HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk > Polls - (hockey-related only)

Should Goalies be fair game outside of the crease?

View Poll Results: Should Gaolies be fair game outside the crease
Yes 47 34.56%
No 89 65.44%
Voters: 136. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
11-18-2011, 09:11 AM
  #1
Firestorm
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canada Eh?
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,989
vCash: 500
Should Goalies be fair game outside of the crease?

I know that the rule is there to protect goalies, this is just a theoretical discussion if the rule wasn't there.

Personally, I don't think that goalies should be fair game outside the crease. Their job is to stop the puck (not to create any offensive/defensive opportunities for the team through checking/pushing the other team's forwards). If goalies were fair game, no one would want to really play that position.

It's kinda like saying you want to drive your car without your seat belt on (besides it being the law of course). You don't fully realize the consequences until something bad happens. Likewise, you don't really know what 'fair game' is, until your goalie gets injured from being 'fair game' (and your goalie may be the best player on your team).

But that's just my opinion.

__________________
Revenge is sweet... Revenge is a dish best served cold... Revenge is ice cream!
Firestorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 12:49 PM
  #2
Jocke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 910
vCash: 500
They don't have the equipment for taking hits.

Jocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 12:51 PM
  #3
Gabe84
Bring back Bonk!
 
Gabe84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Montreal, QC
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,076
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jocke View Post
They don't have the equipment for taking hits.
This. Absolutely not.

Goalies are not trained or equipped for hits, and they have every right to play the puck out of their crease.

That doesn't mean interfering with a skater or a goalie checking another player should be tolerated.

Gabe84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 01:02 PM
  #4
Jocke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 910
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabe84 View Post
This. Absolutely not.

Goalies are not trained or equipped for hits, and they have every right to play the puck out of their crease.

That doesn't mean interfering with a skater or a goalie checking another player should be tolerated.
I'm looking at you, Tim!

Jocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 01:08 PM
  #5
Hal 9000
Registered User
 
Hal 9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,618
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustAnotherHockeyFan View Post
I know that the rule is there to protect goalies, this is just a theoretical discussion if the rule wasn't there.

Personally, I don't think that goalies should be fair game outside the crease. Their job is to stop the puck (not to create any offensive/defensive opportunities for the team through checking/pushing the other team's forwards). If goalies were fair game, no one would want to really play that position.

It's kinda like saying you want to drive your car without your seat belt on (besides it being the law of course). You don't fully realize the consequences until something bad happens. Likewise, you don't really know what 'fair game' is, until your goalie gets injured from being 'fair game' (and your goalie may be the best player on your team).

But that's just my opinion.
If their job is to stop the puck, then why are they out at the hash marks and beyond playing the puck as a defenseman would? Why are they running interference behind the goal? If a goalie skates to the side wall and makes a clearing up to a forward then he is in fact getting in on the offence and should be checkable.

Instead of a trapazoid, there should be a secondary crease that if the goalie leaves, he becomes fair game. We should not allow them to play as they do without consequence.

What is a guy like Lucic supposed to do? Just peel off and allow Miller to send the puck up the ice for an odd man break, I dont think so!

Hal 9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 01:10 PM
  #6
Armond White
Go Sabres!
 
Armond White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oakland Zoo
Country: United States
Posts: 10,030
vCash: 50


The rule would last until the first separated shoulder.

Armond White is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 01:16 PM
  #7
RandV
It's a wolf
 
RandV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,625
vCash: 50
I'm usually not this opinionated but I think everyone that votes 'yes' is being an idiot. Unfortunately this will never be validated because the NHL or any other hockey league would never be stupid enough to implement this rule to show them just why it's such a bad idea.

That said, goalies can't be going this far:



Giving him a gentle nudge was the right play by hordichuk there

RandV is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 01:33 PM
  #8
Hal 9000
Registered User
 
Hal 9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,618
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandV View Post
I'm usually not this opinionated but I think everyone that votes 'yes' is being an idiot. Unfortunately this will never be validated because the NHL or any other hockey league would never be stupid enough to implement this rule to show them just why it's such a bad idea.

That said, goalies can't be going this far:

Giving him a gentle nudge was the right play by hordichuk there
So, what does a forward do when a goalie does come out that far to play the puck as a defenseman?

Hal 9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 01:34 PM
  #9
Generic User
Lafferty, Daniel
 
Generic User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: Vatican City State
Posts: 5,459
vCash: 470
If a goalie is pinching in the corner and overtly blocking your path, then sure, skate through him/knock him over. But lowering your shoulder and hitting a goalie like you would a skater should never be allowed.

Generic User is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 02:01 PM
  #10
Ohashi_Jouzu
Registered User
 
Ohashi_Jouzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Halifax
Country: Japan
Posts: 16,672
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Generic User View Post
If a goalie is pinching in the corner and overtly blocking your path, then sure, skate through him/knock him over. But lowering your shoulder and hitting a goalie like you would a skater should never be allowed.
I can agree with this. Which is to say, while I can't vote "yes" for this poll, I think goalies outside of the crease should be "movable objects".

Ohashi_Jouzu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 02:12 PM
  #11
Hal 9000
Registered User
 
Hal 9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,618
vCash: 500
Judging by Miller's interview, he was literally shocked by what Lucic did. Miller had a false sense of security - even entitlement, and thats why he got injured. Miller made a dumb choice, should the NHL protect people from making dumb choices?

If you want to protect goalies and if you want to increase scoring, stop goalies from running all over the ice and playing like a d-man - simple as that.

Hal 9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 02:19 PM
  #12
MeowLeafs
LM is awesome
 
MeowLeafs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Baconland
Country: Canada
Posts: 22,835
vCash: 772
I think goalies can go out a little further then the crease without getting hit, but there should be a point where it's just too far and the goalie can get hit.

MeowLeafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 04:03 PM
  #13
crazycanuck
Registered User
 
crazycanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,859
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hal 9000 View Post
So, what does a forward do when a goalie does come out that far to play the puck as a defenseman?
Use their heads... and no not headbutt them...

There are other ways to pressure/defend a player/goalie while forechecking other than hitting.

That being said, in terms of goaltender contact when they are out that far, Hordichuk did minimize the contact while still getting a hit in so I'll give him credit there, looked much better than when he tried to hit Ballard this year...

crazycanuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 04:56 PM
  #14
King Woodballs
v Kings Fans
 
King Woodballs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Your Mind
Posts: 24,574
vCash: 50
yes they should
stipulation
only in front of the goal line and if you are out of your crease.

If you are 20 feet in front of your net you should be fair game

__________________
King Woodballs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 05:28 PM
  #15
thadd
Oil4Life
 
thadd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: China
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,899
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to thadd
What's a crease for anyway? What was the trapezoid for anyway? Nobody on the face of the planet can possibly convince me that a goalie going North of his crease isn't fair game.

thadd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 06:42 PM
  #16
CampingintheSnow
Registered User
 
CampingintheSnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,502
vCash: 500
Yes they should be.

CampingintheSnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 07:00 PM
  #17
JayRoadkill
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 303
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thadd View Post
What's a crease for anyway? What was the trapezoid for anyway? Nobody on the face of the planet can possibly convince me that a goalie going North of his crease isn't fair game.
this

why even have a crease if its basically meaningless?

how about, allow goalies to go into the trapezoidal area, but in there they are fair game?

enter at your own risk.


or just stay in the net and nothing will happen.

JayRoadkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 07:14 PM
  #18
Ogopogo*
 
Ogopogo*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,216
vCash: 500
Why do I want my team's goalie being targeted for injury?

The UFC crowd thirsts for blood when the reality is that goalies should be protected. Use some common sense.

Ogopogo* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 07:21 PM
  #19
czechmate25
Registered User
 
czechmate25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Langhorne, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,181
vCash: 500
Behind the net = No

Coming out by the hash marks or higher = Yes

It's the main reason I didn't have that much of a problem with what Lucic did with Miller. If you're a player skating after the puck with your head down expecting a clear path to the puck and all of a sudden a goalie is in your face, what are you supposed to do? As a player myself, I understand that in instances such as that, which happens in a split second, it is a natural instinct to brace yourself or prepare for a hit.

If goalies are going to cry about contact, stay in the crease where they should be protected.

czechmate25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 07:37 PM
  #20
wej20
Registered User
 
wej20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Swansea,UK
Country: Wales
Posts: 18,376
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyguy1993 View Post
this

why even have a crease if its basically meaningless?

how about, allow goalies to go into the trapezoidal area, but in there they are fair game?

enter at your own risk.


or just stay in the net and nothing will happen.
Goalies getting crushed in the trapezoid by forecheckers is going to result in a lot of goalies on IR.

wej20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 07:56 PM
  #21
islesfan3991
Registered User
 
islesfan3991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Washingtonville, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,778
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to islesfan3991
Quote:
Originally Posted by czechmate25 View Post
Behind the net = No

Coming out by the hash marks or higher = Yes

It's the main reason I didn't have that much of a problem with what Lucic did with Miller. If you're a player skating after the puck with your head down expecting a clear path to the puck and all of a sudden a goalie is in your face, what are you supposed to do? As a player myself, I understand that in instances such as that, which happens in a split second, it is a natural instinct to brace yourself or prepare for a hit.

If goalies are going to cry about contact, stay in the crease where they should be protected.
I agree. Behind the net is fine but when a goalie comes why out in front what else is a skater supposed to do? I say they should be fair game out in front.

islesfan3991 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 09:47 PM
  #22
loadie
HFBoards Sponsor
 
loadie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Brunswick
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,201
vCash: 500
No. Until your teams loses its number one goaltender a week before the playoffs from a hit by a 4th liner, its easy to say yes. Goalies are off limits. Period.

__________________

The French Canadian rule: Read about it, go to bed smarter.
http://liammaguiresultimatehockey.co...-or-fiction-2/

Last edited by loadie: 11-18-2011 at 09:55 PM.
loadie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 10:25 PM
  #23
jbeck5
Registered User
 
jbeck5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,727
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by loadie View Post
No. Until your teams loses its number one goaltender a week before the playoffs from a hit by a 4th liner, its easy to say yes. Goalies are off limits. Period.
Then stay in the net? His job description is to stop pucks....you're not doing that behind the net or at the hash marks.

If you play the puck, make sure there's no forchecker right there or else stay in your net.

It's actually a pretty simple concept.

jbeck5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 11:06 PM
  #24
mgoyette
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 24
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbeck5 View Post
Then stay in the net? His job description is to stop pucks....you're not doing that behind the net or at the hash marks.

If you play the puck, make sure there's no forchecker right there or else stay in your net.

It's actually a pretty simple concept.
And is a defencemen's job description not to prevent the other team from scoring? Yet they are still allowed to contribute offensively.

IMO, Goalies should never be fair game, and never will be.

mgoyette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2011, 11:10 PM
  #25
loadie
HFBoards Sponsor
 
loadie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Brunswick
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,201
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbeck5 View Post
Then stay in the net? His job description is to stop pucks....you're not doing that behind the net or at the hash marks.

If you play the puck, make sure there's no forchecker right there or else stay in your net.

It's actually a pretty simple concept.
Actually it is. Don't touch the goaltender. Your version of hockey kinda reminds me of the old table top game that the goalie just moved from side to side and nothing else. In today's game, he's used to break up the fore check and to help get the puck out of your end faster. Also they play the most important position and you only have two. Sure, I see the desire to paste a goaltender, for years I've wanted someone to drill Brodeur because he was so damn good with the puck, it was like having a 3rd D man sitting back there.

loadie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.