HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The Business of Hockey
The Business of Hockey Discuss the financial and business aspects of the NHL. Franchise sales, valuations, TV contracts, ratings, expansion, relocation, the CBA and work stoppage discussion goes here.

Ontario Businesses may lose ticket writeoff

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-01-2012, 02:51 PM
  #26
nds90
Registered User
 
nds90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 2,680
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by htpwn View Post
I didn't say they shouldn't. I just find it hypocritical for a corporation to demand benefits to set-up shop in a locale, and then cry for 'less government,' as so often happens.
fair enough. they're not really demanding any benefits though. they just don't want the government to take what they already have from them. less government doesn't necessarily mean more benefits.

nds90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 02:54 PM
  #27
nds90
Registered User
 
nds90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 2,680
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyhopeful View Post
Absolutely, I know a half dozen people who get Leaf tickets from relatives. None of them could name you 5 or 6 players on the team. They go and text message all their friends throughout the whole game, oh we're at the Leaf game.. Everybody down the line seemed to have gotten the tickets for free. My guess is some company with about 100,000 shareholders is paying and none of the users really care.
what you're saying is understandable, but when you're a business, would you rather make more money from less interested fans, or less money from diehard fans? i'd go with more $$$$$$$$$$$$$$. the diehards will watch on tv anyway

nds90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 03:10 PM
  #28
Charon of Styx
Registered User
 
Charon of Styx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,812
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nds90 View Post
what you're saying is understandable, but when you're a business, would you rather make more money from less interested fans, or less money from diehard fans? i'd go with more $$$$$$$$$$$$$$. the diehards will watch on tv anyway
Absolutely, but as the Math guy said if there were no freebies and the people there had to buy their own tickets for the most part, the atmosphere would be way better. Not saying it is terrible now but it naturally would be alot better if more of the fans were into it.
Anybody spending 100 or more of their own money would be watching and cheering every second.

Charon of Styx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 03:26 PM
  #29
nds90
Registered User
 
nds90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 2,680
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyhopeful View Post
Absolutely, but as the Math guy said if there were no freebies and the people there had to buy their own tickets for the most part, the atmosphere would be way better. Not saying it is terrible now but it naturally would be alot better if more of the fans were into it.
Anybody spending 100 or more of their own money would be watching and cheering every second.
great point

nds90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 05:52 PM
  #30
Hamilton Tigers
Registered User
 
Hamilton Tigers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamilton
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,204
vCash: 500
Lessening the corporatization of the Leafs' attendance would be the best catalyst for that team's turnaround.

Hamilton Tigers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 07:00 PM
  #31
MountainHawk
Registered User
 
MountainHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salem, MA
Country: Vanuatu
Posts: 12,647
vCash: 500
If Ottawa can't keep a team without government support, then they don't deserve a team. I mean, that argument works in the Phoenix thread, right?

MountainHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 07:29 PM
  #32
2525
Registered User
 
2525's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,305
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainHawk View Post
If Ottawa can't keep a team without government support, then they don't deserve a team. I mean, that argument works in the Phoenix thread, right?
You don't really want to go there, do you?

2525 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 07:47 PM
  #33
htpwn
Registered User
 
htpwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Country: Poland
Posts: 9,880
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainHawk View Post
If Ottawa can't keep a team without government support, then they don't deserve a team. I mean, that argument works in the Phoenix thread, right?
You don't know posturing when you see it, do you?

htpwn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 08:33 PM
  #34
Disclose
Registered User
 
Disclose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,144
vCash: 472
hopefully there's a plan.
but i have no idea what to think. i dont know anything on the subject, but it would suck to lose the team for a government decision.
if they need money they shoulf milk it directly on those companies ant not make the ontario teams lose.

(i know the leafs will be fine, but i guess they still "lose" money)

-
another random thing.... could moving the arena to hull/gatineau help them? is it legal? (according theyre still called the "ottawa" sens to not piss the already small* fan base

* (toronto/habs sanwich)


Last edited by Disclose: 03-01-2012 at 08:38 PM.
Disclose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 08:38 PM
  #35
Eaglepride*
#5 in Wotan we trust
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Promiseland Walhalla
Posts: 3,504
vCash: 500
Overall I think this is a good thing, most companies are buying season tickets and hardly show up yet they sell them and are collecting all the money.

Watching hockey should be for the reason of loving the sport not business. Most companies I know are booking a flight and play Golf.

On the other hand if some teams wealth depends heavily on these things better not change it.

Eaglepride* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 08:44 PM
  #36
2525
Registered User
 
2525's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,305
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Disclose View Post
hopefully there's a plan.
but i have no idea what to think. i dont know anything on the subject, but it would suck to lose the team for a government decision.
if they need money they shoulf milk it directly on those companies ant not make the ontario teams lose.

(i know the leafs will be fine, but i guess they still "lose" money)
It won't happen. When the Liberals regain a bit of sanity they'll realize that the money the taxman makes as a result of the Sens being in Ottawa far outweighs the money the taxman loses through this write off.

I recall reading where the Canadiens paid more in municipal tax than all the American teams combined (2004 I think)
I have no idea what the Leafs and Sens pay to their respective municipalities but I'd bet it's higher than most.

Canadian teams and fans are at a disadvantage in so much they pay more than their American counterparts but they still pay their fair share into revenue sharing.

I for one am not worried, but I will call my local Liberal MPP and express my opinion. If he wants my vote again, he better listen.

2525 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 08:48 PM
  #37
Gil Gunderson
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ottawa, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,791
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Disclose View Post
another random thing.... could moving the arena to hull/gatineau help them? is it legal? (according theyre still called the "ottawa" sens to not piss the already small* fan base

* (toronto/habs sanwich)
Doubt it.

Gil Gunderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 08:51 PM
  #38
Disclose
Registered User
 
Disclose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,144
vCash: 472
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodwan553 View Post
Or, you know, downtown Ottawa.
im actually asking.... from what i understand this is an ontario thing only. so could they cheat and move to hull and dodge this?

edit: ah you got it... :p

Disclose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 08:52 PM
  #39
Gil Gunderson
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ottawa, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,791
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Disclose View Post
im actually asking.... from what i understand this is an ontario thing only. so could they cheat and move to hull and dodge this?
I wasn't sure what you meant at first haha.

Gil Gunderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 09:06 PM
  #40
No Fun Shogun
Registered User
 
No Fun Shogun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Country: United States
Posts: 11,951
vCash: 1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by one2gamble View Post
why. Entertaining your customers or potential customers is a huge part of doing business in many industries. Its also a large expense. Its no different than having a marketing budget.
No, I get that.... but you wouldn't expect spending on marketing to be tax deductible, would you?

Have nothing against companies having an entertainment budget for employee appreciation and to try to attract clients, but don't like the idea of it being a tax deductible expenditure. That, to me, makes absolutely no sense.

No Fun Shogun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 09:55 PM
  #41
coladin
Registered User
 
coladin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,852
vCash: 500
[QUOTE=htpwn;45316701]There is more than enough corporate support in the Greater Toronto Area for a second team, tax break or not, especially with the absence of an NFL team.

This should not effect Toronto teams in the slightest. The Leafs may not even need to reduce prices (and if they do, it will be on the high end tickets ranging from $250-800 and not the ones that the average fan can afford QUOTE]

Those tickets will go begging as will all the corporate boxes. All these cookie cutter arenas were built with corporations in mind. Now that may possibly be out the window.

Corporate support is based on the write-off. Pure and simple. Corporations are in it to make money and save on taxes. If they don't save taxes, those boxes will all be empty. Every single one other than a billionaire nut who will spend 100k to watch hockey from a box with no tax credit...but rich people aren't stupid. MLSE can saygoodbye to upwards of 20 million. Easy.

coladin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-01-2012, 10:11 PM
  #42
nds90
Registered User
 
nds90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 2,680
vCash: 500
[QUOTE=coladin;45352013]
Quote:
Originally Posted by htpwn View Post
There is more than enough corporate support in the Greater Toronto Area for a second team, tax break or not, especially with the absence of an NFL team.

This should not effect Toronto teams in the slightest. The Leafs may not even need to reduce prices (and if they do, it will be on the high end tickets ranging from $250-800 and not the ones that the average fan can afford QUOTE]

Those tickets will go begging as will all the corporate boxes. All these cookie cutter arenas were built with corporations in mind. Now that may possibly be out the window.

Corporate support is based on the write-off. Pure and simple. Corporations are in it to make money and save on taxes. If they don't save taxes, those boxes will all be empty. Every single one other than a billionaire nut who will spend 100k to watch hockey from a box with no tax credit...but rich people aren't stupid. MLSE can saygoodbye to upwards of 20 million. Easy.
if the boxes are empty and not sold, then the quality of the league would fall. it would be a disaster. teams need that money to you know, run their business. the maple leafs making lots of money is good for the league.

nds90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-02-2012, 03:04 AM
  #43
htpwn
Registered User
 
htpwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Country: Poland
Posts: 9,880
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by coladin View Post
Those tickets will go begging as will all the corporate boxes. All these cookie cutter arenas were built with corporations in mind. Now that may possibly be out the window.

Corporate support is based on the write-off. Pure and simple. Corporations are in it to make money and save on taxes. If they don't save taxes, those boxes will all be empty. Every single one other than a billionaire nut who will spend 100k to watch hockey from a box with no tax credit...but rich people aren't stupid. MLSE can saygoodbye to upwards of 20 million. Easy.
Again, I doubt it.

For every company that declines to purchase platinum seats or boxes, another will step up. Toronto's corporate community is large enough for its sports teams to avoid any kind of significant blow.

Even if (in your worst case scenario) MLSE can "say goodbye to upwards of $20 million," they'd still be making more than $80 million annually.

htpwn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-02-2012, 10:54 AM
  #44
knorthern knight
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,727
vCash: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by coladin View Post
Corporate support is based on the write-off. Pure and simple. Corporations are in it to make money and save on taxes. If they don't save taxes, those boxes will all be empty. Every single one other than a billionaire nut who will spend 100k to watch hockey from a box with no tax credit...but rich people aren't stupid. MLSE can saygoodbye to upwards of 20 million. Easy.
If you want $20 million+ per year of your tax dollars to support your hockey team, may I suggest moving to Glendale, Arizona?

I've been a lifelong small-C conservative, but the current setup makes me sympathize with the "Occupy" protestors. Why should working stiffs, who can barely make their mortgage payments, subsidize the rich in their "expense account lifestyle"?

knorthern knight is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-02-2012, 11:54 AM
  #45
Hamilton Tigers
Registered User
 
Hamilton Tigers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamilton
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,204
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by knorthern knight View Post
Why should working stiffs, who can barely make their mortgage payments, subsidize the rich in their "expense account lifestyle"?

Completely agree. If the modern pro sports business model is dependent on those write offs, then maybe it's time to change tax laws and the business model as well in the interests of fairness.

Hamilton Tigers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-02-2012, 12:04 PM
  #46
Neely2005
Grey Cup Champions
 
Neely2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,763
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyhopeful View Post
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle2354327/

Well now tickets may become affordable afterall.

Leaf tickets will still sellout albeit at a cheaper price. Ottawa however........
It could be a good idea but the same article also says this:

Quote:
However, cancelling the subsidy for sporting events will actually end up having little impact on the corporate sector’s bottom line. As part of the harmonized sales tax agreement Ontario signed with the federal government in 2009, large corporations will get a sales tax rebate on certain expenses, including meals and entertainment, beginning in 2015

Neely2005 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-02-2012, 12:05 PM
  #47
Mathradio
Move up or else!
 
Mathradio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,413
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyhopeful View Post
Absolutely, I know a half dozen people who get Leaf tickets from relatives. None of them could name you 5 or 6 players on the team. They go and text message all their friends throughout the whole game, oh we're at the Leaf game.. Everybody down the line seemed to have gotten the tickets for free. My guess is some company with about 100,000 shareholders is paying and none of the users really care.
I was told, if you were lucky to go to a game at the ACC, you could even hear your neighbor write their text messages.

Mathradio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-02-2012, 12:10 PM
  #48
powerstuck
User Registered
 
powerstuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Quebec City
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,680
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamilton Tigers View Post
http://sports.nationalpost.com/2012/...ded-team-says/

Senators face extinction if Ontario scraps tax exemption
What it means is that most of the companies are buying the seasons tickets for tax rebates and not sports/entertainement as it is.

I mean, for companies having a box is a big marketing offer. Then, if it cost them 100k per year, they can always rent it for 20ish games per season making it half the price for them. Then when they get the tax, it's already betweek 25-50% rebate they are getting, the rest (25%) it's marketing expenses.

powerstuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-02-2012, 12:14 PM
  #49
Neely2005
Grey Cup Champions
 
Neely2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,763
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2525 View Post
It won't happen. When the Liberals regain a bit of sanity they'll realize that the money the taxman makes as a result of the Sens being in Ottawa far outweighs the money the taxman loses through this write off.

I recall reading where the Canadiens paid more in municipal tax than all the American teams combined (2004 I think)
I have no idea what the Leafs and Sens pay to their respective municipalities but I'd bet it's higher than most.

Canadian teams and fans are at a disadvantage in so much they pay more than their American counterparts but they still pay their fair share into revenue sharing.

I for one am not worried, but I will call my local Liberal MPP and express my opinion. If he wants my vote again, he better listen.
So you only have yourself to blame.

Neely2005 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-02-2012, 12:17 PM
  #50
Neely2005
Grey Cup Champions
 
Neely2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,763
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by htpwn View Post
Again, I doubt it.

For every company that declines to purchase platinum seats or boxes, another will step up. Toronto's corporate community is large enough for its sports teams to avoid any kind of significant blow.

Even if (in your worst case scenario) MLSE can "say goodbye to upwards of $20 million," they'd still be making more than $80 million annually.
The leafs are already having trouble selling Luxury Boxes:

http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/D...da-Centre.aspx

http://www.kuklaskorner.com/index.ph...t_leafs_games/

Neely2005 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.