HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Los Angeles Kings
Notices

Mike Richards playing injured ? [All Posts re: the Mike Richards Debate Go in Here]

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
02-13-2012, 03:14 PM
  #201
tomd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,697
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by KINGS17 View Post
Fair enough. I too am patient. I just think Richards was too enticing to pass up.
And I think Schenn and Simmonds had too much upside to trade.

I'm pretty confident history will prove me correct.

tomd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2012, 03:33 PM
  #202
KINGS17
Smartest in the Room
 
KINGS17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 13,185
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomd View Post
And I think Schenn and Simmonds had too much upside to trade.

I'm pretty confident history will prove me correct.
It will depend on whether or not Richards is a key component in getting the Kings deep into the playoffs for multiple seasons. I think on that we can agree.

Lombardi will have to add depth to the forwards very soon to balance out the offense/defense scale.

KINGS17 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2012, 03:37 PM
  #203
tomd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,697
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by KINGS17 View Post
It will depend on whether or not Richards is a key component in getting the Kings deep into the playoffs for multiple seasons. I think on that we can agree.

Lombardi will have to add depth to the forwards very soon to balance out the offense/defense scale.
Yes, I think we can both agree on those points.

tomd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2012, 03:46 PM
  #204
Duc620
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 880
vCash: 500
The Richards / Schenn, Simmonds trade was fair for both teams. It's early to be writing down one side as a clear "winner".

At the beginning of the year, the Kings were clear winners. Now, the Flyers have an edge. You know what? It's going to change again. That's what a good trade does.

Duc620 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2012, 03:58 PM
  #205
Johnny Utah
Registered User
 
Johnny Utah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 6,294
vCash: 500
My only saving grace in this deal is thinking that Lombardi knew he had a replacement for Simmonds in Clifford, Nolan and now Andreoff...and that the latter two emerge as that type of player.

Look at the Flyers now; Hartnell, Simmonds, Talbot, Sestito, Rinaldo, Shelley all in the mix with a mix of skilled players like Briere, Grioux, Voracek, Jagr, Read.

The Kings had a similar line-up last year in the playoffs with Brown, Simmonds, Clifford, Handzus, Smyth, and Penner to go with Kopitar, Williams, etc...

Now, on some nights (before the most recent call up), it left the Kings with Brown, Penner and Clifford as the only bigger forwards complimenting skilled guys who ARE NOT producing. Brown has been hugely inconsistent and Penner has played less physical than Brad Richardson.

If Nolan emerges as a Simmonds type it would be a huge help to the Kings knowing they have another player besides Clifford that has size, skill and toughness that can rotate up and down the line-up like Wayne could. From the 1st line to 3rd line.

We gave the Sharks fits in the playoffs with our big bodies, that is Kings hockey...especially an organization managed by former Flyers.

If Nolan sticks with LA this year or next and puts up 10-15 goals, it will hugely help this trade impact particularly the loss of Simmonds. Then essentially all the Kings did is swap Schenn and a 2nd for Richards.

Johnny Utah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2012, 04:36 PM
  #206
moosehead81
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Great White North
Country: Canada
Posts: 480
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Utah View Post
My only saving grace in this deal is thinking that Lombardi knew he had a replacement for Simmonds in Clifford, Nolan and now Andreoff...and that the latter two emerge as that type of player.

Look at the Flyers now; Hartnell, Simmonds, Talbot, Sestito, Rinaldo, Shelley all in the mix with a mix of skilled players like Briere, Grioux, Voracek, Jagr, Read.

The Kings had a similar line-up last year in the playoffs with Brown, Simmonds, Clifford, Handzus, Smyth, and Penner to go with Kopitar, Williams, etc...

Now, on some nights (before the most recent call up), it left the Kings with Brown, Penner and Clifford as the only bigger forwards complimenting skilled guys who ARE NOT producing. Brown has been hugely inconsistent and Penner has played less physical than Brad Richardson.

If Nolan emerges as a Simmonds type it would be a huge help to the Kings knowing they have another player besides Clifford that has size, skill and toughness that can rotate up and down the line-up like Wayne could. From the 1st line to 3rd line.

We gave the Sharks fits in the playoffs with our big bodies, that is Kings hockey...especially an organization managed by former Flyers.

If Nolan sticks with LA this year or next and puts up 10-15 goals, it will hugely help this trade impact particularly the loss of Simmonds. Then essentially all the Kings did is swap Schenn and a 2nd for Richards.
Certainly Richards may have had some issues in Philadelphia with the captaincy and all it entailed with "some" of the fans and media but, at the time, guys like Toews, Crosby, and others from the 2003 and 2004 draft years were being knighted the same way. So him getting the captain's "C" at such as young age was not that unheard of and he certainly had carried a leader's role thru his career up to this point. In any case, the Flyers were loaded with essentially 4 top flight centers in Richards, Giroux, Briere and Carter and needed to answer the question- who was going to play 3rd and 4th line. Briere had a no movement contract and Giroux wasn't going anywhere; that left Richards and Carter as odd men out. Even then, I think the Flyers would have kept Richards and shopped some-body like Hartnell, who had some value but also was tied to Philly cause of his no-trade contratct. Trust me, had Richards stayed in Philly and played with the forwards named above, excluding Simmonds, some of who such as Hartnell are having career years (and who in their right mind would think Jagr would have the impact he's had) and played his normal 20 minutes a game including power play and penalty kill time (with Giroux, no less) under the high tempo, offensive type of game esposed by Laviolette, he'd have a s--t load more points than that from playing in the suffocating, defensively minded game put out by the current Kings, particularly given the 2 wingers foisted upon him until just recently. It's way too early to put any negative spin on this trade (I mean you're comparing apples to bananas) but anybody who thinks Richards has plateaued just hasn't followed his play over the past years. I hope Simmonds and Schenn turn out to be great players but I don't think they'll ever match Richards' intensity and desire to win when an important game is on the line.

moosehead81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2012, 04:42 PM
  #207
Telos
Moderator
In Dean We Trust
 
Telos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Reno, Nv.
Country: United States
Posts: 22,786
vCash: 50
Send a message via ICQ to Telos Send a message via AIM to Telos Send a message via MSN to Telos Send a message via Yahoo to Telos
Wise words from Sutter:

Quote:
SUTTER: “I think that everybody is way too critical of Mike Richards. What he brings is not just measured in statistics.’’
http://lakingsinsider.com/2012/02/13...he-ever-leave/

__________________

"It has not been a good day. I lost my glasses early this morning and I had to go buy a pair of 79 dollar reading glasses today. 79 bucks. You can literally get them at Costco, three-for-20." - Darryl Sutter's response to going up 2-0 in the series.
Telos is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2012, 04:46 PM
  #208
Johnny Utah
Registered User
 
Johnny Utah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 6,294
vCash: 500
Sutter reading HF?

I was mad a week ago...I'm still upset, but Jordan Nolan makes me feel a bit better.

Johnny Utah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2012, 05:58 PM
  #209
KINGS17
Smartest in the Room
 
KINGS17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 13,185
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Utah View Post
Sutter reading HF?

I was mad a week ago...I'm still upset, but Jordan Nolan makes me feel a bit better.
Nah, he saw the dopes on TSN or the CBC.

It would be great if Richards has an impact on the development of Nolan and King. He's done it before.

KINGS17 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2012, 06:25 PM
  #210
Duc620
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 880
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Utah View Post
Sutter reading HF?

I was mad a week ago...I'm still upset, but Jordan Nolan makes me feel a bit better.
Yep, Nolan and King look to have some upside. Richards can make them shine as long as they create some space for him - keeping him off the boards and getting crunched - and keep going to the net.

It was a surprising line. But it shows why Sutter is a much better coach than he's generally given credit for. He's not just a yeller...

Duc620 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-14-2012, 12:59 AM
  #211
drugold
drunk, goals&swagger
 
drugold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brisbane,
Country: Australia-Aboriginal
Posts: 2,189
vCash: 50
I'd rather Richards showing these kids how to play rather than Simmonds. I think even Utah could agree with me here

Quote:
Originally Posted by KINGS17 View Post
Nah, he saw the dopes on TSN or the CBC.

It would be great if Richards has an impact on the development of Nolan and King. He's done it before.

drugold is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-15-2012, 11:37 AM
  #212
MsWoof
Registered User
 
MsWoof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,031
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomd View Post
And I think Schenn and Simmonds had too much upside to trade.

I'm pretty confident history will prove me correct.
I'm pretty confident you're wrong. They wouldn't have the seasons they are if they had a coach and personnel that was about defence first. Philly is slowly dropping in the standings after being top 3 all season to 4th right now, tied with Pitts who just got Staal back and 1 point up on NJ. It's all because the coach can't/won't make the players defensively responsible.

MsWoof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-15-2012, 11:40 AM
  #213
Sydor25
LA Kings
 
Sydor25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North Texas
Country: United States
Posts: 21,395
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Sydor25
Quote:
Originally Posted by MsWoof View Post
I'm pretty confident you're wrong. They wouldn't have the seasons they are if they had a coach and personnel that was about defence first. Philly is slowly dropping in the standings after being top 3 all season to 4th right now, tied with Pitts who just got Staal back and 1 point up on NJ. It's all because the coach can't/won't make the players defensively responsible.
At least they have a 31 year old Bryzgalov for another 8 seasons at $5.67 million per with a NMC.

Sydor25 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-15-2012, 01:02 PM
  #214
MsWoof
Registered User
 
MsWoof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,031
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sydor25 View Post
At least they have a 31 year old Bryzgalov for another 8 seasons at $5.67 million per with a NMC.
Stop, just stop! Like we don't all remind ourselves of THAT every day!

MsWoof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-15-2012, 01:50 PM
  #215
tomd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,697
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MsWoof View Post
I'm pretty confident you're wrong. They wouldn't have the seasons they are if they had a coach and personnel that was about defence first. Philly is slowly dropping in the standings after being top 3 all season to 4th right now, tied with Pitts who just got Staal back and 1 point up on NJ. It's all because the coach can't/won't make the players defensively responsible.
Philly didn't make the trade for this year. They got rid of Richards because they obviously felt he was expendable and they could be a better team without him (for a number of reasons).

In 2-3 years (if not sooner) this trade will swing HEAVILY in favor of Philly. If LA doesn't get to the SC finals in the next 2-3 years, the Richards window will close quickly. He is simply too frail and small to play the way he does after he hits 30. Meanwhile, Schenn and Simmonds will be in their primes.

As usual, it sucks to be a Kings fan.

tomd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-15-2012, 03:28 PM
  #216
MsWoof
Registered User
 
MsWoof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,031
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomd View Post
Philly didn't make the trade for this year. They got rid of Richards because they obviously felt he was expendable and they could be a better team without him (for a number of reasons).

In 2-3 years (if not sooner) this trade will swing HEAVILY in favor of Philly. If LA doesn't get to the SC finals in the next 2-3 years, the Richards window will close quickly. He is simply too frail and small to play the way he does after he hits 30. Meanwhile, Schenn and Simmonds will be in their primes.

As usual, it sucks to be a Kings fan.
Schenn and Simmonds will be in their primes as far as age goes but you don't know what's going to happen in 2 or 3 years any more than I do. What I see is right now. Schenn has had 3 injuries already this year, foot, shoulder and concussion and was rocked by Kovalchuk in a fight. How do you know he's not going to be too injured to continue? If Laviolette puts in a more defensive game, their points will come down but will they suddenly become excellent defensive players? All I've seen out of almost every Philly forward is the ability to turn the puck over. Philly needs to employ a more defensive style of play because these 6-5 type of games aren't going to get them far come playoff time and that's from the goalies on out. We'll see how good the trade looks if Philly decides to dramatically change their system.

MsWoof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 01:33 PM
  #217
04' hockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: City of Brotherly Lo
Posts: 511
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomd View Post
Philly didn't make the trade for this year. They got rid of Richards because they obviously felt he was expendable and they could be a better team without him (for a number of reasons).

In 2-3 years (if not sooner) this trade will swing HEAVILY in favor of Philly. If LA doesn't get to the SC finals in the next 2-3 years, the Richards window will close quickly. He is simply too frail and small to play the way he does after he hits 30. Meanwhile, Schenn and Simmonds will be in their primes.

As usual, it sucks to be a Kings fan.
Wrong.....look at the Flyers goals against , they'll be lucky to sneak into the post season. Our million $ goale is a head case and all our good Dmen are old or hurt..... the Flyers miss Pronger of course but they also miss Richie, way too many first year guys in the lineup without a true captain. Why Mike was ostricized here in Philly is beyond me.....just wait till the playoffs before you judge him.

04' hockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 07:36 PM
  #218
Johnny Utah
Registered User
 
Johnny Utah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 6,294
vCash: 500
19 and 20 for Simmonds.

Johnny Utah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 07:45 PM
  #219
Johnny Utah
Registered User
 
Johnny Utah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 6,294
vCash: 500
Let's put it this way....

Brown-Kopitar-Williams
Penner-Stoll-Simmonds
Clifford-Schenn-Lewis
Richardson-Fraser-Westgarth/Hunter

or

Brown-Kopitar-Williams
Penner-Richards-Stoll
Clifford-Loktionov-Lewis
Richardson-Fraser-Hunter/Westgarth

Which would you rather have? The top line-up is big, young and skilled, the bottom has a bunch of guys playing out of position.

Johnny Utah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 07:47 PM
  #220
DocWest
Stanley Cup Champs!
 
DocWest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 5,282
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Utah View Post
19 and 20 for Simmonds.
Why not just make a new thread every time Simmonds scores a goal? You post about it so much that it's borderline creepy.

DocWest is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 07:53 PM
  #221
Johnny Utah
Registered User
 
Johnny Utah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 6,294
vCash: 500
How can you dispute the numbers? Combine Simmonds and Schenn stats then look at Richards? IT WAS NOT WORTH IT.

The Kings were not good enough to make that deal...now another season of barely squeaking in and Richards now turned 27.

If we were floating around 1-4 in the conference the past few years I would say make this deal, but we aren't and gave up significant assets.

Johnny Utah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 07:57 PM
  #222
Sydor25
LA Kings
 
Sydor25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North Texas
Country: United States
Posts: 21,395
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Sydor25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Utah View Post
How can you dispute the numbers? Combine Simmonds and Schenn stats then look at Richards? IT WAS NOT WORTH IT.

The Kings were not good enough to make that deal...now another season of barely squeaking in and Richards now turned 27.

If we were floating around 1-4 in the conference the past few years I would say make this deal, but we aren't and gave up significant assets.
Richards has still scored a higher percentage of the Kings goals than Simmonds. Why can't you see that the Kings score less than Philly? Simmonds only has 11 ES goals. Mike Richards has 10 ES goals and 2 SH goals. That's 12 to 11 without the PP goals.

Sydor25 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 08:01 PM
  #223
Duc620
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 880
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomd View Post
... In 2-3 years (if not sooner) this trade will swing HEAVILY in favor of Philly. If LA doesn't get to the SC finals in the next 2-3 years, the Richards window will close quickly. He is simply too frail and small to play the way he does after he hits 30. Meanwhile, Schenn and Simmonds will be in their primes.

As usual, it sucks to be a Kings fan.
'member when Fleury, Oates, St. Louis, and Doug Gilmore were too frail and too small? M. Richards is bigger than any of them. Of course, he's got the concussion virus. I'm just saying he's won an awful lot of league championships. All of them but the Cup, right? So, he's got something big he still needs to add to the quiver. Let's add determination to the mix. Not quite as bad a bet as you spin.

Of course, you think it sucks. To be a Kings fan.

Duc620 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 08:02 PM
  #224
Johnny Utah
Registered User
 
Johnny Utah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 6,294
vCash: 500
Richards and Gilmore are the same height actually, Mike just out weighs him by a few pounds.

Johnny Utah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 08:09 PM
  #225
Telos
Moderator
In Dean We Trust
 
Telos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Reno, Nv.
Country: United States
Posts: 22,786
vCash: 50
Send a message via ICQ to Telos Send a message via AIM to Telos Send a message via MSN to Telos Send a message via Yahoo to Telos
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Utah View Post
How can you dispute the numbers? Combine Simmonds and Schenn stats then look at Richards? IT WAS NOT WORTH IT.

The Kings were not good enough to make that deal...now another season of barely squeaking in and Richards now turned 27.

If we were floating around 1-4 in the conference the past few years I would say make this deal, but we aren't and gave up significant assets.
Ridiculous argument is ridiculous. I don't care if you are dead last, if you can give up a decent prospect and a third liner for a top 15 center, and you need a center, you do it.

Simmonds has more goals than Kopitar single handedly, is he a better player? Should we trade Kopitar to the Flyers for Simmonds straight up? You sound like you belong to the Philly board because it is obvious your heart is there. You don't have to ache here when you can be happy there. You will never get him back. He will never play for the Kings again. The tears here won't change a thing. What are you going to do when Richards rebounds, proves that he isn't a 40 point player for the rest of his career, and that your 50 game sample size was negligent? If Richards rebounds after having spent only like 5% of his contract length here are you going to concede, only then, to not bring this up every single day?

Telos is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.