im intrigued to see if there is any truth to that recent tweet.....not going to get my hopes up but itll be interesting. and like i said earlier and others have, not happy at all about marty starting b2b's
The thing is Marty MAY have to play back to back come playoff time so why not do it here ? I may have played Hedberg against Vancouver as they more then likely would not have expected it and see how the Devils responded to him playing them.
The thing is Marty MAY have to play back to back come playoff time so why not do it here ? I may have played Hedberg against Vancouver as they more then likely would not have expected it and see how the Devils responded to him playing them.
There is always a day in between, never back to backs.
After fully dissecting his sentence, it just has to be an extension for somebody.
"trades FOR PLAYERS" stands out.. if its ownership, he just writes "trades"
I mean, we have a bunch of UFAs.. Marty, Zach, Poni are only ones that I expect to be 'big' news if we re-sign.. and I really only see us working on Zach's mid-season right now.
That is a very odd wording. I'm hoping for a Parise signing, just to troll everybody at the deadline.
There is always a day in between, never back to backs.
Occasionally there is a back-to-back, but it's not the norm. I know Games 4 and 5 against Carolina in 2006 were back-to-back, in different cities no less. Plus you never know when you might have to play a 'doubleheader' in one night (i.e. a multi-OT game).
Occasionally there is a back-to-back, but it's not the norm. I know Games 4 and 5 against Carolina in 2006 were back-to-back, in different cities no less. Plus you never know when you might have to play a 'doubleheader' in one night (i.e. a multi-OT game).
Game 6 in buffalo in 1994 is a classic example. Poor doc and Pete mcnabb were begging for people to call in with **** because they were out of ad time and material lol.
Also the goalie platoon game between Marty and terreri fun game though.