HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Toronto Maple Leafs
Notices

The Ultimate Armchair GM Hindsight Thread

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-16-2012, 04:13 PM
  #76
indigobuffalo
Portage and Main
 
indigobuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Winnipeg MB
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,795
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mapes View Post
Sorry I didn't explain myself, ya I was dealing Kadri and Kaberle for Kessel
Fantasy #1

Phil Kessel


Nazem Kadri, Tomas Kaberle

Fantasy #2

Phil Kessel


Tyler Seguin, Jared Knight, Greg McKegg

Reality

Phil Kessel, Joe Colborne, John-Michael Liles, Tyler Biggs


Tomas Kaberle, Tyler Seguin, Dougie Hamilton, Jared Knight


TOR 2nd 2011 (John Gibson, G)

indigobuffalo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2012, 04:18 PM
  #77
EazyB97
Registered User
 
EazyB97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dundas
Posts: 26,342
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BertCorbeau View Post
Additionally Burke recaptured some good value for acquiring Versteeg, despite him not fitting here. He got Phili's 1st and 3rd rounders which have turned into Percy and Leivo who are solid looking prospects based on how they've performed this year.

The Tlusty deal slightly backfired, but I doubt he would have gotten the same kind of chance here as he has in Carolina.
I didn't mind the Tlusty deal just because his window with this team was closing and I don't see where he would've fit. Paradis wasn't fantastic, but neither player would've been Leaf regulars today IMO.

EazyB97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2012, 04:24 PM
  #78
indigobuffalo
Portage and Main
 
indigobuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Winnipeg MB
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,795
vCash: 500
Personally I don't recall Chiarelli and Burke ever discussing trading Kadri+Kaberle for Kessel.

I do recall Burke having a package in place to get the 5th overall in the 2009 draft that involved trading Kaberle to LA, but trade talks broke down at the last second because it turned out LA was under the impression that they were getting Kaberle + TOR 1st 2009 for LA 1st 2009.

indigobuffalo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2012, 04:29 PM
  #79
indigobuffalo
Portage and Main
 
indigobuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Winnipeg MB
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,795
vCash: 500
As for the Offer Sheet option for Kessel, Chiarelli had been given authorization from ownership to keep Kessel if there was an offer sheet.

So Burke would've only succeeded is getting the price higher for Kessel and he'd still be a Bruin, he'd have at least one Stanley Cup ring, and Seguin would be all ours...

Of course then people would be ragging on Burke for ending up with Seguin when we ALMOST had Kessel!

indigobuffalo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2012, 04:44 PM
  #80
mapes
Registered User
 
mapes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Halifax
Posts: 18,343
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by indigobuffalo View Post
Personally I don't recall Chiarelli and Burke ever discussing trading Kadri+Kaberle for Kessel.

I do recall Burke having a package in place to get the 5th overall in the 2009 draft that involved trading Kaberle to LA, but trade talks broke down at the last second because it turned out LA was under the impression that they were getting Kaberle + TOR 1st 2009 for LA 1st 2009.
You don't? Did you watch the 2009 draft? It was all they seemed to talk about. Chia wanted Kadri and Kaberle for Kessel, Burke thought it was Kessel and their first for Kaberle.

mapes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2012, 04:48 PM
  #81
BertCorbeau
Yelling at clouds
 
BertCorbeau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,896
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mapes View Post
You don't? Did you watch the 2009 draft? It was all they seemed to talk about. Chia wanted Kadri and Kaberle for Kessel, Burke thought it was Kessel and their first for Kaberle.
God that would have been sweet.

BertCorbeau is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2012, 04:50 PM
  #82
mapes
Registered User
 
mapes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Halifax
Posts: 18,343
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by indigobuffalo View Post
As for the Offer Sheet option for Kessel, Chiarelli had been given authorization from ownership to keep Kessel if there was an offer sheet.

So Burke would've only succeeded is getting the price higher for Kessel and he'd still be a Bruin, he'd have at least one Stanley Cup ring, and Seguin would be all ours...

Of course then people would be ragging on Burke for ending up with Seguin when we ALMOST had Kessel!
Given the green light is different than doing. Kessel was unhappy there

Have atleast one ring? According to who? They would have had less cap room, so different players

mapes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2012, 04:57 PM
  #83
mapes
Registered User
 
mapes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Halifax
Posts: 18,343
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BertCorbeau View Post
God that would have been sweet.
No kidding eh. Especially in hindsight. But it still made no sence why he didn't pull the trigger. You'd get a young stud for a 7th overall pick and a declining dman when you know you are a few years away from competing and that player has a NMC during the season so it is one of your only chances to get something good for him.

mapes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2012, 04:59 PM
  #84
Avec Fromage
Registered User
 
Avec Fromage's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 492
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by indigobuffalo View Post
Fantasy #1

Phil Kessel


Nazem Kadri, Tomas Kaberle

Fantasy #2

Phil Kessel


Tyler Seguin, Jared Knight, Greg McKegg

Reality

Phil Kessel, Joe Colborne, John-Michael Liles, Tyler Biggs


Tomas Kaberle, Tyler Seguin, Dougie Hamilton, Jared Knight


TOR 2nd 2011 (John Gibson, G)
You forgot Rickard Rakell to the Ducks. Although you shouldn't have included the Kaberle deal, it has nothing to do with Kessel.

Avec Fromage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2012, 01:10 AM
  #85
SuperJayMann
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 472
vCash: 50
I liked the Komisarek signing at the time, he always played us tough. Probably 80% of you felt the same way at the time. I was worried the draft picks in the Kessel trade would haunt us when it first happened. We are the Leafs and whenever we trade a first rounder it's a bad decision. Probably about 75% of you felt that way at the time. Signing Tim Connelly was worth a try, it obviously didn't work, all we lose is cap space so big deal, willing to bet half of you felt the same way. I didn't think Lupul would pan out, a pleasant surprise, 98% probably thought the same thing. Kadri seemed like a good selection, and still has hope of working out, I bet at least half of you would have drafted him too.

Hindsight is always 20/20. If we're honest with ourselves and think back to when Burke made these moves alot of us cheered at our acquisitions.

SuperJayMann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2012, 01:20 AM
  #86
MorriPage
Registered User
 
MorriPage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Earth
Country: Canada
Posts: 611
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperJayMann View Post
I liked the Komisarek signing at the time, he always played us tough. Probably 80% of you felt the same way at the time.
Liked the signing, hated the cap hit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperJayMann View Post
I was worried the draft picks in the Kessel trade would haunt us when it first happened. We are the Leafs and whenever we trade a first rounder it's a bad decision. Probably about 75% of you felt that way at the time.
Didn't mind the trade as much as some. Phil Kessel a sniper, in it's purest form. He is easily the best player in that deal today, and he was then as well. One day Seguin might be better, but he's not right now. I still feel like a lot of what we're seeing from Tyler Seguin is a product of the team he plays for and the system he plays in. Had we drafted him, I don't think we'd be witnessing the same player. As it stands, we got the best player in that deal and until that changes, if it even does, Toronto wins the trade.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperJayMann View Post
Signing Tim Connelly was worth a try, it obviously didn't work, all we lose is cap space so big deal, willing to bet half of you felt the same way.
Hated the Connolly signing then, hate it now. Overpayment, huge risk, and I have never been a Connolly fan. I never wanted to have anything to do with him.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperJayMann View Post
I didn't think Lupul would pan out, a pleasant surprise, 98% probably thought the same thing.
I was indifferent about Lupul. I was much more interested in seeing what Gardiner would gve us. I expected that, at best, Lupul would be a serviceable early 20's goal scorer. Blew my expectations away.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperJayMann View Post
Kadri seemed like a good selection, and still has hope of working out, I bet at least half of you would have drafted him too.
I actually would have drafted him even if I had made the trade for the Kings' 5th overall pick. I like Kadri a lot more than Brayden Schenn. I personally think the Kadri pick was a solid selection.


Last edited by MorriPage: 03-17-2012 at 04:26 AM.
MorriPage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2012, 08:12 AM
  #87
mapes
Registered User
 
mapes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Halifax
Posts: 18,343
vCash: 500
Regarding Komi, I was never big on the contract. I liked him but a shutdown dman making 4.5.. Just wasn't a fan.

I liked the Kessel trade. Never thought in a million years it would be top 2. Still wanted Kaberle and 7th overall for him. But whatever.

I thought Lupul would be a decent 2nd liner, but not a first liner. Gardiner was the one I was most happy about.

Actually most Leaf fans wanted MPS. I wanted Cowan or MPS but I'm happy with Kadri and think he has a good future.

mapes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2012, 10:01 AM
  #88
rojac
HFBoards Sponsor
 
rojac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Waterloo, ON
Posts: 4,503
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avec Fromage View Post
You forgot Rickard Rakell to the Ducks. Although you shouldn't have included the Kaberle deal, it has nothing to do with Kessel.
To me, that's debatable. You don't think Burke was able to squeeze a little bit more out of Chiarellii for Kaberle because it looked like the Kessel deal was favoring the Bruins?

rojac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2012, 11:31 AM
  #89
dirk41
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,008
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
And you knew that we were going to be a top 2 draft pick comming into the season when the rest of the hockey world expected us to finish around our typical 7-12 pick? I thought we were supposed to be honest with ourselves in this discussion?
Were those optimistic predictions made before or after the Leafs traded for Kessel (without losing a roster player) and signed two expensive defensemen? If we're being honest, Christ.

dirk41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2012, 11:41 AM
  #90
dirk41
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,008
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Durkin67 View Post
No, Burke brought in a league leading goal scorer
Who's that? Stamkos is leading this year, Perry led last year, and Crosby and Stamkos were tied two years ago. Then we had Ovy leading for a few years. So who did Burke bring in that is a league-leading goal scorer?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Durkin67 View Post
a future all star defenseman in Gardiner
You can see in the future? Cool, Hamilton will be a future Hall of Famer. And next Friday's lotto numbers are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 69


Quote:
Originally Posted by Durkin67 View Post
and he rebuilt the prospect pool from the ground up.
What does this even mean? A team that's near the bottom of the league should be acquiring prospects. Six straight years in the bottom ten of the league and the Leafs still don't have a real blue-chip prospect.

dirk41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-17-2012, 07:02 PM
  #91
Durkin67
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,270
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirk41 View Post
Who's that? Stamkos is leading this year, Perry led last year, and Crosby and Stamkos were tied two years ago. Then we had Ovy leading for a few years. So who did Burke bring in that is a league-leading goal scorer?


You can see in the future? Cool, Hamilton will be a future Hall of Famer. And next Friday's lotto numbers are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 69



What does this even mean? A team that's near the bottom of the league should be acquiring prospects. Six straight years in the bottom ten of the league and the Leafs still don't have a real blue-chip prospect.
I described Kessel as A league leading goal scorer. Didnt say THE league leading goal scorer. Was it that hard to figure out, or are you just after an argument?

Dont need to see the future. Every pro scout, and recently, even Bowman acknowledged that Gardiner projects as a very special breed of player. But thanks for the tip on the lotto numbers...

If you cant see the difference between today's prospect depth and what was here when Burke arrived, youre on your own. And if you want to pretend that the obvious improvement in the quality of organizational depth is the result of anything less than astute asset management and resourcefulness, youre choosing to be oblivious to what is glaringly apparent.

Durkin67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.