HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > San Jose Sharks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Dreger: Sharks strong contender for Nash

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-21-2012, 09:51 PM
  #51
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 17,926
vCash: 500
For better or worse, I feel a shake-up trading coming, whether it's Nash or not.

None of think this team is cup worthy, I can't imagine DW does. He's going to do something stupid.

hockeyball is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 09:52 PM
  #52
fasterthanlight
Registered User
 
fasterthanlight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ithaca, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,054
vCash: 50
I don't see how a deal couldn't include havlat.

Clowe + Havlat for Nash as a basis? We'd need to add, but salary cap is there, too.

fasterthanlight is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 09:52 PM
  #53
Kitten Mittons
Registered User
 
Kitten Mittons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco
Country: Armenia
Posts: 47,655
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
None of think this team is cup worthy, I can't imagine DW does. He's going to do something stupid.
Good. This board has been painfully boring lately. I want to rage.

Kitten Mittons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 09:53 PM
  #54
Brent Burns
TROTZTROTZTROTZTROTZ
 
Brent Burns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Coming in hot
Posts: 6,597
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd View Post
If they insist on either of them being involved, you walk away. It's that simple.
Thankfully DW is not a dummy GM like so many others

Brent Burns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 09:55 PM
  #55
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 17,926
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by fasterthanlight View Post
I don't see how a deal couldn't include havlat.

Clowe + Havlat for Nash as a basis? We'd need to add, but salary cap is there, too.
NTC, jeezus. Doug Wilson has NEVER asked a player to waive a NTC. Not once. It's total counter productive for a team that ALREADY Has a tough time bringing in players outside of trades.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent Burns View Post
Thankfully DW is not a dummy GM like so many others
Yah... Huskins, Moen, Wallin, Guerin... He never does anything stupid

hockeyball is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 09:56 PM
  #56
sjshark91
Registered User
 
sjshark91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country:
Posts: 24,930
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by magic school bus View Post
Team too slow? Sign Handzus!
My meme lives

sjshark91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 09:58 PM
  #57
SonomaShark
The sidebar is suck
 
SonomaShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,140
vCash: 500
This is probably it gentlemen. It's Cup or bust time for the Sharks, so future cap be damned.

Marleau-Thornton-Pavelski
Nash-Cooter-Havlat

That's a pretty brutal top-6.

However,

Wingels-Thornton-Pavelski
Marleau-Cooter-Havlat
Nash-Moore-McGinn

is a wicked and deep top-9.

SonomaShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 09:58 PM
  #58
CommanderShepard15
Eberle=Clutch
 
CommanderShepard15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,326
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by fasterthanlight View Post
I don't see how a deal couldn't include havlat.

Clowe + Havlat for Nash as a basis? We'd need to add, but salary cap is there, too.
Cant include 2 top 6 forwards. Then wed only have 5, and wed be worse off.

Im in the corner of trade Havlat+Murray to even salary (300k diff) and then add picks + prospects.

CommanderShepard15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 09:58 PM
  #59
fasterthanlight
Registered User
 
fasterthanlight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ithaca, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,054
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
NTC, jeezus. Doug Wilson has NEVER asked a player to waive a NTC. Not once. It's total counter productive for a team that ALREADY Has a tough time bringing in players outside of trades.
Fair enough, didn't know Havlat's NTC was still active, sorry.

fasterthanlight is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 09:59 PM
  #60
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 17,926
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by fasterthanlight View Post
Fair enough, didn't know Havlat's NTC was still active, sorry.
It's been discussed to freaking death. Sorry, I'm in a lousy mood.

hockeyball is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 09:59 PM
  #61
Negatively Positive
Save us Tomas!
 
Negatively Positive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5,973
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by fasterthanlight View Post
I don't see how a deal couldn't include havlat.

Clowe + Havlat for Nash as a basis? We'd need to add, but salary cap is there, too.
Say what? Then we'd be short a top six forward. That would make it worse.

Negatively Positive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 10:00 PM
  #62
magic school bus
***********
 
magic school bus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 15,590
vCash: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
For better or worse, I feel a shake-up trading coming, whether it's Nash or not.

None of think this team is cup worthy, I can't imagine DW does. He's going to do something stupid.
Don't say that, HB. I'm already worried.

magic school bus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 10:01 PM
  #63
OrrNumber4
Registered User
 
OrrNumber4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Country: Switzerland
Posts: 7,465
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chubbs View Post
Two highly paid forwards is more than enough. When you get three, you're limiting what you can dress for your depth. 7.8 million is enough to sign two quality second liners, so you're essentially robbing yourself of two forwards to overload your first line. That mindset won't work in the playoffs because every team has their own first line and defensive pair that can match your own, but the other lines will have an advantage.
Boston, Philly, Chicago, Detroit, Pittsburgh all had multiple top-tier players. Some of them might have been on the cheap b/c of their age, but they were star players non-the-less.

But I am coming around to your overall point. SJ can't have 4 forwards making over 6 million....

OrrNumber4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 10:01 PM
  #64
WTFetus
Moderator
Most popular combo
 
WTFetus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 12,138
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorthBaySharksFan View Post
However,

Wingels-Thornton-Pavelski
Marleau-Cooter-Havlat
Nash-Moore-McGinn

is a wicked and deep top-9.
Wingels has shown to be ineffective on the top-line when going against playoff teams.

WTFetus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 10:01 PM
  #65
TheJuxtaposer
#Shorks
 
TheJuxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 26,932
vCash: 1379
I'm kinda sad we didn't trade Clowe to the Leafs a month ago, to be perfectly honest.

TheJuxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 10:03 PM
  #66
CommanderShepard15
Eberle=Clutch
 
CommanderShepard15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,326
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by superroyain10 View Post
Boston, Philly, Chicago, Detroit, Pittsburgh all had multiple top-tier players. Some of them might have been on the cheap b/c of their age, but they were star players non-the-less.

But I am coming around to your overall point. SJ can't have 4 forwards making over 6 million....
HUH? we have 2 currently, and Havlat at 5m. You may mean players in general, but even then 4 isnt to bad. We had Heatley last season, and we sure as hell were doing better then than we are now.

CommanderShepard15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 10:03 PM
  #67
sjshark91
Registered User
 
sjshark91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country:
Posts: 24,930
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TehJuxtaposer View Post
I'm kinda sad we didn't trade Clowe to the Leafs a month ago, to be perfectly honest.
Yeah, we could use Komisarek.

sjshark91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 10:04 PM
  #68
TheJuxtaposer
#Shorks
 
TheJuxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 26,932
vCash: 1379
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjshark91 View Post
Yeah, we could use Komisarek.
We could use Kulemin, Kadri, and a 1st.

TheJuxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 10:04 PM
  #69
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 34,087
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by fasterthanlight View Post
I don't see how a deal couldn't include havlat.

Clowe + Havlat for Nash as a basis? We'd need to add, but salary cap is there, too.
It likely won't if he has anything resembling a clause at this point. Even if he just has a handful of teams to not be dealt to, one would have to be Columbus is on there. However, even if you dismiss it, moving Clowe and Havlat for Nash makes the team worse substantially.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent Burns View Post
Thankfully DW is not a dummy GM like so many others
He can make a dumb move now and then but he generally keeps those dumb moves to the depth players rather than the blockbusters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
NTC, jeezus. Doug Wilson has NEVER asked a player to waive a NTC. Not once. It's total counter productive for a team that ALREADY Has a tough time bringing in players outside of trades.



Yah... Huskins, Moen, Wallin, Guerin... He never does anything stupid
The thought behind those trades, with the exception of Wallin, was nice but it just didn't work out. He has generally kept the mistakes to the guys that doesn't require much of a commitment beyond the trade itself and isn't for guys that have to be relied upon for the long term success of the franchise. When he gets big time players, they generally go well for them...even the Heatley trade wasn't that bad as the trade itself was a good value.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorthBaySharksFan View Post
This is probably it gentlemen. It's Cup or bust time for the Sharks, so future cap be damned.

Marleau-Thornton-Pavelski
Nash-Cooter-Havlat

That's a pretty brutal top-6.

However,

Wingels-Thornton-Pavelski
Marleau-Cooter-Havlat
Nash-Moore-McGinn

is a wicked and deep top-9.
You don't pick up Nash to put him on the 3rd line...especially when you're putting Wingels on the top line. Getting Nash can help the team if it's for the right guys. It'll just depend on the price.

Pinkfloyd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 10:06 PM
  #70
Mafoofoo
:facepalm:
 
Mafoofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 13,245
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TehJuxtaposer View Post
I'm kinda sad we didn't trade Clowe to the Leafs a month ago, to be perfectly honest.
For Schenn? lol I'm glad we didn't dump Clowe for him.

Mafoofoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 10:06 PM
  #71
SJeasy
Registered User
 
SJeasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 12,531
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrie22 View Post
And you are thinking that thronton, marleau, boyle, will all be making the same amount as they are in 3 years. If those 3 players are still with the sharks it won't be at 6.6 mil, 6.9 mil and 7.0 mil, they will all be much less. I am one of the biggest thornton fans there is, but if he is paid anything over 6 mil his next contract then it is a huge over payment.

Boyle will most likely be gone after or before his contract is up, as the sharks have already signed his replacement long term in burns.
You can get a clue on future contracts by looking at the individual years. JT's current contract is 8, 7, 6. Likely means that his next contract has a first year of <6mil and an average of much less if it is multi-year. Patty's is flat at 6.9mil for all years so no clue there. I do think that Patty would drop, but to where?

SJeasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 10:06 PM
  #72
WTFetus
Moderator
Most popular combo
 
WTFetus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 12,138
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by superroyain10 View Post
Boston, Philly, Chicago, Detroit, Pittsburgh all had multiple top-tier players. Some of them might have been on the cheap b/c of their age, but they were star players non-the-less.

But I am coming around to your overall point. SJ can't have 4 forwards making over 6 million....
I don't think his point was around the # of star players, but the amount those star players are getting paid.
During their Cup runs: Detroit had 3 players over 6 million, none over 7. Chicago had tons of ELCs. Philly had 2 players a little over 6 million. Pittsburgh, aside from Crosby, Malkin, and Fleury did not have any expensive players. Boston, aside from Chara, nobody made over 5 million.

WTFetus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 10:06 PM
  #73
Karl with a C
RIP Локомотив
 
Karl with a C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: Russian Federation
Posts: 15,768
vCash: 990
I don't think it would be a mistake to trade Clowe + Demers + 1st 2012 + 2nd 2013 for Nash if it came to it. It's hard to imagine what the team would play like after that trade, but I think it would be beneficial. It is cup or bust.

Karl with a C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 10:06 PM
  #74
Ninja Hertl
formerly sharkohol
 
Ninja Hertl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Yay
Country: United States
Posts: 5,184
vCash: 500
I'd be fine with Nash, just because if he doesn't work out then we'll get a huge exciting rebuild.

Ninja Hertl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-21-2012, 10:07 PM
  #75
Fistfullofbeer
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Fistfullofbeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Whidbey Island, WA
Country: India
Posts: 8,135
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
For better or worse, I feel a shake-up trading coming, whether it's Nash or not.

None of think this team is cup worthy, I can't imagine DW does. He's going to do something stupid.
Yah. This is going to happen. And it would set us back.

I still think that with Havlat back we can be a fairly good playoff team. But having good players means nothing if the players dont show up to play.

__________________
What?! Look, he thinks he's people!
Fistfullofbeer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.