HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The Business of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
The Business of Hockey Discuss the financial and business aspects of the NHL. Topics may include the CBA, work stoppages, broadcast contracts, franchise sales, and NHL revenues.

Would You Watch Scabs Play?

View Poll Results: Would You Watch Scabs Play?
Yes To Scabs! 67 79.76%
No To Scabs! 17 20.24%
Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-16-2004, 08:41 PM
  #1
nikeisevil
Registered User
 
nikeisevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Burnaby, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,664
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to nikeisevil
Would You Watch Scabs Play?

We've been talking about this on the Oilers' board a bit and it's gotten some interesting results. Take a look: http://www.hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=104060. Just wondering what everyone thinks.

There has been some speculation about the league perhaps eventually calling an "impasse". If that occurs the league could force a new economic system on the league at which point the players would likely strike.

This leads to an interesting question - would you watch scabs play in NHL uniforms?

Here's Gary's current statements:

Q. Commissioner, what is the League's entitlement if a year goes by and there is no agreement? How can you reconstitute the League and begin play again?

COMMISSIONER BETTMAN: The question that you are asking is, when can an employer unilaterally implement new terms and conditions of employment. You can do that at impasse. I have seen a lot of speculation that that's something that we plan to do, and it's something, quite frankly, we haven't given any thought. We're hoping that at some point in the not-too-distant future, the League and the players can get together and that the Union will finally be prepared to negotiate the type of partnership deal that can take our game forward.

Q. This may be too early to say, but do you ever envision a scenario in which you might use replacement players?

COMMISSIONER BETTMAN: As I indicated before that's not anything we have been considering. Speculation on that has probably been used as a device to get the players energized, but it's not something we're considering right now.

from: http://www.nhlcbanews.com/transcript..._qa091504.html

nikeisevil is offline  
Old
09-16-2004, 08:44 PM
  #2
loudi94
Master of my Domain
 
loudi94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lethbridge, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,368
vCash: 50
Uniform first and player second!!

loudi94 is offline  
Old
09-16-2004, 08:45 PM
  #3
Grave77digger
Registered User
 
Grave77digger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,550
vCash: 500
AHL teams should play in there parent club building

Grave77digger is offline  
Old
09-16-2004, 08:55 PM
  #4
Benji Frank
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,650
vCash: 500
Can you imagine guys showing up in their Chevy's to cross a picket line formed by a bunch of guys driving Ferrarri's??

I don't think it'll get to that. There's 700 wives/girlfriends and several more alimony/support payments that won't allow it to get to that!!!

I say we start seeing some serious cracks (in the union!! ) by Christmas!!!

Benji Frank is offline  
Old
09-16-2004, 09:43 PM
  #5
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 110,016
vCash: 5792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grave77digger
AHL teams should play in there parent club building
And penalize the AHL markets? The AHL won't make nearly as much money and there isn't even 30 AHL teams right now, to even cover most of the costs it does for NHL clubs. Most AHL teams are not owned by their NHL parent.


Although the Phantoms and Flyers have the same owner, even the same city. Philadelphia lucked out a bit with this lockout.

GKJ is offline  
Old
09-16-2004, 09:57 PM
  #6
ALF AmericanLionsFan
Registered User
 
ALF AmericanLionsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cleveland, Ohio USA
Country: United States
Posts: 7,571
vCash: 500
Hell no. Too much other good hockey to watch i.e. AHL, Euro Leagues, College and Junior. Plenty to keep you occupied until these clowns figure this out.

ALF AmericanLionsFan is offline  
Old
09-16-2004, 10:02 PM
  #7
Sotnos
Registered User
 
Sotnos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Not here
Posts: 10,900
vCash: 500
If this was what I got stuck watching with my tickets (that I've already paid for), I'd demand a big portion of my money back, since I'd most likely be watching some seriously sub-par hockey.

Sotnos is offline  
Old
09-16-2004, 10:41 PM
  #8
me2
Seahawks 43
 
me2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Broncos 8
Country: Wallis & Futuna
Posts: 17,836
vCash: 50
Trained monkeys in a team jumper will do.

me2 is offline  
Old
09-16-2004, 11:02 PM
  #9
Sotnos
Registered User
 
Sotnos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Not here
Posts: 10,900
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by me2
Trained monkeys in a team jumper will do.
Even if they're charging you standard NHL prices to watch them?

The monkey idea does sound pretty fun though

Sotnos is offline  
Old
09-16-2004, 11:46 PM
  #10
Puckhead
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Behind you!!!
Country: Italy
Posts: 703
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benji Frank
Can you imagine guys showing up in their Chevy's to cross a picket line formed by a bunch of guys driving Ferrarri's??

I don't think it'll get to that. There's 700 wives/girlfriends and several more alimony/support payments that won't allow it to get to that!!!

I say we start seeing some serious cracks (in the union!! ) by Christmas!!!

I hope you're right BF!

Puckhead is offline  
Old
09-16-2004, 11:51 PM
  #11
BCCHL inactive
 
Join Date: May 2002
Country:
Posts: 10,561
vCash: 500
No to scabs.

Why would I want to watch scabs in the NHL (most likely minor pro and junior players) and pay NHL ticket prices when I could watch those same players play with their regular teams at an AHL, ECHL or CHL ticket price??

BCCHL inactive is offline  
Old
09-16-2004, 11:52 PM
  #12
a89mogilny89
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Section 114, Row 15
Posts: 696
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to a89mogilny89 Send a message via AIM to a89mogilny89 Send a message via MSN to a89mogilny89 Send a message via Yahoo to a89mogilny89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grave77digger
AHL teams should play in there parent club building
Definitely not. And I'm not just saying that because I am in an AHL city, but the AHL agreed on their CBA- no need to pull it out of their markets.

a89mogilny89 is offline  
Old
09-17-2004, 12:11 AM
  #13
rt
Usually Incorrect
 
rt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rarely Sober
Country: United States
Posts: 41,741
vCash: 500
Hell yeah, I'd watch the scabs. If enough people did watch the scabs, we'd see the union crack pretty damn quick. Unless of course, the current NHLers are eager to look for new jobs, without college degrees, in this economy. I'd say that when listing "special skills" on a resume, a 95mph slapshot probably won't get you a job in sales.

rt is offline  
Old
09-17-2004, 12:36 AM
  #14
ExplosiveLEAFman
Registered User
 
ExplosiveLEAFman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,661
vCash: 500
No and most people wouldn't. Talk is cheap. Scabs only sounds like a good idea (not to me) until you watch them play.

ExplosiveLEAFman is offline  
Old
09-17-2004, 03:39 AM
  #15
me2
Seahawks 43
 
me2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Broncos 8
Country: Wallis & Futuna
Posts: 17,836
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sotnos
Even if they're charging you standard NHL prices to watch them?

The monkey idea does sound pretty fun though
Clearly with monkeys they'd only be charging peanuts.

AHLers wouldn't be much more.

me2 is offline  
Old
09-17-2004, 03:44 AM
  #16
Vlad The Impaler
Registered User
 
Vlad The Impaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 11,726
vCash: 500
I would.

And anyone who thinks the NHL would charge regular price to attend games is most probably seriously misguided.

Quite simply, I will watch the best hockey I can watch. I like options. This means if the NHL employed scabs but that other options were more entertaining, I wouldn't watch the scabs.

But I have nothing against the concept itself and would watch gladly.

Vlad The Impaler is offline  
Old
09-17-2004, 03:51 AM
  #17
struckmatch
Registered User
 
struckmatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,963
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by explosivethinman
No and most people wouldn't. Talk is cheap. Scabs only sounds like a good idea (not to me) until you watch them play.
You mean end to end, emotion filled, passionate hockey without traps or defensive systems employed to put the crowds to sleep? You mean actual offensive hockey?

Oh no, who wants that. Bring me the Minnesota Wild and Carolina Hurricanes.

struckmatch is offline  
Old
09-17-2004, 04:04 AM
  #18
BCCHL inactive
 
Join Date: May 2002
Country:
Posts: 10,561
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by puck you
You mean end to end, emotion filled, passionate hockey without traps or defensive systems employed to put the crowds to sleep? You mean actual offensive hockey?
If you think the trap/defensive hockey doesn't exist outside the NHL, you haven't watched much hockey outside the NHL in recent years.

BCCHL inactive is offline  
Old
09-17-2004, 04:14 AM
  #19
Tom_Benjamin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,152
vCash: 500
Most AHL players are on NHL contracts. Replacements would have to be drawn mostly from the ECHL and the semi-pro leagues. I don't think the hockey can be sold as anywhere near major league. I think most fans would prefer Major Junior.

It isn't going to happen. The NHL will try to get a judge to declare an impasse in the negotiations and allow them to unilaterally impose change. The NHLPA will oppose that that motion. I'm not going to try to guess what a judge will do in that case but I would guess that it depends on whether there is a lot more effort on the owner's behalf to negotiate a deal between now and then. If the judge rules for the players, nothing changes.

If the judge rules in favour of the league, the NHL will probably try to tempt the players with the most generous salary cap system they are prepared to give. The players will have three options: 1) Convert the lockout to a strike. As long as the players hold firm nothing really changes 2) Decertify the union, report for work and start with the anti-trust lawsuits or 3) Accept the deal or a variation of the deal.

Tom

Tom_Benjamin is offline  
Old
09-17-2004, 05:16 AM
  #20
Vlad The Impaler
Registered User
 
Vlad The Impaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 11,726
vCash: 500
Tom, if the NHL could legally pull it, would (some of) the NHL-bound players have (legally) the right to cross the line and play with the scabs?

Vlad The Impaler is offline  
Old
09-17-2004, 06:18 AM
  #21
me2
Seahawks 43
 
me2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Broncos 8
Country: Wallis & Futuna
Posts: 17,836
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlad The Impaler
Tom, if the NHL could legally pull it, would (some of) the NHL-bound players have (legally) the right to cross the line and play with the scabs?
After the impasse: Yes (and some will). Until that time we won't know how big a rift exists within the NHLPA. 40% of players might not be happy with Goodenow and walk as a group. It might be 10%, it might be just a handful. With 1200 employees and fringe NHL/AHL/prospects you can bet some will cross. Its not if, its how many and equally important WHO.


Last edited by me2: 09-17-2004 at 06:21 AM.
me2 is offline  
Old
09-17-2004, 06:37 AM
  #22
Vlad The Impaler
Registered User
 
Vlad The Impaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 11,726
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by me2
After the impasse: Yes (and some will). Until that time we won't know how big a rift exists within the NHLPA. 40% of players might not be happy with Goodenow and walk as a group. It might be 10%, it might be just a handful. With 1200 employees and fringe NHL/AHL/prospects you can bet some will cross. Its not if, its how many and equally important WHO.
Ok. My problem with the question (whether they can LEGALLY cross after the impasse) and my problem with replacement players is because of the numerous provincial/state and federal laws at work.

I would really like a study to be done, something. I winder why reporters keep on presenting inane issues and moan instead of reporting interesting stuff like that.

I mean, labor laws differ in Canada and the US. That's one issue. Then hockey takes place in four Canadian provinces, which also have different laws and God knows how many US states. I don't know if US states each have different labor laws the same way we do in our different provinces either.

The whole thing is very complicated and it's tough to find clear answers. I'd like to see detailed articles about that one day, instead of seeing Bob McKenzie's mug telling me the same stuff over and over again like a broken record.

Vlad The Impaler is offline  
Old
09-17-2004, 07:44 AM
  #23
BrickRed
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Phoenix
Country: United States
Posts: 219
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grave77digger
AHL teams should play in there parent club building
I agree. Teams should do more of this anyway.

BrickRed is offline  
Old
09-17-2004, 07:55 AM
  #24
BrickRed
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Phoenix
Country: United States
Posts: 219
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by puck you
You mean end to end, emotion filled, passionate hockey without traps or defensive systems employed to put the crowds to sleep? You mean actual offensive hockey?

Oh no, who wants that. Bring me the Minnesota Wild and Carolina Hurricanes.
Right on. I'll take players with something to prove, sensible rules called consistently & 80s goalie pads tomorrow.

BrickRed is offline  
Old
09-17-2004, 08:03 AM
  #25
justapantherfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunrise, Fl
Country: United States
Posts: 3,205
vCash: 500
Yes To Scabs

justapantherfan is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.