HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Arizona Coyotes
Notices

Yotes @ cbj

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-06-2012, 07:07 PM
  #76
Swat Ultra
~Hockey!~
 
Swat Ultra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Northern NH
Country: United States
Posts: 2,667
vCash: 500
how the F is that a goal

Swat Ultra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:07 PM
  #77
hbk
Registered User
 
hbk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,509
vCash: 500
the cbj player is lying on top of the goalie. how that is not goaltender interference is beyond me.

hbk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:08 PM
  #78
TeamTippett
Formally TeamTurris
 
TeamTippett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Phx
Country: United States
Posts: 5,325
vCash: 500
How the **** isn't that interference, he is standing on his ****ing back

TeamTippett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:08 PM
  #79
hbk
Registered User
 
hbk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,509
vCash: 500
"Dorsett just happens to be on top of him"

give me a break. homerism at its best.

hbk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:08 PM
  #80
Muppet
Howlin' For You
 
Muppet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: New Zealand
Posts: 2,979
vCash: 500
How is that a good goal!?

Muppet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:08 PM
  #81
RafaNadal
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Country: Sweden
Posts: 293
vCash: 500
Goalie interference?!?!? Its a joke.

RafaNadal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:09 PM
  #82
mouser
Global Moderator
Business of Hockey
 
mouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Mountain
Posts: 11,274
vCash: 500
Why have refs at all if they can't figure out a simple goalie interference?

mouser is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:09 PM
  #83
Swat Ultra
~Hockey!~
 
Swat Ultra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Northern NH
Country: United States
Posts: 2,667
vCash: 500
does anyone really think that was even close to being a good goal, im baffled

Swat Ultra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:10 PM
  #84
Doug19
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Country: Aland Islands
Posts: 6,128
vCash: 50
I'm curious as to how that was a good goal. For all the goals I've seen waived off over the years, that one appeared to be the most obvious that should be waived off.

Doug19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:10 PM
  #85
WJF
Registered User
 
WJF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 3,490
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muppet View Post
How is that a good goal!?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTrollhunter View Post
Goalie interference?!?!? Its a joke.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mouser View Post
Why have refs at all if they can't figure out a simple goalie interference?
The better question is, how in the world did we come out snoozing in this period. We deserve it. First 4 min hemmed in our own end.

WJF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:10 PM
  #86
hbk
Registered User
 
hbk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,509
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swat Ultra View Post
does anyone really think that was even close to being a good goal, im baffled
honestly listening to the columbus announcers (who are still better than Anaheim's) I almost feel stupid for questioning the call.

hbk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:10 PM
  #87
TeamTippett
Formally TeamTurris
 
TeamTippett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Phx
Country: United States
Posts: 5,325
vCash: 500
There needs to be a point where the adults in Toronto flash the red light and over rule the ****tards on the ice. HE IS STANDING ON THE GOALIES BACK

TeamTippett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:10 PM
  #88
MIG
Registered User
 
MIG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: U.S. of A.
Country: United States
Posts: 368
vCash: 500
The refs in this league really suck. I'm sick of everyone talking about how they get most calls right when they miss some really big ones.

MIG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:11 PM
  #89
Naych_PHX
Are you, kidding me?
 
Naych_PHX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: phoenix
Posts: 5,661
vCash: 500
Yeah, Im not gonna be like the fans of other teams and say "eff you refs, you cost us this game". That call wont beat us, that first period is what will cost us.

Naych_PHX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:12 PM
  #90
CitizenCoyote
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,610
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WJF View Post
The better question is, how in the world did we come out snoozing in this period. We deserve it. First 4 min hemmed in our own end.
So, is the rule that you post when the opponent has a 2-goal lead or better, but not if it's less?

CitizenCoyote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:12 PM
  #91
hbk
Registered User
 
hbk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,509
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Naych_PHX View Post
Yeah, Im not gonna be like the fans of other teams and say "eff you refs, you cost us this game". That call wont beat us, that first period is what will cost us.
true

hbk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:14 PM
  #92
CitizenCoyote
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,610
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Naych_PHX View Post
That call wont beat us
It very well might. The fact that they played a crappy period doesn't give the refs license to make it harder to come back. It's a 60 minute game, and if they lose by 1, that call certainly will make a difference.

CitizenCoyote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:15 PM
  #93
mouser
Global Moderator
Business of Hockey
 
mouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Mountain
Posts: 11,274
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamTippett View Post
There needs to be a point where the adults in Toronto flash the red light and over rule the ****tards on the ice. HE IS STANDING ON THE GOALIES BACK
Don't take this as gospel, but I don't think the war room in Toronto can rule goalie interference. Believe the on ice officials have to call it.

mouser is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:16 PM
  #94
TeamTippett
Formally TeamTurris
 
TeamTippett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Phx
Country: United States
Posts: 5,325
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mouser View Post
Don't take this as gospel, but I don't think the war room in Toronto can rule goalie interference. Believe the on ice officials have to call it.
You're right, that's why I think Toronto needs expanded jurisdiction on goals and everything leading up to goals.

TeamTippett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:17 PM
  #95
PhoPhan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,225
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mouser View Post
Don't take this as gospel, but I don't think the war room in Toronto can rule goalie interference. Believe the on ice officials have to call it.
This is my interpretation as well. It's a brutal call to miss but not something they can overturn after the fact.


PhoPhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:17 PM
  #96
Naych_PHX
Are you, kidding me?
 
Naych_PHX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: phoenix
Posts: 5,661
vCash: 500
Fire the NHL.

Naych_PHX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:17 PM
  #97
Muppet
Howlin' For You
 
Muppet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: New Zealand
Posts: 2,979
vCash: 500
Well, next time we crash the net, Hanzal, Doan, or Pyatt can simply knock Mason down and sit on him until we put the puck into the net.

Muppet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:17 PM
  #98
moosemeister
Registered User
 
moosemeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 1,231
vCash: 500
Too late to fail for Nail isnt it...

moosemeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:21 PM
  #99
WJF
Registered User
 
WJF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 3,490
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by CitizenCoyote View Post
So, is the rule that you post when the opponent has a 2-goal lead or better, but not if it's less?
Rule is i post when we stink so much i can't hold myself back.

WJF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2012, 07:21 PM
  #100
TeamTippett
Formally TeamTurris
 
TeamTippett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Phx
Country: United States
Posts: 5,325
vCash: 500
See here is why the NHL is full of ****, Toronto can review kicking motions, but not goalie interference.

TeamTippett is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.