HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The Business of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
The Business of Hockey Discuss the financial and business aspects of the NHL. Topics may include the CBA, work stoppages, broadcast contracts, franchise sales, and NHL revenues.

Don't expect hockey for at least a year

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-26-2004, 11:57 PM
  #1
Joe T Choker
Roll Wide Roll
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Country: Italy
Posts: 23,279
vCash: 500
Don't expect hockey for at least a year

and get used to the word IMPASSE

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...ary&va=impasse

http://www.hfboards.com/showpost.php...94&postcount=2

Go owners Go!

Joe T Choker is offline  
Old
09-27-2004, 01:50 AM
  #2
Hab-a-maniac
Registered User
 
Hab-a-maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto via Calgary!
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,157
vCash: 500
I hope your Go Owners Go chant was sarcastic. Seriously, I don't understand how anyone can take either's side. I'm neutral; they're both being @$$holes about the whole thing and need to be willing to give up more. I see the problems of the players in this situation more clearly, so I hate the owners a bit more but they both p!ss me off. What's discouraging is the number of hockey yahoos who don't know the economics or issues at stake. If we get a salary cap, I guarantee 1/3 of the people bashing the players and wanting a cap so badly will complain. It's hypocrisy all around.

Now, the other 2/3 will see it as a small price to pay to save the economic spiral the NHL is in. But others will go back on their old staunch positions and bemoan when their favourites teams must give up their superstars at early stages of their careers. And not with a trade, but an outright cut. Of course, unless a cap like the NBA's that allows going over the limit to resign stars. But that won't fix all problems. There aren't any guaranteed contracts in a hard cap.

In a cap, it won't totally hinder superstars from making just as much money as they do now but the lower level guys will be jerked around from town to town even worse than now except not during seasons. You can forget FA season, but the worse part is not as many deadline deals due to working out salary structures. Most trades now will be of future UFAs. You see, in a way, big market teams can get their big UFAs if they so choose to spend a bunch of cash.

A guy like Iginla can sign a 4yr/4Mper deal on the Red Wings when he becomes a UFA cap casualty. Now, a small market team can maybe offer more like Calgary. Maybe same length, 6 million a year. But Detroit can pay Iginla a sick bonus to convince him to take the smaller base salary. Maybe an upfront 20 million dollar bonus. Now this is unless the NHL has a hard cap limiting bonuses/incentives and taxing those perhaps. As well as a rule guaranteeing contracts. Without those two stipulations, the big cheese teams with money can still get the superstar they want to overpay.

Hab-a-maniac is offline  
Old
09-27-2004, 05:50 AM
  #3
Classic Devil
Global Moderator
Spirit of 1988
 
Classic Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Country: United States
Posts: 33,376
vCash: 500
Awards:
There would have to be restrictions on signing bonus'.

Classic Devil is offline  
Old
09-27-2004, 06:25 AM
  #4
txpd
Registered User
 
txpd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 40,204
vCash: 500
i am reasonably sure that any nhl salary cap would include all bonuses paid under the cap number. exempting signing bonus from the cap would just allow the big markets teams to pay what they pay now up front rather than in salary. of the course the difference between the nhl and the signing bonus league, the nfl is that football has no guaranteed contracts. the only guaranteed money is the signing bonus.

txpd is offline  
Old
09-27-2004, 01:54 PM
  #5
the_hockey_knowitall
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9
vCash: 500

the_hockey_knowitall is offline  
Old
09-27-2004, 02:32 PM
  #6
littleHossa
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,753
vCash: 500
I hate both sides now, the hard cap at $31 millions is not the answer to a better NHL and Goodnow talks nonsense all day long. The seperate interviews with Bettman and Goodnow on CBC were so bad, they basically took their answers right out of a book and they brough nothing new. Goodnow especially doesn't know what he's talking about. "The owners are entirelly responsible for the increase in salaries" Then why the hell does the union have any power? Idiot...

Anyway, they could both take their heads out of their respective ***** and start negociating, or hire a mediator who should film them and make them see how stupid they look, either way they can solve this but won't.


Last edited by littleHossa: 09-27-2004 at 02:35 PM.
littleHossa is offline  
Old
09-27-2004, 02:48 PM
  #7
MLH
Registered User
 
MLH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,292
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hab-a-maniac
Seriously, I don't understand how anyone can take either's side. I'm neutral; they're both being @$$holes about the whole thing and need to be willing to give up more.
I strongly disagree. As a fan of a small market team (Buffalo) I'm pulling for the owners 100%. Hockey won't survive in some of the most passionate markets without a hard salary cap.

MLH is offline  
Old
09-27-2004, 02:57 PM
  #8
H/H
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 308
vCash: 500
Why would a salary cap change anything? It will only mean owners will have to care even less than they already do. Half of the owners in this battle probably forgot they even had NHL teams.

H/H is offline  
Old
09-27-2004, 07:17 PM
  #9
Hab-a-maniac
Registered User
 
Hab-a-maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto via Calgary!
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,157
vCash: 500
Yeah, some owners will still charge ridiculous prices for tickets, food, etc. If that becomes the case, people will hit backlash on the owners big time. They've been whining about salaries driving up the prices for tickets and merchandise, etc. But in some cities, salary cap will make little difference in how the owner may/may not screw over his team and fans. Sorry Hawks fans, but Bill Wirtz won't be any more likeable or tolerable under a cap system. You've gotta see the big picture. Rather than demand for them to rush hockey back for the sake of having it, people need to think about what needs to be comprimised by both sides to make it a fair and equitable league for all.

Hab-a-maniac is offline  
Old
09-27-2004, 07:23 PM
  #10
Beukeboom Fan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,526
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hab-a-maniac
Yeah, some owners will still charge ridiculous prices for tickets, food, etc. If that becomes the case, people will hit backlash on the owners big time. They've been whining about salaries driving up the prices for tickets and merchandise, etc. But in some cities, salary cap will make little difference in how the owner may/may not screw over his team and fans. Sorry Hawks fans, but Bill Wirtz won't be any more likeable or tolerable under a cap system. You've gotta see the big picture. Rather than demand for them to rush hockey back for the sake of having it, people need to think about what needs to be comprimised by both sides to make it a fair and equitable league for all.
On the Hawks front, agree with you 100% that it won't directly change the way Wirtz does business. One thing though - Hawks might retain more of their talent if other teams couldn't offer UFA $'s though (Roenick, Amonte, Chelios, Belfour).

I do think that if salaries came down enough, ticket prices would be reduced (not nearly the same rate) in some markets. That would not be the case in places like TOR or DET where every game is sold out. Some newer markets might be able to lower ticket prices to introduce a wider fan base to the game, and not have an impact on the bottom line.

Beukeboom Fan is offline  
Old
09-27-2004, 07:31 PM
  #11
H/H
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 308
vCash: 500
Quote:
Hawks might retain more of their talent if other teams couldn't offer UFA $'s though (Roenick, Amonte, Chelios, Belfour).
Roenick and Chelios were traded. I think there were more reasons than $ that made the two other guys split town as soon as they saw daylight. Playing for the Blackhawks seems to have that effect.

H/H is offline  
Old
09-28-2004, 12:55 AM
  #12
roadrunner
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: U Can'tTake Me Alive
Posts: 866
vCash: 500
For every cash cow, soon appear the parasites. It is currently the lawyers' turn to get rich, as both sides will fight long and hard with legal eagles spoon-feeding ideas and statements to both sides' higher-ups.

Some agents, on the other hand, can take a several month vacation with all the riches gained from outrageous contracts that knuckle-headed owners forked over in the recent past.

*sigh* What a waste of a great league. Let's hope that both sides spend their respective "war chests" wisely and productively.

roadrunner is offline  
Old
09-28-2004, 01:29 AM
  #13
shveik
Registered User
 
shveik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,844
vCash: 500
1. Right now:
Owners to players: take the cap or go play elsewhere!

2. Later. Declare this magic IMPASSE. Spend a load of money on lawyers, dissolve the NHL, and .

3. Afterwards:
Owners to players: take the cap or go play elsewhere!

Sounds like a great plan!

shveik is offline  
Old
09-28-2004, 04:44 PM
  #14
Sotnos
Registered User
 
Sotnos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Not here
Posts: 10,900
vCash: 500
Don't expect hockey for at least a year

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seven_Nation_Army
While everyone else has gone off on a tangent, I actually clicked on the link in the original post and must ask...are we supposed to just take Crispy's word for it that this will happen? I'm not understanding what you were getting at, SNA.

Sotnos is offline  
Old
09-28-2004, 05:49 PM
  #15
Beukeboom Fan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,526
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by H/H
Roenick and Chelios were traded. I think there were more reasons than $ that made the two other guys split town as soon as they saw daylight. Playing for the Blackhawks seems to have that effect.
The main reason they were traded is that they wanted to get paid "market value". If they couldn't cash in elsewhere, they'd probalby both still be Hawks.

Beukeboom Fan is offline  
Old
09-29-2004, 10:40 AM
  #16
Joe T Choker
Roll Wide Roll
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Country: Italy
Posts: 23,279
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sotnos
While everyone else has gone off on a tangent, I actually clicked on the link in the original post and must ask...are we supposed to just take Crispy's word for it that this will happen? I'm not understanding what you were getting at, SNA.
I'm just saying if you don't believe a guy like Crispy who speaks his mind *and is still part of a Hockey organization* all of the time, who can you believe?


Joe T Choker is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.