HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Northwest Division > Edmonton Oilers
Notices

Latest on New YEG Arena: Part V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
11-04-2011, 11:41 PM
  #76
Dorian2
The bag don't lie.
 
Dorian2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,565
vCash: 250
Hell, I wanna hear more about magetism. I wanna know more about the exclusion principle and anti parallel spins! I wanna learn more about field alignment by external atoms! Lets dig into the disruptive effect of thermal vibrations.

Dorian2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-04-2011, 11:54 PM
  #77
Booya42
ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) What the...
 
Booya42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,129
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarus View Post
Given the lack of arena news and the hilarity of the night's discussion, thought some relevant humor would fit. Sums up quite a bit of the arguments around the whole arena -

http://www.cracked.com/article_19468...you-think.html

Sadly, don't think there is a category for the guy who responds to everything with "no you!" however
Cheers for that!

Booya42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-05-2011, 01:22 AM
  #78
Gone
Fire KLowe
 
Gone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,008
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dorian2 View Post
Hell, I wanna hear more about magetism. I wanna know more about the exclusion principle and anti parallel spins! I wanna learn more about field alignment by external atoms! Lets dig into the disruptive effect of thermal vibrations.
OMG, I think ... I've found someone ... who understands.

I love physics, and most importantly the mystery of gravity, 'rippling effects of gravitational waves'; I need to be the first to observe/find a 'gravity wave'. Space is a medium in which gravity is allowed to exist. Prove in and you prove the existance of God!

Really the medium part is hard to grasp since it is nothing; an important part of this question is can time change with time (to the fixed observer)? If so, does the infinite expansion of the universe slow with time or does time slow with it?

Gone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-05-2011, 08:42 AM
  #79
Gone
Fire KLowe
 
Gone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,008
vCash: 500
Alberta's financial house is starting to look pretty grim

http://eedition.calgary.24hrs.ca/epa...3d%3d&feed=rss

Gone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-05-2011, 04:50 PM
  #80
Dorian2
The bag don't lie.
 
Dorian2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,565
vCash: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone View Post
OMG, I think ... I've found someone ... who understands.
Actually, I don't really understand it much. I just read a paragraph on the basis of the subject, reworded some key points of interest into my own statements, and tried to come across really smart and as someone who knew what he was talking about.

Amazing what you can do with the interwebs and a half assed writing ability.

The truth is out

Dorian2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-05-2011, 05:01 PM
  #81
Oilerz
Registered User
 
Oilerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: River City. E-Town
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,206
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone View Post
Alberta's financial house is starting to look pretty grim

http://eedition.calgary.24hrs.ca/epa...3d%3d&feed=rss
Expect a big rebound in oil royalties next year, and late this year.

Oilerz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-05-2011, 05:13 PM
  #82
Beerfish
Registered User
 
Beerfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,477
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilerz View Post
Expect a big rebound in oil royalties next year, and late this year.
What, so we will just be getting screwed and not totally screwed by the oil companies? Oil prices have been high enough the last few years that the province should be rolling in the dough. I'd say our share of royalties will get worse not better because the middle east is becoming a bit more stable.

Beerfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-05-2011, 05:16 PM
  #83
Oilerz
Registered User
 
Oilerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: River City. E-Town
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,206
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beerfish View Post
What, so we will just be getting screwed and not totally screwed by the oil companies? Oil prices have been high enough the last few years that the province should be rolling in the dough. I'd say our share of royalties will get worse not better because the middle east is becoming a bit more stable.
Bah Humbug. Middle east a bit more stable?? Upgrade your cable package to include a news network or two. If anything it shows that anything can and does happen over there.

Oilerz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-05-2011, 06:04 PM
  #84
NotBad*
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,728
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beerfish View Post
What, so we will just be getting screwed and not totally screwed by the oil companies? Oil prices have been high enough the last few years that the province should be rolling in the dough. I'd say our share of royalties will get worse not better because the middle east is becoming a bit more stable.
What are you talking about?

NotBad* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-05-2011, 07:38 PM
  #85
Gone
Fire KLowe
 
Gone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,008
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beerfish View Post
What, so we will just be getting screwed and not totally screwed by the oil companies? Oil prices have been high enough the last few years that the province should be rolling in the dough. I'd say our share of royalties will get worse not better because the middle east is becoming a bit more stable.
I complete agree with you that we have mismanaged our resources. If it was done properly, high royalties would not hinder exploration, and provide the necessary revenue to provide proper monitoring of the environment, resources, etc. to ensure they are extracted in a 'friendly' manner.

MOD


Last edited by Chairman Maouth: 11-05-2011 at 09:28 PM.
Gone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-05-2011, 09:12 PM
  #86
Chairman Maouth
Team Leader
 
Chairman Maouth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fire Lake
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,366
vCash: 50
Okay please keep the Middle East politics out of this guys. I know they're an extrapolation of how things pertain to the topic at hand, but please do the best you can. Thanks.

__________________
Congress tart!

Last edited by Chairman Maouth: 11-05-2011 at 09:19 PM.
Chairman Maouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2011, 02:21 PM
  #87
Gone
Fire KLowe
 
Gone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,008
vCash: 500
Great article, basically confirming Katz took the City of Edmonton to the cleaners on the arena deal.

http://blogs.edmontonjournal.com/201...s-few-options/

Gone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2011, 02:40 PM
  #88
Reimer
Tambo Troll Face
 
Reimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,325
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone View Post
Great article, basically confirming Katz took the City of Edmonton to the cleaners on the arena deal.

http://blogs.edmontonjournal.com/201...s-few-options/
Great article or do you mean blog?

edit: Unless Detroit is making a **** load of money from playoff revenue I don't see how they can be that successful. They have had a pretty empty building the last few years.


Last edited by Reimer: 12-02-2011 at 02:46 PM.
Reimer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2011, 02:58 PM
  #89
copperandblue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,724
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone View Post
Great article, basically confirming Katz took the City of Edmonton to the cleaners on the arena deal.

http://blogs.edmontonjournal.com/201...s-few-options/
Boy talk about drawing your own conclusions.

copperandblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2011, 03:03 PM
  #90
Fourier
Registered User
 
Fourier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Waterloo Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,081
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone View Post
Great article, basically confirming Katz took the City of Edmonton to the cleaners on the arena deal.

http://blogs.edmontonjournal.com/201...s-few-options/
The Forbes numbers must be taken with a HUGE grain of salt.

How do the Oilers make so much money in operating profits compared to Calgary when Forbes estimates Calgary has $9M more in reveneue. The Oilers probably spent $5-7M less in real dollars on salary last year but this does not make up a $25M gap in costs. By Forbes numbers other teams need $50M more in revenue to have the same operating profits as the Oilers. They must be miracle workers in the Oilers front office.

Also not ethat Forbes suggests Dallas mlost about $1M last year. Bankruptcy filings show this to be $30M. Had they bothered to do any real searching they would have noticed this.


Last edited by Fourier: 12-02-2011 at 03:29 PM.
Fourier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2011, 03:18 PM
  #91
jadeddog
Registered User
 
jadeddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 10,707
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourier View Post
The Forbes numbers must be taken with a HUGE grain of salt.

How do the Oilers make so much money in operating profits compared to Calgary when Forbes estimates Calgary has $9M more in reveneue. The Oilers probably spent $5-7M less in real dollars on alary last year but this does not make up a $25M gap in costs. By Forbes numbers other team need $50M more in revenue to have the same operating profits as the Oilers. They must be miracle workers in the Oikers front office.

Also not ethat Forbes suggests Dallas mlost about $1M last year. Bankruptcy filings show this to be $30M. Had they bothered to do any real searching they would have noticed this.
yeah these Forbes franchise valuations (and the articles surrounding them) are widely known to be black holes of information... they are wildly inaccurate in many instances... they aren't even worth reading to be honest

jadeddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2011, 04:02 PM
  #92
Beerfish
Registered User
 
Beerfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,477
vCash: 500
Of course if the Forbes article was pro arena then it would be the beacon of financial wisdom with unassailable data.

20 million a year, 35 years....Ohhhhh shiny!

The deal has been reached and it is onward and upward, Katz is going to make a nice profit over the coming years, the city may or may not realize a net benefit from what it puts in.

The biggest problem is that nice headlines like "City of Edmonton will have a 95 million dollar capital short fall this year!" or "city to raise taxes by 4.5 % this year" are set to rankle people even if the tax increase in theory has nothing to do with this separate arena deal.

Beerfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2011, 04:10 PM
  #93
Vomiting Kermit*
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,562
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone View Post
Great article, basically confirming Katz took the City of Edmonton to the cleaners on the arena deal.

http://blogs.edmontonjournal.com/201...s-few-options/
Posted by:
Jonathan Willis



Vomiting Kermit* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2011, 04:13 PM
  #94
Fourier
Registered User
 
Fourier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Waterloo Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,081
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beerfish View Post
Of course if the Forbes article was pro arena then it would be the beacon of financial wisdom with unassailable data.

20 million a year, 35 years....Ohhhhh shiny!

The deal has been reached and it is onward and upward, Katz is going to make a nice profit over the coming years, the city may or may not realize a net benefit from what it puts in.

The biggest problem is that nice headlines like "City of Edmonton will have a 95 million dollar capital short fall this year!" or "city to raise taxes by 4.5 % this year" are set to rankle people even if the tax increase in theory has nothing to do with this separate arena deal.
No the Forbes numbers would be flawed no matter what they said about the Oilers quest for an arena. They estimate Dallas lost $1M last year. Bankruptcy filings show the loss to be $30M. These are court documents that the Forbes guys could have found if they cared. Does that sound like Woodward and Bernstein level journalism to you? Serious question!

Fourier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2011, 04:17 PM
  #95
joestevens29
Registered User
 
joestevens29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 19,674
vCash: 1600
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vomiting Kermit View Post
Posted by:
Jonathan Willis



joestevens29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2011, 04:21 PM
  #96
Replacement
Fly Fly away
 
Replacement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hockey Hell
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,313
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourier View Post
No the Forbes numbers would be flawed no matter what they said about the Oilers quest for an arena. They estimate Dallas lost $1M last year. Bankruptcy filings show the loss to be $30M. These are court documents that the Forbes guys could have found if they cared. Does that sound like Woodward and Bernstein level journalism to you? Serious question!
Does it immediately folllow that if you find one fault in the league wide valuations that all the numbers are wrong?

Really?

Sounds like wanting to throw out all the numbers.

I've yet to see another independent source that has better information than Forbes.

Replacement is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2011, 04:34 PM
  #97
SK13
Mo'Linguish
 
SK13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,255
vCash: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
Does it immediately folllow that if you find one fault in the league wide valuations that all the numbers are wrong?

Really?
One brutal miss where they are thirty times off the mark on the pertinent number (in spite of the correct number being in a recent public document) tends to sour people on the veracity of the rest of numbers.

SK13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2011, 04:37 PM
  #98
Soundwave
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 21,211
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
Does it immediately folllow that if you find one fault in the league wide valuations that all the numbers are wrong?

Really?

Sounds like wanting to throw out all the numbers.

I've yet to see another independent source that has better information than Forbes.
Where does Forbes even get their numbers?

I'm pretty sure no NHL team gives them any official numbers.

They're estimates. Plain and simple.

Soundwave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2011, 04:38 PM
  #99
joestevens29
Registered User
 
joestevens29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 19,674
vCash: 1600
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
Does it immediately folllow that if you find one fault in the league wide valuations that all the numbers are wrong?

Really?

Sounds like wanting to throw out all the numbers.

I've yet to see another independent source that has better information than Forbes.
Just because it's the best inaccurate data out there doesn't mean we should use it.

joestevens29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2011, 04:48 PM
  #100
Reimer
Tambo Troll Face
 
Reimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,325
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundwave View Post
Where does Forbes even get their numbers?

I'm pretty sure no NHL team gives them any official numbers.

They're estimates. Plain and simple.
Yeah it even states that in the article that even though they are a trustworthy source you can't take their numbers as gospel as they are estimates.

Like I said, I beg to differ over the Detroit number unless making the playoffs brings them in that much revenue because over the past few years their barn has been pretty empty.

Reimer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.