HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Nashville Predators
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

What's our bigger need? Top 6 forward or defensive depth?

View Poll Results: Bigger need:
Top 6 Forward 8 57.14%
Defensive Depth 6 42.86%
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-17-2012, 11:23 AM
  #1
Drake744
#HeyHeyPekkaRinne
 
Drake744's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nashville
Posts: 4,141
vCash: 325
What's our bigger need? Top 6 forward or defensive depth?

I was going to put this in the trade deadline thread but I wanted to make a poll to see what everyone thought about this.

Pretty simple. Pick one. Bigger need: top 6 or d-depth.

I say at the end of the day a top 6 is the more explosive acquisition but if we really had one need I'd say defensive depth. Will be cheaper, keep the guys we have in tact, and we really don't have too many issues scoring goals at the end of the day so it's not as pressing as veteran defensive toughness in my mind.

Drake744 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2012, 11:43 AM
  #2
triggrman
HFBoards Sponsor
 
triggrman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 18,921
vCash: 500
I think they're both equal needs.

triggrman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2012, 11:47 AM
  #3
101st_fan
I taught Yoda
 
101st_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Some Army fort
Country: United States
Posts: 6,260
vCash: 500
Three games since New Year's with less than three scored by our guys. We're in a relative dead heat in goals per game with Tampa, the Rangers, and Washington.

Solidify the defensive pairings ... add depth up front ... in that order given the current trade market and level of play from our guys. If a guy like Nash/Carter/Parise somehow becomes available though we need to make a serious offer. Yes, it may require juggling our lines and changing the chemistry, but, it's a risk worth taking.

101st_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2012, 11:58 AM
  #4
maplepred
Registered User
 
maplepred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,683
vCash: 500
We are in most need of a top 3 forward

maplepred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2012, 12:10 PM
  #5
deanwormer
Registered User
 
deanwormer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Nashville
Country: United States
Posts: 1,277
vCash: 437
Given we know how much Trotz trusts rookies, and we know how Cube's play drops off when he plays too many minutes, and we're about 10th in the league in scoring, I just don't see how F scoring can be a HIGHER priority. Maybe you can argue equal, but unless Trotz is gonna' go 25/20/15 on the pairings I don't know how our D holds up for a deep run - and Trotz isn't gonna' do that with those rookies.

deanwormer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2012, 12:14 PM
  #6
worstfaceoffmanever
These Snacks Are Odd
 
worstfaceoffmanever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Country: United States
Posts: 12,562
vCash: 500
"Top six forward" is such a vague term. We need a guy who can possess the puck really well to go out there on a long shift and cycle in the offensive end, wear down the opposition, and create scoring chances by making the other team move their feet. That's how you create chances on the power play, but the only player we have that can really control a three-man cycle is Erat. We put him out there with Fisher and Hornqvist and we're totally helpless. A guy like Derek Roy or Tomas Plekanec would be a huge boost in that department.

I'm not sure how much a guy like Nash or Carter helps us. They can create space for our other forwards, but their strength is not possession and control, it's in finishing chances. We have to set up in the offensive end before we can even think about a guy like that being a factor, and that's something we simply can't seem to do with any kind of regularity.

That said, Bouillon is horrible with the puck on his stick. He kills any offensive buildup this team might be able to generate. If we could get a good deal on a defenseman that can handle the puck without being a major liability in the other end, that might go a long way to helping us establish offensive pressure.

worstfaceoffmanever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2012, 12:19 PM
  #7
Roman Yoshi
Ellis too short
 
Roman Yoshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Franklin, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 4,939
vCash: 500
Neither. Top 3 forward

Roman Yoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2012, 12:44 PM
  #8
SavageSteve
Registered User
 
SavageSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 538
vCash: 500
Since the playoffs often bring forth stellar performances by forwards playing over their heads for the right period of time (see Joel Ward, Doug Wickenheiser, etc), I'd have to say someone to replace the Cube or a renowned penalty killing forward... but not at the expense of our secondary scoring. What killed us against Vancouver last year was not being able to neutralize Kessler and the inability to effectively split 6/20 IMO. Our discipline and ability to juggle lines are blessings that tell me we need to add a defenseman that logs 20 minutes that we don't notice because they defend well!

SavageSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2012, 12:59 PM
  #9
AtlantaWhaler
Moderator
Thrash/Preds/Sabres
 
AtlantaWhaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: United States
Posts: 12,632
vCash: 500
I voted D, but I wonder if a top-6 has a bigger impact on trying to keep Suter.

AtlantaWhaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2012, 01:02 PM
  #10
CalleJAMkrok
Weber/Neal/Rinne
 
CalleJAMkrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Yesterday
Country: Ireland
Posts: 4,153
vCash: 500
cant decide between the two but a top 3 f would be gorgeous.

CalleJAMkrok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2012, 01:48 PM
  #11
101st_fan
I taught Yoda
 
101st_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Some Army fort
Country: United States
Posts: 6,260
vCash: 500
Well .... we got the defensive depth at a cost. Now to see what we get to bolster the forward corps.

101st_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2012, 02:44 PM
  #12
Drake744
#HeyHeyPekkaRinne
 
Drake744's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nashville
Posts: 4,141
vCash: 325
In a bit of foreshadowing, this thread now seems irrelevant.

Drake744 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.