HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The Business of Hockey
The Business of Hockey Discuss the financial and business aspects of the NHL. Topics may include the CBA, work stoppages, broadcast contracts, franchise sales, and NHL revenues.

Goodenow Statement

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-15-2004, 02:22 PM
  #1
hockeytown9321
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,343
vCash: 500
Goodenow Statement

http://www.nhlpa.com/Content/FEATURE...es.asp?ID=3362

hockeytown9321 is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 02:26 PM
  #2
X8oD
Registered User
 
X8oD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 612 Warf Ave.
Country: United States
Posts: 7,157
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeytown9321
what a lame statement.

Its 1-0 Bettman right now. Bettman released statements and quotes, Goodenow didnt even refute ANY of the comments bettman made, and instead just repeated earlier statements [ironically which is what the NHL accuses the NHLPA of doing with its 2 proposals].

Bettman gets an almost nationally televised Presser, Goddenow releases a rehashed statement on its website....... geesh

X8oD is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 02:34 PM
  #3
Oil_slick9416*
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraft dinner is good
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,441
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Oil_slick9416* Send a message via MSN to Oil_slick9416*
Well, Goodenow apparently will speak live around 4 pm EST according steve koulas of the score, i guess we will have to wait and see what happens next.

Oil_slick9416* is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 02:47 PM
  #4
jpsharkfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 738
vCash: 500
IMO regardless of which side you support it is hard to argue that the NHL does a much better job with their press releases/press conferences than the NHLPA. The NHLPA might want to consider spending a little of their war chest on a top notch speech writer and image consultant.

jpsharkfan is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 02:53 PM
  #5
Oil_slick9416*
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraft dinner is good
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,441
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Oil_slick9416* Send a message via MSN to Oil_slick9416*
oh yah, i mean that goodenow statement almost sliped through the cracks. they do need better speach writters, i agree 100%

Oil_slick9416* is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 02:57 PM
  #6
HckyFght*
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 442
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to HckyFght*
Check out this take on the CBA impasse...

http://www.sportsfanmagazine.com/content/view/775/29/

See what you think?
-HckyFght!

HckyFght* is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 03:11 PM
  #7
Castor Troy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 141
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpsharkfan
IMO regardless of which side you support it is hard to argue that the NHL does a much better job with their press releases/press conferences than the NHLPA. The NHLPA might want to consider spending a little of their war chest on a top notch speech writer and image consultant.
Exactly. IMO the NHL is saying all the right things, and is playing the NHLPA's cards before the NHLPA can do so. After watching all of Bettman's conference, and this is coming from a guy who absolutely despises Gary Bettman, I'm a lot more convinced that the owners know what they are doing. For right or wrong, they seem to be at the stage where they admit mistakes and are looking to the future. The NHLPA, however, has yet to give me that impression. They refuse to deal with the details of this dispute and instead sit there and regurgitate their "no salary cap" ideal over and over.

The NHL has continually addressed in the media and to the fans exactly what their views are and then they showed us the numbers and figures to back it up. Whether you believe the numbers or not is another thing, but I ask where are the players numbers to refute these claims? I haven't seen one verifiable claim coming out of the players. Instead, they have simply said that they want a free market, which means no salary cap. Again, I'm not trying to argue which side is in the right, I'm just saying from where I sit, the NHL has done a MUCH better job of presenting their position.

Castor Troy is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 03:14 PM
  #8
triggrman
HFBoards Sponsor
 
triggrman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nashville
Country: United States
Posts: 16,074
vCash: 500
nhlpa's presser on the net anywhere?

triggrman is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 06:36 PM
  #9
jpsharkfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 738
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Castor Troy
Exactly. IMO the NHL is saying all the right things, and is playing the NHLPA's cards before the NHLPA can do so. After watching all of Bettman's conference, and this is coming from a guy who absolutely despises Gary Bettman, I'm a lot more convinced that the owners know what they are doing. For right or wrong, they seem to be at the stage where they admit mistakes and are looking to the future. The NHLPA, however, has yet to give me that impression. They refuse to deal with the details of this dispute and instead sit there and regurgitate their "no salary cap" ideal over and over.

The NHL has continually addressed in the media and to the fans exactly what their views are and then they showed us the numbers and figures to back it up. Whether you believe the numbers or not is another thing, but I ask where are the players numbers to refute these claims? I haven't seen one verifiable claim coming out of the players. Instead, they have simply said that they want a free market, which means no salary cap. Again, I'm not trying to argue which side is in the right, I'm just saying from where I sit, the NHL has done a MUCH better job of presenting their position.
Agree 100%. While I was watching Bettman's press conference I was hoping that many of the Players were also watching. I think it is important for the players to hear the reality as the NHL sees it. The NHL sells their position really well and makes the NHLPA look like a spoiled child. Many of the owners will loose less money if there is no hockey this year. The players will loose all their salary if there is no hockey. The NHL makes it clear that they have no choice but to shut down hockey until there is a new system. How many years income are the players willing to give up.

After a few years it wont matter because the league can call impass and start all over again without the NHLPA. The young up and coming kids from Juniors will think that a league average salary of $1.3 million is like mana from heaven(down from the current $1.8)

jpsharkfan is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 07:31 PM
  #10
Licentia
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 370
vCash: 500
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story.asp...94&hubName=nhl

Is this the Goodenow statement? It actually sounds pretty good. But I still understand how the owners need more assurance with salaries. It was the owner's idea to get Bettman in the first place. They wanted him for one reason: Salary Cap. That's all that I heard when he was first hired. He is going to do exactly that.



TORONTO - NHLPA Executive Director, Bob Goodenow released a statement following NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman's press conference:



"This is a disappointing day for NHL Players and fans. Gary Bettman's announcement that he and the owners have locked out the Players and are shutting down the game of hockey is simply the wrong way to address the issues we are facing. The Players have been prepared to compromise for a very long time and have proposed frameworks that should already have produced a deal that is fair for all. Unfortunately, the League has rejected all opportunities for compromise, while stubbornly insisting that Gary Bettman has the single solution to every problem - a salary cap."


Last edited by Sotnos: 09-16-2004 at 08:21 AM. Reason: please give a link and do not post more than a paragraph or two from an online article, otherwise it's a copyright violation, thanks
Licentia is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 07:42 PM
  #11
Licentia
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 370
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Castor Troy
Exactly. IMO the NHL is saying all the right things, and is playing the NHLPA's cards before the NHLPA can do so. After watching all of Bettman's conference, and this is coming from a guy who absolutely despises Gary Bettman, I'm a lot more convinced that the owners know what they are doing. For right or wrong, they seem to be at the stage where they admit mistakes and are looking to the future. The NHLPA, however, has yet to give me that impression. They refuse to deal with the details of this dispute and instead sit there and regurgitate their "no salary cap" ideal over and over.

The NHL has continually addressed in the media and to the fans exactly what their views are and then they showed us the numbers and figures to back it up. Whether you believe the numbers or not is another thing, but I ask where are the players numbers to refute these claims? I haven't seen one verifiable claim coming out of the players. Instead, they have simply said that they want a free market, which means no salary cap. Again, I'm not trying to argue which side is in the right, I'm just saying from where I sit, the NHL has done a MUCH better job of presenting their position.
I think the NHLPA could have the best PR available and they still wouldn't have much support. Fans are sick of paying players millions of dollars, and rightfully so. Fans work hard for their money, and they have to spend too much of it to see a hockey game, only to be helping some guy live the easy life. I swear, if I was a player, I would sign for $3 million and give $2 million back to the team to help reduce ticket prices. The fans would love me forever. The fans are what it's all about anyway.

Licentia is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 07:43 PM
  #12
Licentia
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 370
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by triggrman
nhlpa's presser on the net anywhere?
What does presser mean? Pressure? Press Conference? Press Release?

Licentia is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 08:01 PM
  #13
hockeytown9321
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,343
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Licentia
I think the NHLPA could have the best PR available and they still wouldn't have much support. Fans are sick of paying players millions of dollars, and rightfully so. Fans work hard for their money, and they have to spend too much of it to see a hockey game, only to be helping some guy live the easy life. I swear, if I was a player, I would sign for $3 million and give $2 million back to the team to help reduce ticket prices. The fans would love me forever. The fans are what it's all about anyway.
So when payrolls go down under a cap, ticket prices will too, right?

You have the impression the league is trying to get a cap for this noble competitive balance purpose(which is a faulty purpose anyway). They could care less about you or me. Mike Ilitch could care less if Edmonton ever wins another game. Edmonton's owner could care less if Detroit ever wins another game. Its about maximizing profits, nothing more.

hockeytown9321 is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 08:14 PM
  #14
I in the Eye
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Country:
Posts: 4,058
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Licentia
As said by Goodenow: An honest partnership can never be achieved under the League's 'my way or the highway' approach. Partnerships are built on respect, trust and willingness to compromise. Partnerships are not built through confrontation. Nonetheless, Gary and the Owners have chosen, through a lockout, to try to force Players to accept a system they know Players would never agree to.
The NHLPA considers themselves a 'partner' when it's convenient for them to do so... The NHLPA wants to go to the weddings, and skip the funerals... If the NHLPA wants to consider themselves a 'partner' - along with the benefits of a 'partnership', they should also share in the costs of a 'partnership'...

For franchises that lost a lot of money, as 'partners', the players on those team should share in paying for those losses - out of their own salaries... IF for franchises that made a lot of money, as 'partners', the players feel entitled to a share in the revenue generated...

Isn't that only fair for a 'partnership'? When revenue is generated, both partners share in that revenue? When expenses are incurred, both partners share in paying for those expenses?

Oh, but the NHLPA only wants to share in the revenue and profit- not the expenses and losses...

When talking about expenses and losses, the NHLPA all of a sudden becomes 'employees' - not 'partners' - and not responsible...

The NHLPA suffers from a role complex...

I in the Eye is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 08:19 PM
  #15
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 107,620
vCash: 6115
Quote:
Originally Posted by X8oD
what a lame statement.

Its 1-0 Bettman right now. Bettman released statements and quotes, Goodenow didnt even refute ANY of the comments bettman made, and instead just repeated earlier statements [ironically which is what the NHL accuses the NHLPA of doing with its 2 proposals].

Bettman gets an almost nationally televised Presser, Goddenow releases a rehashed statement on its website....... geesh

How is it 1-0 Bettman? If you're talking about alienating the neogeotiating process and making absolutely no concessions whatsoever and telling the NHLPA to screw off, then I guess it is 1-0 Bettman in the eyes of the people that are brainwashed by the NHL's propaganda that "oh we're poor, we need a salary cap.

Wrong.

The owners think they need a salary cap because some teams can't keep their spending on player contracts under control and need the players to bail them out of their own mistakes. So if this is 'Bettman-1' then the NHLPA has a healthy lead.

GKJ is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 08:31 PM
  #16
Licentia
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 370
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeytown9321
So when payrolls go down under a cap, ticket prices will too, right?

You have the impression the league is trying to get a cap for this noble competitive balance purpose(which is a faulty purpose anyway). They could care less about you or me. Mike Ilitch could care less if Edmonton ever wins another game. Edmonton's owner could care less if Detroit ever wins another game. Its about maximizing profits, nothing more.
They might, because teams in the US are losing fans due to the high ticket prices, so the league might not have a choice. But I know it's not a guarantee.

Fans don't care if they pay $40 for a game instead of $80 now. Fans are still paying millionaires salaries, and don't like when the millionaires whine.

Licentia is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 08:34 PM
  #17
Licentia
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 370
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by go kim johnsson
How is it 1-0 Bettman? If you're talking about alienating the neogeotiating process and making absolutely no concessions whatsoever and telling the NHLPA to screw off, then I guess it is 1-0 Bettman in the eyes of the people that are brainwashed by the NHL's propaganda that "oh we're poor, we need a salary cap.

Wrong.

The owners think they need a salary cap because some teams can't keep their spending on player contracts under control and need the players to bail them out of their own mistakes. So if this is 'Bettman-1' then the NHLPA has a healthy lead.
Nobody thinks the NHL is poor. Who cares why the NHL wants a salary cap? At the end of the day - with a cap - the NHL will have 30 teams all able to compete with the same amount of money to spend on players. That's what counts.

Licentia is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 08:49 PM
  #18
djhn579
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tonawanda, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,747
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeytown9321
So when payrolls go down under a cap, ticket prices will too, right?

You have the impression the league is trying to get a cap for this noble competitive balance purpose(which is a faulty purpose anyway). They could care less about you or me. Mike Ilitch could care less if Edmonton ever wins another game. Edmonton's owner could care less if Detroit ever wins another game. Its about maximizing profits, nothing more.
Ticket prices are already coming down substantially in some markets. Buffalo, for instance...


The Sabres will reduce the cost of some season tickets 12-28%, with seats in the lower bowl of the HSBC Arena costing less than when the arena first opened in 1996.


http://www.usatoday.com/sports/hocke...t-prices_x.htm

djhn579 is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 09:05 PM
  #19
ArtG
Registered User
 
ArtG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,659
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by go kim johnsson
How is it 1-0 Bettman? If you're talking about alienating the neogeotiating process and making absolutely no concessions whatsoever and telling the NHLPA to screw off, then I guess it is 1-0 Bettman in the eyes of the people that are brainwashed by the NHL's propaganda that "oh we're poor, we need a salary cap.

Wrong.

The owners think they need a salary cap because some teams can't keep their spending on player contracts under control and need the players to bail them out of their own mistakes. So if this is 'Bettman-1' then the NHLPA has a healthy lead.
oh yes.. and the players made HUGE concessions.

The NHL isn't the one having to make concessions here, you forget that the players are fine and dandy with the NHL and the way it is right now. It's the owners that want the players to concede and the players have not been willing to do so. The NHL is not claiming that it is poor -- they're saying that they lose $300million year, that's not healthy for any business. This is not propaganda. Did you not read the Levitt report?

As for the cap, it's not only to stop the owners from making stupid signings as you say but also to put teams like Vancouver and Colorado on a level playin field. The Canadian dollar comes into play here as well. Even if Vancouver manages its money correctly and has a $45 million payroll, Colorado can easily afford 60-70 million. Meanwhile some teams can barely scrape up $20 million...

ArtG is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 09:11 PM
  #20
Go Flames Go*
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 943
vCash: 500
Bob Goodnow is a peice of garbage that should be thrown out into the trash. He speaks nuthing but crap, a market place my ass. If it was a free market place, would player hold out and still be paid while there greedy ass wants more money. Contracts are gaurnteed, this guy seems like he has no education what a peice of garbage.

Go Flames Go* is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 09:16 PM
  #21
User571
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Between the Pipes
Posts: 926
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to User571
This just in from the boardroom.

NHLPA: No Salary Cap

Gary Bettman: Salary cap

NHLPA: No Salary cap times a thousand

GB: Salary Cap Infiniti

NHLPA: Hey you cant do that

GB: Yes we can

NHLPA: well your ears are big

GB: Nuh uh

NHLPA: Yuh huh times a billion

GB: Nuh uh times infiniti

NHLPA: a billions more than infiniti

GB: No its not

(Meanwhile rink worker sells his car and moves in with his parents)

User571 is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 09:33 PM
  #22
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 107,620
vCash: 6115
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtG
oh yes.. and the players made HUGE concessions.

The NHL isn't the one having to make concessions here, you forget that the players are fine and dandy with the NHL and the way it is right now. It's the owners that want the players to concede and the players have not been willing to do so. The NHL is not claiming that it is poor -- they're saying that they lose $300million year, that's not healthy for any business. This is not propaganda. Did you not read the Levitt report?

As for the cap, it's not only to stop the owners from making stupid signings as you say but also to put teams like Vancouver and Colorado on a level playin field. The Canadian dollar comes into play here as well. Even if Vancouver manages its money correctly and has a $45 million payroll, Colorado can easily afford 60-70 million. Meanwhile some teams can barely scrape up $20 million...
I never said the players made HUGE concessions. I said they made some, should they make more? Yes. At some point will they make more? Yes, but not until the owners make some concessions, which right now stands at zero.

I read the Levitt report, and the only thing the Levitt report says is that the NHL lost a load of money. This isn't soley because of player salaries, it is also because of poor business decisions, terrible arena leases and not having a supportive fan base that generates income. Minnesota has a supportive fan base, thus they are arguably the healthiest franchise in the league.

How is Vancouver and Colorado not on a level playing field? Vancouver manages its money well. Vancouver is one of the model franchises in the league. Vancouver made between $20-25 million this past season. If Colorado can afford $60-70M on its payroll than more power to them, which brings in the luxury tax and revenue sharing.

So please tell me what exactly are the owners conceding thus far?

GKJ is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 09:37 PM
  #23
Licentia
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 370
vCash: 500
"The salary cap is a mechanism whereby the owners would pay the players less than they otherwise would receive."

Quote from Bob Goodenow.

http://www.canada.com/sports/story.h...6-44584B0466C5

He's as sharp as George W. Bush.


Last edited by Licentia: 09-15-2004 at 10:04 PM.
Licentia is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 09:57 PM
  #24
jpsharkfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 738
vCash: 500
It seems to me that every time the NHLPA or one of the players open their mouths they just dig themselves deeper in a ditch.
The following is from an article from Yahoo news:``We're not closing our eyes to the financial problems the league has,'' LeClair said. ``We made many concessions, but the reality of the situation is, it's not our fault.

``We didn't create this problem.''


I would not accept that kind of answer from a 5 year old let alone a multi millionaire many times over. Its not my fault, I didnt do it!!! The players need to grow up and stop making those kind of statements to the press.

When you compare the above with quotes from Bettmans statement the players and the union look like fools. Here are a few quotes from Bettman:
We offered the union systems that would continue to pay multi-million dollar salaries to our star players. We will not apologize for contracts which could still be in excess of $6 million US per year, even if some players would make less than they are now getting.

We offered the union systems that would provide an average player salary of $1.3 million US per season. An average salary of $1.3 million may be less than the players are getting now, but we will not apologize for an average player salary of $1.3 million per season.

That said, we do apologize to our millions of fans and the thousands of people whose livelihoods depend on our game. It is truly unfortunate that we have to go through this. I assure you that no one is more unhappy about this situation than I am.


I won't even insist on $1.3 million, they can pay me $1.1 million, I won't ask the NHL to apologize; in fact I will thank them all the way to the bank . All us "normal people would feel like we won the lottery if we could earn anywhere near $1 mil a year.

Regardless of which side you back it is hard to argue that the league is doing a much better job with its PR.

jpsharkfan is offline  
Old
09-15-2004, 10:08 PM
  #25
Licentia
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 370
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpsharkfan
I won't even insist on $1.3 million, they can pay me $1.1 million, I won't ask the NHL to apologize; in fact I will thank them all the way to the bank . All us "normal people would feel like we won the lottery if we could earn anywhere near $1 mil a year.
Yep. I'll even take (and be happy with) $100,000 a year.

Please somebody, the NHLPA to see the light

Licentia is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.