HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Los Angeles Kings
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Kings #11 in new HF Organizational Rankings

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-29-2004, 01:35 AM
  #1
David A. Rainer
Registered User
 
David A. Rainer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Huntington Beach
Country: Italy
Posts: 7,293
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to David A. Rainer
Kings #11 in new HF Organizational Rankings

Article

I thought for sure the Kings would crack the top 10 this year. I was thinking #8 or #9. But I guess #11 is not far off.

With as many as 5 of the Kings top 20 set to graduate this season, some the Kings projects (Boyle, Karlsson, even Pushkarev to some degree) better step up this season or the Kings won't be this high in the rankings again for awhile.

__________________
Saxon Sports Information and Research
David A. Rainer is offline  
Old
09-29-2004, 02:52 AM
  #2
KingPurpleDinosaur
Bandwagon Kings Fan
 
KingPurpleDinosaur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: irvine, ca
Posts: 2,883
vCash: 500
i think the fact that we have virtually no goalie prospects drags us down a lot. had we had a decent goaltender in our farm, i bet we'd jump a few positions based purely on having a more balanced farm.

KingPurpleDinosaur is offline  
Old
09-29-2004, 06:43 AM
  #3
T2M
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 687
vCash: 500
If this were done 1 month later, we'd be in the top 10. Once Pushkaryev (who wasn't mentioned at all in the article) starts lighting up the WHL, then everybody'll take notice of another top flight younger. Finally, what's the big deal about having a bunch of "projects". Every player's a project until he has 3 or 4 consistent years in the NHL.

T2M is offline  
Old
09-29-2004, 10:07 AM
  #4
David A. Rainer
Registered User
 
David A. Rainer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Huntington Beach
Country: Italy
Posts: 7,293
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to David A. Rainer
Quote:
Originally Posted by T2M
If this were done 1 month later, we'd be in the top 10. Once Pushkaryev (who wasn't mentioned at all in the article) starts lighting up the WHL, then everybody'll take notice of another top flight younger. Finally, what's the big deal about having a bunch of "projects". Every player's a project until he has 3 or 4 consistent years in the NHL.
If you want to look at it that way, not every player is the same level of a project. It's a relative term and if every player is a "project" to some degree, then the Kings have more high-risk projects than the rest of the league.

If you want to define "project" the way you have and call both Zach Parise and Brian Boyle "projects" because neither has played 3 or 4 years in the NHL, then you are not telling the whole story between the two prospects. You are making the term "project" superfluous.

So, when someone uses the term "project", they mean that although every prospect is nothing but a "prospective player" (and not a sure thing), a "project" of a prospective player is someone who is going to take a lot more time (and therefore some more risk) to develop than others.

David A. Rainer is offline  
Old
09-29-2004, 11:59 AM
  #5
KingPurpleDinosaur
Bandwagon Kings Fan
 
KingPurpleDinosaur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: irvine, ca
Posts: 2,883
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by T2M
If this were done 1 month later, we'd be in the top 10. Once Pushkaryev (who wasn't mentioned at all in the article) starts lighting up the WHL, then everybody'll take notice of another top flight younger. Finally, what's the big deal about having a bunch of "projects". Every player's a project until he has 3 or 4 consistent years in the NHL.
ur a bit optimistic on push's development. don't expect too much from him just yet, he hasn't done anything to prove himself worthy of this hype. the more important prospects that MUST show up this year are the boyles, steckles, lehoux, and karlsson if they want to even have a crack shot at making the NHL.

also, i too am not big on projects. i don't really know if boyle was worth that first round pick we made, but we'll see. skeptical, but i see the raw material there at the same time.

KingPurpleDinosaur is offline  
Old
10-04-2004, 02:20 PM
  #6
T2M
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 687
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathFromAbove
If you want to look at it that way, not every player is the same level of a project. It's a relative term and if every player is a "project" to some degree, then the Kings have more high-risk projects than the rest of the league.

If you want to define "project" the way you have and call both Zach Parise and Brian Boyle "projects" because neither has played 3 or 4 years in the NHL, then you are not telling the whole story between the two prospects. You are making the term "project" superfluous.

So, when someone uses the term "project", they mean that although every prospect is nothing but a "prospective player" (and not a sure thing), a "project" of a prospective player is someone who is going to take a lot more time (and therefore some more risk) to develop than others.
The point I was trying to make (and didn't make it all that well) is that most teams aren't filled with sure fire things. If you look at our guys in development (and I'm including Brown here) I'd say we have four or five guys who will be solid NHLers. Grebs, Gleason, Brown, Cammy and Tukkonen. That the rest are "projects" just plain doesn't surprise me. You can be a big guy who needs to pull things together, a little guy who needs to step it up and prove he can play in traffic, I guess my problem is that one homer's "sure thing" is another guy's "boom or bust project". I think the best you can do is select raw talent, what appears to be a good head on the kid's shoulders and hope things fall into place before he's 23 and washed up. That's what I was implying with the project assessment.

T2M

P.S. I'm also just plain not sold on Parise. Sorry to all the supporters and I've eaten crow before, but I think he's further along than Boyle, and at the same time could have a much shorter career. Got all the fundamentals, I just worry about an injury filled future.

T2M is offline  
Old
10-07-2004, 02:59 PM
  #7
Game Misconduct
Registered User
 
Game Misconduct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 1,862
vCash: 500
I find your lack of faith in Boyle disturbing.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg vader.jpg‎ (5.4 KB, 3 views)

Game Misconduct is offline  
Old
10-07-2004, 11:30 PM
  #8
Legionnaire
Kill! Jeff, Kill!!!
 
Legionnaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: LA-LA Land
Country: United States
Posts: 35,395
vCash: 500
I still say the Kings prospects are better than the Oilers and a few other teams. But hey, what are you going to do?

__________________
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." - Mark Twain
Legionnaire is offline  
Old
10-07-2004, 11:56 PM
  #9
jfont
Registered User
 
jfont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 15,374
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Game Misconduct
I find your lack of faith in Boyle disturbing.
come to the dark side, luc...

__________________
Due to budget cuts, the light at the end of the tunnel will be turned off
jfont is online now  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.