HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Dallas - Pittsburgh - Vancouver

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
02-18-2012, 08:59 PM
  #1
LatvianTwist
Blow for Barkov
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston
Country: Tibet
Posts: 13,668
vCash: 143
Dallas - Pittsburgh - Vancouver

Receive:
Eric Tangradi
Jordan Schroeder
Vancouver 2nd, 2012
Pittsburgh 2nd, 2012

Receive:
Brendan Morrow

Receive:
Mason Raymond

Stars add some great prospect depth, and get guys who seem to be buried under depth where they won't have a great chance to succeed, which they will in Dallas. We also continue to stockpile picks, always a big help.

Vancouver gives up the most for a risky player, but chances are he'll turn out great and end up becoming a force in the playoffs and next year. Go ahead and tell me he looks like he's slowing down this year, but he's played ~8 games at 100%, where he scored 10 points. If he isn't ready to go this year, he'll come back next year and score 30 goals, I can almost guarantee that.

Pittsburgh gets a speedy top 6 forward to help solidify their forward depth, and he's got a great contract for them as well. They give up a player who seems to just have no chance at all there, and the 2nd shouldn't be that hard to part with.

Flame away.


Last edited by LatvianTwist: 02-18-2012 at 09:13 PM.
LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:02 PM
  #2
ColePens
Global Moderator
save.us.07
 
ColePens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: United States
Posts: 24,975
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to ColePens
Pittsburgh gives up Tangradi and a 2nd for Raymond? Pittsburgh says no. We would just add to the offer for Morrow instead.

ColePens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:02 PM
  #3
Sarcastic
Registered User
 
Sarcastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 759
vCash: 500
Pittsburgh has absolutely no reason to do this at all.

Sarcastic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:03 PM
  #4
Bgav
We Stylin'
 
Bgav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,383
vCash: 950
thats a lot to give up for brendan morrow

Bgav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:03 PM
  #5
mpp9
Registered User
 
mpp9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 9,998
vCash: 500
I want a forward who can make more of an impact than Raymond at this point. A Sidless Pens team needs Staal to be a huge playoff performer and Raymond isn't enough to make him one, imo.

It's not terrible valuewise from our point of view though. Just would rather use those assets to bring in a bigger fish.

mpp9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:03 PM
  #6
Avs44
Registered User
 
Avs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 4,399
vCash: 450
I don't think Vancouver wants to give up Raymond+1st+Schroeder for Morrow. Dallas also received to much. Take out Van's 1st perhaps?

Avs44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:04 PM
  #7
LatvianTwist
Blow for Barkov
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston
Country: Tibet
Posts: 13,668
vCash: 143
That's the thing, though. The only thing I think you could add that would entice us is Morrow or Despres, both of which are obviously unavailable.

If a 2nd is too much to upgrade from Tangradi to Raymond, then I don't see a trade in our futures at all. And I can't believe anyone doesn't see the upgrade from Tangradi to Raymond.

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:06 PM
  #8
LatvianTwist
Blow for Barkov
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston
Country: Tibet
Posts: 13,668
vCash: 143
If the package from Vancouver is too much, I think a 2nd would be alright too. It's just that there'd likely be a bidding war, and that's what I would see taking the prize. A 2nd would be more realistic value.

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:06 PM
  #9
Rowdy Roddy Peeper
Search and Destroy
 
Rowdy Roddy Peeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 34,755
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatvianTwist View Post
That's the thing, though. The only thing I think you could add that would entice us is Morrow or Despres, both of which are obviously unavailable.

If a 2nd is too much to upgrade from Tangradi to Raymond, then I don't see a trade in our futures at all. And I can't believe anyone doesn't see the upgrade from Tangradi to Raymond.
Raymond gives the Pens nothing they need.

Rowdy Roddy Peeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:08 PM
  #10
Bennrocks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,078
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatvianTwist View Post
If the package from Vancouver is too much, I think a 2nd would be alright too. It's just that there'd likely be a bidding war, and that's what I would see taking the prize. A 2nd would be more realistic value.
if we're trying to stage a bidding war for morrow why bother with a three way trade?

And how are we staging this bidding war with him on the shelf probably until after the deadline

Bennrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:09 PM
  #11
ChrisFromVan
Registered User
 
ChrisFromVan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 213
vCash: 500
Dallas makes out like bandits

ChrisFromVan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:10 PM
  #12
Lqhsim RNH
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6
vCash: 500
I think the Pittsburgh Penguins could have more with Tangradi .
Raymond seems to be injured a lot in the past few years .

Lqhsim RNH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:11 PM
  #13
KIRK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,680
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisFromVan View Post
Dallas makes out like bandits
Yeah, but at least the fleecing isn't limited to one team . . .

KIRK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:12 PM
  #14
LatvianTwist
Blow for Barkov
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston
Country: Tibet
Posts: 13,668
vCash: 143
Meh, should've said this in the OP. I really want Tangradi in a Stars' uniform, but to get him and Morrow in the same deal, all that you guys' would give up is Kennedy+Tangradi+2nd, which simply won't cut it. This is the best way I could find us shipping out Morrow while still getting Tangradi, but it obviously won't happen.

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:15 PM
  #15
mpp9
Registered User
 
mpp9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 9,998
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatvianTwist View Post
That's the thing, though. The only thing I think you could add that would entice us is Morrow or Despres, both of which are obviously unavailable.

If a 2nd is too much to upgrade from Tangradi to Raymond, then I don't see a trade in our futures at all. And I can't believe anyone doesn't see the upgrade from Tangradi to Raymond.
That's why I said Tangradi+ for Raymond is fair. But from our point of view, if we can use those assets in a package to nab AK, that's a better avenue.

mpp9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:19 PM
  #16
LatvianTwist
Blow for Barkov
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston
Country: Tibet
Posts: 13,668
vCash: 143
So, kind of a different direction:

Would Morrow be able to get Tangradi+Despres/Morrow? That's what I think we'd ask for, considering your 1st is off the table for certain. I'd rather have that than a large package of prospects.

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:20 PM
  #17
Campoli2Burrows
Registered User
 
Campoli2Burrows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 999
vCash: 500
Make it Ott not Morrow and take out Schroeder and the pick.

Campoli2Burrows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:21 PM
  #18
mpp9
Registered User
 
mpp9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 9,998
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatvianTwist View Post
So, kind of a different direction:

Would Morrow be able to get Tangradi+Despres/Morrow? That's what I think we'd ask for, considering your 1st is off the table for certain. I'd rather have that than a large package of prospects.
Personally, I'd move Tangradi+1st for Morrow. We'd have to move salary at some point next year, but I'm sure we could figure it out.

If Shero is interested, I'd imagine we'd need some kind of medical opinion on Morrow to see if he's going to be good to go come playoffs.

mpp9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:23 PM
  #19
denkiteki
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,775
vCash: 500
Would do Eric Tangradi + 2nd for Raymond if we plan on getting another top 9 forward but no way interested in the Morrow trade.

#1 He's too expensive. Only way this works is if we keep Ballard on LTIR until the playoffs. Not to mention his production next year is meaningless 'cause the 'nucks can't keep him next year nor does it make sense. Its better to spend that money on D not another expensive forward.

#2 Raymond, Schroeder, and a 1st... thats a lot to give up. So much in fact, we might as well go bid for Carter. Just add Schneider to that package and we'll probably have one of the best package for Carter (and thats ignoring problem #1... i.e. the 'nucks won't make this type of move)

#3 He would end up being on the 3rd line and has had similar production as Raymond (in terms of pace) this year. So a side move doesn't even make sense. He doesn't fit in the 2nd line due to the speed. The first line is full.

denkiteki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:23 PM
  #20
LatvianTwist
Blow for Barkov
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston
Country: Tibet
Posts: 13,668
vCash: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpp9 View Post
Personally, I'd move Tangradi+1st for Morrow. We'd have to move salary at some point next year, but I'm sure we could figure it out.

If Shero is interested, I'd imagine we'd need some kind of medical opinion on Morrow to see if he's going to be good to go come playoffs.
The value is there, but with the draft being in Pittsburgh, unless you get another 1st, no way that happens.

Chances are Morrow won't be good for this year's playoffs, but next year, he will be. I think an OS deal would work great between these two, and we could get your 2013 1st then.

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:24 PM
  #21
Rowdy Roddy Peeper
Search and Destroy
 
Rowdy Roddy Peeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 34,755
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatvianTwist View Post
So, kind of a different direction:

Would Morrow be able to get Tangradi+Despres/Morrow? That's what I think we'd ask for, considering your 1st is off the table for certain. I'd rather have that than a large package of prospects.
Despres and Morrow are non-starters. They offer too much of what we need if/when Martin is dealt.

Tangradi + 1st could be doable, if Dallas can add a different sort of wing prospect we might want. Reilly Smith?

Rowdy Roddy Peeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:27 PM
  #22
ColePens
Global Moderator
save.us.07
 
ColePens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: United States
Posts: 24,975
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to ColePens
Give us Ott and Morrow... we will gladly give you Kennedy, Tangradi, 2nd, Lovejoy


ColePens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:29 PM
  #23
Modo
Global Moderator
That's a paddlin'
 
Modo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Etobicoke
Country: Canada
Posts: 35,335
vCash: 147
Stars take OP's offer and run.

__________________
If you're telekinetic and you know it, clap my hands!
Modo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:30 PM
  #24
Blitzburgh87*
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,480
vCash: 500
No... that's way to much to give up for Raymond haha. Although I could see tangradi+2013 1st

Blitzburgh87* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2012, 09:33 PM
  #25
KIRK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,680
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatvianTwist View Post
So, kind of a different direction:

Would Morrow be able to get Tangradi+Despres/Morrow? That's what I think we'd ask for, considering your 1st is off the table for certain. I'd rather have that than a large package of prospects.
No . . . Despres and Morrow are untouchables. I mean, if Joe called Ray and said 'I'll give you Benn for Despres', then they're not untouchable, but you and I both know that's not happening, which means for all intents and purposes they are untouchable.

Shero isn't trading his 1st. The other two untouchables are Beau Bennett and Scott Harrington. Personally, I think Bennett could be had in a deal for a winger with some term, but Shero would be looking for a younger guy who he'd have for more than 15 months.

Simply put, I imagine that Ray Shero wouldn't be offering an asset more valuable than a 2nd or a Tangradi or a Kennedy or a Jeffrey or a Bortuzzo in some combination.

I just don't see how there's a hockey trade to be made between the Pens and Stars for Brendan Morrow. The expendable (touchable) pieces aren't there for the Pens for a 33 year old winger with injury issues and one more year on his contract.

KIRK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.