HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Montreal Canadiens
Notices

Alexei Emelin

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
11-02-2011, 09:46 AM
  #26
Perrah
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,681
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by CGG View Post
All rookies have to sign a two-way contract. There will be no waivers, he simply is not eligible for waivers, so please drop this. Out clauses with the go-to-Russia-free card are purely a myth at this point as well. He might have been able to return if Montreal tried to cut him at the start of the season, but now that he's made the team and played in the NHL he can't simply jump back to Russia if they try to send him to Hamilton.

But it's in everyone's best interest to keep him in Montreal and work him into the lineup on a semi-regular basis.
I might have been off base on the out clause I was going off memory from the signing article on tsn but a two way deal just means he makes less money in the AHL than in the NHL. He has 1 year of waiver exemption since this was his first NHL contract I believe. I thought since he was 25 he didnt get any but that was false, its 26.

Edit: It is in their best interest to work him in but do you really think that will happen considering he got benched for spacek and then 2 more dmen are going to be returning they arent keeping him up or putting him in semi-regularly.


Last edited by Perrah: 11-02-2011 at 09:59 AM.
Perrah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 09:53 AM
  #27
Karl Pilkington
Registered User
 
Karl Pilkington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,862
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gillyguzzler View Post
Seing that, in JM's mind, he is not good enough to play even with Markov out, wow did they badly evaluate him during the last many years. It seems their Pro Scouts are horrible at identifying talent - or JM just won't develop it (for some).
You make a good point. Either Emelin was over evaluated or he's not getting the opportunity to display his talents. I'm not talking purely ice time, I'm talking about getting the support and confidence from your coach. I don't think JM has ever had faith in someone who hasn't been in the league for at least 2-3 years. He takes an extremely cautious approach with youth. There is no discrimination in his style other than that he seems determined to "keep those youth in line".

I can see JM as a youth, sitting at home on a Friday night organizing the pencils on his desk.. not because he's a loser or anything, but because that's honestly what he liked to do.

Karl Pilkington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:01 AM
  #28
bsl
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,800
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLP View Post
JM's treatment of Emelin suggests 1) he wants to win now to save his job and so values a steady presence in Gill, 2) he is more comfortable dealing with old guys than developing youngsters.

Arguments can be made but clearly Emelin is a talent we could use going forward, he's also a special case, an All-Star KHL defenceman who came over to play in the NHL not sit in the press box. I hope he's reasonable enough to hold on through November but if he does not get to play and leaves I would not blame him. Would not be the first youngster JM has lost.
I agree. However, I think that something has changed in management.

There is a loss of confidence in JM. I think he'll be watched on player development, and I could see someone stepping in and dealing with Emelin if he will not.

Losing a player like Emelin would be an absolute joke. He needs to play 40 games this year. He should also be reassured that that is the intention. Unbelievable if Emelin is not being told what the strategy for him is, but I would not be surprised. NHL coaches are a management joke for the most part, with some exceptions.

There are enough games against **** teams, there are injuries, and yes, Gill and Spacemen should be sat out every 6 games or so.
No more losses of top prospects please.

It will be very interesting to see how this unfolds. If the kid does not start playing now and then, or gets benched all the time in play, I'm going to seriously start hating JM. I don't watch the Habs to see JM, I watch the Habs to see kids like Emelin.

At the very least Emelin should be platooning with Diaz, and he is not. I'm getting very nervous about JM's handling of this difficult problem. I do not think he's up to it. Emelin's fate will decide me on JM, and it might decide management on him too.

bsl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:02 AM
  #29
airic000
Breaking Hab
 
airic000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,687
vCash: 186
Anyone know how much Emelin was making in the KHL? Is he making less here (I'm sure he is)?

airic000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:08 AM
  #30
Roulin
Registered User
 
Roulin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,715
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habtacular View Post
Still, remembering how Martin ruined Suban and Price, maybe the ruined Emelin will be a decent player anyway.
Boom. Well said!

Roulin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:09 AM
  #31
Jigger77
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,282
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnapVirus View Post
Emelin is better than Gill and Diaz. End of conversation.


Diaz has been the player that's surprised me the most. He plays like a veteran. Rarely out of position, stong hockey sense and has the offensive flair. He's been solid.

Gill is a PK specialist and even though he's not overly physical he still wins a lot of board battles with his size. His reach and positioning make up for his lack of footspeed. He always starts slow but he's coming around now. He's also a great leader and mentor (and yes that is important on a hockey team)

Most importantly however, he's 11th in the entire NHL right now in blocked shots.


Emelin, save for a couple of offensive zone rushes where he looked good, looked lost a little, gave the puck away wasn't playing with confidence. He needs time in the AHL. He will also really, really benefit from Markov's return providing Markov assumes the responsibility to help him out.


Last edited by Jigger77: 11-02-2011 at 10:30 AM.
Jigger77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:10 AM
  #32
buddahsmoka1
Registered User
 
buddahsmoka1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 24,040
vCash: 500
"Letting him rot in the press box," the guy is freaking 26 years old.

buddahsmoka1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:17 AM
  #33
Jigger77
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,282
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsl View Post
I agree. However, I think that something has changed in management.

There is a loss of confidence in JM. I think he'll be watched on player development, and I could see someone stepping in and dealing with Emelin if he will not.

Losing a player like Emelin would be an absolute joke. He needs to play 40 games this year. He should also be reassured that that is the intention. Unbelievable if Emelin is not being told what the strategy for him is, but I would not be surprised. NHL coaches are a management joke for the most part, with some exceptions.

There are enough games against **** teams, there are injuries, and yes, Gill and Spacemen should be sat out every 6 games or so.
No more losses of top prospects please.

It will be very interesting to see how this unfolds. If the kid does not start playing now and then, or gets benched all the time in play, I'm going to seriously start hating JM. I don't watch the Habs to see JM, I watch the Habs to see kids like Emelin.

At the very least Emelin should be platooning with Diaz, and he is not. I'm getting very nervous about JM's handling of this difficult problem. I do not think he's up to it. Emelin's fate will decide me on JM, and it might decide management on him too.
What is he supposed to do put Alexei Emelin ahead of the interest of the team as a whole?

The team is winning at the moment. He has to go with the D-men that allow him to win. Simple as that.


Last edited by Jigger77: 11-02-2011 at 10:28 AM.
Jigger77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:17 AM
  #34
Habs 4 Life
No Excuses
 
Habs 4 Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montreal
Country: Italy
Posts: 30,066
vCash: 722
I just hope the Habs coaching staff are talking to the kid and keep encouraging him. I'm sure they are and Ladouceur I trust for that

Habs 4 Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:19 AM
  #35
Monctonscout
Monctonscout
 
Monctonscout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,414
vCash: 500
I don't buy that Diaz is better than him. Maybe a bit better offensively, but in terms of defense, Yemelin is bigger, stronger and always in good position. I think part of Diaz playing more at this point is a language thing, easier for him to adapt to systems and such. I think they should rotate guys in and out, having one sitting for 2 weeks is not a good thing.

Monctonscout is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:20 AM
  #36
Jigger77
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,282
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habs 4 Life View Post
I just hope the Habs coaching staff are talking to the kid and keep encouraging him. I'm sure they are and Ladouceur I trust for that
Apparently Ladouceur is a guy who takes a lot of time 1 on 1 and talks to the players a lot. I'm sure he does. I wonder if they have an interpreter or translator to do this though. I would imagine they do.

Jigger77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:26 AM
  #37
Habs 4 Life
No Excuses
 
Habs 4 Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montreal
Country: Italy
Posts: 30,066
vCash: 722
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carey Price View Post
I don't buy that Diaz is better than him. Maybe a bit better offensively, but in terms of defense, Yemelin is bigger, stronger and always in good position. I think part of Diaz playing more at this point is a language thing, easier for him to adapt to systems and such. I think they should rotate guys in and out, having one sitting for 2 weeks is not a good thing.
Not going to say he is better, but at the moment Diaz is definitely "le chou chou" of Jacques. He even got the 5 on 3 pp time against the Bruins. PK should be the one out there until Markov comes back

Habs 4 Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:41 AM
  #38
HarryHabs
GO HABS GO!
 
HarryHabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,039
vCash: 1100
Him not playing is not a demotion it's just we have lots of depth and they want him to learn the NA game. I am sure they are telling him that.

HarryHabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:47 AM
  #39
zzoo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Country: Vietnam
Posts: 1,682
vCash: 500
Emelin hasn't impressed me so far. At this time, Diaz is slightly better.
But we have to give time to Emelin to adapt to N.A. hockey. I agree that Emelin should replace Gill from time to time.

zzoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:48 AM
  #40
Karl Pilkington
Registered User
 
Karl Pilkington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,862
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roulin View Post
Boom. Well said!
Subban and Price grew up with different cultures and more importantly, different attitudes towards the NHL. This whole idea of "if they don't fall in line they're out of here" is a horrible approach to managing unique assets. We've lost many players because management refused to tailor an approach to players with attitude problems. Instead they said "hey! fall in line youuuuuuu!" and as these are professional athletes with egos they did the opposite and we lost potentially good players and even worse, due to the lack of attention given to these players their trade values decreased and they brought a negative element to the dressing room. Management needs to take more responsibility in this area. It seems the culture is to have a very high behavioural/attitude standard for a player and leave it completely up to them to fall in line. I don't know what goes on behind the scenes but I doubt there's a lot of level-to-level motivation and confidence building going on. More likely its stern talking-tos and discpline. A new generation of players requires a new generation approach.

I guess 24 cups and all the Habs would have an interest in preserving the past and the old ways...

We nit pick a lot about small things on this board, but those small things are the difference between a good team and a champion.

Karl Pilkington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:48 AM
  #41
Paul Dipietro
Registered User
 
Paul Dipietro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 703
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habs 4 Life View Post
Not going to say he is better, but at the moment Diaz is definitely "le chou chou" of Jacques. He even got the 5 on 3 pp time against the Bruins. PK should be the one out there until Markov comes back
PK's been pretty reckless of late. Nothing wrong with having him skip his turn once in a while

And his ridiculous wind-ups have got to go

Paul Dipietro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:54 AM
  #42
BobbyFischer*
 
BobbyFischer*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,864
vCash: 500
We'll take him off your hands...


To Flyers: Alexei Emelin.


To Montreal: Blair Betts, 5th rounder 2012.

BobbyFischer* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:54 AM
  #43
habdynasty
Registered User
 
habdynasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,239
vCash: 500
Martin wont change the lineup untill the habs lose a game or 2, Emelin will get back in.

habdynasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:55 AM
  #44
Et le But
Moderator
 
Et le But's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New York
Country: Argentina
Posts: 12,811
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyFischer View Post
We'll take him off your hands...


To Flyers: Alexei Emelin.


To Montreal: Blair Betts, 5th rounder 2012.
I actually wouldn't be surprised at all if we lose Emelin in a similar trade.

Et le But is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 10:57 AM
  #45
BobbyFischer*
 
BobbyFischer*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,864
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Et le But View Post
I actually wouldn't be surprised at all if we lose Emelin in a similar trade.
And then cringe 2-3 yrs later when Emelin is playing amazing and the player you traded him for is an old dried up prune of a man..

BobbyFischer* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 11:01 AM
  #46
Jigger77
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,282
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Dipietro View Post
PK's been pretty reckless of late. Nothing wrong with having him skip his turn once in a while

And his ridiculous wind-ups have got to go
Amen to that. So predictable and slows his release. Just put it on net man. Doesn't have to be flashy or the hardest shot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by habdynasty View Post
Martin wont change the lineup untill the habs lose a game or 2, Emelin will get back in.
Agreed. And I'd be willing to bet my house that it's not Gill that sits. Likely Diaz.


Last edited by Habsfan18: 11-02-2011 at 05:13 PM. Reason: merge
Jigger77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 11:02 AM
  #47
Rscorpio
Epic Meal Time!
 
Rscorpio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Santiago, Chile
Country: Chile
Posts: 2,716
vCash: 500
I would trade Diaz before Emelin for some toughness (big grinder)

Rscorpio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 11:03 AM
  #48
Habs 4 Life
No Excuses
 
Habs 4 Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montreal
Country: Italy
Posts: 30,066
vCash: 722
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyFischer View Post
We'll take him off your hands...


To Flyers: Alexei Emelin.


To Montreal: Blair Betts, 5th rounder 2012.
No more need of Betts with the trade of Nokelainen. For Emelin you would need to give us Giroux

Emelin I could see being moved for a 2nd or 3rd later if Diaz and Weber keep playing the way they have

Habs 4 Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 11:10 AM
  #49
Rscorpio
Epic Meal Time!
 
Rscorpio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Santiago, Chile
Country: Chile
Posts: 2,716
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habs 4 Life View Post
No more need of Betts with the trade of Nokelainen. For Emelin you would need to give us Giroux

Emelin I could see being moved for a 2nd or 3rd later if Diaz and Weber keep playing the way they have

Thats the error this club is doing for years... keep the same type of players (small skilled).


Diaz is like Weber. We don t need both of them IMO

Rscorpio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-02-2011, 11:14 AM
  #50
Habs 4 Life
No Excuses
 
Habs 4 Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montreal
Country: Italy
Posts: 30,066
vCash: 722
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rscorpio View Post
Thats the error this club is doing for years... keep the same type of players (small skilled).


Diaz is like Weber. We don t need both of them IMO
I don't agree with it either, I'm just saying it's what I would expect from the Habs

Habs 4 Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.