HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The Business of Hockey
The Business of Hockey Discuss the financial and business aspects of the NHL. Topics may include the CBA, work stoppages, broadcast contracts, franchise sales, and NHL revenues.

Owners considering a new league...

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
08-27-2004, 12:53 PM
  #1
Finkle is Einhorn
Registered User
 
Finkle is Einhorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,733
vCash: 500
Owners considering a new league...

Sorry if this has been posted....

Link

Finkle is Einhorn is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 12:56 PM
  #2
Vic Rattlehead*
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: St-Hubert, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 40,790
vCash: 500

Vic Rattlehead* is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:02 PM
  #3
Lionel Hutz
Registered User
 
Lionel Hutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Locking the Lounge??
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,981
vCash: 500
Wow, that is one well prepared and well thought out and researched article. Its certainly all the information I need to get familiar with the subject.

Lionel Hutz is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:02 PM
  #4
WrightOn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ohio
Country: Isle of Man
Posts: 4,464
vCash: 500
GEEZ. Anything but actually solve the problem. Just make a new league and let it decay into sadness.

WrightOn is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:04 PM
  #5
WrightOn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ohio
Country: Isle of Man
Posts: 4,464
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lionel Hutz
Wow, that is one well prepared and well thought out and researched article. Its certainly all the information I need to get familiar with the subject.
Disgustingly true and comical.
:lol :lol

WrightOn is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:05 PM
  #6
Blind Gardien
Global Moderator
nexus of the crisis
 
Blind Gardien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Four Winds Bar
Country: France
Posts: 19,357
vCash: 500
New logo, new league, makes sense.

Blind Gardien is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:13 PM
  #7
degroat*
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: http://nhl.degroat.n
Posts: 8,108
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WrightOn
GEEZ. Anything but actually solve the problem. Just make a new league and let it decay into sadness.
When they formed the new league they would automically institute their desired financial system... much like the WHA did.

degroat* is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:15 PM
  #8
Finkle is Einhorn
Registered User
 
Finkle is Einhorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,733
vCash: 500
This just in......the league will be named the XHL, and the Stanley Cup will be re-named "The Big Shiny Trophy At The End." Bertuzzi has dibs on the name "He Hate Me".

Finkle is Einhorn is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:16 PM
  #9
DownFromNJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,536
vCash: 500
Another scare tactic. NHLPA says it will hold out for a year, owners say screw you we're going somewhere else, and a CBA is signed on September 14th.

NHLPA would never let this happen, because without the NHL the union is null.

DownFromNJ is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:22 PM
  #10
YellHockey*
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,830
vCash: 500
So the owners form their own new league and the players form their own new league. Which one has more appeal, the one whose biggest feature is that is owned by the same people who owned the NHL or the one whose biggest feature is that its players are the ones who played in the NHL?

Let them both start their own leagues. It would be the best thing for the fans to have two competitive major pro hockey leagues.

YellHockey* is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:24 PM
  #11
WrightOn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ohio
Country: Isle of Man
Posts: 4,464
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stich
When they formed the new league they would automically institute their desired financial system... much like the WHA did.
No, really?!?!? I had no idea!

WrightOn is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:24 PM
  #12
degroat*
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: http://nhl.degroat.n
Posts: 8,108
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackRedGold
So the owners form their own new league and the players form their own new league. Which one has more appeal, the one whose biggest feature is that is owned by the same people who owned the NHL or the one whose biggest feature is that its players are the ones who played in the NHL?

Let them both start their own leagues. It would be the best thing for the fans to have two competitive major pro hockey leagues.
The owners have the venues, the team names that fans already identify with, & TV contract.

The league that the players would start would have the same problem that the WHA has as far as not being able to find places to play.

The players will eventually go where the money is.

degroat* is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:25 PM
  #13
degroat*
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: http://nhl.degroat.n
Posts: 8,108
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WrightOn
No, really?!?!? I had no idea!
COOL GUY ALERT!

degroat* is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:26 PM
  #14
WrightOn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ohio
Country: Isle of Man
Posts: 4,464
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stich
COOL GUY ALERT!
Sarcasm identification Expert!

WrightOn is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:27 PM
  #15
Puckhead
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Behind you!!!
Country: Italy
Posts: 703
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lionel Hutz
Wow, that is one well prepared and well thought out and researched article. Its certainly all the information I need to get familiar with the subject.
How true is that! This is pathetic, and why if you are the reporter, would you bother with such a vague article. I mean we could have come up with a much better story ourselves. I think that if the owners were on the same page with eachother, let alone the players, then this CBA would be done by the 15th of September. But, they are not together, and therefore whether they find a common ground in the present NHL or decide to start a new league (RIDICULOUS!) it will only be a matter of time before it started down the same road. How sad it is for all of us fans, to have to be held hostage by greedy owners and players who aren't willing to concede some salary for the greater good or the game that afforded them all of the finer things in life.

Puckhead is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:35 PM
  #16
Papa Smurf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Country: Bahrain
Posts: 1,345
vCash: 500
Let me get this straight, after over 90 years of NHL hockey, it's all going to come to an end in January????

Papa Smurf is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:38 PM
  #17
I in the Eye
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Country:
Posts: 4,174
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackRedGold
Let them both start their own leagues. It would be the best thing for the fans to have two competitive major pro hockey leagues.
And let the best league win...

My money is on the owner's league...

I in the Eye is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:45 PM
  #18
YellHockey*
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,830
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stich
The owners have the venues, the team names that fans already identify with, & TV contract.
No. Some of the owners have venues. The NHL has the team names and the TV contracts, not the owners' new league.

Do you think TSN or CBC is going to pay the same for some new unestablished league as it would for a league with decades of history and with another unestablished league offering a similiar product? The owners wouldn't get nearly as much from its contracts.


Quote:
The league that the players would start would have the same problem that the WHA has as far as not being able to find places to play.

The players will eventually go where the money is.
But the owners are starting a new league to try and prevent the players from getting the money.

There are plenty of arenas around North America that are NHL calibre and aren't owned by an NHL owner. Saddledome, Rexall Centre, Rose Garden, Houston's new arena, and Arrowhead Pond to name some of them. They could also go into arenas are that are almost NHL calibre like the new Winnipeg arena, Copps Coliseum, Ottawa Civic Centre, Toronto's AHL arena, etc.

The fans would rather watch the best players in the less desireable buildings then the less desireable players in the best buildings.

The players also know if they stick together they can beat the owners' new league and get their buildings from them for a song.

YellHockey* is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:45 PM
  #19
salty justice
Registered User
 
salty justice's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Country: Albania
Posts: 7,162
vCash: 500
If it saves hockey and we keep the same team names, I could live with a new league run by owners. Just call it the NAHL for North American Hockey League. Because if you think about it, National Hockey League doesnt make sense for an international league like it is. Im really sick of the escalating contracts, if this new league gives players the option of continuing their current contracts but installs a cap and eliminates arbitration I will be very happy and the players would stay.

salty justice is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:47 PM
  #20
FlyersProspect2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicopee, Ma
Country: United States
Posts: 805
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to FlyersProspect2
This is ********. The players want to play hockey, the owners want the players to play hockey whats the problem?

FlyersProspect2 is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:47 PM
  #21
salty justice
Registered User
 
salty justice's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Country: Albania
Posts: 7,162
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackRedGold
There are plenty of arenas around North America that are NHL calibre and aren't owned by an NHL owner. Saddledome, Rexall Centre, Rose Garden, Houston's new arena, and Arrowhead Pond to name some of them. They could also go into arenas are that are almost NHL calibre like the new Winnipeg arena, Copps Coliseum, Ottawa Civic Centre, Toronto's AHL arena, etc.
I would be giddy as hell if they returned hockey to the Great Western Forum! I hope Im not the first to say that the atmosphere in Staples Center SUCKS!

salty justice is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:49 PM
  #22
Papa Smurf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Country: Bahrain
Posts: 1,345
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by theBob
If it saves hockey and we keep the same team names, I could live with a new league run by owners. Just call it the NAHL for North American Hockey League. Because if you think about it, National Hockey League doesnt make sense for an international league like it is. Im really sick of the escalating contracts, if this new league gives players the option of continuing their current contracts but installs a cap and eliminates arbitration I will be very happy and the players would stay.
I went to the Canucks.com board and asked why an international league like the NHL was called the National Hockey League and I got harrassed to hell!

Anyway, if the league keeps everything about the NHL the same but change the name and commisioner, I would be fine with it.

Having said that, I believe this will NOT happen to the NHL. The league is not going anywhere.

Papa Smurf is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:53 PM
  #23
I in the Eye
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Country:
Posts: 4,174
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackRedGold
No. Some of the owners have venues. The NHL has the team names and the TV contracts, not the owners' new league.
err... the NHL could sell (or transfer) the franchise names to the owner's new league... It can be the same individuals involved (at the NHL level), the same franchises, etc... Just operating under a new entity (or 'brand')... and new business model of their choosing...

and with basically the same individuals involved, chances are the majority of the TV contracts would follow...

I in the Eye is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:53 PM
  #24
salty justice
Registered User
 
salty justice's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Country: Albania
Posts: 7,162
vCash: 500
I dont expect at all for this new league to happen, but I think it would honestly save hockey if it did, at the cost of tradition.

salty justice is offline  
Old
08-27-2004, 01:54 PM
  #25
Lionel Hutz
Registered User
 
Lionel Hutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Locking the Lounge??
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,981
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puckhead
How true is that! This is pathetic, and why if you are the reporter, would you bother with such a vague article. I mean we could have come up with a much better story ourselves. I think that if the owners were on the same page with eachother, let alone the players, then this CBA would be done by the 15th of September. But, they are not together, and therefore whether they find a common ground in the present NHL or decide to start a new league (RIDICULOUS!) it will only be a matter of time before it started down the same road. How sad it is for all of us fans, to have to be held hostage by greedy owners and players who aren't willing to concede some salary for the greater good or the game that afforded them all of the finer things in life.
I have made posts in the "rate the avatar of the user above you thread" that had more substance than that article.

Lionel Hutz is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.