HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > St. Louis Blues
Notices

Elliott v. Halak

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
02-14-2012, 06:27 AM
  #51
execwrite
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Peekskill, NY
Posts: 3,414
vCash: 500
Meanwhile, the goal-against averages of Blues goalies Jaroslav Halak and Brian Elliott are dropping quicker than the frigid temperatures outside in the metro-east. Elliott (18-5-2, 1.63 goals-against average, five shutouts) and Halak (16-9-5, 1.97 goals-against average, six shutouts) have a chance to become only the second goaltending tandem in Blues history to finish with goals-against averages below 2.00.

That last happened during the Blues' Presidents Trophy season of 1999-2000, when they won 51 games and piled up 114 points. Roman Turek (42 wins, 1.95 goals-against) and backup Jamie McLennan (9 wins, 1.96 goals-against) were in the nets that season.

Halak and Elliott have combined for 11 shutouts, just two behind the Blues' all-time record of 13 set by Hall of Famers Jacques Plante and Glenn Hall in 1968-69. Despite a 1-6 start this season, Halak has rebounded in a big way. He is 13-2-3 in last 19 starts since Nov. 29 with a 1.66 goals-against average and has five shutouts in his last 10 starts.

Read more here: http://www.bnd.com/2012/02/14/205746...#storylink=cpy

execwrite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 09:59 AM
  #52
execwrite
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Peekskill, NY
Posts: 3,414
vCash: 500
Would you trade Halak (or Elliott) for Columbus' number one pick?

Armstrong would have to consider it if offered.

execwrite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 10:06 AM
  #53
Alklha
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,764
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by execwrite View Post
Would you trade Halak (or Elliott) for Columbus' number one pick?

Armstrong would have to consider it if offered.
He wouldn't have to consider it, he'd be online booking Halak his flight to Columbus before the end of the phone call.

If the Blue Jackets wanted Halak for the first overall, they would be asking for quite a bit more on top of it.

Alklha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 10:38 AM
  #54
Mike Liut
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 4,064
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prometheus View Post
He wouldn't have to consider it, he'd be online booking Halak his flight to Columbus before the end of the phone call.

If the Blue Jackets wanted Halak for the first overall, they would be asking for quite a bit more on top of it.


Elliot, Stewart, Cole, Blues 2012 1st rounder ?

Mike Liut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 10:50 AM
  #55
execwrite
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Peekskill, NY
Posts: 3,414
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prometheus View Post
He wouldn't have to consider it, he'd be online booking Halak his flight to Columbus before the end of the phone call.

If the Blue Jackets wanted Halak for the first overall, they would be asking for quite a bit more on top of it.
Halak, Chris Stewart, Cade Fairchild and the Blues #1?

execwrite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 11:25 AM
  #56
Alklha
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,764
vCash: 50
Then we'd be in a situation where the deal doesn't make sense for us. We don't need to go out and get a star winger, and we certainly don't need to create a hole in our team when doing so. If Yakupov was a star center, then things might be different.

In terms of value, if Columbus are actively looking to move the first overall, then Halak, Stewart and our first is probably a good starting point. I think other teams would offer more though. But with the way that Columbus are run, who knows what kind of decisions they'd make. Nash should have been moved at the deadline so they knew exactly what they needed done in the off season.

Alklha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-31-2012, 03:44 PM
  #57
PocketNines
Woyrika? Tyraid.
 
PocketNines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mt.Crested Butte, CO
Posts: 6,943
vCash: 500
Yeah it would be a weird trade and Columbus would have to initiate the proposal but I'd give up one of the goalies and Stewart and the first for the #1 overall without even thinking about it, because the value that represents is so high.

PocketNines is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-01-2012, 01:33 AM
  #58
oPlaiD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 316
vCash: 500
Yea 1st, Stewart, Halak/Elliott for the 1st overall is a no brainer, especially when you considering how long we'll have that 1st overall in a Blues uniform compared to how long Halak and Elliott will be here, with their current deals.

It'd be ridiculous to add Yakupov and Tarasenko next season, ridiculous.

oPlaiD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-01-2012, 06:50 PM
  #59
execwrite
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Peekskill, NY
Posts: 3,414
vCash: 500
Halak's GAA is up to 1.97. Hope he can finish under 2.00

execwrite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-01-2012, 06:57 PM
  #60
2 Minute Minor
Hi Keeba!
 
2 Minute Minor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Country: United States
Posts: 5,164
vCash: 500
At this point, I have no idea what Hitchcock is going to do with his goalies. I still don't get it, but Halak seems to have some bad luck of the team not playing as well some of the time when he's in net. I can't quite figure that.

I'm guessing he'll probably have Halak start game 1 and 2 with Elliott scheduled to start game 3 regardless of the outcome of the first two? Also, possibly this will be his plan, and the players will know...but the outside media/fans won't be privy.

Hitchcock has so many pieces to play with right now, he has a great opportunity to show he is a Hall of Fame coach. What those moves are....I'm not sure.

2 Minute Minor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-01-2012, 07:21 PM
  #61
Beninnola
Rookie User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2 Minute Minor View Post
At this point, I have no idea what Hitchcock is going to do with his goalies. I still don't get it, but Halak seems to have some bad luck of the team not playing as well some of the time when he's in net. I can't quite figure that.

I'm guessing he'll probably have Halak start game 1 and 2 with Elliott scheduled to start game 3 regardless of the outcome of the first two? Also, possibly this will be his plan, and the players will know...but the outside media/fans won't be privy.

Hitchcock has so many pieces to play with right now, he has a great opportunity to show he is a Hall of Fame coach. What those moves are....I'm not sure.
If I were coach.

This job now is Elliot's to win and not Halaks to lose.

Play Elliot against strong contenders ( DET) and If he earns it he gets the start the next game.

Stop with the "it doesn't matter if one goaltender leads the league in every stat, is an Allstar and has 3 shutouts in a row im starting the other guy because he's fragile" ****.

Im not convinced BE is better, but he has earned the chance to prove it.

Beninnola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-01-2012, 08:36 PM
  #62
Burynai
Registered User
 
Burynai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: St. Louis
Country: United States
Posts: 130
vCash: 500
IMO Elliot gets the nod. His glove has been ridiculous. Halak (although has been solid) is too inconsistent at times.

Burynai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-01-2012, 08:52 PM
  #63
Ronnie Coleman
****in' eh
 
Ronnie Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,919
vCash: 500
Halak, no doubt.

Ronnie Coleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-01-2012, 09:09 PM
  #64
BlueDream
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 2,349
vCash: 500
I agree Halak should get the majority of games in the playoffs which is why it makes no sense that we still refuse to play Elliott down the stretch here. Elliott deserves more...he may even be better than Halak.

BlueDream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-01-2012, 09:47 PM
  #65
h22prelude93
Registered User
 
h22prelude93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: St.Louis, Mo
Country: United States
Posts: 1,393
vCash: 500
Anybody else like me and could care less which goalie gets the start for the playoffs? They are BOTH great goalies and I'm sure Hitchcock will use them wisely. IMO it should be more about who's rested the most then who's "hot" because both of these guys can put on a great performance on any given night. Also, these are 7 game series we're talking about...if one goalie does get cold then you simply switch em up. One thing is for sure...not knowing which one will start is a great problem for Hitchcock to have going into the playoffs.

h22prelude93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2012, 06:45 AM
  #66
MedicBluesFan443
Registered User
 
MedicBluesFan443's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New Haven MO.
Country: United States
Posts: 146
vCash: 500
Elliot was awesome last night. He got hung out to dry on both regulation goals. As far as who starts in the playoffs.. Ride the hot hand and know the back up is more then capable of coming in and stealing games. Its win win!

MedicBluesFan443 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2012, 08:03 AM
  #67
kittensmasher
moe.ron
 
kittensmasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 524
vCash: 500
I've felt a little more comfortable with Elliott all season and nothing's really happened in the past few weeks to change that. All things considered, Halak has been fantastic since his rough October, but of the two goalies he's shown to be more prone to letting in soft goals. Right or wrong, when Halak starts, I sometimes need to see him make those first couple of good saves before I really start to feel "confident" in him for that particular game. I don't get that feeling with Elliott. I'm not saying Elliott is hands-down the better goalie, as Halak's had more career consistency and obviously he's got that monster playoff run on his resume, but ultimately I think Elliott's been the better of the two this year. If Hitch gives the nod to Halak I won't be disappointed - I just hope it's because he genuinely believes Halak gives the Blues the best chance to win in the playoffs and not because people are worried about hurt feelings, contracts, or who was the team's designated "starter" back in October.


Last edited by kittensmasher: 04-05-2012 at 08:36 AM.
kittensmasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2012, 07:02 PM
  #68
the
Registered User
 
the's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 437
vCash: 500
The great thing about Jaroslav Halak is that he's a winner,under pressure situation he comes out big.There' no doubt in my mind that this guy is going to lead us to the cup or bring us pretty close.Blues fans are going to remember this years playoffs.If there's anything then we can rely on Elliot to rest Jaroslav a bit.

the is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.