a little worse on the LD side but I doubt it.

I think that LD we get for JVR would be pretty good.
terrible idea all around tbh. but ill take rielly.

Semyon Says is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 06:54 PM
  #177
indigobuffalo
Portage and Main
 
indigobuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Winnipeg MB
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,408
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semyon Says View Post
terrible idea all around tbh. but ill take rielly.
Sorry... you'd do Duchene for Rielly but you disagree on the rest or you wouldn't do Duchene for Rielly?

indigobuffalo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 07:03 PM
  #178
Semyon Says
grocery stick
 
Semyon Says's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: downtown poundtown
Posts: 9,346
vCash: 527
Quote:
Originally Posted by indigobuffalo View Post
Sorry... you'd do Duchene for Rielly but you disagree on the rest or you wouldn't do Duchene for Rielly?
trading rielly from the leafs is a horrible idea.

gardiner being a 1d is a horrible idea.

trading jvr for a 2d is a pipedream.

theres no point in discussing value on rielly for duchene due to the above.

Semyon Says is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 07:05 PM
  #179
cadillaccts
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 263
vCash: 500
Yet another Toronto proposal peddling jvr and some spare parts... jvr has some decent value, but you're not getting anyone significant for him + garbage. Any player of Landeskog or Duchene (or any player you feel significantly improves your team) is going to start with Nylander +.

Hilarious that Leafs fans feel like they don't have to give up any significant pieces to land a top end player.

cadillaccts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 07:11 PM
  #180
cgf
FireBednarsSuccessor
 
cgf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: w/ Renley's Peach
Country: Germany
Posts: 27,849
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semyon Says View Post
trading rielly from the leafs is a horrible idea.

gardiner being a 1d is a horrible idea.

trading jvr for a 2d is a pipedream.

theres no point in discussing value on rielly for duchene due to the above.
Yep. I'd take a Rielly trade, unless the Canes or Habs make stronger offers, but I don't see why the f*** Toronto would offer anything around Rielly.

cgf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 08:13 PM
  #181
McMetal
Registered User
 
McMetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 2,598
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cadillaccts View Post
Yet another Toronto proposal peddling jvr and some spare parts... jvr has some decent value, but you're not getting anyone significant for him + garbage. Any player of Landeskog or Duchene (or any player you feel significantly improves your team) is going to start with Nylander +.

Hilarious that Leafs fans feel like they don't have to give up any significant pieces to land a top end player.
To be fair, it's not just Leafs fans that want one of our core forwards for a song and expendable B assets. Every proposal I hear starts with "our best prospects are off the table, but how about..."

McMetal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 09:05 PM
  #182
Avsblitzkrieg
Registered User
 
Avsblitzkrieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Westminster
Country: United States
Posts: 1,127
vCash: 191
Tar and feather the op

Avsblitzkrieg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 09:20 PM
  #183
TimeZone
Superstar
 
TimeZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lost
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,343
vCash: 500
We need D-men.

TimeZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 09:32 PM
  #184
discobob
Registered User
 
discobob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Everything
Posts: 1,021
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namikaze Minato View Post
how so
Plenty of others answered your question, but it is obvious to a neutral fan that NVR is not as valuable as most Leafs fans think. The quantity and quality of the proposals makes that highly obvious...

discobob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 09:37 PM
  #185
arrbez
bad chi
 
arrbez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,040
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to arrbez
Why would either team be interested in this trade? It would be hard to imagine two teams that make worse trading partners.

arrbez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 09:45 PM
  #186
a mangy Meowth
#thestructure
 
a mangy Meowth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Denver
Country: United States
Posts: 4,578
vCash: 50
Why is this clown thread still going? The Leafs can't make this trade, and the original offer is insulting to Avs fans. Just lock this crap up

a mangy Meowth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 09:49 PM
  #187
McMetal
Registered User
 
McMetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 2,598
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by arrbez View Post
Why would either team be interested in this trade? It would be hard to imagine two teams that make worse trading partners.
If anything, they should be in bidding wars for the exact same players from other teams trying to acquire blue chip defense.

McMetal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2017 All Rights Reserved.