HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Northwest Division > Edmonton Oilers
Notices

Unofficial Trade Rumor/Proposal Thread Part XI: Just evaluating.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
11-22-2011, 02:38 PM
  #76
Cloned
Sexy Genesis
 
Cloned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,820
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohaj View Post
on the flipside....Feaster gets fired and the Flames probably loose a fan or two (hundred) to the Oilers....

they do compete for fanbase, do they not?
You actually want Feaster to be fired as an Oilers fan?

I sure don't. He's worse than Lowe.

You can pretty much look at every big trade that Feaster has pulled off and they all suck for his teams. Boyle, Richards, Regehr, etc.

__________________

Sig AND X-mas avatar courtesy of The Nemesis

"Pull yourself together!" - Solid Snake to Otacon, multiple times in the series
Cloned is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 02:46 PM
  #77
clayton magnet
Registered User
 
clayton magnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Peace River, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 746
vCash: 500
For those of you that want Turris.

How could you possibly want a young guy that has such a ridiculous sense of entitlement to actually hold out for money he has in no way earned in our locker room befriending our own young guys that sooner or later will need to be signed by the Oilers?

clayton magnet is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 02:49 PM
  #78
CupofOil
#getyourbagon
 
CupofOil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oiler Fan in the NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 11,759
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeus3007 View Post
Gagner for Turris and David Schlemko. I would be happy with that. Both Gagner and Turris need a shakeup anyway.
Seriously? The Yotes probably wouldn't trade Turris straight up for Gagner nevermind adding a defenseman who has been playing very well for them.
Gagner's trade value has gone in the crapper IMO, we would be lucky to get a 2nd rounder for him at this point or at the very best, we would get an equally struggling young player back for him.

CupofOil is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 02:54 PM
  #79
Joe Hallenback
Registered User
 
Joe Hallenback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,125
vCash: 500
Did anyone watch the game last night?

Why the hell do we want a guy who weighs a dollar eighty soaking wet?

Get real people if anything the Oilers are going to move some of the guys we currently have and get bigger

Joe Hallenback is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 02:56 PM
  #80
hockeyaddict101
Registered User
 
hockeyaddict101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 19,871
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CupofOil View Post
Seriously? The Yotes probably wouldn't trade Turris straight up for Gagner nevermind adding a defenseman who has been playing very well for them.
Gagner's trade value has gone in the crapper IMO, we would be lucky to get a 2nd rounder for him at this point or at the very best, we would get an equally struggling young player back for him.
And Turris's trade value is high because?

hockeyaddict101 is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 02:58 PM
  #81
Moonlapse Vertigo
....
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,635
vCash: 1025
Turris had zero value before his trade request.

Moonlapse Vertigo is online now  
Old
11-22-2011, 02:59 PM
  #82
Reimer
Tambo Troll Face
 
Reimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,325
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeus3007 View Post
Gagner for Turris and David Schlemko. I would be happy with that. Both Gagner and Turris need a shakeup anyway.
I think we'd be lucky to get Schlemko for just Gagner.

Reimer is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:00 PM
  #83
Groucho
Registered User
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St Albert
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,320
vCash: 1010
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyaddict101 View Post
And Turris's trade value is high because?
Ding ding ding...

What has Turris done to keep his trade value up?
He hasn't even played yet this season.

Groucho is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:03 PM
  #84
Jimmi Jenkins
Don't touch the Fish
 
Jimmi Jenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 34,592
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyaddict101 View Post
And Turris's trade value is high because?
He's not Sam Gagner

Jimmi Jenkins is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:03 PM
  #85
Eytinge
Registered User
 
Eytinge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,934
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CupofOil View Post
Seriously? The Yotes probably wouldn't trade Turris straight up for Gagner nevermind adding a defenseman who has been playing very well for them.
Gagner's trade value has gone in the crapper IMO, we would be lucky to get a 2nd rounder for him at this point or at the very best, we would get an equally struggling young player back for him.
An equally struggling young player....hmm like Turris?

If Phoenix thinks they can get more than a Gagner or Bailey type swap they are kidding themselves.

Eytinge is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:10 PM
  #86
nabob
#GETYOURBAGON
 
nabob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: HF boards
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,478
vCash: 1596
Quote:
Originally Posted by clayton magnet View Post
For those of you that want Turris.

How could you possibly want a young guy that has such a ridiculous sense of entitlement to actually hold out for money he has in no way earned in our locker room befriending our own young guys that sooner or later will need to be signed by the Oilers?
He wants out of Pheonix, cant say I blame him. It was never about money. Bet he gets dealt now, especially with such a low $$ contract.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Hallenback View Post
Did anyone watch the game last night?

Why the hell do we want a guy who weighs a dollar eighty soaking wet?

Get real people if anything the Oilers are going to move some of the guys we currently have and get bigger
To be fair Joe RNH weighs 175 soaking wet during the offseason. It matters more how strong a guy is on his skates.

I have not seen enough of Turris to know if he needs to wear snowpants like Sammy does.

nabob is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:14 PM
  #87
Joe Hallenback
Registered User
 
Joe Hallenback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,125
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nabob View Post
He wants out of Pheonix, cant say I blame him. It was never about money. Bet he gets dealt now, especially with such a low $$ contract.



To be fair Joe RNH weighs 175 soaking wet during the offseason. It matters more how strong a guy is on his skates.

I have not seen enough of Turris to know if he needs to wear snowpants like Sammy does.
The point is we don't need him at all. He is not a difference maker and we have a group of very similar players. If anything we need to move a few guys and make room in the future for some of bigger developing guys in the AHL

Joe Hallenback is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:14 PM
  #88
hockeyaddict101
Registered User
 
hockeyaddict101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 19,871
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmi Jenkins View Post
He's not Sam Gagner
You are right he is worse.

hockeyaddict101 is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:18 PM
  #89
Horseradish
Registered User
 
Horseradish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,848
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Hallenback View Post
Did anyone watch the game last night?

Why the hell do we want a guy who weighs a dollar eighty soaking wet?

Get real people if anything the Oilers are going to move some of the guys we currently have and get bigger
I don't disagree that we need to get bigger, but it is a long way down the list of needs. More than anything, by far, Edmonton needs more NHL-capable d-men, and further yet, they need NHL dmen who can get the puck up the ice. There is no logical reason other than lack of back end support that edmonton's forwards can't win the puck possession game against half the teams in the league.

Detroit isn't a big team at all, even though they play in a big, tough division. They win lots because they almost always out-possess and as a result, outchance their opposition.

Horseradish is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:18 PM
  #90
CupofOil
#getyourbagon
 
CupofOil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oiler Fan in the NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 11,759
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eytinge View Post
An equally struggling young player....hmm like Turris?

If Phoenix thinks they can get more than a Gagner or Bailey type swap they are kidding themselves.
I would say that Okposo is more in the realm of an equally struggling player. Turris hasn't played enough games to earn the title of struggling young player just yet plus he was starting to "get it" towards the end of last season and the playoffs so he seemed to be on a bit of an upward trend going into the offseason.

Also, i don't know why anybody would want to make the Gagner for Turris swap anyway, it doesn't solve any problems although i personally feel that Turris has more long term potential than Gagner. We just don't have a need for a Turris type player in the top 6.

CupofOil is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:23 PM
  #91
Joe Hallenback
Registered User
 
Joe Hallenback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,125
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horseradish View Post
I don't disagree that we need to get bigger, but it is a long way down the list of needs. More than anything, by far, Edmonton needs more NHL-capable d-men, and further yet, they need NHL dmen who can get the puck up the ice. There is no logical reason other than lack of back end support that edmonton's forwards can't win the puck possession game against half the teams in the league.

Detroit isn't a big team at all, even though they play in a big, tough division. They win lots because they almost always out-possess and as a result, outchance their opposition.
Detroit is a big team. Just because Datysuk or Zetterberg arnt big plaeyrs doesn't make Franzen,Holmstrom,Flippula or Bertuzzi small. They have a mixture of skill with guys who can battle in front or along the boards.

Most teams have that mixture. Both teams in the Stanley cup final had that mixture.

If you don't think the Oilers are headed there then look at this

6'2 195
6'1 215
6'2 205
6'2 220
6'2 190
6'5 235
6'0 205
6'1 195

5'11 184
5'11 190
6'1 175
6'0 185
6'1 194
6'1 192
6'1 207

This is a list of Oiler draft picks and size above playing the minors and the 2nd list is our current top 9 at some point you are going to start to see some of those smaller guys get moved out and some of those bigger minor league guys move in

Joe Hallenback is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:24 PM
  #92
dnicks17
Moderator
Bill Ranford!
 
dnicks17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,448
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by CupofOil View Post
I would say that Okposo is more in the realm of an equally struggling player. Turris hasn't played enough games to earn the title of struggling young player just yet plus he was starting to "get it" towards the end of last season and the playoffs so he seemed to be on a bit of an upward trend going into the offseason.

Also, i don't know why anybody would want to make the Gagner for Turris swap anyway, it doesn't solve any problems although i personally feel that Turris has more long term potential than Gagner. We just don't have a need for a Turris type player in the top 6.
A guy who can win face-offs and shoot the puck.

I'd say that's exactly what we need in our top6.

dnicks17 is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:26 PM
  #93
Beerfish
Registered User
 
Beerfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,463
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by clayton magnet View Post
For those of you that want Turris.

How could you possibly want a young guy that has such a ridiculous sense of entitlement to actually hold out for money he has in no way earned in our locker room befriending our own young guys that sooner or later will need to be signed by the Oilers?
Just change 'young' to old in your statement and you have Horcoff!

Beerfish is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:27 PM
  #94
Jimmi Jenkins
Don't touch the Fish
 
Jimmi Jenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 34,592
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyaddict101 View Post
You are right he is worse.
Not really sure how that's possible.

Jimmi Jenkins is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:35 PM
  #95
CupofOil
#getyourbagon
 
CupofOil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oiler Fan in the NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 11,759
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnicks17 View Post
A guy who can win face-offs and shoot the puck.

I'd say that's exactly what we need in our top6.
We have guys that can shoot the puck in the top 6....RNH, Hall and Eberle all have above average shots, Gagner has actually been solid on faceoffs this year so i don't see Turris as a huge upgrade on him in that area.
My point is that we don't need another cream puff in the top 6, we need a player that will battle on the boards and get into the dirty areas while also providing strong defensive play, Turris does none of that.

CupofOil is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:44 PM
  #96
Petro Points
Registered User
 
Petro Points's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,732
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmi Jenkins View Post
Not really sure how that's possible.
Cogliano and Brule come to mind...

Petro Points is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 03:59 PM
  #97
Jimmi Jenkins
Don't touch the Fish
 
Jimmi Jenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 34,592
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petro Points View Post
Cogliano and Brule come to mind...
Having more value then Gagner? Seems like it.

Jimmi Jenkins is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 04:12 PM
  #98
Eytinge
Registered User
 
Eytinge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,934
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmi Jenkins View Post
Having more value then Gagner? Seems like it.
Your new sarcasm character sure is subtle.

BTW CupofOil I don't see a fit for Turris either. I think an Okposo-Gagner swap might be good for both teams.

Eytinge is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 04:16 PM
  #99
BoldNewLettuce
Registered User
 
BoldNewLettuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,772
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloned View Post
You actually want Feaster to be fired as an Oilers fan?

I sure don't. He's worse than Lowe.

You can pretty much look at every big trade that Feaster has pulled off and they all suck for his teams. Boyle, Richards, Regehr, etc.
i have no idea what you are getting at.

BoldNewLettuce is offline  
Old
11-22-2011, 04:19 PM
  #100
Petro Points
Registered User
 
Petro Points's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,732
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohaj View Post
i have no idea what you are getting at.
basically saying that a bad Flames team is good for Oilers.
Feaster being there helps it stay that way.

Petro Points is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.