Maybe so but, we should ride Garon while he's playing hot... ntm, look at the age difference between our 2 goalies.
I'm not against riding him for the time being, but I wouldn't make him our permanent starter. I'm not convinced that Garon would be able to sustain his play over longer periods of time, which is what we would required from a starting netminder.
Ok well, let me put it like this. If Roloson doesnt do well for most of this season, we should switch to Garon.
Agreed, but if that were the case, I think it'd be more important to find a long-term solution for a starter (unless Tokarski can convince us otherwise). Garon would have to be a temporary stop gap solution.