HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk > Polls - (hockey-related only)

Who won the Johnson Trade

View Poll Results: Who "won" the trade?
Colorado 46 21.80%
St Louis 89 42.18%
Wait another year or two 76 36.02%
Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-07-2012, 04:29 PM
  #76
bluemandan
Ya Ma Goo!
 
bluemandan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,153
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgf View Post
Well him and Paul Stastny were in a very serious bromance. Getting separated when they were so close has really messed with both of their heads...staz has just gotten out of his funk after the new year...

So this is just one fans theory, but I feel like right after the trade Stewie had that "**** you colorado, I'm gunna make you want me back. So hard" focus that lead to his success after the trade. But this offseason he got over it, realized there was nothing he could do get Paul back and just hasn't developed that man-love for anyone on the Blues roster, thus his protective instincts to beat the ever loving piss out of anyone that threatens his Bromantic Interest, wouldn't be kicking in...

Hey, it makes sense in my head and gives some explanation for how awful Staz was during the 2011 calendar year and how cold and disengaged MBP has been this season.
I think you might be on to something.

I've notice that Stewart is finally starting to develop a bit of chemistry with Arnott, perhaps even a little bit of a bromance. I just wish he would develop that same relationship he had with Statsny with someone like Perron or McDonald.

bluemandan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2012, 04:33 PM
  #77
TheNorthFace
More Morgan Rielly
 
TheNorthFace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,433
vCash: 500
Solid trade for both sides, but I'd edge it for the Blues right now.

TheNorthFace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2012, 10:44 PM
  #78
TK 421
Registered User
 
TK 421's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,014
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
You're ignoring fact that Johnson plays more difficult minutes with worse defensive forwards in front of him and a worse D-partner defensively. Plus, Shatty is good for at least one ugly turnover per game. He isn't a liability, of course, but he's hardly the defensive stud that EJ has been.
I'm not ignoring it, I'm just not placing so much emphasis on who plays "tougher minutes". That sounds like a free pass under the excuse umbrella to me. You're suggesting that there is a significant gap between EJ and Shattenkirk defensively. This is based on what exactly? That he plays "tougher minutes"? You're going to need to do a little better than that considering I've seen both play quite a bit, both before and after the trade. In fact, I don't see any visual evidence that EJ is better defensively. Care to make a case if you're so certain?

TK 421 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2012, 10:54 PM
  #79
TheJuxtaposer
#healHavlat
 
TheJuxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: United States
Posts: 17,673
vCash: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by TK 421 View Post
I'm not ignoring it, I'm just not placing so much emphasis on who plays "tougher minutes". That sounds like a free pass under the excuse umbrella to me. You're suggesting that there is a significant gap between EJ and Shattenkirk defensively. This is based on what exactly? That he plays "tougher minutes"? You're going to need to do a little better than that considering I've seen both play quite a bit, both before and after the trade. In fact, I don't see any visual evidence that EJ is better defensively. Care to make a case if you're so certain?
If you won't accept my numbers case, you'll accept my "visual evidence" case? I watch lots of Blues games and Avs games (they're my two favorite non-Shark WC teams) and I see it with my own eyes. Shatty is prone to turnovers, and he consistently faces third and fourth line players who don't have the hands or vision to even test Shatty very hard defensively. Shatty's a good skater, but that's all he has on EJ defensively. EJ is more imposing, better at snuffing people out on the boards, and has better anticipation, especially recently. He has a longer reach, which helps him disrupt stick-handlers much better than Shatty.

TheJuxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 12:33 AM
  #80
Falco Lombardi
LET'S GO BLUES
 
Falco Lombardi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: St. Louis, MO
Country: United States
Posts: 4,402
vCash: 713
Why won't it just die?

Falco Lombardi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 12:48 AM
  #81
TheJuxtaposer
#healHavlat
 
TheJuxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: United States
Posts: 17,673
vCash: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Falco Lombardi View Post
Why won't it just die?
Seriously, I'd be pretty pissed if I were an Avs or Blues fan.

TheJuxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:06 AM
  #82
Forest Whitaker
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Forest Whitaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Country: Poland
Posts: 11,757
vCash: 113
The way I see it:

Erik Johnson>=Kevin Shattenkirk
Jay McClement<<Chris Stewart
Duncan Siemens>Ty Rattie

It's really close.

Forest Whitaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:18 AM
  #83
bleedblue1223
VancouverChicknWings
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 11,095
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
If you won't accept my numbers case, you'll accept my "visual evidence" case? I watch lots of Blues games and Avs games (they're my two favorite non-Shark WC teams) and I see it with my own eyes. Shatty is prone to turnovers, and he consistently faces third and fourth line players who don't have the hands or vision to even test Shatty very hard defensively. Shatty's a good skater, but that's all he has on EJ defensively. EJ is more imposing, better at snuffing people out on the boards, and has better anticipation, especially recently. He has a longer reach, which helps him disrupt stick-handlers much better than Shatty.
well according to behindthenet.ca, Shattenkirk has a higher quality of competition than Johnson...

bleedblue1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:19 AM
  #84
TheJuxtaposer
#healHavlat
 
TheJuxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: United States
Posts: 17,673
vCash: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by bleedblue1223 View Post
well according to behindthenet.ca, Shattenkirk has a higher quality of competition than Johnson...
I hope you aren't looking at QoC. QoC is based purely on +/-, which we can all agree is a mostly rubbish stat. You should be looking at QoC Rel Corsi, which uses Corsi and is much, much, MUCH more accurate than +/-.

TheJuxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 09:10 AM
  #85
klozge
Avs
 
klozge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Siegen, Germany
Country: Germany
Posts: 818
vCash: 500
Voted Avs because the trade was pretty awesome for them and because I'm a homer but both teams "won" it imo. I'm sure both teams would do the trade again and again.

klozge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 10:42 AM
  #86
danmcn12
Registered User
 
danmcn12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,714
vCash: 500
Voted even. Teams just swapped their strengths for weaknesses. People saying Shattenkirk is a better pure defense man then EJ are out their minds lol. Let's see how good Shatty would look with Hejda, not Alex Pietrangelo and Colaiacavo, as his partners.

danmcn12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 10:51 AM
  #87
SirPaste
Registered User
 
SirPaste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: STL
Posts: 4,734
vCash: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarnkrok View Post
The way I see it:

Erik Johnson>=Kevin Shattenkirk
Jay McClement<<Chris Stewart
Duncan Siemens>Ty Rattie

It's really close.
I think you mean Siemens=Rattie

SirPaste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 11:43 AM
  #88
Thepoolmaster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 81
vCash: 500
who cares what the difference between siemens and rattie is. At the time of the trade it was 1st for 2nd
if rattie turns out better than siemens then the avs just messed up the draft not the trade. Not to mention so did most of the rest of the league for not taking rattie in the first round...
1st>>2nd

Thepoolmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 11:49 AM
  #89
Viking Mode
Engaged
 
Viking Mode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,801
vCash: 50
Lot's of Avs fans saying wait, lots of Blues fan saying they won. The poll wouldn't be so uneven if you all weren't homers.

(maybe not all of you)

Viking Mode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 12:50 PM
  #90
SirPaste
Registered User
 
SirPaste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: STL
Posts: 4,734
vCash: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thepoolmaster View Post
who cares what the difference between siemens and rattie is. At the time of the trade it was 1st for 2nd
if rattie turns out better than siemens then the avs just messed up the draft not the trade. Not to mention so did most of the rest of the league for not taking rattie in the first round...
1st>>2nd
The point was that they are irrelevant since neither one has played a game in the NHL

SirPaste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:01 PM
  #91
Thepoolmaster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 81
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirPaste View Post
The point was that they are irrelevant since neither one has played a game in the NHL
The players themselves are irrelevant, but not the value. Thats like saying if you trade a 1st liner and a 7th for a 4th liner and a 1st round pick the first round pick is irrelevant. Yes its irrelevant when comparing the effects right now, but ultimately when talking about who won a trade now you look at the value of draft picks and the impact of the players.

Even if in the above example you pick a Datsyuk in the 7th round the fact is that the value was that of a 7th round pick. What you did with that pick is what creates value for you. Just like if you picked Hugh Jessiman in the first round. The value of the pick is still high your scouting staff just sucks.

Its the same flawed logic as saying Colorado traded a fourth round pick for Winnik then Winnik for Mcginn so we basically traded a fourth round pick for Mcginn. They don't go together. Its good asset management if you buy low and sell high, but the value at the time of the trade is stagnant and always will be in terms of an unknown commodity like a draft pick. A player with potential like Johnson or Shattenkirk is different because you know what you have and you should not what potential they have.

Thepoolmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:14 PM
  #92
Elway
Doubt your Doubters
 
Elway's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: Norfolk Island
Posts: 5,490
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirPaste View Post
I think you mean Siemens=Rattie
Why?

And Silent Jay is getting sold short in this thread. He may not have the "potential" Stewart has, but they aren't in the same league defensively/effort wise and Jay has 10 less points as our 3-4 line center.

Elway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 01:29 PM
  #93
Market Street Heroes
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 735
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Sakic View Post
Lot's of Avs fans saying wait, lots of Blues fan saying they won. The poll wouldn't be so uneven if you all weren't homers.

(maybe not all of you)
You calling other people a homer is quite funny.

Also, i'd be willing to bet their are more Avs fans on this board than Blues fans, so most likely it's the neutral sides saying the Blues won.

That being said, it was a good trade for both teams, hard to say either team won (though I voted Blues because I AM a homer)

Market Street Heroes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 02:22 PM
  #94
TK 421
Registered User
 
TK 421's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,014
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
If you won't accept my numbers case, you'll accept my "visual evidence" case? I watch lots of Blues games and Avs games (they're my two favorite non-Shark WC teams) and I see it with my own eyes. Shatty is prone to turnovers, and he consistently faces third and fourth line players who don't have the hands or vision to even test Shatty very hard defensively. Shatty's a good skater, but that's all he has on EJ defensively. EJ is more imposing, better at snuffing people out on the boards, and has better anticipation, especially recently. He has a longer reach, which helps him disrupt stick-handlers much better than Shatty.
Shattenkirk wins more puck battles than any other Blues defender including Pietrangelo, Jackman and Polak. He also strips the puck more consistently than anyone including Oshie. And he does so against EVERYONE, not just the 3rd and 4th liners you're claiming.

I laugh contemptuously at your suggestion that his anticipation is better than Shattenkirks. Shattenkirk is considerably smarter than EJ. Other than physical traits like size,skating and longer reach(which btw doesn't neccessarily translate to better defensive stick work OR more effective defensive play), I'm not seeing any clear advantage for EJ here especially in positioning and intelligence. Shattenkirks defensive stickwork is excellent and has been all season long, so EJ would have to have been dominant all season long to best him here and he just flat out hasn't.

I think you give EJ a free pass based on his "tougher minutes" while selling Shatty way short based on his minutes. Again, I think you're placing a bit too much emphasis on "tougher minutes". The fact that you would accept Backes as a Selke candidate over Datsyuk because he plays in more defensive situations is something that I'll admit to having a hard time with. Personally, I think Datsyuk is the superior defensive player whether he's in more defensive situations or not. His reads and ability to strip pucks make Backes look like a junior player(no disrespect to Backes who is the very definition of will and determination). It's simply a difference in smart stickwork combined with superior reads(greater intelligence). In the case of EJ vs. Shatty defensively, +/- accurately reflects what I'm seeing with my own eyes while watching these two players. Shattenkirk is making a higher % of smart plays in all zones and EJ is pretty average in this regard.

This past offseason you and I had a discussion regarding Pietrangelo and I felt you sold him way short defensively to the tune of being flat out wrong. I think you're doing the exact same thing here with Shattenkirk, while pumping the tires of a guy who has largely been an average defender at best.

TK 421 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 02:47 PM
  #95
TheOrganist
Don't Call Him Alex
 
TheOrganist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,083
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by danmcn12 View Post
Voted even. Teams just swapped their strengths for weaknesses. People saying Shattenkirk is a better pure defense man then EJ are out their minds lol. Let's see how good Shatty would look with Hejda, not Alex Pietrangelo and Colaiacavo, as his partners.
Umm...he's played with Jackman basically the entire year.

Shattenkirk, already one of the best young offensive defenseman in the league and becoming better every day on his side of the red line, is by far the best player in the deal as of March 8th, 2012.

Frankly, that's all the matters if you're asking who won the trade as of now.

TheOrganist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 04:50 PM
  #96
Viking Mode
Engaged
 
Viking Mode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,801
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Market Street Heroes View Post
You calling other people a homer is quite funny.

Also, i'd be willing to bet their are more Avs fans on this board than Blues fans, so most likely it's the neutral sides saying the Blues won.

That being said, it was a good trade for both teams, hard to say either team won (though I voted Blues because I AM a homer)
Why is that? If you have read any of my posts in this thread I have been saying wait and see.

How do you know how many Avalanche fans are on this board? There sure aren't a whole heck of a lot posting in any of our threads or GDTs, maybe 30ish (and that's being generous).

Viking Mode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 05:08 PM
  #97
bleedblue1223
VancouverChicknWings
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 11,095
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Sakic View Post
Why is that? If you have read any of my posts in this thread I have been saying wait and see.

How do you know how many Avalanche fans are on this board? There sure aren't a whole heck of a lot posting in any of our threads or GDTs, maybe 30ish (and that's being generous).
We don't have a whole lot of posters on this site either. Safe to assume there are quite a few neutral voters on this poll. I think the majority of the rational people here agree that it is close, and will have to wait a few years. Both fanbases are happy with their return, so both teams won IMO.

bleedblue1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 09:09 PM
  #98
cgf
Registered User
 
cgf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,991
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by TK 421 View Post
Shattenkirk wins more puck battles than any other Blues defender including Pietrangelo, Jackman and Polak. He also strips the puck more consistently than anyone including Oshie. And he does so against EVERYONE, not just the 3rd and 4th liners you're claiming.

I laugh contemptuously at your suggestion that his anticipation is better than Shattenkirks. Shattenkirk is considerably smarter than EJ. Other than physical traits like size,skating and longer reach(which btw doesn't neccessarily translate to better defensive stick work OR more effective defensive play), I'm not seeing any clear advantage for EJ here especially in positioning and intelligence. Shattenkirks defensive stickwork is excellent and has been all season long, so EJ would have to have been dominant all season long to best him here and he just flat out hasn't.

I think you give EJ a free pass based on his "tougher minutes" while selling Shatty way short based on his minutes. Again, I think you're placing a bit too much emphasis on "tougher minutes". The fact that you would accept Backes as a Selke candidate over Datsyuk because he plays in more defensive situations is something that I'll admit to having a hard time with. Personally, I think Datsyuk is the superior defensive player whether he's in more defensive situations or not. His reads and ability to strip pucks make Backes look like a junior player(no disrespect to Backes who is the very definition of will and determination). It's simply a difference in smart stickwork combined with superior reads(greater intelligence). In the case of EJ vs. Shatty defensively, +/- accurately reflects what I'm seeing with my own eyes while watching these two players. Shattenkirk is making a higher % of smart plays in all zones and EJ is pretty average in this regard.

This past offseason you and I had a discussion regarding Pietrangelo and I felt you sold him way short defensively to the tune of being flat out wrong. I think you're doing the exact same thing here with Shattenkirk, while pumping the tires of a guy who has largely been an average defender at best.
In what universe has EJ been anything less than damn good this year? Much less average at best?

cgf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 10:18 PM
  #99
Forest Whitaker
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Forest Whitaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Country: Poland
Posts: 11,757
vCash: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirPaste View Post
I think you mean Siemens=Rattie
Nope, Siemens is easily a better prospect.

Forest Whitaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2012, 10:22 PM
  #100
Mr Irreverent
Missing Tito
 
Mr Irreverent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,079
vCash: 500
St Louis got the best defenseman in the deal, Pietrangelo.

Erik Johnson reminds me of Dustin Brown in his manorisms. Nice guy with a goofy grin, but just not enough fire in his heart to be a true elite player.

St. Louis wins. #1 team in the league folks.

Mr Irreverent is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.