Not on the review, no. On the ice, though, it could have been called interference.
Well yea, if they called an interference penalty for sure.
Originally Posted by Spongolium
Yeah i'm struggling to undertstand how that would of possibly been the flyers fault to cancel the goal. Couts is pushed into the net, the puck crossed the line regardless. If thats the case, what stops goaltenders pushing the net off in scrambles?
Originally Posted by flyersfan018
Doesn't matter. If the net was off, it's off. It was probably too close to call so they went with what they called on the ice.
Exactly. The fact that Couts was pushed means nothing. A net being off is a net being off. The only issue is would a penalty (of some sort) be called.