HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > New York Rangers
Notices

3 Stars and GBR: #57 vs. Columbus

View Poll Results: 3 Stars
Michael Del Zotto 92 92.00%
Marian Gaborik 26 26.00%
Derek Stepan 58 58.00%
Henrik Lundqvist 15 15.00%
Ryan Callahan 20 20.00%
Artem Anisimov 32 32.00%
Brad Richards 11 11.00%
Dan Girardi 4 4.00%
John Mitchell 1 1.00%
Brandon Prust 1 1.00%
Brandon Dubinsky 1 1.00%
Carl Hagelin 10 10.00%
Anton Stralman 2 2.00%
Ryan McDonagh 2 2.00%
Other 6 6.00%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 100. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
02-20-2012, 09:45 AM
  #201
NHRangerfan
NYR - just lucky
 
NHRangerfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Country: United States
Posts: 2,618
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgerfan View Post
Don't worry, the NHL more and made up for that lucky bounce we had by stealing our goal at the end of the period.
No goal was stolen...we saw this last year in the PO's against the Caps if memory serves me correctly...replays showed a puck going in but the clock inset in the pic was NBC's not the official clock.

NHRangerfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-20-2012, 09:46 AM
  #202
GloveSave35
Registered User
 
GloveSave35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 548
vCash: 500
MDZ: Player of the game.

GloveSave35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-20-2012, 10:02 AM
  #203
Hensch
Registered User
 
Hensch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Kelowna, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 366
vCash: 500
Anybody have a vid of the "We Don't Want You" Chant?

Hensch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-20-2012, 10:22 AM
  #204
Jackpot
Registered Abuser
 
Jackpot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 455
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowblindNYR View Post
Two top 5 offenses in Boston (during their hottest streak of the season) and Detroit (albeit at a cold streak) each scored 1 goal against Columbus this season. No I wasn't happy with it going into OT and this team still needs a scorer or two, but let's keep things in perspective.

Columbus was coming off a 6 - 1 thumping Saturday, Rangers were at home resting up and preparing for two days. I'm trying to keep things in perspective, a win is a win, just shouldn't be so hardto get two points from the worst team in hockey in the second game of a back to back. Goals are even harder to come by in the playoffs..

I'm of the opinion we need more punch offensively if we plan on advancing past the likes of Pitts, NJ, Boston, Phil, Wash(?)..All of whom have more offensive creativity and skill. Yes I'm aware they have weakness's outside of their offensive capabilities that negate the edge in pure skill... But it's defense first come the post season, unlike the regular season, after that it's skill and creativity that usually wins games. I'm not 100% for trading for Nash, but we need some offensive creativity from somewhere, or someone...

The Rangers system is a post season style of hockey, defense first, score a goal when you can..Just a little concerned about playing teams with more skill once they change their philosophy as well..The Rangers have a hard time scoring when they should, for example on the powerplay, not due to lack of effort, just lack of true offensive ability outside of one or two players...


Last edited by Jackpot: 02-20-2012 at 10:52 AM.
Jackpot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-20-2012, 10:34 AM
  #205
Killem Dafoe
10 Minute Misconduct
 
Killem Dafoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NJ & FL
Country: United States
Posts: 11,836
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by RangerBoy View Post
Columbus beat the Blues last week. Boston lost to Winnipeg and Minnesota. There are no easy games.

Maybe if Sather can find anyone who can win a face-off,the Rangers wouldn't have been in OT.
i totally agree. i know that last place teams beat first place teams and it's going to happen. but when the Rangers dominate like they did with nothing to show for it. It's not like the Jackets came out as the underdogs and scraped and fought hard for the point. they pretty much stood there all night and the Rangers skated and danced around them and couldn't sink anything.

Killem Dafoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-20-2012, 10:50 AM
  #206
ltsthinaz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kingman, Arizona
Country: United States
Posts: 470
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackpot View Post
Columbus was coming off a 6 - 1 thumping Saturday, Rangers were at home resting up and preparing for two days. I'm trying to keep things in perspective, a win is a win, just shouldn't be so hardto get two points from the worst team in hockey in the second game of a back to back. Goals are hard to come by in the post season,

I'm of the opinion we need more punch offensively if we plan on advancing past the likes of Pitts, NJ, Boston..All of whom have more offensive creativity and skill. Defense first come the post season, unlike the regular season, after that it's skill and creativity that usually wins games. I'm not 100% for trading for Nash, but we need some offensive creativity from somewhere, or someone...

The Rangers system is a post season style of hockey, defense first, score a goal when you can..Just a little concerned about playing teams with more skill once they change their philosophy as well..The Rangers have a hard time scoring when they should, for example on the powerplay, not due to lack of effort, just lack of true offensive ability outside of one or two players...
We could certainly use someone who can bury the puck - we controlled the puck the whole game and out-chanced them by a mile - but there is no sense breaking up the whole team to get one. The Flyers have lots of guys who can bury the puck, they have no defense or goaltending and are going nowhere fast.

ltsthinaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-20-2012, 10:54 AM
  #207
Inferno
HFB Partner
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 18,051
vCash: 500
couple of things i wanted to talk about but im too lazy to go back and quote everyone.

On Hagelin:

He was frikkin awesome last night. Kid is such a good board player for someone so small and fast, its ridiculous. Wish he could get a little more zip on his shots, but hes a very good, very smart, very effective player. You could put him on any line and have it be effective. Such a versatile player. Adaptability is something you see so rarely these days. Guys are going for specialty focuses...he can shoot...he can pass, he can play the boards, he can PK....Hagelin can do it ALL, very well. Much like Ryan Callahan.

On MDZ:
Easily the first star of the game, not sure which genius decided to give it to Cally, because i for one didnt think Cally was even one of the first 3 stars of the game, but, whatever. MDZ is turning into a stud. MCD is turning into a stud. Girardi and Staal were/are already studs. 4 awesome defenseman on 1 team, pretty tough to match up against em, unless they are having a bad game a-la Chicago...this is one of the HUGE reasons we don't seem to go on losing streaks, our D can shut you down, and can provide offense. It would be criminal to deal any of the 4 guys. 4 stud deefenseman with awesome contracts, all young, all love being Rangers. I seriously can not remember this having happened in my lifetime as a Ranger fan. Even Leetch-Zubov-Beuke were only a trio...whose the 4th super d-man there?

granted, none of our 4 are as good as Leetch or Zubov were offensively, but still...4 of em, so awesome.

This also leads to...the offense.

Can't seem to finish our chances, This team needs someone who can finish so badly its not even funny. Carter had one of the best scoring chances in the game, and it took a spectacular save by Henrik to stop it. If Carter can be had on the cheap, I cant see a reason not to get him.

Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-20-2012, 10:55 AM
  #208
eco's bones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Elmira NY
Country: United States
Posts: 9,693
vCash: 500
In a Machiavellian sense Tort's saying the no goal 'was the right call'--is a smart move--whether he believes it or not. He burned some bridges with on ice officials at the winter classic (though he was right)--since we won last night anyway--might as well do some repair work.

eco's bones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-20-2012, 11:01 AM
  #209
charlie460
Stone Age Hockey
 
charlie460's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Florida
Country: United States
Posts: 3,474
vCash: 110
"There's six damn clocks."

charlie460 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-20-2012, 11:45 AM
  #210
skitts
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 11
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Megustaelhockey View Post
Del Zotto
Callahan
My delicious dinner

Redden: I don't even know what day it is.
best post ever

skitts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-20-2012, 02:20 PM
  #211
JimmyStart*
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,569
vCash: 500
Stepans OT goal made me think of Leetch's game 7 goal

JimmyStart* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-20-2012, 03:19 PM
  #212
htk30
Registered User
 
htk30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 665
vCash: 1563
CBJ beat the Canucks and took Boston and Detroit to shootouts. These clubs aren't push overs in any sense of the word, they're all professional hockey players for a reason and made it to the NHL for a reason. They don't just roll over and die because they're playing a team higher than them in the standings.

htk30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.