HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The History of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

The History of Hockey Relive great moments in hockey history and discuss how the game has changed over time.

The Divisional Playoff Format

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-17-2011, 03:51 PM
  #1
Al Bundy*
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 5,073
vCash: 500
The Divisional Playoff Format

With the realignment for next season and new playoff format, I decided it would be a good time to bring up the old playoff format that the new one resembled.

From 1981-81 to 1992-93, the Stanley Cup Playoffs were done divisionally (top 4 teams per division got in regardless of record, play down to division champ, they meet in conference finals, then conference champs play for Cup).

Looking back, it was a playoff format that had its positives and negatives

Positives

Built up intense rivalries- Battles of Alberta, Quebec, New York, plus all the intense Norris Division showdowns in the 80s

Unpredictability- at least one fourth-place team upset a division champ in round each year save for 1992 (and even that year, two of them had to come back from a 3-1 series deficit)

Negatives

Divisional predictability- A lot of things didn't change year in and year out. Montreal and Boston met 9 straight years in the Adams Division (5 of them in the division finals), which made it hard for Sabre and Whaler fans back then. Also save for the '82 Canucks and '93 Kings, the Smythe Division participant in the conference finals came from the province of Alberta, which probably didn't set well with Winnipeg, which had good team's but was stuck in the wrong division for them way back when. Also, it led to conference final mismatches- only twice did the Norris Division make it to the Cup Finals in this era.

Mediocrity sometimes rewarded- unlike recently, some of the lower ranked playoff teams with win-loss records didn't have stellar win-loss records, which created interesting situations (1982 and 1991 Campbell Conference Finals were contested between teams that did not have a winning record), and some of them went deep into the playoffs (1982 Canucks, 1984 Habs, 1986 Rangers, 1991 North Stars all made it to round 3 even though they had less than stellar records.

What were your thoughts on this playoff format?


Last edited by Al Bundy*: 12-17-2011 at 04:09 PM.
Al Bundy* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-17-2011, 04:06 PM
  #2
VanIslander
Don't waste my time
 
VanIslander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,158
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomerHimpson View Post
Built up intense rivalries- Battles of Alberta, Quebec, New York, plus all the intense Norris Division showdowns in the 80s
The only thing like it since was the Western Conference Detroit vs. Colorado rivalry.

The divisional playoff format is more important today as there are more teams, making for too many less meaningful regular season games.

I remember the DISTINCT CULTURE of the divisions!! That was awesome.

VanIslander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-17-2011, 05:05 PM
  #3
reckoning
Registered User
 
reckoning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,782
vCash: 500
I hated it. Mostly because of the disparity between the divisions. You'd have years like 1987 where every team in the Norris was under .500, yet one of them was guaranteed a spot in the conference final because of the format. It also bothered me that Edmonton always got the easy third round match against Detroit or Chicago. I really hope they decide to reseed the final four based on points rather than preset division champ vs. division champ matches.

I've never bought the whole "creating rivalries" argument. In a 7-game playoff series you're going to have intense passion and hatred regardless of whether the teams are in the same division or not. Detroit-Colorado and Vancouver-Chicago being prime examples.

reckoning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-17-2011, 05:15 PM
  #4
Buck Aki Berg
My pockets hurt
 
Buck Aki Berg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ottawa, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,221
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomerHimpson View Post
Divisional predictability
I don't see this being the problem it once was - remember back in the day it was 5 teams per division (with an extra in the Patrick). When 80% of the division (75% in the Patrick) ends up in the playoffs, you'll see a lot of the same matchups from year to year. When drawing four teams out of seven or eight, there are enough permutations that you'll have a healthy balance of familiarity breeding contempt and matchups between teams that don't have much of a postseason history.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SomerHimpson View Post
Mediocrity sometimes rewarded
Again, remember that there's a big difference between 16 out of 21 teams advancing, compared to 16 out of 30, regardless of the playoff format. If you look at any season in the last decade and regroup the teams to the new alignment & playoff format, I'm sure in any given year at least 13 of the 16 playoff teams would be identical. You definitely wouldn't see any sub .500 teams in the playoffs.

Buck Aki Berg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-19-2011, 08:09 AM
  #5
tony d
Is it though?
 
tony d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Behind A Tree
Country: Canada
Posts: 50,977
vCash: 500
Yeah, it would be different now as you have more teams in the league but the same number of teams making the playoffs. I'm looking forward to the league returning (Hopefully) to the divisional playoff format.

__________________
tony d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-19-2011, 08:34 AM
  #6
darkhorse686
Registered User
 
darkhorse686's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 143
vCash: 500
I'd say the 1980's playoff format was a mixed bag. One the one hand, as you mention, the increased opportunity for giant-killing was definitely a positive. But the way the system rewarded mediocrity was, at times, appalling. No team should be getting into the Stanley Cup playoffs with 51 points ('88 Leafs) at the expense of a team with 82 points ('88 NY Rangers) simply because the weaker team happened to be in a seperate division.

darkhorse686 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.