Chorney is on waivers from St.Louis would you guys claim him and send him to OKC?
I would the D in OKC could use some help and he may become a servicable D-man in the future.
Your thoughts?
This was on twitter from Dan Tencer today about 1 hour ago!
After 30 days the Oilers no longer have the right of first refusal. The Oilers are in the pecking order just like everyone else and if the Oilers claim him and send him down he will be on waivers again. This is exactly what St. Louis had in mind all along. They knew that if they put Chorney on waivers prior to the 30 days that Edmonton would just take him back and he would not have to pass through waivers to go through OKC. St. Louis can them just grab him and send him to the AHL with no problems.
After 30 days the Oilers no longer have the right of first refusal. The Oilers are in the pecking order just like everyone else and if the Oilers claim him and send him down he will be on waivers again. This is exactly what St. Louis had in mind all along. They knew that if they put Chorney on waivers prior to the 30 days that Edmonton would just take him back and he would not have to pass through waivers to go through OKC. St. Louis can them just grab him and send him to the AHL with no problems.
After 30 days the Oilers no longer have the right of first refusal. The Oilers are in the pecking order just like everyone else and if the Oilers claim him and send him down he will be on waivers again. This is exactly what St. Louis had in mind all along. They knew that if they put Chorney on waivers prior to the 30 days that Edmonton would just take him back and he would not have to pass through waivers to go through OKC. St. Louis can them just grab him and send him to the AHL with no problems.
You've got it backwards, I think. The Oilers waived him first, St Louis claimed and then waived again... therefore, as I understand it, the Oilers have first crack at him and can send him straight down.
You've got it backwards, I think. The Oilers waived him first, St Louis claimed and then waived again... therefore, as I understand it, the Oilers have first crack at him and can send him straight down.
Unless this 30-day rule actually exists, then he's got a valid point.
After 30 days the Oilers no longer have the right of first refusal. The Oilers are in the pecking order just like everyone else and if the Oilers claim him and send him down he will be on waivers again. This is exactly what St. Louis had in mind all along. They knew that if they put Chorney on waivers prior to the 30 days that Edmonton would just take him back and he would not have to pass through waivers to go through OKC. St. Louis can them just grab him and send him to the AHL with no problems.
We placed him on waivers on the 10th though, he was claimed on the 11th. Is that 30 days in the CBA?
You've got it backwards, I think. The Oilers waived him first, St Louis claimed and then waived again... therefore, as I understand it, the Oilers have first crack at him and can send him straight down.
Sorry, I don't have it backwards man. This was talked about a few weeks ago. Check it out:
We placed him on waivers on the 10th though, he was claimed on the 11th. Is that 30 days in the CBA?
Yeah I would think it would. He was added to their roster on the 11th and today is the 9th and with October having 31 days today would be the 30th day he's been on their roster.
Who cares. We don't need to add contracts, we need to subtract them.
Chorney is not a fit for this org anymore. IMO Plante should be out the door really soon as well.
Who cares. We don't need to add contracts, we need to subtract them.
Chorney is not a fit for this org anymore. IMO Plante should be out the door really soon as well.
I have always been rooting for Plante. Not sure he will ever become a regular in Edmonton (not likely) but he is exactly what OKC needs. He is their most physical defenceman and becoming a leader down there.
Chorney is on waivers from St.Louis would you guys claim him and send him to OKC?
I would the D in OKC could use some help and he may become a servicable D-man in the future.
Your thoughts?
This was on twitter from Dan Tencer today about 1 hour ago!
Why do the 9-2-1, 1st place Barons need any help on D? They have the 4th best GA in the league.
I'd say both of those are misinformed. I'm guessing they're misreading the one passage of the CBA because the only thing 30 days has to do with anything is after players have passed through waivers they can be called up and sent down without being subject to waivers again until they reach 30 days and 10 games cumulative. There's nothing about a team owning a player after 30 days (or not that I've seen). If you want proof, look at Steve MacIntyre. We claimed him from the Panthers on September 30th, they claimed him back on November 10th and sent him straight to the AHL.
I'd say both of those are misinformed. I'm guessing they're misreading the one passage of the CBA because the only thing 30 days has to do with anything is after players have passed through waivers they can be called up and sent down without being subject to waivers again until they reach 30 days and 10 games cumulative. There's nothing about a team owning a player after 30 days (or not that I've seen). If you want proof, look at Steve MacIntyre. We claimed him from the Panthers on September 30th, they claimed him back on November 10th and sent him straight to the AHL.
Not exactly sure how to interpret 13.5 in the link below, however, do you really think it is just a coincidence that it is exactly 30 days when St. Louis sent him down?
Not exactly sure how to interpret 13.5 in the link below, however, do you really think it is just a coincidence that it is exactly 30 days when St. Louis sent him down?
Not exactly sure how to interpret 13.5 in the link below, however, do you really think it is just a coincidence that it is exactly 30 days when St. Louis sent him down?
13.20 is exactly what I assume people are misinterpreting. What that's saying is that if Team B claims a player off waivers from Team A and, within the same season, places him back on waivers and he is successfully claimed back by Team A, Team A can send him directly to their a minor league affiliate without subjecting him to waivers again. They (Team A) may also keep him on their active roster for up to 30 days and 10 games cumulative without having to place him back on waivers. Basically, if you re-claim the player, they can be treated as having cleared waivers.
13.20 is exactly what I assume people are misinterpreting. What that's saying is that if Team B claims a player off waivers from Team A and, within the same season, places him back on waivers and he is successfully claimed back by Team A, Team A can send him directly to their a minor league affiliate without subjecting him to waivers again. They (Team A) may also keep him on their active roster for up to 30 days and 10 games cumulative without having to place him back on waivers. Basically, if you re-claim the player, they can be treated as having cleared waivers.
Does OKC need D, from the looks of things they haven't been doing too bad. Also I could see a couple of other teams taking a shot at him. I would pass, the Oilers need the contract space.
13.20 is exactly what I assume people are misinterpreting. What that's saying is that if Team B claims a player off waivers from Team A and, within the same season, places him back on waivers and he is successfully claimed back by Team A, Team A can send him directly to their a minor league affiliate without subjecting him to waivers again. They (Team A) may also keep him on their active roster for up to 30 days and 10 games cumulative without having to place him back on waivers. Basically, if you re-claim the player, they can be treated as having cleared waivers.
This of course is based on no other team putting in a claim for said player.
