HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > New York Islanders
Notices

Wang's Last Chance in Nassau???

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
02-15-2012, 11:09 PM
  #51
periferal
Registered User
 
periferal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,303
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bert Marshall days View Post
Just for kicks, I'm gonna bring back the thread of Petition to Move Isles to Queens. Hopefully we'll get some more signatures, beef it up and I'll send it to the Queens Borough president's office. The guy from the Daily News that did the story on the petition said he'd do another story if it gets sent to H Marshall's office as I spoke to him.

Send it to the Queens Borough President's Office!?!?!?! Bert - I thought you had your stuff together. Queens would take the Islanders in a hot second.

YOU NEED TO CREATE A PETITION AND SEND IT TO WANG, who refuses to talk to Queens - Not the other way around.

periferal is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-15-2012, 11:11 PM
  #52
periferal
Registered User
 
periferal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,303
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 19 in a row View Post
found this :
http://www.king5.com/home/New-Seattl...139407008.html

Mentions basketball but I am sure it could suit both...
I'm Seattle Seahawks fan so if the Isles move there, I'm buying an aisle seat next to Tavares.

periferal is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-15-2012, 11:42 PM
  #53
Bunk Moreland
Moderator
 
Bunk Moreland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 6,665
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvin De Haan Job View Post
According to kyper and a bunch of other people on twitter Seattle is set to announce a new arena tomorrow.. Ugh..

(I'm on my phone can't copy it over but if someone can link something feel free)
To further this up.. The Seattle Metropolitans were the first US based team with the Stanley cup... Will the new Seattle Mets be as cursed as the New York team?

Bunk Moreland is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 12:54 AM
  #54
Bert Marshall days
Registered User
 
Bert Marshall days's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 3,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by periferal View Post
Send it to the Queens Borough President's Office!?!?!?! Bert - I thought you had your stuff together. Queens would take the Islanders in a hot second.

YOU NEED TO CREATE A PETITION AND SEND IT TO WANG, who refuses to talk to Queens - Not the other way around.
Relax dude, you should know better. It was sent to Wang months ago when the petition had almost 400 signatures in 4 days.

Nick Hirshon of the Daily News speaks to the Queens Borough President's Office occasionally and he suggested sending it to her to show her the people's interest. She told him she's interested in having NYI move to Queens but doesn't just want to be used as leverage only and will only talk to Wang if the talks are serious.

Remember, Wang didn't approach Brooklyn about the pre-season game, Brooklyn approached him. Wang likes people to woo him and when Botta wrote he'd listen to any municipalities the implied onus/emphasis was on the municipality reaching out to Wang not vice versa. (I took Nick's advice as he's dealt with Wang and Marshall.) If this is the push she needs then ya never know what might happen. At least she'll know people are interested in having NYI in her borough.

Bert Marshall days is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 01:03 AM
  #55
Bert Marshall days
Registered User
 
Bert Marshall days's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 3,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by IslesFanatic View Post
We have had our differences about qns/nassau/bklyn, but man I couldnt be more on your side right now. **** these guys. We gotta do everything we can to keep the Isles local. Queens, Broolyn or wherever. I am tired of this **** with nassau County. They all suck. Lets kick some ass!!!!
I hear ya and remember our "chats". Nice to see you left the dark side. Seriously, you're right and I wrote the same thing on the main board as it's not about a site preference now it's about surviving locally. Queens/Brooklyn is better than Seattle/Quebec as Nassau seems to have let everyone down.

Bert Marshall days is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 09:52 AM
  #56
DerekJR321
Registered User
 
DerekJR321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Manorville, NY (LI)
Country: United States
Posts: 123
vCash: 500
Until Wang himself says something, then everything else is speculation.

I don't see Wang going for a 3rd proposal on his dime. It seems like Nassau is trying to bend him over the table right now.

I think Wang will wait till after the Isles - Devils game in October to say a word about this situation.

DerekJR321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 10:11 AM
  #57
Bert Marshall days
Registered User
 
Bert Marshall days's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 3,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvin De Haan Job View Post
According to kyper and a bunch of other people on twitter Seattle is set to announce a new arena tomorrow.. Ugh..

(I'm on my phone can't copy it over but if someone can link something feel free)
Wonderful.

Phoenix to Seattle. NYI to..........Quebec? Phoenix to Quebec and NYI to Seattle?

Queens/Brooklyn......please.

Bert Marshall days is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 10:31 AM
  #58
HyeDray
HFB Partner
 
HyeDray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Hyde Park, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,806
vCash: 500
Right now, there is a sense of urgency to be sure, but no need to panic.

Those fans who think the Brooklyn preseason game is not important in keeping the Islanders within driving distance is kidding themselves.

For all the talk of Suffolk and some Nassau fans concerned about getting into Brooklyn or Queens — is that not a better option then hoping a flight to Seattle, Quebec, Hamilton, Vegas or Kansas City? Isn't the goal to keep the team in the area the priority?

Brooklyn would be my second choice over Queens.

Nassau County is really no longer an option, and if I am the owner of the New York Islanders after being slapped in the face by Nassau voters and by the Town of Hempstead — and all of the political half brains in Nassau — I am more or less publicaly shopping the team to other municipalities. Nassau County does not deserve the Islanders, and clearly, neither it, or the Town of Hempstead want the Islanders. So far the entire onus here has been on the Islanders to produce something, while Nassau and Hempstead have really offered nothing. All the while, both Queens and Brooklyn are showing that they want the team.

As for Brooklyn — if you want to be able to get to games locally, I highly recommend we as fans do everything we can to fill Barclays to the rafters for that preseason game. THAT more than anything else will be the loudest communication to Charles Wang that should move to Brooklyn, the fans will be there. If there are 1,000 people at that game, it communicates that Brooklyn will not be viable.

I know some argue Brooklyn won't be viable because of capacity issues, but that is very SMALL thinking over what is at stake here. Does it really affect you, the fan, if there are 14,500 vs 16,234? Let that be the owners issue. The impact to you is a ticket price, but at the same time, I am willing to go to Brooklyn vs another city.

A new building in Queens would be great. I would not mind western Suffolk — but Suffolk has made very light, very casual talk and nothing substantive on an arena for the team. Of course, a new County Exec in Steve Bellone could sweep in and make his case. I hope he does.

My goal is to keep the franchise local — anywhere on the physical Island is fine with me over another city and THAT should be our priority. $crew Nassau County and its stupidity. Enough!

HyeDray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 10:49 AM
  #59
19 in a row
Registered User
 
19 in a row's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 929
vCash: 500
All things have their significance and I dont think anyone should take brooklyn lightly at all. However to say that nassau is "no longer an option" is taking that a little too lightly..
None of us know what Wang is thinking for sure, but you have think that all options are on the table. It is just good business sense.
"It's not personal Sonny, it's strictly business" TGF

And yes, from a transportation standpoint, Brooklyn is favorable to Seattle. However, IMHO and from what i have seen so far, from a sustainable profitability standpoint, I dont think that Brooklyn presents a viable alternative. However, if they move there (and I hope they dont) I do hope i have to eat those words.


Last edited by 19 in a row: 02-16-2012 at 11:18 AM.
19 in a row is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 11:17 AM
  #60
PJGooch
Registered User
 
PJGooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 440
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HyeDray View Post
Nassau County is really no longer an option, and if I am the owner of the New York Islanders after being slapped in the face by Nassau voters and by the Town of Hempstead — and all of the political half brains in Nassau — I am more or less publicaly shopping the team to other municipalities. Nassau County does not deserve the Islanders, and clearly, neither it, or the Town of Hempstead want the Islanders. So far the entire onus here has been on the Islanders to produce something, while Nassau and Hempstead have really offered nothing. All the while, both Queens and Brooklyn are showing that they want the team.
Whether the Islanders wind up in Nassau, Brooklyn, Queens, Cantiague Park, Hot Skates... I don't really care, as long as they are in NY.

With that said, business of this magnitude is not done out of spite. Business tied to politics -- on Long Island, no less -- does not fall into place with a few empty meetings and hollow threats. This is as much a political/economic issue for the County as it is a hockey issue for fans. I am fully expecting this speculation to go on for another 12-18 months before anything of substance is revealed.

For Wang, publicly shopping the Islanders to other local municipalities is just revealing his entire hand before it's necessary. Maybe it's necessary for fans to put our mind at ease, but it's a bad idea for Wang. What happens if he preemptively goes public with his desire to take the Isles to NYC and the other options fall through? All you've done then is cast a darker cloud over the franchise and put yourself at Nassau's mercy for longer.

PJGooch is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 11:44 AM
  #61
lorwood
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,124
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 19 in a row View Post
All things have their significance and I dont think anyone should take brooklyn lightly at all. However to say that nassau is "no longer an option" is taking that a little too lightly..
None of us know what Wang is thinking for sure, but you have think that all options are on the table. It is just good business sense.
"It's not personal Sonny, it's strictly business" TGF

And yes, from a transportation standpoint, Brooklyn is favorable to Seattle. However, IMHO and from what i have seen so far, from a sustainable profitability standpoint, I dont think that Brooklyn presents a viable alternative. However, if they move there (and I hope they dont) I do hope i have to eat those words.
I think Nassau is only an option because of Wang's stubbornness but I also think that that stubbornness may be grounded in fantasy land at this point.

Based on the hearing this week and the Newsday article stating that Mangano will listen to another development plan by Wang I think that Wang is still insisting that the only starting point for the Islanders staying is control over the HUB development.

But in this regard nothing has changed. At the end of the day the TOH has final say. And even if Wang does come up with another plan it seems logical that it is sure to get bogged down by the same politics. (Other developers will sue saying the project was not open, a new environmental study, new NIMBY and of course the TOH zoning)

My biggest fear is not the team moving, I am afraid that at the last minute the county will agree to start the process of permitting Wang's plan which will take years to wind its way through the politics, meanwhile Wang will keep the team at the cap floor (or below) until his real estate aspirations are final. So come 2018 nothing will have changed.

lorwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 11:51 AM
  #62
beach
Things are looking
 
beach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: here
Country: United States
Posts: 1,595
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to beach
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJGooch View Post
For Wang, publicly shopping the Islanders to other local municipalities is just revealing his entire hand before it's necessary. Maybe it's necessary for fans to put our mind at ease, but it's a bad idea for Wang. What happens if he preemptively goes public with his desire to take the Isles to NYC and the other options fall through? All you've done then is cast a darker cloud over the franchise and put yourself at Nassau's mercy for longer.
I think Wang has played this well. Only an idiot (not you) would not realize that he is looking at options outside of Nassau. Now that Picker has stated as much, to me , it just finally exerts pressure on the clowns in Nassau and makes them realize that the end game is near. For the longest time, Wang's inner circle would not even admit to exploration of options outside of Nassau. And how long should he wait? If an arena needs to be built, a decision needs to be made in the next few months. Even a deal in Brooklyn should ideally be made in the next few months so that Ratner doesn't think that he is the only game in town. If Wang waits til 2013/2014 to go to Ratner, he will not get the best deal.

beach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 12:01 PM
  #63
lorwood
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,124
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach View Post
I think Wang has played this well. Only an idiot (not you) would not realize that he is looking at options outside of Nassau. Now that Picker has stated as much, to me , it just finally exerts pressure on the clowns in Nassau and makes them realize that the end game is near. For the longest time, Wang's inner circle would not even admit to exploration of options outside of Nassau. And how long should he wait? If an arena needs to be built, a decision needs to be made in the next few months. Even a deal in Brooklyn should ideally be made in the next few months so that Ratner doesn't think that he is the only game in town. If Wang waits til 2013/2014 to go to Ratner, he will not get the best deal.
The deal with Ratner could be as simple as Wang asking Ratner...

I am going to put in one last effort to develop in Nassau but if it doesn't work out would you be interested in the team?

lorwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 12:06 PM
  #64
rollin109
Registered User
 
rollin109's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 418
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bert Marshall days View Post
Wonderful.

Phoenix to Seattle. NYI to..........Quebec? Phoenix to Quebec and NYI to Seattle?

Queens/Brooklyn......please.
Phoenix to Brooklyn...

rollin109 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 12:11 PM
  #65
Steve55
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,386
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by lorwood View Post
I think Nassau is only an option because of Wang's stubbornness but I also think that that stubbornness may be grounded in fantasy land at this point.

Based on the hearing this week and the Newsday article stating that Mangano will listen to another development plan by Wang I think that Wang is still insisting that the only starting point for the Islanders staying is control over the HUB development.

But in this regard nothing has changed. At the end of the day the TOH has final say. And even if Wang does come up with another plan it seems logical that it is sure to get bogged down by the same politics. (Other developers will sue saying the project was not open, a new environmental study, new NIMBY and of course the TOH zoning)

My biggest fear is not the team moving, I am afraid that at the last minute the county will agree to start the process of permitting Wang's plan which will take years to wind its way through the politics, meanwhile Wang will keep the team at the cap floor (or below) until his real estate aspirations are final. So come 2018 nothing will have changed.
Let's hope that does not happen and by 2015 the Isles have moved out of Nassau.

Steve55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 12:14 PM
  #66
hb6947
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,013
vCash: 500
Just to add my two cents here about Wang coming up with another proposal, I would not be surprised if a smaller hybrid version of the Lighthouse Project and the Old Plainview project are what ultimately gets approval here in the next 9 months.

hb6947 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 12:36 PM
  #67
Bert Marshall days
Registered User
 
Bert Marshall days's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 3,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJGooch View Post
Whether the Islanders wind up in Nassau, Brooklyn, Queens, Cantiague Park, Hot Skates... I don't really care, as long as they are in NY.

With that said, business of this magnitude is not done out of spite. Business tied to politics -- on Long Island, no less -- does not fall into place with a few empty meetings and hollow threats. This is as much a political/economic issue for the County as it is a hockey issue for fans. I am fully expecting this speculation to go on for another 12-18 months before anything of substance is revealed.
Picker (and K Law) said in Tuesday's meeting that a decision HAS to be made by late this year 2012 and no longer. They were adamant on that.

Bert Marshall days is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 12:51 PM
  #68
Steve55
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,386
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bert Marshall days View Post
Picker (and K Law) said in Tuesday's meeting that a decision HAS to be made by late this year 2012 and no longer. They were adamant on that.
Actually I heard Picker wanted a deadline BEFORE the end of 2012.

Steve55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 01:05 PM
  #69
PJGooch
Registered User
 
PJGooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 440
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bert Marshall days View Post
Picker (and K Law) said in Tuesday's meeting that a decision HAS to be made by late this year 2012 and no longer. They were adamant on that.
That's all well and good. But unless they come out and declare 12/31/12 a drop-dead date for the Isles in Nassau, it doesn't amount to much. What happens if a decision isn't made?

My guess is the same thing that happened after 8/1/11. More uncertainty, more threats, more posturing, more meetings.

PJGooch is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 01:17 PM
  #70
lorwood
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,124
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve55 View Post
Actually I heard Picker wanted a deadline BEFORE the end of 2012.
Yes he did say that but "in a ham handed way" he went on to say that this would be only phase one.

This is a bit of a sleight of hand on Wang's part and one that even Nassau will probably see through.

Wang saying we need to get the Arena up now lets worry about the rest later.

Which really means if an arena goes up Wang expects to continue to hold the rights to the HUB.

To me this is like being down to your last few chips so you might as well go all in right away and hope everybody folds early or you luck into a hand on the turn or the river.

lorwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 01:25 PM
  #71
19 in a row
Registered User
 
19 in a row's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 929
vCash: 500
We have to keep in mind that any comments from the involved parties may be posturing. We can disect them all we want or interpret one way or the other.. the clock is obviously ticking but until I see action I won't get my hopes up too high or too low for anything.. maybe worry about it more once the season is done (hopefully in June, ok very hopefully)

19 in a row is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 01:35 PM
  #72
Bert Marshall days
Registered User
 
Bert Marshall days's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 3,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJGooch View Post
That's all well and good. But unless they come out and declare 12/31/12 a drop-dead date for the Isles in Nassau, it doesn't amount to much. What happens if a decision isn't made?

My guess is the same thing that happened after 8/1/11. More uncertainty, more threats, more posturing, more meetings.
Picker basically said as much.

Hopefully Wang wises up and finally plans to bolt if a decision isn't made. This crap can't go on forever. One or both parties has to sheet or get off the pot already.

Meantime, NYI continues to suck with a cap floor payroll until anything here is resolved.

Bert Marshall days is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 01:41 PM
  #73
Steve55
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,386
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by lorwood View Post
Yes he did say that but "in a ham handed way" he went on to say that this would be only phase one.

This is a bit of a sleight of hand on Wang's part and one that even Nassau will probably see through.

Wang saying we need to get the Arena up now lets worry about the rest later.

Which really means if an arena goes up Wang expects to continue to hold the rights to the HUB.

To me this is like being down to your last few chips so you might as well go all in right away and hope everybody folds early or you luck into a hand on the turn or the river.
What do you think are the chances that TOH will expand the zoning to make a privately funded arena worthwhile? I also think that the Mets legal problems are delaying a Queens arena from being constructed even though that will likely happen through revenue bonds. I wonder if Nassau County will kick the Islanders out before 2015 if a new arena deal is announced elsewhere.

Steve55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 01:48 PM
  #74
lorwood
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,124
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve55 View Post
What do you think are the chances that TOH will expand the zoning to make a privately funded arena worthwhile? I also think that the Mets legal problems are delaying a Queens arena from being constructed even though that will likely happen through revenue bonds. I wonder if Nassau County will kick the Islanders out before 2015 if a new arena deal is announced elsewhere.
Well here is one of the telling things. The TOH was not even at this weeks hearing. Nassau can meet all they want the TOH will decide what happens at the HUB.

I think that nobody has moved off of their original positions.

Wang wants the HUB or nothing
The TOH will stick to their zoning regs
Nassau will take the path of least resistance and highest political payout.

If there is financial gain for the Mets by the Islanders being there then I think NYC will be more than willing to help out via bonds.


Last edited by lorwood: 02-16-2012 at 01:54 PM.
lorwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2012, 03:07 PM
  #75
jBuds
pretty damn valuable
 
jBuds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NYC Suburbs
Country: Lord Howe Island
Posts: 24,471
vCash: 500
Francesa: "Brooklyn arena can be 'amended' to accommodate hockey"

Mods, please merge if a thread already exists for this - I assume there are 34983 arena-related threads, including the one on Nassau a few down.


I hadn't heard this, but just heard Mike say it on the show. Is this true? All reports I've seen and heard have led me to believe that the Nets' new arena just simply isn't conducive to hockey.

I know the plan is to play a preseason game there...but can anyone confirm that it has indeed been stated that the Brooklyn arena could be tweaked to accommodate a hockey team?

Even if it could be...wouldn't we be talking about an MTS Centre-like capacity, <14k? And who renovates an arena that has been standing for all of two years?


(please save the "Francesa doesn't know **** about hockey" comments...we all know that.... but this isn't about the sport, this is about the arena, and the comment happened to come on his show)

jBuds is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.