HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Vancover-Tampa Bay

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-01-2012, 09:44 AM
  #101
Sayonara77
Badassian
 
Sayonara77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon
Country: United States
Posts: 2,072
vCash: 500
Only intriguing young defenceman/asset the canucks would want from the lightning is victor hedman. However, that isn't happening considering he's unlikely to be traded.

Sayonara77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 09:45 AM
  #102
The Yzerplan
Not enough goalies
 
The Yzerplan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Country: Finland
Posts: 784
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luck 6 View Post
Canucks fans who are saying Tampa 1st and Connolly are insane. It will be something like Tampa's 2x late 1sts and a 3rd, or Connolly and TBL 2nd, or TBL 1st and a late 2nd. Something along those lines if he goes to Tampa. We need to be reasonable here and set a fair price or they look elsewhere for a goalie.

Connolly is a top prospect, like Schneider, who is undeveloped. Add a 2nd to that to make up for the risk and you have a pretty fair deal if you ask me.
Finally a reasonable Canucks fan

The Yzerplan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 09:50 AM
  #103
Mizral
Registered User
 
Mizral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Earth, MW
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,035
vCash: 500
All I would want on Tampa - outside of MSL & Stamkos of course - would be Hedman. Connolly is good too but doesn't really fit.

The way I see it, there are quite a few teams vying for Schneider and during this coming off-season Gillis can sit back and work draft day deals until he finds the right one. There is no deadline for dealing Schneider and worst case scenario says the team could sign him and trade him during next year as he's still only an RFA. If a team tries to offer-sheet him I say take the 1st rounders and wish him the best.

Mizral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 09:51 AM
  #104
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ginner classic View Post
They will trade him for assets and Connolly is that. There is a poor fit between Canuck needs and the teams that have keepers available. The best fit would have been Phoenix prior to their acquisition of Smith as they have a ton of young defenders (far too many IMO).

Buyers:
Tampa
Toronto
Columbus
New Jersey

Possible:
Edmonton
Washington

Improbable:
NY Islanders
Chicago
Philadelphia
San Jose
According to 19canuck90........

Quote:
Originally Posted by 19canuck90 View Post
There is no chance if Schnieder is a UFA he signs in columbus aside from massive overpayment, and i guess Tampa is possible but by NO means a guarentee.
I dont see why Colombus would be interrested in a one year Schneider rental. And i dont think Tampa Bay would give a fortune to acquiere Schneider if its by NO means a garantee they will be able to keep him.

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 09:57 AM
  #105
NYVanfan
Registered User
 
NYVanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,308
vCash: 500
not sure if this has been posted, and correct me if im wrong, but --
Schneider is offersheet-eligible RFA this summer, then UFA next summer.

So there's no way he signs more than a one-year deal with the Cancuks this summer, barring a very unlikely Luongo trade. He's been a great team guy and has earned his right to be a starter, so I think there's a 80% chance Gillis moves him to give him that shot before July 1st, and a 15% chance he signs another 1 year deal, and a 5% chance Luongo gets moved and Cory signs long term w the Canucks.

That said, with this trade Gillis will be looking for a Salo replacement, so a top 4 young solid, but offensive, Dman of comparable calibre to Schneider (meaning pretty darn good.) In the event that Gragnani flourishes the rest of this season, he will probably want just high picks.

It's also very possible that he's being judicious with capspace to leave room to go after Weber in summer 2013; more reason to target only picks & prospects for Cory.

NYVanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 09:59 AM
  #106
ginner classic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kitsilano
Posts: 5,984
vCash: 1365
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
According to 19canuck90........



I dont see why Colombus would be interrested in a one year Schneider rental. And i dont think Tampa Bay would give a fortune to acquiere Schneider if its by NO means a garantee they will be able to keep him.
Schneider will likely be a sign and trade on a medium term deal. I don't think he'd have any issue going to Columbus. He wants to be a starter and Columbus with JMFJ and their other D and Schneider in net have the basis of a really good Spine. Ryan Johanson and Brassard are currently their projected top two centers which is fine for a rebuilding club. They also have two first rounders this year and the proceeds from Rick Nash. With proper leadership, Columbus have the ability to get out of this mess. I am quite certain Cory would have no issue going there for the long term.

ginner classic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 10:01 AM
  #107
ginner classic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kitsilano
Posts: 5,984
vCash: 1365
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYVanfan View Post
not sure if this has been posted, and correct me if im wrong, but --
Schneider is offersheet-eligible RFA this summer, then UFA next summer.

So there's no way he signs more than a one-year deal with the Cancuks this summer, barring a very unlikely Luongo trade. He's been a great team guy and has earned his right to be a starter, so I think there's a 80% chance Gillis moves him to give him that shot before July 1st, and a 15% chance he signs another 1 year deal, and a 5% chance Luongo gets moved and Cory signs long term w the Canucks.

That said, with this trade Gillis will be looking for a Salo replacement, so a top 4 young solid, but offensive, Dman of comparable calibre to Schneider (meaning pretty darn good.) In the event that Gragnani flourishes the rest of this season, he will probably want just high picks.

It's also very possible that he's being judicious with capspace to leave room to go after Weber in summer 2013; more reason to target only picks & prospects for Cory.
None of the teams that want Cory have that asset available. Schenn is the only option in that regard.

ginner classic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 10:19 AM
  #108
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ginner classic View Post
Schneider will likely be a sign and trade on a medium term deal. I don't think he'd have any issue going to Columbus. He wants to be a starter and Columbus with JMFJ and their other D and Schneider in net have the basis of a really good Spine. Ryan Johanson and Brassard are currently their projected top two centers which is fine for a rebuilding club. They also have two first rounders this year and the proceeds from Rick Nash. With proper leadership, Columbus have the ability to get out of this mess. I am quite certain Cory would have no issue going there for the long term.
I dont see why Schneider would agree to sign and trade on a medium deal and have no control on his destination.... (and be obliged to stay in colombus the term of the deal)

Instead of signing one year deal..then choose a team and get bigger $ as UFA.

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 10:21 AM
  #109
Kagee*
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,096
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ginner classic View Post
None of the teams that want Cory have that asset available. Schenn is the only option in that regard.
It's too bad BB won't move him though, unless it's beyond overpayment.

Kagee* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 11:04 AM
  #110
Bolts f4n
Registered User
 
Bolts f4n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tampa
Country: United States
Posts: 241
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Bolts f4n
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYVanfan View Post
So there's no way he signs more than a one-year deal with the Cancuks this summer, barring a very unlikely Luongo trade. He's been a great team guy and has earned his right to be a starter, so I think there's a 80% chance Gillis moves him to give him that shot before July 1st, and a 15% chance he signs another 1 year deal, and a 5% chance Luongo gets moved and Cory signs long term w the Canucks.
No way it's over 65%.

Bolts f4n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 11:11 AM
  #111
Momesso
Registered User
 
Momesso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,189
vCash: 500
I'd personally trade both Schneider and Schroder for Johansen if CBJ were willing to part with him.

IMO he's going to be a solid player. Doesn't hurt that he's homegrown as well.

Momesso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 11:30 AM
  #112
Dick Whitman
Registered User
 
Dick Whitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,406
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Swearengen View Post
now I never said anything about a 1st, I just said a package including Connolly. And even if it is Connolly and a 1st, I think "mortgaging the future" is hyperbolic.
My original post was in reply to someone who said that Schneider should fetch Tampa's 1st and Connolly.

Dick Whitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 11:39 AM
  #113
NYVanfan
Registered User
 
NYVanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,308
vCash: 500
how about

TB: Schneider
Nash: Connolly
Van: Blum

with whatever balancing picks

NYVanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 12:18 PM
  #114
canuklehead
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 411
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kagee View Post
It's too bad BB won't move him though, unless it's beyond overpayment.
Overrated do not want. Do not want any toronto players for that matter.

I think the devils would be a good partner. Would they do either of these?

schnieds + tanev for larsson

schnieds + 1st for Clarkson + 1st

canuklehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 12:39 PM
  #115
mstad101
Registered User
 
mstad101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,240
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by canuklehead View Post
Overrated do not want. Do not want any toronto players for that matter.

I think the devils would be a good partner. Would they do either of these?

schnieds + tanev for larsson

schnieds + 1st for Clarkson + 1st
Most Devils fans admit, with the Kovy thing, they will most likely forfeit this year 1st since they are in a Playoff position.

Both proposals are crap no doubt, but the first reason is the only reason these won't happen that actually matter.



And to all the offer sheet speculation, I'd be willing to go as high as 3 million before I stop considering the Match. If CBJ were to offer sheet Cory at that, I may take the week to not match and heavily think it over. That 1st n 3rd could be very nice piece in 2013, especially if Weber is still available.

mstad101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 12:44 PM
  #116
xtra
Registered User
 
xtra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,921
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
I dont see why Schneider would agree to sign and trade on a medium deal and have no control on his destination.... (and be obliged to stay in colombus the term of the deal)

Instead of signing one year deal..then choose a team and get bigger $ as UFA.

One min your saying Schneider is no better than a jose theodore and the next your saying he is going to get big money in FA?

Make up your mind on where Schneider ranks. And i bet that where ever he is traded he signs for 2 years minimum if not 3 years as there is security for a player that has only made roughly 2 million in his career so far.

xtra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 12:47 PM
  #117
DJOpus
Registered User
 
DJOpus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,971
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYVanfan View Post
how about

TB: Schneider
Nash: Connolly
Van: Blum

with whatever balancing picks
Blum has had a really tough year, the balancing would have to be a 1st which NSH doesn't have... Or change Blum to Ellis.

DJOpus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 12:48 PM
  #118
Dreamskull
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sudbury, ON
Posts: 124
vCash: 500
nevermind

Dreamskull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 12:49 PM
  #119
Al Swearengen
Smug Nation National
 
Al Swearengen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,053
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Whitman View Post
My original post was in reply to someone who said that Schneider should fetch Tampa's 1st and Connolly.
Well, you quoted me, so I couldn't help but think that's what you were responding to.

Al Swearengen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 01:05 PM
  #120
canuklehead
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 411
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstad101 View Post
Most Devils fans admit, with the Kovy thing, they will most likely forfeit this year 1st since they are in a Playoff position.

Both proposals are crap no doubt, but the first reason is the only reason these won't happen that actually matter.
huh?

canuklehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 01:06 PM
  #121
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by xtra View Post
One min your saying Schneider is no better than a jose theodore and the next your saying he is going to get big money in FA?

Make up your mind on where Schneider ranks. And i bet that where ever he is traded he signs for 2 years minimum if not 3 years as there is security for a player that has only made roughly 2 million in his career so far.
Good point, people often misunderstand me about this.

I dont really contest Schneider skill, the big disagreement is about his trade value. Skill doesn't equate trade value, its only a part of the equation to find it.

While many Vancouver fans on this forum doesn't go really farther than watching Schneider and listen to rumor to find out his trade value.

I prefer to consider many factors, evaluate all goalies around the league, consider the market, supply, demand, trend, contract, age, status, odds.

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 01:26 PM
  #122
y2kcanucks
Cult of Personality
 
y2kcanucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Surrey, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 37,195
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to y2kcanucks
How about:

Van: JVR
TB: Bryzgalov
Phi: Schneider

y2kcanucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 02:41 PM
  #123
chasespace
Registered User
 
chasespace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Williston, FL
Posts: 1,874
vCash: 500
Yzerman comes from the philosophy of using 1A/1B goalie system unless a #1 comes through the pipeline(Howard). Doubt he pays a fortune for a goalie who looks good but is ultimately unproven and really untethered from the franchise.

chasespace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 02:52 PM
  #124
Boondock
Registered User
 
Boondock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,539
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
Good point, people often misunderstand me about this.

I dont really contest Schneider skill, the big disagreement is about his trade value. Skill doesn't equate trade value, its only a part of the equation to find it.

While many Vancouver fans on this forum doesn't go really farther than watching Schneider and listen to rumor to find out his trade value.

I prefer to consider many factors, evaluate all goalies around the league, consider the market, supply, demand, trend, contract, age, status, odds.
Actually you don't consider any factors other then your own dislike for a particular player/fanbase and spend your time trolling any thread with mention of said player and cutting down their value based on very skewed personal opinion.

Boondock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 02:53 PM
  #125
Burningblades
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 650
vCash: 500
Vancouver wants (at least I do) a young Dman and Tampa is not going to trade Hedman, seems like it would have to be an overpayment from Tampa or bring in a 3rd team so Vancouver can get their young Dman.

Burningblades is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.