HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Northwest Division > Edmonton Oilers
Notices

LMHF Report - Game #32

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-03-2012, 01:02 AM
  #1
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1
Registered User
 
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: E-town
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,513
vCash: 500
LMHF Report - Game #32

EDMONTON 1

VS.

DALLAS 3
-------------

What a giant pile of garbage. My friend who accompanied me tonight has come to about 1/4 of the home games each season for the past 3. She figures that's the worst game she's been to. I'd be inclined to agree. Even in blowouts and bad efforts there's usually something that is even mildly entertaining. Tonight's game was the definition of boring.

A lot of people at the game we saying that they didn't see a lot of effort tonight and I'd disagree with that sentiment. It was not that we went out there and had no try, but much moreso that we went out and tried really really stupidly. I'm not sure I've seen such a confusing and awkward effort from our team in a long time.

Our passing game wasn't great against the Blues, who put on a clinic in terms of keeping their passes short and crisp while closing gaps on the Oilers as they tried to advance the puck. Dallas wasn't near as good at either aspect of the game but still managed to keep the Oilers bouncing the puck around the ice to no one in particular. If we could have connected on even a half-decent amount of the passes we attempted in the first and second period, we win this game going away. Instead, players were hesitating, second-guessing, re-routing, bobbling and basically doing everything possible to screw up. It was amazing.

One exceptionally weird thing about this game was that it probably should have ended 0-0. Both meaningful Dallas goals were horrible, they added an empty netter and then we got one in garbage time. It is not every day that you see a game played that sloppily.

Don't get me wrong, the Oilers had chances. The amount of times Ales Hemsky hit a player with a pass in a dangerous shooting area tonight had to have been at least 8-10. Hall got the puck in his office multiple times in the second period alone and couldn't do a bloody thing for some reason. Though I am usually in favor of shaking the lines up in such a game, I thought it was a mistake to take Hall off of the line with Gagner and Hemsky. They hadn't connected yet and were having some confusing/frustrating ventures into the offensive zone, but they were also generating enough chances that eventually one would have bounced in or finally come off Hall's stick smoothly. It was only a matter of time. The other lines I wouldn't have minded, but not that one. Then again, this is the price you pay with 91, 23 and 56 on the farm. All the bottom sixers you could elevate on nights when people go cold are in OKC.

I'm really sick of talking about how bad the officiating is, but I will say this; if it is true that the Oilers are getting after the officials vocally I understand, but if it isn't doing anything you might as well snap a little bit, REALLY get their attention and maybe scare them some. If you're going to passively complain and get treated the same or worse, you might as well crank it to 11 and really get something going. What's the worst that happens so long as you keep it short of physical contact? They've been patient enough with this BS all year. They play a disciplined speed game that should draw a ton of penalties, yet are grabbed, hooked, and interfered with by the Detroits, Vancouvers and Calgarys of the world and don't get a thing. Time to change the approach.

As I got into above, I didn't really mind the top line so much. They didn't connect but the chances were being generated and the puck was moving the right way. They were a couple connections off from being money. A couple of times, they hit the line with speed and went offside. Just so you know how I see this, the puck carriers job is to make sure his line hits that blue line with as much speed as possible, and he needs to make sure that puck gets to the blue paint quickly. This sometimes means extending and always means having the puck fairly forward. Gagner and Hall didn't do this and it cost the Oilers two very nice looking rushes. Hemsky was the one hitting the line at break-neck speed both times. Another time, Hall made a great back pass, opening up a lane and Hemsky was a step too late getting there. All of these guys slightly miscued and it cost the Oilers some glorious chances. These plays could have been the game. It is not good that they whiffed on them, but at least they had the opportunity to begin with.

Our second line was a bit of a different animal because Petrell played on it. While Hopkins and to a lesser extent Eberle both had opportunities, they were largely individual efforts, not including passes or even using teammates as screens or picks. This meant there wasn't much ice to play with and kept these guys from being really effective tonight. I'm torn on what to say about Lennart. In a sense, he did what he does best in terms of being positionally safe, landing some good hits and getting to the front of the net. Indeed he had a couple of really solid tips that could have gone in...but the thing is that he so messed up the dynamics of the rush attack that the odd-man situations both Eberle and Hopkins thrive on were not created. Lennart isn't good enough to do his own thing, so the Stars could effectively double team both of the other guys. That's not going to end well and it didn't tonight. One really cool thing I noticed Hopkins doing, is that he keeps making really small passes to himself on the rush. It is something I've never really seen from a hockey player and keeps the opposition very off-balance. This appears to be why he's so effective with the puck. I will say though, that he has not been the same player since coming back from his first injury.

After those two groups, it was pretty sad. The mishmash of the remaining six players does not have enough talent to make up a single line capable of putting goals on the board. This won't serve you well over any kind of averaging-out period. When some of the best passes on the night are made by Darcy Hordichuk (credit to him, in the second he was patient, kept his head up and made some truly sound decisions out there), you're not going to succeed. I maintain that without Paajarvi's speed to change the dynamic of the third line, no sustained attack is possible. Opposing checkers can simply play back and wait for the Eager, Smyth, Horcoff (or similar) combo to make a mistake with the puck. They always will if you don't let them get behind you. Horcoff was doing a whole bunch of skating and creating a whole whack of nothing all night. His choices with the puck were weird even for him. Smyth kept thinking he could make a play behind the net and the Stars shut him down easily. Eager didn't have that extra jump he needs. I will give credit to Jones as he did a good job of driving in on Dallas and always made sure to finish his check. I already mentioned Hordichuk's most meaningful contributions to the game. Belanger needs to be sat. He contributed absolutely nothing to this game, and his attempt at checking Dvorak on his goal was absolutely embarrassing. What is wrong with this guy? Seriously?

I have a hard time harping too much on our D tonight. I liked the balanced combinations and the fact that they really didn't let Dallas beat them aside from the odd Trevor Daley rush and the unfortunate run-in Corey Potter had with Khabibulin. For the most part, these guys did their job. If I had to pick one area though, I would criticize their decision-making as they approached their own blue line. Many times tonight, Dallas simply backed off and let the D rush the puck up. For whatever reason, guys like Whitney, Potter, Petry and Schultz especially decided that this meant despite the speed they were carrying, a forced pass would be necessary. I'm quite sure that at least one D man could have generated a goal with a solid rush up the middle tonight as Dallas was standing still. Whitney was especially guilty of pass-forcing, but I was certainly glad he showed initiative with the puck at times. He got set up for a fabulous chance by Hemsky and couldn't finish...odd...two games in a row where Gilbert probably would have scored...

For a guy who is defensively skilled and doesn't show much offensive potential, Schultz sure jumps up in the rush a lot. He actually does it quite smoothly (I'm sure a function of his sound skating) but just can't seem to add any pop to the finishing effort. This is really too bad. One nice thing we have going for us right now, is that both Petry and Smid are playing a mean game on D, dishing out some abuse. I just wish #5 would stop doing that side-block (he's going to get hurt) and maybe drop the gloves from time to time (he's got a nearly unblemished record there).

As for Khabibulin, did it really matter what he did tonight?

I think I had more fun tonight eating dinner, driving home, and writing this report than I did watching the game tonight. Yuck.

Call up 23.

LoudmouthHemskyfan#1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 01:14 AM
  #2
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1
Registered User
 
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: E-town
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,513
vCash: 500
Additional note - I'll be away for the upcoming MTL game, so no report...unless Mowzie wants to guest-write it.

LoudmouthHemskyfan#1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 02:39 AM
  #3
Mowzie
Asst. Dishwasher
 
Mowzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lebanon, Alberta
Country: Lebanon
Posts: 8,030
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoudmouthHemskyfan#1 View Post
Additional note - I'll be away for the upcoming MTL game, so no report...unless Mowzie wants to guest-write it.
I would be honoured... wait does that mean your offering me your tickets?

Mowzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 02:41 AM
  #4
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1
Registered User
 
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: E-town
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,513
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mowzie View Post
I would be honoured... wait does that mean your offering me your tickets?
Would that i could sir, but LMHF#2 has claim to both of those.

LoudmouthHemskyfan#1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 02:52 AM
  #5
Bryanbryoil
Moderator
Oilers Heart
 
Bryanbryoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: And Soul
Posts: 47,435
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mowzie View Post
I would be honoured... wait does that mean your offering me your tickets?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoudmouthHemskyfan#1 View Post
Would that i could sir, but LMHF#2 has claim to both of those.
And just like that, Mowzie went from to and then

__________________
Treat Others As You Would Like To Be Treated
Bryanbryoil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 02:53 AM
  #6
Mowzie
Asst. Dishwasher
 
Mowzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lebanon, Alberta
Country: Lebanon
Posts: 8,030
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoudmouthHemskyfan#1 View Post
Would that i could sir, but LMHF#2 has claim to both of those.
...After all we've been through...

I will try to fill in for you anyways, but no promises. Even if I was to do it, it wouldn't be nearly as on point as your reports.

As for today, I commend you for putting this together. I really felt bad for the fans today, to pay that kind of money to watch this absolute atrocity really says something. It seems like Friday night home games always end up being dull, but today was like a brand new kind of dull. This was two teams who mailed it in tonight, focus wise, but Dallas just did more with what we gave them. Not sure how many shots we passed up looking for a better chance that never came.

Frustrating stuff, terrible officiating. If I'm Renney, Im telling my players to keep on trucking and not argue with the officials, but I'm spending 15 minutes every post-game press conference ripping apart the zebras. Take your cheque book with you and sign it to the league on camera, do something to get their attention. This game at 0 entertainment value, no redeeming qualities what so ever.

Mowzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 03:06 AM
  #7
Mowzie
Asst. Dishwasher
 
Mowzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lebanon, Alberta
Country: Lebanon
Posts: 8,030
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryanbryoil View Post
And just like that, Mowzie went from to and then
I know, the nerve of that guy. It's like me telling him my dad has a luxury condo in the turks and caicos that isn't being used next month if he wants to go on holidays there's lots of great hotels there.

Mowzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 03:10 AM
  #8
Krut
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Krut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,467
vCash: 500
I by no means blame the refs tonight for the loss, but the officiating tonight was a disgrace once again. I never even considered a concerted effort by officials to boost playoff teams at the expense of lower seeds, but I'm beginning to believe it. It's been about 5 games in a row now that several clear calls to the Oilers benefit have blatantly not been called. As much as Maclean on Sportsnet is a joke, he claims that when he was with the Jackets as a bottom seed he didn't get the calls either.

No PP's for the Oilers is a joke, plain and simple.

Krut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 03:37 AM
  #9
Moonlapse Vertigo
....
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,631
vCash: 1025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krut View Post
I by no means blame the refs tonight for the loss, but the officiating tonight was a disgrace once again. I never even considered a concerted effort by officials to boost playoff teams at the expense of lower seeds, but I'm beginning to believe it. It's been about 5 games in a row now that several clear calls to the Oilers benefit have blatantly not been called. As much as Maclean on Sportsnet is a joke, he claims that when he was with the Jackets as a bottom seed he didn't get the calls either.

No PP's for the Oilers is a joke, plain and simple.
It's blatant. Tencer tweeted something earlier in the evening about the Oilers barely averaging 2 powerplays a game over their last 8 or 9 contests. Wtf is that??

Moonlapse Vertigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 10:53 AM
  #10
GreatKeith
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,220
vCash: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonlapse Vertigo View Post
It's blatant. Tencer tweeted something earlier in the evening about the Oilers barely averaging 2 powerplays a game over their last 8 or 9 contests. Wtf is that??
Either the refs changed their standards mid-season or there's something bigger going on here.

GreatKeith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 11:04 AM
  #11
Jepprey
Creeper
 
Jepprey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 3,534
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatKeith View Post
Either the refs changed their standards mid-season or there's something bigger going on here.
I'm pretty sure they did change the standards league-wide. It's garbage all over the place.

The thing is, they should have said something public, because fans and players have been raging for the past couple months now. lol. It seems more players have been chirping the refs more than ever (Not only the Oilers).

Clutch and Grab is back folks!

Jepprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 11:11 AM
  #12
GreatKeith
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,220
vCash: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jepprey View Post
I'm pretty sure they did change the standards league-wide. It's garbage all over the place.

The thing is, they should have said something public, because fans and players have been raging for the past couple months now. lol. It seems more players have been chirping the refs more than ever (Not only the Oilers).

Clutch and Grab is back folks!
There certainly have been a few horrible games around the league. It's not just the Oilers and you're right, they should have said something...

I can deal with missing the clutch and grab penalties. But how do you miss crosschecks to the face?

GreatKeith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 11:17 AM
  #13
Dorian2
The bag don't lie.
 
Dorian2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,564
vCash: 250
Gotta hand it to you LMHF...good write up for a really lousy, boring game. I'm surprised you didn't fall asleep half way through the write up.

I thought the Oilers were playing Minny (a couple of years ago) watching this one.

Whatta snooze fest. Hall was good though.

Dorian2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 11:36 AM
  #14
Replacement
Fly Fly away
 
Replacement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hockey Hell
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,279
vCash: 500
Glad you saw the effort out there tonight LMHF. A lot of people would have just dismissed that as the Oilers not showing up. As much as theres a distinction between Dallas and St Louis I did feel that the Stars did what they had to to stymie our offense. Stars were quite effective in puck battles, covering passing lanes, and generally not making any stupid mistakes. They played a generally smart game and pretty good road game. In some way I like these kind of games because it forces our young turks to have to get better reads on what will work against good opponent play.

Lets be honest as well. Shots didn't really matter. Dallas Stars beat us for fun and clearly play a style that has our number.

I agree that Hemsky had a good game but was a little annoyed at the offsides. Quite a few rushes negated.

I thought Petrell had a predictably strong game. 4 shots off, 2 great scoring chances, and really had the best chances of the night next to maybe Eberle, or Gagner, who was the lone scorer. Petrell was really greasy, competed physically, and was getting into spots effortlessly. He has a bigger man game than many people recognize. The guy wins battles.

Schultz(and I know people don't want to see this) had a more characteristic of this season type game. Got caught badly losing a play on the boards, gave up inside position, and had to drag his man down. Anybody should note where Schultz was on this play and how far out of position. This is the kind of play Pronger could execute. Schultz gets outside his game a little more than is thought. It was just a bad read and turning a nothing stars possession into a serious chance and a penalty.

Also freezed and forced a play over the glass on heat side. Now I have to ask, even if the puck doesn't go over the glass for a penalty whats Schultz doing trying to force the puck heatside. Wasn't good read and anticipation. Another penalty.

I mean in fairness I could talk about spotty D efforts by Potter or Sutton but that isn't really news. It just makes sense to do some intense Schultz watching right now.

He had a really good first game, followed by a pedestrian second game.

Replacement is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 11:52 AM
  #15
Rawg
Get your hands offme
 
Rawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Berlin
Country: Germany
Posts: 977
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
Glad you saw the effort out there tonight LMHF. A lot of people would have just dismissed that as the Oilers not showing up. As much as theres a distinction between Dallas and St Louis I did feel that the Stars did what they had to to stymie our offense. Stars were quite effective in puck battles, covering passing lanes, and generally not making any stupid mistakes. They played a generally smart game and pretty good road game. In some way I like these kind of games because it forces our young turks to have to get better reads on what will work against good opponent play.

Lets be honest as well. Shots didn't really matter. Dallas Stars beat us for fun and clearly play a style that has our number.

I agree that Hemsky had a good game but was a little annoyed at the offsides. Quite a few rushes negated.

I thought Petrell had a predictably strong game. 4 shots off, 2 great scoring chances, and really had the best chances of the night next to maybe Eberle, or Gagner, who was the lone scorer. Petrell was really greasy, competed physically, and was getting into spots effortlessly. He has a bigger man game than many people recognize. The guy wins battles.

Schultz(and I know people don't want to see this) had a more characteristic of this season type game. Got caught badly losing a play on the boards, gave up inside position, and had to drag his man down. Anybody should note where Schultz was on this play and how far out of position. This is the kind of play Pronger could execute. Schultz gets outside his game a little more than is thought. It was just a bad read and turning a nothing stars possession into a serious chance and a penalty.

Also freezed and forced a play over the glass on heat side. Now I have to ask, even if the puck doesn't go over the glass for a penalty whats Schultz doing trying to force the puck heatside. Wasn't good read and anticipation. Another penalty.

I mean in fairness I could talk about spotty D efforts by Potter or Sutton but that isn't really news. It just makes sense to do some intense Schultz watching right now.

He had a really good first game, followed by a pedestrian second game.
To be fair the player who beat him was benn wasnt it? that guy is amazing

Rawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 11:58 AM
  #16
ponokanocker
Registered User
 
ponokanocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,336
vCash: 500
Thanks for the write up as I missed the game. Doesn't sound like I missed a whole lot, so not that big of a deal. I probably would have been cursing the ref's, which has become usual. I really don't understand why the league decided to stop calling things. I really like the free flow action when the penalties are being called and players stop doing the clutching and grabbing.

ponokanocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 12:33 PM
  #17
Bryanbryoil
Moderator
Oilers Heart
 
Bryanbryoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: And Soul
Posts: 47,435
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
Glad you saw the effort out there tonight LMHF. A lot of people would have just dismissed that as the Oilers not showing up. As much as theres a distinction between Dallas and St Louis I did feel that the Stars did what they had to to stymie our offense. Stars were quite effective in puck battles, covering passing lanes, and generally not making any stupid mistakes. They played a generally smart game and pretty good road game. In some way I like these kind of games because it forces our young turks to have to get better reads on what will work against good opponent play.

Lets be honest as well. Shots didn't really matter. Dallas Stars beat us for fun and clearly play a style that has our number.

I agree that Hemsky had a good game but was a little annoyed at the offsides. Quite a few rushes negated.

I thought Petrell had a predictably strong game. 4 shots off, 2 great scoring chances, and really had the best chances of the night next to maybe Eberle, or Gagner, who was the lone scorer. Petrell was really greasy, competed physically, and was getting into spots effortlessly. He has a bigger man game than many people recognize. The guy wins battles.

Schultz(and I know people don't want to see this) had a more characteristic of this season type game. Got caught badly losing a play on the boards, gave up inside position, and had to drag his man down. Anybody should note where Schultz was on this play and how far out of position. This is the kind of play Pronger could execute. Schultz gets outside his game a little more than is thought. It was just a bad read and turning a nothing stars possession into a serious chance and a penalty.

Also freezed and forced a play over the glass on heat side. Now I have to ask, even if the puck doesn't go over the glass for a penalty whats Schultz doing trying to force the puck heatside. Wasn't good read and anticipation. Another penalty.

I mean in fairness I could talk about spotty D efforts by Potter or Sutton but that isn't really news. It just makes sense to do some intense Schultz watching right now.

He had a really good first game, followed by a pedestrian second game.
My bad, I wasn't aware that we should compare Schultz to Pronger, I guess you'll be fine from here on out when I compare Gilbert to Lidstrom and Chara and Gagner to Malkin and Crosby?

Bryanbryoil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 12:39 PM
  #18
Replacement
Fly Fly away
 
Replacement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hockey Hell
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,279
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryanbryoil View Post
My bad, I wasn't aware that we should compare Schultz to Pronger, I guess you'll be fine from here on out when I compare Gilbert to Lidstrom and Chara and Gagner to Malkin and Crosby?
That wasn't a comparison. I thought that was Clear.

Its an observation. For instance that Scultz swimming out on the boards for no reason 40 ft from where he should be isn't exactly textbook hockey play by a "shutdown D" of his calibre. What I was saying with the Pronger comment is Chris could get away with this. Theres no way in hell he would lose that battle. Schultz on the other hand being of more ordinary size, strength, and skill needs to play much more within his game.

You can ignore that I guess. Or acknowledge it was a clueless play where he got owned.

I could say he pulled a barker on the play but you'd accuse me of making a direct player comparison.

One thing I find a little funny is Schultz has a bit of goal bloodlust playing with the free range Oilers vs the Wild. While this is entertaining if he's not careful its going to put a blemish on his flawless shutdown play..


Last edited by Replacement: 03-03-2012 at 01:11 PM.
Replacement is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 01:03 PM
  #19
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1
Registered User
 
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: E-town
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,513
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mowzie View Post
...After all we've been through...

I will try to fill in for you anyways, but no promises. Even if I was to do it, it wouldn't be nearly as on point as your reports.

As for today, I commend you for putting this together. I really felt bad for the fans today, to pay that kind of money to watch this absolute atrocity really says something. It seems like Friday night home games always end up being dull, but today was like a brand new kind of dull. This was two teams who mailed it in tonight, focus wise, but Dallas just did more with what we gave them. Not sure how many shots we passed up looking for a better chance that never came.

Frustrating stuff, terrible officiating. If I'm Renney, Im telling my players to keep on trucking and not argue with the officials, but I'm spending 15 minutes every post-game press conference ripping apart the zebras. Take your cheque book with you and sign it to the league on camera, do something to get their attention. This game at 0 entertainment value, no redeeming qualities what so ever.
Sorry to get your hopes up man, didn't even think of it. Just figured that the readers would appreciate your unique and entertaining take on a game. Give it a shot if you get the chance!

It was a little like slowly scraping your face against a wall last night...ugly and pointless.

LoudmouthHemskyfan#1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 01:06 PM
  #20
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1
Registered User
 
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: E-town
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,513
vCash: 500
Someone said Pronger...I swear I heard a Pronger...right? He's on the team again? Good times are here again? Right? RIGHT?!?!


Dammit...

LoudmouthHemskyfan#1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 01:15 PM
  #21
Replacement
Fly Fly away
 
Replacement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hockey Hell
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,279
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoudmouthHemskyfan#1 View Post
Someone said Pronger...I swear I heard a Pronger...right? He's on the team again? Good times are here again? Right? RIGHT?!?!


Dammit...
Maybe I shoulda mentioned Souray instead. Would've been more fitting.

Funny how the Rexall crowd were sitting so low in thier seats they forgot to boo Souray half way through the game.

Maybe they shoulda been booing Vincour for leaving us.. or Dvoraks Symphony.

Replacement is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 01:17 PM
  #22
Bryanbryoil
Moderator
Oilers Heart
 
Bryanbryoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: And Soul
Posts: 47,435
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
That wasn't a comparison. I thought that was Clear.

Its an observation. For instance that Scultz swimming out on the boards for no reason 40 ft from where he should be isn't exactly textbook hockey play by a "shutdown D" of his calibre. What I was saying with the Pronger comment is Chris could get away with this. Theres no way in hell he would lose that battle. Schultz on the other hand being of more ordinary size, strength, and skill needs to play much more within his game.

You can ignore that I guess. Or acknowledge it was a clueless play where he got owned.

I could say he pulled a barker on the play but you'd accuse me of making a direct player comparison.

One thing I find a little funny is Schultz has a bit of goal bloodlust playing with the free range Oilers vs the Wild. While this is entertaining if he's not careful its going to put a blemish on his flawless shutdown play..
Fair enough, and yeah I'd agree that it looks like he is really trying to get involved offensively, as long as he doesn't get caught up ice too often, I'm fine by it.

Bryanbryoil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 01:27 PM
  #23
Replacement
Fly Fly away
 
Replacement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hockey Hell
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,279
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryanbryoil View Post
Fair enough, and yeah I'd agree that it looks like he is really trying to get involved offensively, as long as he doesn't get caught up ice too often, I'm fine by it.
He's a reasonable player. A good guy. Not meaning to get on him either. Its just funny watching how excited he is getting some shackles off. its kind of strange though. The Shackles were off this year in Minny anyway.

He's like a kid out there playing hockey and looks to be having fun. But which could quickly venture him out of the sphere of what got him here.

Its gotta be a lot of fun playing with our youngturks. It kind of entices D. Which is why we have jump D as a game plan anyway. But Nick needs to play differently to be Nick.

Replacement is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-03-2012, 02:23 PM
  #24
Bryanbryoil
Moderator
Oilers Heart
 
Bryanbryoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: And Soul
Posts: 47,435
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
He's a reasonable player. A good guy. Not meaning to get on him either. Its just funny watching how excited he is getting some shackles off. its kind of strange though. The Shackles were off this year in Minny anyway.

He's like a kid out there playing hockey and looks to be having fun. But which could quickly venture him out of the sphere of what got him here.

Its gotta be a lot of fun playing with our youngturks. It kind of entices D. Which is why we have jump D as a game plan anyway. But Nick needs to play differently to be Nick.
He's played 2 games here, he'll find his niche eventually, this is one of the reasons that I haven't said boo about Gilbert's play in Minny, it takes time to get comfortable with your new team.

Bryanbryoil is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.